Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

MANSTON -3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Aug 2017, 20:52
  #2101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Siargao Island
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ANGRYBEARD
I'm from Thanet and I feel you may of got some of the facts wrong... It is Westwood Cross and it has been in development since the late 90's. Primarily a retail and entertainment area,opened over 10 years ago with the housing part of it only being quite recent. It is a long way from being a town and up take has been quite limited, with most of the abandoned farm land remaining empty.
As far as people coming from Lewisham??? The whole of Thanet is populated with people from the London area, with the seaside draw being bigger than ever with the reinvention of Margate. There are only probably a few dozen houses built so far and the planned site of the school is now a supermarket. From the site you can see one of the many areas designated a business park, lying empty, but the space here is nothing compared to the large areas planned for business and industrial use next to Manston, with the first new buildings there in over 10 years.
Riveroaks plans have been well advertised in the local press, with the links we have on this forum. There have been no lies. I don't want to disrespect your guests, but they have obviously heard what they want to.
The owners plans for Manston have been little more than a map coloured in, freight has always been the main earner for Manston, with other potential following, passenger flights are planned on the same scale as ever, with the increasingly affluent, growing local population wanting the choice to connect to the world or take their holiday charter without enduring the misery of the M25 and the chaotic, in personal experience of the London airports.
Whether it be Weston Cross or Westwood Cross might be considered nitpicking!

As for connecting to the world Manston had that opportunity with KLM connecting Thanet to KLM's, and all their codeshare partners, world, but two or three Fokkers, or whatever, a day don't make for a viable airport.

You say that freight has always been the main earner for Manston, is that because it failed so miserably trying to attract passengers that the occasional freight movement won every time?

I worked for some 7 years in the cargo airline business, I do recall the occasional loaded freighter going thru Manston but more often than not the freighters were in Manston for maintenance with Jet Support, they weren't carrying revenue loads and what part of "THE RUNWAY ISN'T LONG ENOUGH" do you people have difficulty understanding?

And, yes, I did put a loaded freighter in to Manston one day, it was an F27 on it's way back DUS/SEN when pretty much all of England fogged out, Manston popped up with 1,000m RVR so we diverted it in there ... There, you can add a diverted F27 freighter to your statistics!

As for holiday destinations, EUJet tried it with modestly sized F100's and they failed miserably, Flybe had a route or two out of Manston but they couldn't make those work, as per my previous post the people of Thanet are being led to believe that with a re-opened Manston they can be jetting off to a holiday destination of their choice from their doorstep airport, well someone needs to tell these people the truth!
Harry Wayfarers is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 07:04
  #2102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 950
Received 60 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by ANGRYBEARD
I really hope that it becomes a thriving working airport again........
I can't recall any point at which Manston could be described as "thriving".......
Andy_S is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 07:45
  #2103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Facts vs. Fiction

Originally Posted by Harry Wayfarers
Whether it be Weston Cross or Westwood Cross might be considered nitpicking!

As for connecting to the world Manston had that opportunity with KLM connecting Thanet to KLM's, and all their codeshare partners, world, but two or three Fokkers, or whatever, a day don't make for a viable airport.

You say that freight has always been the main earner for Manston, is that because it failed so miserably trying to attract passengers that the occasional freight movement won every time?

I worked for some 7 years in the cargo airline business, I do recall the occasional loaded freighter going thru Manston but more often than not the freighters were in Manston for maintenance with Jet Support, they weren't carrying revenue loads and what part of "THE RUNWAY ISN'T LONG ENOUGH" do you people have difficulty understanding?

And, yes, I did put a loaded freighter in to Manston one day, it was an F27 on it's way back DUS/SEN when pretty much all of England fogged out, Manston popped up with 1,000m RVR so we diverted it in there ... There, you can add a diverted F27 freighter to your statistics!

As for holiday destinations, EUJet tried it with modestly sized F100's and they failed miserably, Flybe had a route or two out of Manston but they couldn't make those work, as per my previous post the people of Thanet are being led to believe that with a re-opened Manston they can be jetting off to a holiday destination of their choice from their doorstep airport, well someone needs to tell these people the truth!
Too much fiction Harry and not enough fact. Looking at 2011 the airport was ranked 8th largest in the UK on total freight handled, and 5th largest when considering only dedicated freighter cargo (i.e. excluding pax ops cargo).

