PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   Leaving BA for low cost (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/610247-leaving-ba-low-cost.html)

Polorutz 1st March 2019 15:19


Originally Posted by monquay (Post 10403891)

So questions wise,
1. Can EZY FO's really not park?! seems odd to me!
2. Can FO's call stop? surprised me during the sim check when the skipper took over the thrust levers on TO, hadn't seen that coming.
3. Is the atmosphere at Easy as relaxed as it seemed during the recruitment day?
4. How often do trips change on the roster? as a general rule I don't mind what I do on a particular day at work but I would like to know when i'm not working!
5. Hows LTN as a base?
6. Any other up to date factors which may influence my decision to take/ not take and offer

1- It’s SOP for CM1 to park, I think it harkens back to when we had 737’s with the tiller only on the LHS. Current logic is that a lot of the parking aids are LHS only.

2- CM1 has the responsibility to call stop. The skipper is the only one with his hands on the thrust levers. As PM you can bring anything to CM1’s attention but the responsibility lies with CM1

3- I don’t know how things are in BA but we’re pretty relaxed in Orangeland.

4- After roster publication your days off are
sacred, they will not change and you have the ability to refuse certain changes to your schedule within 48 hours of your duty. If you opt for fixed roster you can extrapolate your days off for years in the future with the exception of the reserve months (2 a year) where you have flexible roster. Within your working days you can experience disruption but our fatigue management system is not punitive and can be used if you’re not feeling up to the task.

Can’t help you with 5 or 6 as I haven’t been LTN based or worked at BA. PM me if you have any more questions.

Kind Regards

Polo

LHS LGW

BarryMG 2nd March 2019 15:00


Originally Posted by LlamaFarmer (Post 10403954)

Originally Posted by monquay https://www.pprune.org/images/buttons/viewpost.gif
1. Can EZY FO's really not park?! seems odd to me!
Correct. PF taxis in after landing, and if that is the FO, then just approaching stand hands control to CM1 (Cpt) who parks, CM2 (FO, or RHS LTC) does the parking checklist and post-flight paperwork. Probably partly due to some of the guidance screens only being configured for the LHS, but mostly probably due to insurance costs given most FOs are pretty inexperienced compared to legacy/charter airlines. Exception to that is remote holding, which is holding not parking.

2. Can FO's call stop? surprised me during the sim check when the skipper took over the thrust levers on TO, hadn't seen that coming.
Also correct. FO calls what they see, captain makes the decision to Stop/Go. Exception being if there is a Trainer on the jump seat then they can also call stop if agreed with the operating captain agrees, or during command assessment at the end of command line training (where you fly with an ordinary FO in the RHS). Again, probably due to FO experience.

3. Is the atmosphere at Easy as relaxed as it seemed during the recruitment day? For the most part it's very relaxed, lots of brilliant people, really enjoyable days out.

4. How often do trips change on the roster? as a general rule I don't mind what I do on a particular day at work but I would like to know when i'm not working!
Roster stability can be hit and miss, but your days off are your days off, and you can refuse to operate into them (ie delayed duty on your last day of work, looks like it'll be landing at 1am, you can decline to work that duty). If you choose to, then you get a WIDO payment, either 1/2 rate or full rate (plus another day off) depending on how long into your day off. Often there'll be lots of roster instability in summer, but we have BALPA-agreed short notice change refusals... where we can reject a change within 48 hours if it's more than 2 hours different.

5. Hows LTN as a base?
Pass, I'm not based there.

6. Any other up to date factors which may influence my decision to take/ not take them up on an offer?
Joining as a DEC SFO, you'd be eligible to start the command process within 6 months of joining, so could realistically be in the LHS within a two years. No seniority to worry about, preferential bidding system for earlys/lates/nightstops/etc. Terms are always improving here, and fatigue management is getting better too, they're years ahead of other airlines on that one.

I'm hearing of several colleagues who left to BA who are regretting it and wanting to come back. Some got SH LGW, some got SH LHR, some got DEP LH. At least one of each wants to come back to EZY... I'd say up to 1/3 are not happy with their move!

