Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

LUTON - 6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Feb 2008, 00:20
  #921 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what is FAB movement limit, will they hit the brick wall soon? LTN is very busy on Sundays when FAB has more restrictions.
pabely is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2008, 05:39
  #922 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,856
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The other way to think about this is that Farnborough is now so busy because the biz jets often can’t get into Luton
LTNman is online now  
Old 12th Feb 2008, 08:35
  #923 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

I think that it is 28,000 per year with severe restrictions at weekends. TAG want to massively raise the number of movements allowed. Needless to say, the local councils are somewhat aghast with this concept as part of the original planning approval for the huge infrastructure upgrades also contained this restriction on movements which TAG were happy to then abide with.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b296119e-d...nclick_check=1

I wonder how many of the affluent passengers realise that to fly in and out of Farnborough means that you are spending a proportion of the flight in uncontrolled Class G airspace. No matter just how good local radars are, slow moving targets (like gliders) don't always show up and TCAS is only good against other aircraft with transponders.

TAG have recently bought the land from the MOD.

http://www.shstar.co.uk/news/2019/20...s_land?rss=yes
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2008, 21:36
  #924 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to a man in the know. Farnborough will be doubling their hangar size shortly. This was approved back in 2003 by the local planners. What is interesting is that TAG are are going ahead without the Sec State's movement expansion approval simply as the cost of raw materials will dramatically rise leading into the massive regeneration around London with the 2012 Olympics.

If they don't do it now, they wont be able to afford it in a couple of years.

So where does that leave Luton's expansion plans? Sadly, probably shredded!

Now is the time to expand with the Spanish juggling finances within the BAA towers!
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2008, 11:59
  #925 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: southern spain
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New Ryanair route?

There is a Ryanair advert in the local weekly newspaper advertising Beziers in south west France as a new route from Luton commencing on 1 April but there is nothing about it on Ryanair’s website. At present there is a Bristol-Bezier flight at the moment. If this a new route it will make it the 14th destination from Luton operated by Ryanair so unless there is some reduction of flights on the existing routes this would be a “W” pattern. One thing the advert is not advertising Brest but this route is bookable on the website, interesting?

Last edited by compton3bravo; 13th Feb 2008 at 12:09.
compton3bravo is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2008, 12:09
  #926 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hitchin
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it might be an error. Brest starts again on 1 April and is bookable, but was not mentioned in the advert. Therefore I think it should have read "Brest" and not "Beziers".
Powerjet1 is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2008, 13:52
  #927 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not so many places currently
Age: 60
Posts: 3,799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Buster for the links, I'm in FAB next week so will see what the man on the street their knows
pabely is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2008, 21:24
  #928 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

For those that have yet to meet me, I am in advert number 2!

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=8EtU36Im0kw
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2008, 21:48
  #929 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: -
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So they finally managed it... 10 million Passengers a Year!

LTN has today confirmed on their website they have reached 10 million passengers over a 12 month period!

Its been along time coming, but they did it!

http://www.london-luton.co.uk/en/new...n-the-air.html
gilesdavies is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2008, 21:52
  #930 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

Well done to everyone at Luton Airport!

10 million!

Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2008, 15:38
  #931 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hitchin
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes it is good to see the magic 10m pax figure passed at last. It was just missed out last month. Also, I see Jan pax was up 5.5% to 647,593, so decent figures in what is probably the quietest month of the year.

By contrast, probably because of the ryan & Air Berlin cutbacks, STN saw a large drop in pax of -9.3% in Jan, and down 0.6% for the rolling 12 months.
Powerjet1 is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2008, 21:21
  #932 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: North of 50N
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes it is good to see the magic 10m pax figure passed at last. It was just missed out last month. Also, I see Jan pax was up 5.5% By contrast, STN saw a large drop in pax: -9.3% in Jan, and down 0.6% for the rolling 12 months.
Nice to see that LTN's bucking a trend Just a shame that some of LLAO's efforts end up in LBC's pockets
So where does that leave Luton's expansion plans?
Still on 'hold' whilst the Town Hall dithers
ebenezer is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 09:44
  #933 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK Home Counties
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...the magic 10m pax figure passed at last
This is indeed, a fantastic achievement given the local council 'albatros' with which LLAO has to work.

What makes it even more of a quite spectacular milestone is that these passengers have all been serviced by an airport whose infrastructure - airside and landside - (and obviously, excluding the expanded and 'new' terminals [Main & Silverjet]) has remained largely unaltered in the last few years and where the road system feeding the Airport - although being upgraded - is presently quite appalling.

I wonder just how many more passengers could LTN have handled with a proper road system and improved airfield (aprons/taxiways) infrastructure...??

Hopefully, if the expected recession doesn't bite too hard, once the current road construction is completed perhaps the figure might top 11 million?
CAP493 is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 11:52
  #934 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

10 million passengers. LBC really must me 'raking in' the profits!
Buster the Bear is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 12:00
  #935 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,625
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
I understand LBC gets £3 per passenger. £30m will pay for a lot of trips investigating town 'twinning'
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 14:12
  #936 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Milton Keynes
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely it's £3 per departing passenger - and then only those who pass through the main terminal - so that would only come to £15 million. (That is close to the sums shown in LBC and LLAOL accounts.)

I think you'll find that they don't get a thing for Silverjet, Harrods, and other exec passengers.

Presumably the owners of the infrastructure (LBC) are supposed to make the whole lot over to the tenant (LLAOL) and allow them to keep all the profits without paying any rent?

antilla is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 14:37
  #937 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK Home Counties
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Presumably the owners of the infrastructure (LBC) are supposed to make the whole lot over to the tenant (LLAOL) and allow them to keep all the profits without paying any rent?
Your point is well made about the 'landlord' (LBC) and the 'tenant' (LLAO) - however, I think you'll find that LLAO would have much preferred a 30-year 'tenancy' agreement with a 'rental' agreed for say a three or five year period because this then would have given the Airport Company a fixed outgoing around which it could plan its business.

The only question I would ask about Luton (happily, not as a payer of council tax to LBC) is "Were the hell has the £15M or-so gone?"

Returning to the subject of LTN, one of the spin-off benefits to LTN of STN increasing its charges is that it makes it just that little bit more viable for LLAO to offer deals that undercut it's Essex competitor. This probably accounts for the resurgence in interest in LTN by several operators - but the main impediment remains a lack of stand capacity during peak hours, and the continuing need for medium-term investment by LLAO to cater for any increase in demand.
CAP493 is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 15:12
  #938 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I expect that is considerably more than £15m for 5m departing passengers (dp). The £3 per dp was a 2000 figure and the concession fee was originally index linked with certain step changes - so unless ACDL has renegotiated the original deal, I would imagine it is closer to £4 than £3 per dp. In 2006, I recall that the fee to LBC was c.£18m.

You can, of course, by a lot of art work for the town hall or have some very grand parade for that some of money.

The concession was let in 1998 and must have been a good deal for the operator cos ACDL spent £500m on buying TBI which gave them 23 years remaining on the LLAOL concession (as well as BFS and CWL - the only other profitable assets in the group).
Capt Alcock is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 16:30
  #939 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Under the flight path
Posts: 2,625
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
If it's £3 per departing passenger, I bow to your superior knowledge, Antilla. However, even £15 million pays for a lot of the unnecessary bureaucracy and politically-correct nonsense that seems to spew from Luton Town Hall.
LGS6753 is offline  
Old 16th Feb 2008, 19:27
  #940 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Grrr

Unless things have changed, LBC get in theory £1.43 per tinminal passenger.
Buster the Bear is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.