BA exit LGW
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Middlesex (under the flightpath)
Posts: 1,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote: "So why doesnt IAG do to BA what it did to Iberia? ie. Iberia run long haul and Iberia express run short haul ? After all it was the BACityflyer business model they used to set up Iberia Express, so whats good for the madrid end of the business will probably work at the London end as well, sure the London end will scream and shout just like the Madrid end is doing, but I am sure IAG will quell the dissenting voices."
They had the opportunity to do just that, marlowe, it was called BD ("British Midland"). Returning BD to its original short haul role and running BA and BD as two stand alone airlines was a possibility but they went down the road of integration.
Quote: "The fact is, that BA doesn't have, and won't ever have the slots at LHR to move its routes from LGW over. The BD slots are needed for new routes and increases frequencies on important routes. LGW serves its purpose as a primarily leisure based operation".
Certainly without LHR expansion, BA (and VS) will be at LGW forever, johnrizzo2000, there's also a question of adequate terminal capacity. Despite LHR-5, BA have still been in 2 terminals at LHR and are now in 3!
They had the opportunity to do just that, marlowe, it was called BD ("British Midland"). Returning BD to its original short haul role and running BA and BD as two stand alone airlines was a possibility but they went down the road of integration.
Quote: "The fact is, that BA doesn't have, and won't ever have the slots at LHR to move its routes from LGW over. The BD slots are needed for new routes and increases frequencies on important routes. LGW serves its purpose as a primarily leisure based operation".
Certainly without LHR expansion, BA (and VS) will be at LGW forever, johnrizzo2000, there's also a question of adequate terminal capacity. Despite LHR-5, BA have still been in 2 terminals at LHR and are now in 3!
Last edited by Fairdealfrank; 27th May 2012 at 21:30.
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BA Cityflyer: essentally the BA shorthaul product
Iberia Express: essentially the Iberia shorthaul product
BA Cityflyer: smaller aircraft than mainline
Iberia Express: same size aircraft as mainline
BA Cityflyer: different airport to mainline hub
Iberia Express: same airport as mainline hub
BA Cityflyer: essentially all point-to-point
Iberia Express: feeding the mainline hub
BA Cityflyer: formed to defend high-yield market
Iberia Express: formed to reduce feeder costs because there is a negotiated limit on how much capacity Vueling can operate with an IB code share
Not having a go, but IB Express doesn't look much like BA Cityflyer to me - are there other aspects of the business model that are closer, that I'm missing?
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: the OFCR......and probably somewhere over China zzzzzzzz
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've heard on the grapevine that BA have told the TRMs and loaders at LGW that it's curtains for them, all being outsourced! Hope it's not true. If circus air around the regions are anything to go by, standby for total and utter chaos!
Last edited by BUGS/BEARINGS/BOXES; 28th May 2012 at 08:35.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've heard on the grapevine that BA have told the TRMs and loaders at LGW that it's curtains for them, all being outsourced! Hope it's not true. If circus air around the regions are anything to go by, standby for total and utter chaos!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: the OFCR......and probably somewhere over China zzzzzzzz
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very sad news, professionals that knew how to talk to passengers like human beings are canned for the likes of those at one north western, and one Scottish airport in particular that talk to pax like they are scum, dredged from the bottom of a pond. I have never waited at LHR or LGW for FEGP to be fitted. At both of the others I regularly travel to, I have experienced a 20 min delay! With engines still running.
Circusair/Menzies with a superior product?? On yer bike chap! the central load control at Manchester can't even sort themselves out. No hope at all. No doubt some qudos for those staff who get to wear a BA name badge and pretend they are the real deal, but if you pay peanuts, you hardly get monkeys these days.
And that is my experience as pax and being sat in the front office. Some staff are great and know their jobs inside out. But they tend to have been in the industry a long time. These companies just don't train their staff to an acceptable enougth level. They always need an adult to sort out their problems. I don't really blame them, I blame the management and training regime for failing them.