Is this applicable (especially 3-6) to every EZY base, i.e. Malpensa? Atmosphere, time to command (realistically), short notice change refusal etc?

UberPilot 2nd March 2019 15:23


Originally Posted by BarryMG (Post 10404944)
Is this applicable (especially 3-6) to every EZY base, i.e. Malpensa? Atmosphere, time to command (realistically), short notice change refusal etc?

Time to command is heavily base dependant. Portugal, LGW, LTN: Basically no wait and as soon as you meet the requirements and finish the assessments you’ll probably get something within 2 years.

MXP, NCE: A very long time... very!

CW247 2nd March 2019 16:01

Sorry for the thread drift... I genuinely thought EZY were the champion of Standard Airbus SOP, allowing the FO to taxi and park. Was it changed recently?. BTW, please could someone tell me exactly which stand parking guidance system is calibrated for the LHS. Looking at the history books of aviation, there was one and I haven't come across it in my 10 year career yet.

FlyingStone 2nd March 2019 16:08


Originally Posted by CW247 (Post 10405012)
BTW, please could someone tell me exactly which stand parking guidance system is calibrated for the LHS. Looking at the history books of aviation, there was one and I haven't come across it in my 10 year career yet.

A lot of airports have them. AGNIS, APIS, etc. Most of the parking have stop lines on the left side only as well.


dirk85 2nd March 2019 18:19


Originally Posted by BarryMG (Post 10404944)
Is this applicable (especially 3-6) to every EZY base, i.e. Malpensa? Atmosphere, time to command (realistically), short notice change refusal etc?

Most rules are the same in Italy, but the contract is different. Roster, pension, part time, salary, rank and many other things are country dependant.
Money wise you are better off on the continent (France, Italy or Germany).

Northern Monkey 2nd March 2019 18:25


Originally Posted by CW247 (Post 10405012)
Sorry for the thread drift... I genuinely thought EZY were the champion of Standard Airbus SOP, allowing the FO to taxi and park. Was it changed recently?. BTW, please could someone tell me exactly which stand parking guidance system is calibrated for the LHS. Looking at the history books of aviation, there was one and I haven't come across it in my 10 year career yet.

Who cares who parks the aeroplane, really? Surely the terms and conditions of employment are a lot more important than SOP trivia.




Stone Cold II 2nd March 2019 19:40

AMS stop line and guidance is set up for LHS also. Who cares anyway? Shouldn’t base the job on who parks. Also don’t think the insurance covers the Fo. Personally I think it’s the best short haul job going. People are awesome and fairly relaxed across the network.

Never felt pressured with fuel decisions etc and on the odd occasion I have had to go fatigue in 15 years never questioned once. Preferential bidding for me personally has been superb.

cumulustratus 2nd March 2019 20:22


Originally Posted by RexBanner (Post 10405163)
FO can sling it down the runway at 130 knots with a twenty knot crosswind but can’t taxi it in a straight line at 3 knots and apply a little gentle braking to stop when the guidance tells them to. Makes perfect sense to me (sic). If the guidance is for the LHS only then whats wrong with a transfer of control to park on stand at the limited number of airfields that that situation applies to? Not exactly a hard remedy to a non existent problem really.

I agree it’s not really a big deal in the greater scheme of things but its an absolutely pathetic SOP.

Great display of not knowing how to use the (sic) expression :rolleyes:

So to you it's not important, but important enough to label "pathetic"?

Maybe leave your house a bit more. There's an abundance of non aviation relqted things to stimulate your mind out there.


VJW 2nd March 2019 20:43


Originally Posted by RexBanner (Post 10405163)
FO can sling it down the runway at 130 knots with a twenty knot crosswind but can’t taxi it in a straight line at 3 knots and apply a little gentle braking to stop when the guidance tells them to. Makes perfect sense to me (sic). If the guidance is for the LHS only then whats wrong with a transfer of control to park on stand at the limited number of airfields that that situation applies to? Not exactly a hard remedy to a non existent problem really.