25,500 tonnes of imported cargo in 2011. Runway too short??? I don't think so. And all of this 25,500 tonnes being delivered by "the odd freighter movement"??? I don't think so.

It's a rumour network here but when the facts are to hand, let's use them rather concocting fiction.
asdf1234 is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 08:10
  #2104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: 1000ft above you, giving you the bird!
Posts: 579
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For Freight it really was a dream place for the importers and in particular Tesco that were using MK for the perishables from Africa. I believe the record for on chocks to first truck loaded with LD3's and then truck landside on its way to DC was 8 minutes, that was achieved when the new apron was laid.
The only issues was the runway was not long enough for the fully laden MD 11 which was where the money really was - a 300 mtr extension and the airport would still be busy as a freight / regional pax airport - still all history now and the like of MK dont really exist anymore.
Jetscream 32 is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 08:28
  #2105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Siargao Island
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by asdf1234
Too much fiction Harry and not enough fact. Looking at 2011 the airport was ranked 8th largest in the UK on total freight handled, and 5th largest when considering only dedicated freighter cargo (i.e. excluding pax ops cargo).

25,500 tonnes of imported cargo in 2011. Runway too short??? I don't think so. And all of this 25,500 tonnes being delivered by "the odd freighter movement"??? I don't think so.

It's a rumour network here but when the facts are to hand, let's use them rather concocting fiction.
Ah ... IMPORTED cargo, a heavy freighter needs less runway to land than it does to take off, so this was inbound freight only, hardly a profit making business if every other sector was a ferry flight.

Runway not long enough for a heavy MD11? ... The runway isn't long enough for a heavy DC8, DC10, B747, B777 or pretty much anything of a similar size, for a heavy one of those need a minimum of 10,000ft and then some.

8th largest in freight handled in 2011, well I can think of an obvious first four or five, three LON's, MAN & EMA, then I'd suggest we are scraping the barrel for numbers 6 and below!

Guess what the number 1 airport in Wales was during 2011? ... LOL
Harry Wayfarers is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 10:12
  #2106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Harry Wayfarers
Ah ... IMPORTED cargo, a heavy freighter needs less runway to land than it does to take off, so this was inbound freight only, hardly a profit making business if every other sector was a ferry flight.

Runway not long enough for a heavy MD11? ... The runway isn't long enough for a heavy DC8, DC10, B747, B777 or pretty much anything of a similar size, for a heavy one of those need a minimum of 10,000ft and then some.

8th largest in freight handled in 2011, well I can think of an obvious first four or five, three LON's, MAN & EMA, then I'd suggest we are scraping the barrel for numbers 6 and below!

Guess what the number 1 airport in Wales was during 2011? ... LOL
So you agree that there were substantial movements, there was substantial cargo, however because it was inbound and not outbound that still makes the runway too short

Guess what? Of the total freight Luton shifted last year, 80% was freight in and just 20% freight out. Stansted? 67% of the total freight was freight in.

Manston is viable as a freight hub. Imported fresh produce made up the bulk of its activity, and given its faster hold-to-truck-to-road times over Heathrow, Gatwick et al, the fresh produce got into the London markets quicker despite Manston being further away by road.

Harry, I suggest you stick to reminiscing rather than attempting to shoot people down, like the good Doctor, who might actually have a valid point.
asdf1234 is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 10:38
  #2107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Oban, Scotland
Posts: 1,844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much of our imported fresh produce goes to London markets, and how much to the supermarket distribution centres? And where are they? And how is this produce arriving now? Just asking.
inOban is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 10:53
  #2108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 950
Received 60 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by asdf1234
Guess what? Of the total freight Luton shifted last year, 80% was freight in and just 20% freight out. Stansted? 67% of the total freight was freight in.
They’re not good comparisons, though. Both those airports have substantial passenger traffic, so don’t need to maximise freight in the way Manston would need to.

Originally Posted by asdf1234
Manston is viable as a freight hub.
History would suggest otherwise. Whatever volumes of fresh produce were being flown in, wherever Manston stood in the freight rankings, it was never enough to make the airport commercially viable. Various people have tried, without success.