Anyways back to the original thread points. Perhaps this finally goes to show the curtains are being drawn for the SH@G fleet.
Circusair/Menzies with a superior product?? On yer bike chap! the central load control at Manchester can't even sort themselves out. No hope at all. No doubt some qudos for those staff who get to wear a BA name badge and pretend they are the real deal, but if you pay peanuts, you hardly get monkeys these days.
And that is my experience as pax and being sat in the front office. Some staff are great and know their jobs inside out. But they tend to have been in the industry a long time. These companies just don't train their staff to an acceptable enougth level. They always need an adult to sort out their problems. I don't really blame them, I blame the management and training regime for failing them.
Anyways back to the original thread points. Perhaps this finally goes to show the curtains are being drawn for the SH@G fleet.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have never waited at LHR or LGW for FEGP to be fitted. At both of the others I regularly travel to, I have experienced a 20 min delay! With engines still running.
the central load control at Manchester can't even sort themselves out.
Some staff are great and know their jobs inside out. But they tend to have been in the industry a long time. These companies just don't train their staff to an acceptable enougth level. They always need an adult to sort out their problems. I don't really blame them, I blame the management and training regime for failing them.
Now that I'll agree with
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wasn't it part of the BMI takeover conditions that a proportion of the LHR BMI slots had to be used for domestic purposes? That would explain a move from LGW for some services......
Join Date: May 2012
Location: London
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wasn't it part of the BMI takeover conditions that a proportion of the LHR BMI slots had to be used for domestic purposes? That would explain a move from LGW for some services......
Last edited by Omnipresent; 28th May 2012 at 12:35.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All true, however, how do you surmise that the performance by Servisair (soon to be Menzies) and Aviance before them are somehow inferior to BA ?
Nowadays we get minimum wage from Servisair and Menzies who joined the race to the bottom of ts and cs for aviation ground staff. I wouldn't get out of bed for what they pay their people, indeed some pay about the same as Tesco. Hence turnover is brutally high and there is little customer care. Meet turnaround targets and bid a lower price in the next tender is all that matters. BA were far from perfect but at least the staff appeared to care about their company, not quite something to be found at Servisair and Menzies.
I wonder whether this is UK specific as handlers in Europe seem to be a little more, switched on shall we say?
Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 28th May 2012 at 17:51.
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ireland
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From my own experience, outsourced ground handling is never as good as I house. There is no loyalty to the airline and often very little knowledge of policy etc. It can be a case of "I work for circus air, not BA!". Now this isn't always the case, but unfortunately it happens a lot.
As mentioned already, BAs operation in LHR is already split across LHR with the BD acquisition. Moving a significant amount of LGWs flight to LHR would be a logistical mess.
As it has been said, that LGW is loss making, over and over again, they obviously need to do something. Outsourcing a lot of the ground will cut costs, but I think they also need to focus on their strong points; long haul leisure
As mentioned already, BAs operation in LHR is already split across LHR with the BD acquisition. Moving a significant amount of LGWs flight to LHR would be a logistical mess.
As it has been said, that LGW is loss making, over and over again, they obviously need to do something. Outsourcing a lot of the ground will cut costs, but I think they also need to focus on their strong points; long haul leisure
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: edinburgh
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice attitude Skipness, it is just as well some people get out of bed for the wage offered by handling agents or the flights would not go anywhere!
And lets be honest about it ,BA are more than happy to save costs and therefore assume also happy with the service being offered.
And lets be honest about it ,BA are more than happy to save costs and therefore assume also happy with the service being offered.
This is probably a naive question but the last time I looked, BA shorthaul from Gatwick seemed to be more expensive than Easyjet for comparable flights. If revenue is higher but profit tudns into loss, the obvious conclusion is that BA has higher costs at LGW than Easyjet.