I agree it’s not really a big deal in the greater scheme of things but its an absolutely pathetic SOP.

I find it amazing this is getting so much air time (and was even asked as question 1 in the first place). How many SOP's do we have to do, while thinking some are good, some are annoying and some seem pointless? Bottom line is we don't own these aircraft, we are paid a pretty decent wage to operate them exactly as our employer (who do own them) wants us to. Very simple really. Personally I don't find it half as annoying being handed control before turning on to stand as I would briefing for a monitored approach on every sector.....


Callsign Kilo 2nd March 2019 20:48

You don’t join an airline for its SOPs, I’m pretty sure of that one. If it were the case I doubt anyone would join BA (monitored approaches). That being said, I’m sure most take them their stride when they get there. Just my two cents

LlamaFarmer 3rd March 2019 11:22


Originally Posted by BarryMG (Post 10404944)
Is this applicable (especially 3-6) to every EZY base, i.e. Malpensa? Atmosphere, time to command (realistically), short notice change refusal etc?

Bases vary.

But time to command should in theory be similar anywhere... if you're willing to move for your command.
Anyone who's an SFO in a small base (NCL etc) , or highly sought-after base (MXP), will be waiting (a very long time) for a captain to leave, or an aircraft to be added, for a command position to be available.
Anyone who is in a big base (LGW, LTN etc) with a high turnover, or is willing to move to one will not have to wait long for command once eligible for a course. Many will come to LGW for command and go onto the transfer list again to get back to where they want. Personal preference.


Short notice refusals are agreements between the company and the unions so will vary from country to country.

CW247 7th March 2019 16:55


You don’t join an airline for its SOPs, I’m pretty sure of that one.
Speak for yourself. The SOP is what makes the job what it is. I've been at airlines with god awful SOPs where yabba yabba yabba and pointless box ticking and duplication is the order of the day and I've been at airlines with simple, smart SOPs where duplication is next to zero. Guess which one had more incidents? Some SOPs truly wear you down. And in an industry with so much else to wear you down, that matters. You're kidding yourself if you think other wise.

cessnapete 8th March 2019 15:00


Originally Posted by CW247 (Post 10409688)
Speak for yourself. The SOP is what makes the job what it is. I've been at airlines with god awful SOPs where yabba yabba yabba and pointless box ticking and duplication is the order of the day and I've been at airlines with simple, smart SOPs where duplication is next to zero. Guess which one had more incidents? Some SOPs truly wear you down. And in an industry with so much else to wear you down, that matters. You're kidding yourself if you think other wise.


How complicated aviation SOPs has become!
In my time in Big Airways the pilot flying the sector took over at engine start, after normally being included in the pre flight fuel decisions etc. Personally I also briefed the Senior CC to discuss any inflight problems firstly with the P2 when flying the sector, as good pre command experience.
The whole flight was conducted from the appropriate seat, taxi ,flying to touchdown (prior to the introduction of the MA after the BEA merger) taxi in and parking. Obviously if the parking guidance was set up for the LHS then then handover took place at a convenient time near the Stand. On a P2 sector they also were able to call Stop on takeoff, his/hers hand remained on the thrust levers until V1. That SOP remains today.
The only P2 restrictions I remember were Cat 1 limits, and X wind limit 15/20kts I think, and of course the Capt. always carried out low vis approaches/Autolands. Also on my type, A/P off A/T off.

FACoff 27th July 2019 20:35

To revive an old post, in part thanks to the current climate at BA, I'm wondering how many are still like minded to leave. I meet people on the jet bridge regularly who are at their wits end and I'm one of them.

If you're looking to leave, where to?

MikeAlpha320 28th July 2019 00:42

TUI, EZY or VS.

Buter 28th July 2019 01:58

AA, Delta, Clown school...

wiggy 28th July 2019 08:00

Clown School...:eek: well that can take you places...