Originally Posted by asdf1234
Imported fresh produce made up the bulk of its activity, and given its faster hold-to-truck-to-road times over Heathrow, Gatwick et al, the fresh produce got into the London markets quicker despite Manston being further away by road.
The trouble is that really only works for intermittent freight deliveries. If Manston were to start dealing with the sort of volumes of freight that would make it commercially viable, that rapid turnaround time would be degraded and any time advantage compromised.
Andy_S is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 11:36
  #2109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Siargao Island
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So you agree that there were substantial movements, there was substantial cargo, however because it was inbound and not outbound that still makes the runway too short
Nope, I never suggested anything of the sort!

Guess what? Of the total freight Luton shifted last year, 80% was freight in and just 20% freight out. Stansted? 67% of the total freight was freight in.
LTN & STN make their money from SLF, the type of freight that walks on, the carry on stuff is merely the icing on the cake of an already profitable product.

Manston is viable as a freight hub.
Then why has it changed ownership, ahead of insolvency, more than once and ultimately been sold for real estate development?

Harry, I suggest you stick to reminiscing
I am, once upon a time Manston had an RAF base and then a commercial airport, oh bygone days but we can all reminisce of what could have been!
Harry Wayfarers is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 11:39
  #2110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Kent
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Harry Wayfarers
Whether it be Weston Cross or Westwood Cross might be considered nitpicking!

As for connecting to the world Manston had that opportunity with KLM connecting Thanet to KLM's, and all their codeshare partners, world, but two or three Fokkers, or whatever, a day don't make for a viable airport.

You say that freight has always been the main earner for Manston, is that because it failed so miserably trying to attract passengers that the occasional freight movement won every time?

I worked for some 7 years in the cargo airline business, I do recall the occasional loaded freighter going thru Manston but more often than not the freighters were in Manston for maintenance with Jet Support, they weren't carrying revenue loads and what part of "THE RUNWAY ISN'T LONG ENOUGH" do you people have difficulty understanding?

And, yes, I did put a loaded freighter in to Manston one day, it was an F27 on it's way back DUS/SEN when pretty much all of England fogged out, Manston popped up with 1,000m RVR so we diverted it in there ... There, you can add a diverted F27 freighter to your statistics!

As for holiday destinations, EUJet tried it with modestly sized F100's and they failed miserably, Flybe had a route or two out of Manston but they couldn't make those work, as per my previous post the people of Thanet are being led to believe that with a re-opened Manston they can be jetting off to a holiday destination of their choice from their doorstep airport, well someone needs to tell these people the truth!
I won't be getting into one of these forum arguments, my reply to your previous message was due to you stating the facts of locals, who as I mentioned seem to of paid attention to what they want, rather than published fact.

2-3 Fokkers was never intended to make the place a viable airport, the catchment area has always been to limited and a regional connection was what KLM wanted to achieve as they had done at Norwich and other smaller airports and they were disappointed when the airport closed.
The money was always in freight movements, usually inbound fresh produce with a 747 able to be landed, unloaded and on the road custom checked within an hour being a big appeal. Freight going out was more limited, but printed matter, live animals (the equine facility was one of the few investments that infratil made) and specialist loads-I remember a AN-124 spending some time being loaded with a satellite. Training requirements, GA movements and as you mentioned maintenance counted for other aircraft.
EUJET tried to take on the concept of city breaks with multiple flights to differing Western Europe destinations, but with limited catchment as mentioned, it had mixed results. It was hastily set up and being bought by the airport operator was always a bad business decision. The flybe flights were always doomed to be nothing more than a test of using sat aircraft in the middle of the day to destinations more likely to appeal to business persons who would waste a day taking a flight at such a time.
The holiday destinations I refer to were the charter packages throughout the season that gave locals a choice of holiday with the previously mentioned appeals, These were often fully booked.
What I have said is what the locals have been told, go through the thread, look at the links and tell me where your statements have got fact from, no one promoting the airport has ever said Manston will take on the role of Heathrows third runway, the closest has been that taking a more regional approach, including MSE would reduce the of traffic needing Heathrow. Living in Thanet I have travelled internationally both making the trip to London airports and through Manston and beyond and I can tell you which I preferred.
Please don't come back slating my responses, look into what I say. As far as Manston now, I would love for it to succeed, I know that better investment when it was open would have seen it hold its own, but the tens of millions required to reopen it would never be returned.
ANGRYBEARD is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 11:41
  #2111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andy_S
They’re not good comparisons, though. Both those airports have substantial passenger traffic, so don’t need to maximise freight in the way Manston would need to.