Granted Easy has more aircraft at Gatwick than BA so benefits from scale but what are the big extra costs that causes BA shorthaul to lose money.
Wages ? Old aircraft burning more fuel ? Longer turnaround ? Not imposing baggage charges ? Something else ? I'm sure everything contributes but am interested to know which are the major factors and not just minor
Are there any things that BA can do to make themselves nearly on a par in terms of costs ?
Granted Easy has more aircraft at Gatwick than BA so benefits from scale but what are the big extra costs that causes BA shorthaul to lose money.
Wages ? Old aircraft burning more fuel ? Longer turnaround ? Not imposing baggage charges ? Something else ? I'm sure everything contributes but am interested to know which are the major factors and not just minor
Are there any things that BA can do to make themselves nearly on a par in terms of costs ?
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: the OFCR......and probably somewhere over China zzzzzzzz
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is probably a naive question but the last time I looked, BA shorthaul from Gatwick seemed to be more expensive than Easyjet for comparable flights. If revenue is higher but profit tudns into loss, the obvious conclusion is that BA has higher costs at LGW than Easyjet.
Granted Easy has more aircraft at Gatwick than BA so benefits from scale but what are the big extra costs that causes BA shorthaul to lose money.
Wages ? Old aircraft burning more fuel ? Longer turnaround ? Not imposing baggage charges ? Something else ? I'm sure everything contributes but am interested to know which are the major factors and not just minor
Are there any things that BA can do to make themselves nearly on a par in terms of costs ?
Granted Easy has more aircraft at Gatwick than BA so benefits from scale but what are the big extra costs that causes BA shorthaul to lose money.
Wages ? Old aircraft burning more fuel ? Longer turnaround ? Not imposing baggage charges ? Something else ? I'm sure everything contributes but am interested to know which are the major factors and not just minor
Are there any things that BA can do to make themselves nearly on a par in terms of costs ?
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Skipness, there may be some merit to what you say, particularly regards using judgement, however, in today's game, I'm afraid it's all about 'On Time Performance' with regards handling agents (which is superior to that of BA's btw) and very little else as every 1min delay is followed by finger pointing/apportioning blame/penalty clauses/writing reports etc, so unfortunately customer service usually takes second place either intentionally or not.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is probably a naive question but the last time I looked, BA shorthaul from Gatwick seemed to be more expensive than Easyjet for comparable flights.
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Doncaster
Age: 63
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pardon my ignorance, but which domestic or Irish airports does BA LGW 'hub' with, either directly or by codeshares? Last Oct I went MAN-LGW-NAP and it was excellent. But I believe the MAN-LGW flights have now been reduced.
Join Date: May 2011
Location: IOM
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pardon my ignorance, but which domestic or Irish airports does BA LGW 'hub' with, either directly or by codeshares? Last Oct I went MAN-LGW-NAP and it was excellent. But I believe the MAN-LGW flights have now been reduced.
Routes wise from LGW, using the untrusted source of Wiki:
Edinburgh, Glasgow Intl, Jersey, and Manchester. That lack of domestic routes makes it rather apparent that LGW isn't designed as a hub airport for BA.
Join Date: May 2012
Location: London
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
easyJet is often more expensive than BA at LGW, and easyJet has the benefit of marginal in-flight revenues from catering that BA doesn't.
BA's problem at LGW is largely one of revenue not cost. And competing against easyJet isn't simply an issue of price. easyJet pax I talk to, on the whole, like the easyJet service and experience. And easyJet's marketing and branding has really sharpened up over the past year. The "Where are you going?" campaign was much more inviting and aspirational than easyJet's historical marketing.
BA's problem at LGW is largely one of revenue not cost. And competing against easyJet isn't simply an issue of price. easyJet pax I talk to, on the whole, like the easyJet service and experience. And easyJet's marketing and branding has really sharpened up over the past year. The "Where are you going?" campaign was much more inviting and aspirational than easyJet's historical marketing.