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...po-cruise-ship

VinRouge 28th July 2019 09:12


Originally Posted by Callsign Kilo (Post 10405197)
You don’t join an airline for its SOPs, I’m pretty sure of that one. If it were the case I doubt anyone would join BA (monitored approaches). That being said, I’m sure most take them their stride when they get there. Just my two cents

monitored approaches actually make lots of sense, having seen a few go arounds now, much tidier and far less of a shock for the handling pilot to fly. After all, that’s what he has briefed, whereas the landing pilot is expecting to do that.

If I were going to nitpick an SOP that just is a bit odd, it’s the Non handling pilot selection of reverse.

I would much prefer to work for an outfit though that has an oddity like that though but trusts me as an experienced professional to pull the thrust levers from RHS or call stop as the heavy in the middle seat. Suppose it comes down to trust and experience.

champair79 28th July 2019 11:17

Unless you’re on the Airbus where the handling pilot pulls reverse. The Airbus fleets now are very close to ‘Airbus standard SOPs’ with the major exception being the monitored approach.

champ

DuctOvht 28th July 2019 11:18


Originally Posted by VinRouge (Post 10530352)


monitored approaches actually make lots of sense, having seen a few go arounds now, much tidier and far less of a shock for the handling pilot to fly. After all, that’s what he has briefed, whereas the landing pilot is expecting to do that.

If I were going to nitpick an SOP that just is a bit odd, it’s the Non handling pilot selection of reverse.

I would much prefer to work for an outfit though that has an oddity like that though but trusts me as an experienced professional to pull the thrust levers from RHS or call stop as the heavy in the middle seat. Suppose it comes down to trust and experience.

Thread creep...

You might be able to ‘pull the thrust levers’ on the ground, but we aren’t trusted to use them in the air. QED.

You cannot call ‘stop’ as heavy, that SOP changed a long time ago. Perhaps a flick through the books might be in order?!

As you were...

Northern Monkey 28th July 2019 15:22

I really don't get the fascination with minor variations around SOP's. Who cares? Really? The only things that matter at the end of the day are pay, lifestyle and job security. Who gets to use the thrust levers or park the aeroplane or call stop is absolutely and totally irrelevant.

Back to the thread.

The only places I would personally consider in the UK are BA, EZY or RYR. Anything else seems to me to be a gamble on long term job security. Bear in mind the "OP" is talking about leaving BA. They are not an unemployed cadet looking for their first job. However many years you have left, 10, 20, 30, 40, is anyone really confident that any other operator other than the three I have listed provide a decent shot at making it to retirement? Again I would emphasise that I say this in the context of someone gainfully employed at BA. You can afford to be picky and you must be.

Personally, I cannot imagine ever wanting to work for Ryanair. And the industrial landscape there is barely any better than at BA. You could argue it's worse. Out of the frying pan and into the fire.

That leaves easyJet.

All IMHO, obviously.

cessnapete 28th July 2019 17:14


Originally Posted by VinRouge (Post 10530352)


monitored approaches actually make lots of sense, having seen a few go arounds now, much tidier and far less of a shock for the handling pilot to fly. After all, that’s what he has briefed, whereas the landing pilot is expecting to do that.

If I were going to nitpick an SOP that just is a bit odd, it’s the Non handling pilot selection of reverse.

I would much prefer to work for an outfit though that has an oddity like that though but trusts me as an experienced professional to pull the thrust levers from RHS or call stop as the heavy in the middle seat. Suppose it comes down to trust and experience.

All BA aircraft are 2 pilot flight crew. No checklists involve an augmented crew member. Stop can only be called by the P1/P2
Third and sometimes fourth crew are only carried when Duty Period requires augmented crew.
Also BA does not use partially qualified crew members as SOs. All P2 qualified for 2 crew operations.

RexBanner 28th July 2019 17:15


Originally Posted by FACoff (Post 10530034)
To revive an old post, in part thanks to the current climate at BA, I'm wondering how many are still like minded to leave. I meet people on the jet bridge regularly who are at their wits end and I'm one of them.

If you're looking to leave, where to?

