Wikiposts
Search
Airlines, Airports & Routes Topics about airports, routes and airline business.

BA Cityflyer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Nov 2008, 21:35
  #161 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DutchBird-757
Could be good for the LCY-DUB service though.
Is it just me, or does it illustrate a certain lack of joined-up thinking that the commercial policy for passengers affected by BA's DUB-LGW cancellation doesn't even include the option of rebooking on BA Cityflier's DUB-LCY?
Cyrano is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2008, 22:00
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Isle of Man
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
YES...................................
Haven't a clue is offline  
Old 1st Nov 2008, 22:19
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Nova
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Presumably, people who book to fly to/from LGW do so because that is where they want to fly to/from??? I guess LCY was an option at the time of booking?

Doesn't seem to be unreasonable to expect the pax to wish to retain the same airport pairs? Why wouldn't BA offer flights on their codeshare partner's flights?

Is LCY-DUB still flown by Flightline???

Maybe there's more money in a 'codeshare' pax at LGW, than a 'wet lease' one at LCY?

Last edited by Tandemrotor; 2nd Nov 2008 at 00:26.
Tandemrotor is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2008, 01:09
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Blighty
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
Could also be that those flying into LGW have a significant proportion of leisure-based pax, while those flying into LCY are heavily business-focussed (and paying a much higher fare).

If BA reckon they can still fill their planes from LCY-DUB to almost full with high fares, why let the backpackers who are paying peanuts take the seats instead ?

BA can still argue that by rebooking these people onto a codeshare flight into LGW that they are preserving the exact airport pair and supplying you with a ticket on a plane.
davidjohnson6 is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2008, 10:38
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Nova
Posts: 1,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course the LGW pax could also be connecting with BA longhaul services. (The World doesn't end at GVA) But why let the facts get in the way of a good whinge!
Tandemrotor is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2008, 11:49
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Age: 53
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LGW passengers could also be business travellers for whom LHR is a right pain to get to and from. LCY is a lot more accesible than LHR for a lot of east Surrey, west Kent and south / south east London. The Jubilee line from London Bridge to Canning Town and then the DLR really works very well. I use LCY to replace many of the lost BA LGW short haul destinations.
JP
traveller42 is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2008, 15:38
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidjohnson6
If BA reckon they can still fill their planes from LCY-DUB to almost full with high fares, why let the backpackers who are paying peanuts take the seats instead ?
Thanks, David, that's the best laugh I've had all day! "Almost full with high fares"! Hysterical! (I guess you haven't seen the BA loads on LCY-DUB recently then?)
Cyrano is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2008, 12:00
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Essex
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LCY - DUB is now being flown by a mix of BACF and Flightline.
racer09 is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2008, 12:06
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Middlesesx
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With BA's use of Flightline for round about the last 20 years never seeming to deminish might it not have been a better prospect to have purchased FL in the first place and got them to run the LCY franchaise operation. We must have bought there aged a/c several times over and they must be concerned every time one of our management sneeze.
HZ123 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2008, 12:12
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Spain
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just confirmed - 6 students pilots to start type rating on 26th Jan with BACF as trainee entry pilots from the BACF Mentored Pilot Scheme at FTE.
32SQDN is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2008, 20:49
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: brighton
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a surprise that BA Cityflyer picking up LGW routes , now they have GVA / Zrh as well as Dub!

Whats next ?
flyer55 is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2008, 23:12
  #172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Samsonite Avenue
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With BA's use of Flightline for round about the last 20 years never seeming to deminish might it not have been a better prospect to have purchased FL in the first place and got them to run the LCY franchaise operation.
That is a bit harsh on the front line BACF workers!
Mister Geezer is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2008, 10:44
  #173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: where ever i wake up!!!!
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
flyer55 what else do you want to give them?
marlowe is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2008, 12:10
  #174 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: right-hand seat
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have an interview next week with BA CityFlyer for a first officer position. The HR lady who called me said they are about to "recruit heavily" hence the invite.

Looking through this thread there's been all kinds of speculation about fleet changes. Of course I will find out at my interview but before then asking on here - will I have to fly the RJ? Or is there a chance they're about to introduce some Embraers or even A318s?
archenergy is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2008, 13:00
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The third time in a couple of days I heard this story. Looks like they're up to something in Didsbury.

And scrap the A318 of your list. The announcement should be made before the end of this month, if it isn't gonna be postponed again. Just go for the RJ option.
DutchBird-757 is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2008, 14:47
  #176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: where ever i wake up!!!!
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Archenergy the RJ is the the aircraft type at the moment and thats not going to change in the short term, long term who knows?
marlowe is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2008, 02:23
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Samsonite Avenue
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this recruitment to fill any current shortfall or are more RJs expected?
Mister Geezer is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2008, 10:58
  #178 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The word is that this recruitment is to overcrew us so that we have sufficient flight crew to enable us to introduce the a new type.
towser is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2008, 00:12
  #179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: right-hand seat
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And has an announcement been made yet regarding the introduction of a new type? I don't want to turn up for an interview this week and embarrass myself not knowing about such things.
archenergy is offline  
Old 10th Nov 2008, 10:02
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: EDI
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No announcement has been made yet. You'll probably find out in hear first before we do at work! That seems to have been the case with past announcements.

RJ
RJ100 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.