![]() |
Originally Posted by Cmon-PullUP
(Post 10178009)
Depends on the base you want. Most start out where the need is for the company, and then sign up on the transfer lists. However, there are still choices + Ezy is fairly easy commuting wise if you need that. LGW is not all that bad as some claim - I certainly enjoyed my years there.
I am now a LHS commuter on a 71% contract, or a 7/7 as it is called. In real life it often works out as a 5/9 or 6/8 roster. (yes often 9 days off ;) ) Would not even swap this for a direct entry CMD into a 744 if offered. I didn't realise 7/7 was on the UK contract. That's a good roster pattern to get and might have changed my decision to leave. |
Originally Posted by speed freek
(Post 10178729)
I didn't realise 7/7 was on the UK contract. That's a good roster pattern to get and might have changed my decision to leave.
I have heard rumours though, that UK is going to have new part time contracts in the near future, so a 7/7 might (??) be coming as well. |
Norwegian are a failing business, bums on seats does not translate to profit and Norwegian despite high load factors are massively unprofitable. The oil price is doing them no favours either at the moment and it will be very interesting to see what happens after next winter. Lufthansa are only trying to push the price up for IAG. Long Haul Low Cost doesn’t work, tried and tested. Norwegian are inviting offers now for one reason and one reason only, they know time is running out. |
Originally Posted by Cmon-PullUP
(Post 10178959)
I am not on a UK contract, but a eminent contract in Northern Europe. TBH, even if Ezy opened a base right on my door step, I would still continue to commute. Some of our contracts are really good for family life, and mine is one of these :ok:
I have heard rumours though, that UK is going to have new part time contracts in the near future, so a 7/7 might (??) be coming as well. Thanks for the info but to me nothing has changed. The northern UK bases are still dead man's shoes, London bases still overworked and no 7/7. I'll stick to my 4 trips a month with the blue team :ok: |
Rexbanner.....
Long Haul low cost doesn't work???? I beg to disagree Sir. If you take a look at the many airlines (some Legacy) around the world that now offer this, I think you may be surprised. JAL to be the latest I believe. ....as for the comments regarding Norwegian, don't believe all that you read. |
Originally Posted by AndyDRHuddleston
(Post 10179156)
Rexbanner.....
Long Haul low cost doesn't work???? I beg to disagree Sir. If you take a look at the many airlines (some Legacy) around the world that now offer this, I think you may be surprised. JAL to be the latest I believe. ....as for the comments regarding Norwegian, don't believe all that you read. |
Thanks for all of the info. Lots of great stuff. RE EZY. I would be looking at LGW or LTN. Could anyone provide a few typical early and late rotations that one could expect. And am I right in thinking around 18ths to 2 years currently for a cmd? Earlies are a combination of nice 2 sector days, mostly reporting at 5/6am and off duty about 1/2pm. Some long 4 sector earlies and some short 2 sectors about too. Lates tend to be less predictable and expect your roster to change somewhat each week during summer.Some are lucky, others are not. Deep nights finishing at 2/3am are common on lates, BALPA doing a lot of work trying to get rid of the max FDP duty days. LGW and LTN standby used frequently to cover the rest of the network so expect a few out of base trips, especially captains. Pay is pretty good for captains and if you join as an SFO it is £71k inc sector pay. No incremental pay rise but new pay deals every few years. Not a perfect place to work but look after yourself and home every night in a secure job, there are definitely worse gigs around. best of luck if you decide to join! |
Originally Posted by Tricia Takanawa
(Post 10176843)
Hi,
Im seriously contemplating leaving BA 747 to go to low cost short haul for a quick upgrade, but most people that I speak to look back in shock. So I'm looking for anyone that has done the same, to basically try and find out if they regretted it. And anybody else with any insight that might be helpful. Any help appreciated! TT Once Alex Cruz, Willie Walsh and Bjorn Kjos are through. British Airways could be just another low cost carrier. Good for the board, alright for the share holders, but lousy for the employees. Jumping ship my be ‘out of the frying pan, and into the fire’. youtube has the answer you maybe looking for. Look up the Hounslow sound of the late 1970s. Scissor Fits “I don’t want to work for British Airways”. It could be your new theme tune. |
One major thing with Easyjet: The finances are good. Even if the next volcano erupts on Iceland, if there is a another terror attack or something else happens to the industry, that would put most other airlines in the financial danger zone, Easyjet is still one of the most secure employers around. Operations can be at a complete standstill for 4 months before money starts to run dry.
