PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   Virgin Recruiting (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/647943-virgin-recruiting.html)

737flapoperator 4th February 2024 14:44

Anyone recently passed the sim and final interview? Would be happy for some insights, either here or via DM! Cheers

Tranquility Base 10th February 2024 09:37

So much I could say in response to this but I’ll wait until 2025……….

Cots889 10th February 2024 13:16

In response to what….do share?

Tranquility Base 10th February 2024 18:03


Originally Posted by SECsmachine (Post 11580120)
@NatZulu; not going to get drawn into it here but what is a fact is that the vast majority of pilots were offered re-employment, and a handful were not.

You and I can speculate on the ‘real’ reasons all day, and I am certain each case has individual circumstances, but it's also clear from your posts here, and those you’ve made on the other non-anonymous forums, that not everyone shares your interpretation of events or ‘facts’. But I’m sure you’ll get your day in court, and sincerely hope you find some closure as a result.

The ‘handful’ had mortgages, families and many years of service at VAA but were just dumped out of the company with no return allowed. How ironic that the company are short of pilots.

Tranquility Base 11th February 2024 09:18


Originally Posted by SECsmachine (Post 11580120)
@NatZulu; not going to get drawn into it here but what is a fact is that the vast majority of pilots were offered re-employment, and a handful were not.

You and I can speculate on the ‘real’ reasons all day, and I am certain each case has individual circumstances, but it's also clear from your posts here, and those you’ve made on the other non-anonymous forums, that not everyone shares your interpretation of events or ‘facts’. But I’m sure you’ll get your day in court, and sincerely hope you find some closure as a result.

‘not going to get drawn into it here’………if this isn’t ‘I’m clearly out of my depth and clearly don’t know the facts’, I don’t know what is!

Unless you’re privy to the facts your opinion is meaningless as it’s based on incorrect information. To assume what happened based on rumour, hearsay, conjecture, supposition etc is really not helpful. I know the facts surrounding the redundancy process at VAA whereas you don’t. Therefore you are only guessing and should perhaps question your sources and not express an opinion unless you’re 100% sure of your facts.

bonzy 11th February 2024 22:18


Originally Posted by Brexoff (Post 11550753)
The SO chaps I met doing their 787 TR a few months ago were told at interview they would be cruise relief pilots for 18-24 months. Once they actually started they said they were told in reality it’ll be more like 4-6 months before they’re FO’s

If many existing VS pilots are resigning.

Hopefully any existing or any new SO’s that may have joined with some Airbus or Boeing experience, will get into the right hand seat straight away and moved over using some common sense.

is it true all command upgrade courses are now paused with the lack of FO’s?

Speedbrakes Up 12th February 2024 08:31

All command courses stopped till end of summer apparently due to lack of First Officers.


737 Jockey 12th February 2024 08:50


Originally Posted by Speedbrakes Up (Post 11595308)
All command courses stopped till end of summer apparently due to lack of First Officers.


Any lack of FO’s can be placed largely on HR
and their D&I ‘policy of the season’… where numerous suitable and qualified candidates have been turned down at final interview. You reap what you sow.

Ohfeck 12th February 2024 09:25


Originally Posted by 737 Jockey (Post 11595317)
Any lack of FO’s can be placed largely on HR
and their D&I ‘policy of the season’… where numerous suitable and qualified candidates have been turned down at final interview. You reap what you sow.

Ok, in what way? What’s VAA’s D&I policy?

Lordflasheart 12th February 2024 10:00

...

What’s VAA’s D&I policy?
It depends on the Season .. :E:E ... Boom Boom !

Raph737 12th February 2024 16:23


Originally Posted by 737 Jockey (Post 11595317)
Any lack of FO’s can be placed largely on HR
and their D&I ‘policy of the season’… where numerous suitable and qualified candidates have been turned down at final interview. You reap what you sow.

We know why some were turned down. Being rated and having the hours doesn’t necessarily mean they are suitable candidates. I don’t get why some people apply when they are clearly against how the company operates or their philosophy.
I know from good authority that some guys got there and then had rants about “woke this and that”. Very clever…

Sick 12th February 2024 17:43

They do give feedback, so I can categorically confirm that I was rejected for being insufficiently "woke", or words to that effect. (in my answers to the two woke probing questions). No ranting, I thought I was towing the woke line in a pragmatic way, but obviously it didn't come out the way they wanted. Treading on egg shells these days - can do without that.
Lucky escape by the sounds of it.

PPRuNe user 103842 12th February 2024 18:50

“Everyone is equal, it’s just some are more equal than others”

Raph737 12th February 2024 19:19


Originally Posted by dhc1180 (Post 11595672)
“Everyone is equal, it’s just some are more equal than others”

My point proven…
There were even some posts in this forum that were very clear about that same point. Don’t like their uniform policy? Don’t apply. Don’t like their equality & diversity vision? Don’t apply. Don’t like that you can’t sexually harass your crew down route? Don’t apply. Go to Emirates if you want conservative.

Some are as equals as the others, but some tend to get to the last interview and say things that do not align with what VA wants, then act surprised. They are entitled to choose who they hire.




Raph737 12th February 2024 20:14


Originally Posted by Sick (Post 11595630)
They do give feedback, so I can categorically confirm that I was rejected for being insufficiently "woke", or words to that effect. (in my answers to the two woke probing questions). No ranting, I thought I was towing the woke line in a pragmatic way, but obviously it didn't come out the way they wanted. Treading on egg shells these days - can do without that.
Lucky escape by the sounds of it.

I am very aware of that, you gave the game away as you’re using “woke” as an Insult like most gammon section of this country. You said “towing the woke line in a pragmatic way”. In other words, you were dishonest and they picked it up, these people aren’t stupid. Also, to speak like that it is very obvious you are soo deep in your privilege that you didn’t do any research.