History would suggest otherwise. Whatever volumes of fresh produce were being flown in, wherever Manston stood in the freight rankings, it was never enough to make the airport commercially viable. Various people have tried, without success.



The trouble is that really only works for intermittent freight deliveries. If Manston were to start dealing with the sort of volumes of freight that would make it commercially viable, that rapid turnaround time would be degraded and any time advantage compromised.
Good points Andy, however the financial failure of the airport was down to the freight income not being sufficient to cover overheads that were in place to attract pax operations. The 24 hours fire cover being just one example. If they had concentrated solely on freight the P&L would have looked different.

To grow freight they needed night time flying which I believe was granted just prior to the sale to Ann Gloag.
asdf1234 is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 11:45
  #2112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Thanet
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Manston never handled more than about 1.5% of UK freight tonnage. This may indeed have made it 5th in the UK but it's still only 1.5%.
deedave is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 11:50
  #2113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Siargao Island
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2-3 Fokkers was never intended to make the place a viable airport, the catchment area has always been to limited and a regional connection was what KLM wanted to achieve as they had done at Norwich and other smaller airports and they were disappointed when the airport closed.
The NWI/AMS route was started by Air Anglia, once British & Commonwealth Shipping bought in that became Air UK, once KLM bought in that became KLM UK, KLM didn't achieve anything from NWI except what was already in place for them to buy out.

Right, I'll get back to sucking eggs
Harry Wayfarers is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 15:51
  #2114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: london
Age: 58
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I use to go down to manston quite a lot before the restaurant was changed prior Eujet days use to get quite a lot of the air crews use this I remember one Sunday when the Folkestone air show was on the airport was high in activity with civil aircraft an an124 landed then 2 air Sofia an12s then mk dc8s African international then to round of a il76 I wonder if the British service personal thought they where in the iron curtain also there was a outfit based for a wihile remember OMega air with there 707s bit of a mystery when one of there 707s run of the runway in Africa somewhere with UN Troops on something about the brakes did a bit of leasing out in the early 90s on IT FLights great clip on YouTube
lotus1 is offline  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 16:09
  #2115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 8,555
Received 89 Likes on 61 Posts
For Freight it really was a dream place for the importers and in particular Tesco that were using MK for the perishables from Africa.
Tesco and the other major supermarkets are doing their best to reduce the amount of perishables shipped by air freight - declining market
SWBKCB is online now  
Old 4th Aug 2017, 17:45
  #2116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by deedave
Manston never handled more than about 1.5% of UK freight tonnage. This may indeed have made it 5th in the UK but it's still only 1.5%.
Shall we also get Swansea re-opened? Was the 2nd biggest airport in Wales at one point only recently :-)
01475 is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2017, 05:19
  #2117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: southern spain
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would go for Anglesey as the second airport for Wales not Swansea. Whoever thinks Manston would be a viable airport want their heads testing. I am all for airports but not this one. It would be better used as a lorry park especially after Brexit whenever that might happen, because the EU are really going to make things difficult - remember two years ago at Dover!
compton3bravo is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2017, 07:19
  #2118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Siargao Island
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by compton3bravo
I would go for Anglesey as the second airport for Wales not Swansea. Whoever thinks Manston would be a viable airport want their heads testing. I am all for airports but not this one. It would be better used as a lorry park especially after Brexit whenever that might happen, because the EU are really going to make things difficult - remember two years ago at Dover!
I'd suggest that England's Chester Airport is the 2nd busiest commercial airport in Wales.

OK, a thread drift, but this is a forum of Airlines, Airports & Routes and Manston doesn't have any of those so we may as well chat about something aviation related!
Harry Wayfarers is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.