FACoff if you’re SH have you considered Gatwick? I was 3 years at Heathrow made the move to Gatters in January and I honestly haven’t been as happy in BA as I have since I moved. None of this JSS rubbish, no three week long reserve periods and skippers are far better to fly with, with very few exceptions. Plus you’ll jump in seniority compared to Heathrow. To be fair I’m still desperate for Long Haul but Gatwick is, in my opinion, a far nicer place to wait it out.

Meester proach 28th July 2019 20:12

I’d agree that BA, easy and Ryanair are probably the most stable but having seen my mates low cost short haul roster in the orange one, it wouldn’t matter because I’d be dead or medical - less in under five years I reckon. That ain’t sustainable.

Jock Trapped 28th July 2019 21:29


Originally Posted by Busdriver01 (Post 10530827)


This is something I’ve never really understood. Don’t BA 320 folk do 6 on /1 off 6 on? So is it just that you don’t start as early or finish as late? I can’t imagine feeling any less tired with a 2 hour wait in pret every day? Any more than a 40 minute turn and I’m losing the will ... I just want to get home!

How common is 6 on / 1 off though?

VJW 28th July 2019 22:37


Originally Posted by Meester proach (Post 10530811)
I’d agree that BA, easy and Ryanair are probably the most stable but having seen my mates low cost short haul roster in the orange one, it wouldn’t matter because I’d be dead or medical - less in under five years I reckon. That ain’t sustainable.

No idea what you’re on about. 10 years in Ryr and one now in Ezy and easy is quite literally what it is.


Ollie Onion 28th July 2019 23:01

Don’t do it, BA is one of the best airline gig’s around. Every other airline getting mentioned here pale’s in comparison. Stick it out,

Tay Cough 29th July 2019 07:57


Originally Posted by Ollie Onion (Post 10530905)
Don’t do it, BA is one of the best airline gig’s around. Every other airline getting mentioned here pale’s in comparison. Stick it out,

Depends how you look at it. If you’re junior on SH in either seat, BA will work you harder for less money than the competition. If your goal is Longhaul, if you’re junior it’s not much better and VS is probably worth serious consideration. If you’re likely to see some seniority (which depends entirely on your demographic and the date you join), it may be worth it in the long run but no, it isn’t one of the best airline gigs around. Not by a long shot.

Riskybis 29th July 2019 08:16


Originally Posted by Ollie Onion (Post 10530905)
Don’t do it, BA is one of the best airline gig’s around. Every other airline getting mentioned here pale’s in comparison. Stick it out,

Haha !! Good joke !! I remember when I joined they said you are now the best pilots in the world, flying for the best airline !
Funny how the Nigel Doctrine works on some

frozenpilot 29th July 2019 09:18

Ridiculous to say that BA,EZY and Ryanair will be the sole survivors... Im a BA Pilot and a realist!!

BA are hugely vulnerable to a third runway... The company benefits from a Heathrow monopoly. Loose that and the significant profits that go with it and IAG will look very differently at the setup! That’s if they don’t start to look at us differently regardless.

Also, we at BA have managed to see the loss of NAPS, bidline, seeded blindlines... As well as a myriad of other items that are starting to bite!! We are just as vulnerable as anyone long term ( especially Ts & Cts)... And certainly NOT the best gig in town... If you have the drive and sanity to last out the perils of JSS, a ridiculous seniority system and working out of the joy that is Heathrow... And live within suitable commuting distance... Then it’s competitive in the UK... But that’s it!!

Meester proach 29th July 2019 09:47


Originally Posted by VJW (Post 10530893)


No idea what you’re on about. 10 years in Ryr and one now in Ezy and easy is quite literally what it is.


You must be superman/ women then, or have started when you were 18 ( which is the upper limit I guess )These four sector days terminating at 0030, only to return at 1500 the same day and repeat.

Slavery.



VJW 29th July 2019 09:52


Originally Posted by Meester proach (Post 10531134)
You must be superman/ women then, or have started when you were 18 ( which is the upper limit I guess )These four sector days terminating at 0030, only to return at 1500 the same day and repeat.

Slavery.