It was as simple as siting down with a friend from an ethnic minority, or a female pilot or anyone from LGBTQ+, or someone with a disability and ask them “how is it truly like for you in aviation, under your skin?”.

With all due respect, it’s what truly intelligent people do, instead of listening to right wing demagoguery, they would go to the source and hear the human side. You cannot replicate or replace the human experience, and you cannot tell someone how they should feel about something. You would have learned something that would make you a more round individual, and you would be more prepared to answer a question like that even if you disagreed with it, but it would come from a place of understanding and honesty.

One would argue that they were the ones who dodged a bullet. Because “woke” is simply having or marked by an active awareness of systemic injustices and prejudices, especially those involving the treatment of ethnic, racial, or sexual minorities.

It is very clear in their website, the company values and ethos, it has changed and you don’t have to like it. Most curious is that you applied whilst disagreeing with it.

Go to a BA assessment and disagree with their mission, very likely they won’t hire you, same for most airline HR assessments. You need to prove to them that you are passionate about their brand and ethos, and even if you disagree with certain aspects. Problem with the anti-woke brigade is that they are usually awful and say deplorable things, like something racist followed by “we can’t say anything these days, treading on eggshells”.

Yes you can say what you want, it is freedom of speech, not freedom from consequences. Compassion, empathy, kindness, awareness of our privileges (most pilots are), awareness of the injustices in our system etc. It’s not that hard mate.

I have recruited pilots for years and have seen a lot of ugly things in recruitment, from racism to Islamophobia, sexism etc. The way things were before weren’t great either so I can blame them from trying to be inclusive.




Sick 12th February 2024 20:24

Whatever you say Ralph. :rolleyes:

Vokes55 13th February 2024 00:20


Originally Posted by Raph737 (Post 11595693)
They are entitled to choose who they hire.

Until they run out of pilots. Which they have.

Maybe the fact that Virgin are struggling to hire and Emirates are not suggest that not many people agree with your/their opinion.

Raph737 13th February 2024 05:58


Originally Posted by Vokes55 (Post 11595845)
Until they run out of pilots. Which they have.

Maybe the fact that Virgin are struggling to hire and Emirates are not suggest that not many people agree with your/their opinion.

It’s not an opinion, it is a fact, they can choose who they hire based on standards they set. Emirates? They hire from a wider pool of pilots, whilst Virgin are limited to brits and EASA holders(new), majority of applicants to Emirates are from India, so you’re being disingenuous.

What I find with this discussions, is that people can’t beat the argument so resort to either name calling, or throwing words they don’t know what it means i.e. marxists, woke etc. Gets to a point you can’t defend your position without sounding incredibly ignorant of the subject matter.

Did they run out of pilots because of their recruitment profile? You don’t know that, fact. OR Could the exodus be due to how they acted during the pandemic? Were the issues attracting people due to lower salary and worse schedule, plus a smaller pool of candidates? Could be, we also don’t know that, fact. But now, let’s blame it on “woke”….

BA ran out of pilots, by the way. They also failed a number of people, because they can choose who they hire based on their profile. Also a fact.

TUI can’t hire and are losing people, most of the new hires are cadets, fact.
Easyjet too. Either beat the argument with a sound and honest point, or take a seat my friend.
The intellectual dishonesty is overwhelming on Pprune(that’s an opinion by the way), but to come here and blame an assessment failure on them being “woke” ? and for you to come and defend that point, is a new level of the privileged not taking accountability for their shortcomings. There are plenty of resources for self development and learning on the subject matter, he didn’t pass because he probably spent too much time in his conservative bubble and never bothered with the people most affected this.

double-oscar 13th February 2024 07:00


Originally Posted by Raph737 (Post 11595949)
It’s not an opinion, it is a fact, they can choose who they hire based on standards they set. Emirates? They hire from a wider pool of pilots, whilst Virgin are limited to brits and EASA holders(new), majority of applicants to Emirates are from India, so you’re being disingenuous.

What I find with this discussions, is that people can’t beat the argument so resort to either name calling, or throwing words they don’t know what it means i.e. marxists, woke etc. Gets to a point you can’t defend your position without sounding incredibly ignorant of the subject matter.

Did they run out of pilots because of their recruitment profile? You don’t know that, fact. OR Could the exodus be due to how they acted during the pandemic? Were the issues attracting people due to lower salary and worse schedule, plus a smaller pool of candidates? Could be, we also don’t know that, fact. But now, let’s blame it on “woke”….

BA ran out of pilots, by the way. They also failed a number of people, because they can choose who they hire based on their profile. Also a fact.

TUI can’t hire and are losing people, most of the new hires are cadets, fact.
Easyjet too. Either beat the argument with a sound and honest point, or take a seat my friend.
The intellectual dishonesty is overwhelming on Pprune(that’s an opinion by the way), but to come here and blame an assessment failure on them being “woke” ? and for you to come and defend that point, is a new level of the privileged not taking accountability for their shortcomings. There are plenty of resources for self development and learning on the subject matter, he didn’t pass because he probably spent too much time in his conservative bubble and never bothered with the people most affected this.

You make some valid points but you ruin your post by including what you claim are facts but which are actually not true.

Raph737 13th February 2024 07:04


Originally Posted by double-oscar (Post 11595970)
You make some valid points but you ruin your post by including what you claim are facts but which are actually not true.

What is not true, exactly?

The previous posters can’t prove that VA struggle’s to hire because they are PERCEIVED to be woke. That’s a fact. There are a number of reasons. Emirates can hire from every country in the world, VA can’t so that’s also nonsense.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:30.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.