I’m pushing 40 with a 2 year old and a newborn coming. Started mid/late 20’s. Slavery isn’t the word for what I do. I turned down BA long haul last year who offered me a contract with half the salary easyjet’s contract had written on it. One of the two valued my experience properly and paid me accordingly. I don’t regret it for a single moment, and I wouldn’t even go to BA if they opened up DEC.

If I genuinely feel fatigued I’d call up and let them know. The fallout of this would be nothing negative towards me but in the year I’ve been here I’ve not had to use this facility.

If you’ve been looking at an EJ roster compared to your own BA LH one then yes we work more days than you. Go compare ours to a BA SH one and come back to me.

I think some people are a little too precious.

Vokes55 29th July 2019 10:09

To be fair, I'm not sure I'd consider £105k basic for a captain as being "paid accordingly", especially for the amount and type of work you do at easy. Every easy pilot I pass on the way to/from the car park looks like the walking dead - or certainly too tired for a polite "hello".

If lifestyle is what you're after, it sounds like neither easy or BA are the way to go.

FlyboyUK 29th July 2019 10:29

I definitely work a lot less hard and feel a lot less tired at EZY than I ever did at RYR. EZY do have some pretty early starts/late finishes which can be tiring. I'm at the big London base and average around 700 hours a year. At RYR it was 900hrs every year. I've worked for a couple pf other airlines over my career and three years in at EZY I'm very happy with the move.

VJW 29th July 2019 10:47


Originally Posted by Vokes55 (Post 10531152)
To be fair, I'm not sure I'd consider £105k basic for a captain as being "paid accordingly", especially for the amount and type of work you do at easy.

Funny how people look at things. BA offering a £59k basic to join and easy offered £104k. The roles are very different yes but my family don’t care which seat I sit on. I suggest you don’t look at the BA pay scales as well. The fact it takes 14 years on BA SH lgw to make the basic easy paid me the day I joined...... speaks volumes and it’s why threads like this crop up.

cessnaxpilot 29th July 2019 14:29


Originally Posted by Busdriver01 (Post 10531269)
I’ve heard of several people who left my outfit to join BA, did a few years, and then managed to walk back across the slightly burnt bridge, albeit on the lowest contract available at the time. For most who leave to BA its for the opportunity of long haul which is just never going to be a possibility here. For some it’s the thought that, in their early 20s, being in a loco forever more may not be the most exciting career (who’d have thought, maybe it really does benefit you to go and fly knackered old TPs With the auto throttle and only a basic Ap delivering mail for a few years?). I do have to question the logic of leaving a seniority based airline after only a few years (only 1 year in some cases) of SH flying with them before having tried LH, or gaining a bit of seniority but everyone’s situation is different.

As several people have already said, the fact this thread even exists is a worrying sign of the state of our industries Ts + Cs...

so I’m on the other side of the pond, but at 50 I have a bit of my own experience to impart. I was at a legacy here and I left to go to another legacy because I thought it would provide a better career path. Then 9-11 and then bankruptcy and the T&C were completely unsettling to me. I couldn’t imagine my career going this direction or staying with my airline under those conditions. I took a leave to fly a Citation X and then I went back to the legacy for a month before leaving to fly the “mail” as you say. I couldn’t imagine the legacy I was at would ever recover. So I left in 2007! Then the world economy collapsed in 2009 and I found myself at the bottom of the list at my new airline. Ha! The best laid plans.

I only offer this because sometimes the slow and steady is the way to go. Over an entire career T&C will change. What is hard to win is chasing bases, aircraft, upgrades, etc. I know the market in Europe is different than the US, but I am reading a lot of comments on time to upgrade and to get certain bases... it makes me pause. I know nothing about the state of BA, but I will say I never would have guessed my old legacy contract would bounce back like it did.

Sometimes the current schedule makes one think that they need to make some huge change as soon as possible. If they would have waited just a year or two it could look totally different. I’ve change aircraft and bases and at times it’s seemed like a totally different company and job. If SH is Bad, try LH. Tired of that? Go back to SH. It might take time to get the position you want, but options are great. Use caution with rash decisions based on how it looks today. Step back and have the long view.

I’m happy with my decision, and it’s been a great ride, but I would have been better served by staying put. Best of luck in your decision.

Ollie Onion 29th July 2019 21:37

I left a major legacy carrier during tough times, contract getting screwed down, seniority not moving anywhere and lots of time away from home, having said that I left due to personal issues and needing to move to the other side of the world due to a family situation. Joined a LCC and got a command in 9 months and was home every night whilst earning more than my spot at the legacy carrier.... good times ;-) Fast forward 10 years and I am still in the Left Seat with said LCC, all of my mates at the legacy carrier also now have commands or very senior FO spots in longhaul and have good control over their lifestyles, they are earning more than me and their conditions I.e pension etc are out of my league. Now the LCC has gone backwards in terms of contract, in this respect all airlines are the same constantly screwing down terms, the roster now comprises 4 and 5 day trips as this is ‘more efficient’ for the company, not a day goes by that I wish I could have stayed with the Legacy carrier, at least there you get some reward for your years of service, at the LCC I am likely to lose my bid in any given month to a 1 day Captain as it is totally random, no one is happy and I can tell you multiple 4 sector domestic days for 10 years is more fatiguing than anything I did at the Legacy carrier. As stated above, be very careful about traded short term angst against your long term prospects, what I would give now just to be able to bid to a long haul fleet for a few years, BA may be a bit hard at times but in terms of fleet choice, work choice and career opportunities you probably won’t beat it.

Googlebug 30th July 2019 05:48

It’s all about how your body can cope with Jet Lag and Red eyes combined.
If you find your a quick to recover and a natural night lark LH is great.
If your an Early Bird or struggle to get over jet lag LCC is for you.

At the end if the day money is very close. Yes at Legacy you’ll earn more eventually but the money you earn in the short term can be worth more with compounding, or debt paydown.


frozenpilot 30th July 2019 06:49

There is merit to waiting your time, but I fear Ollie maybe missing the changes that have occurred over the past ten years where his friends have gained a good lifestyle. For example, PP34.. an extra ten years to get to the top of the tree now, so many joining in their thirties will enjoy only a couple of years. This coupled with the loss of NAPS to an industry competitive pension further reduces the significant benefits of a long term BA career.

Other things that must be considered (especially short haul) is the ‘Heathrow factor!’ Slot delays, 25 minute taxi times, holding inbound, waiting for stands, Aircraft and terminal swapping, 2 hour waits between flights in Pret. When you add these together over a 12 month period these add up to 10’s days of lost time ( or effective earnings ). You can also factor reserve periods into this. Considerable loss of earnings and stability can occur during your three week period of reserve. If you get unlucky and sit at the bottom of a fleet you will be enjoying plenty of reserve, regardless of weekend points. Compounded since the loss of fixed flight pay which was in existence when Ollie’s mates joined. Also, long haul are working hard, loss of back to backs due EASA makes life more difficult. Busy long haul fleets can often see five or more trips with just two days off in between. Being junior on certain fleets can be brutal, with reserve, weekend work and lack of roster control.

If you hit a sweet spot during a recruitment bulge and go in as a DEP to a long haul fleet, with 1 or 200 coming in under you on seniority, you may end up with a fairly comfortable lifestyle. However, the desire of management is to reduce lay over lengths ( short haul already enjoy many 12-14 nightstops ), address the hotel budget ( not a good thing when we spend our lives in them ). Who knows what else is to come??

BA is certainly still a decent career in the UK, but it has changed beyond recognition and our new union has a huge battle on their hands. To get to a point where you can control your roster ( tanks to JSS) and enjoy the ‘big bucks’ (PP34) is far longer than previous! Regional based flying with front loaded earnings certainly competes now, hence the frustrations of the many at BA and this thread. You certainly accept less career stability (well at the moment), but you are potentially going to enjoy a far greater work life balance ( something we take for granted whilst we young and have our health). With that said, if you can make BA work, on PP34... You may just earn more on a payslip over thirty years.


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.