For someone with a family to support, this counts for a lot as well. |
Originally Posted by Tricia Takanawa
(Post 10176843)
Hi,
Im seriously contemplating leaving BA 747 to go to low cost short haul for a quick upgrade, but most people that I speak to look back in shock. So I'm looking for anyone that has done the same, to basically try and find out if they regretted it. And anybody else with any insight that might be helpful. Any help appreciated! TT |
Originally Posted by Buter
(Post 10178163)
GK - Have you seen what’s actually possible under EASA? It’s only our industrial agreements (which are being constantly chipped away at) stopping long haul from becoming absolutely miserable. Brakes on at 0500 from JNB and report at 1800 for JFK? Sure, why not... No more 4 crew trips? No problem... Our flat earthers are subject to full EASA limits -30 minutes. I assure you they are not happy about it and those without much time invested in our precious seniority list have left/will leave/are considering their options. Cheers Buter Yes seen what's possible under EASA but most UK AOC I know worked hard and responsibly as did the Unions with scheduling agreements to filter out the few concerns they had. Not sure what you mean by flat earthers sorry. My question is how many times do you work to the limits of EASA. How many times have you operated JNB min rest JFK. How many colleagues commute in before they work these trips it can't all be one way traffic |
Hi GK Flat earthers = Shorthaul/narrowbody/domestic depending on your location. A320 multi sector day operations. I don't currently work to the limits of EASA, and I neither wish nor intend to. Ever. As stated, my shorthaul colleagues are subject to full EASA -30 minutes, sadly negotiated by our union during one of the seemingly endless cost cutting campaigns. I’m not exactly sure what it means, but I do know they’re not happy bunnies about it. We can’t operate the JNB/JFK sector I alluded to due to our contracts. It is possible under EASA, however. This shows exactly how much thought went into their FTL calculations. Back to back GRU or MIA totally unacceptable... except when the local times are 4 hours or less time change from London, then it’s fine. Yeah... makes sense. As as far as I know, nobody lives in the terminal (although I feel like I do at times), so everybody commutes in. I assume you mean by air? Do you include MAN/GLA/EDI/NCL crew in that lot? Jersey? Do you just mean crew that fly in from long distances like Australia or Texas (the crew residences of the last flight I operated)? The answer is, I don’t know. I’ve never worked with a long distance commuter who flew in on the day, then operated (with one exception). Commuting is a personal responsibility. I really don’t care, tbh. Show up to work in good enough shape to do the flight is all I expect. Occasionally life gets in the way of that for commuters and locals alike. My my response to you was just to highlight that my colleague’s comment about the EASA FTL scheme having a negative impact on our lives is valid. Cheers Buter |
Tricia, hi. Having looked at this and nearly left myself I decided to stay. My circumstances will be different but a quick command is a reality in BA. You’re 3 years in, maybe only 1 year of your freeze left. If you go to EZY it will probably be Gatwick and a longer time to command. Maybe talk to LC reference a Gatwick airbus command? It would be reasonable to say you could have a Gatwick command within two years and then be back at LHR a year later. I am LHS and the only thing that’s bad is rostering and the pay is not that special but the gap is closing. BA is not the best, it’s not the worst but it can offer change as your life changes. If you want SH command and are happy with that as a career (many are) then I think LCC are a much better option. |
When comparing pay between eJ and BA take in to account many eJ Captains go part time after a few years to address work/life and fatigue issues. I don’t know if that is such an issue at BA. |
Originally Posted by pitotheat
(Post 10181277)
When comparing pay between eJ and BA take in to account many eJ Captains go part time after a few years to address work/life and fatigue issues. I don’t know if that is such an issue at BA. There's the additional problem at BA of actually getting approval to go PT because doing so seemingly interferes with the business plan. |
Interesting wiggy I hadn’t realised fatigue and going part time were such issues in BA. Sad that lifestyle and sustainable rostering are under constant threat everywhere. Is this an issue on both SH and LH? |
Can’t speak directly for SH but from what I hear from credible sources it can be nasty. My very much a personal take on Longhaul - some of the immediate problem is that the 787 engine issues have loaded up rosters on the 777 and the 744....., fair enough, sometimes these things happen...but it’s not just hours flown this summer that is causing problems. There are problems with “interesting” trip constructions and probably above all the big big issue is the major loss of lifestyle control, especially days off, that has happened as the rostering system has morphed into something that is less and less under pilot control and more and more under company control. This has happened and we’ve not even moved to the new rostering system (JSS) yet, we are still officially working to Bidline Rules (stop laughing at the back). TBH and IMHO the only way to get some element of control back and some semblance of a normal life is one of the part time contracts, because at least on one of those you have some supposedly degree of control/predictability over guaranteed days off..full time outside of leave you now have not a lot...but I emphasise that is IMVHO.... |
Depends where you put the gap on your roster though, Wiggy (certainly as regards to SH). If it’s at the beginning of the month then, yes, you are right in line for an FA because that’s where the hotspots of uncovered work are. Leave the gap until later in the month and generally speaking you are safe. I’ve bid below cap and not got FA’d because I’ve had my gap later on whereas someone three hours above cap has got FA’d instead of me because theirs was at a weekend at the start of the month. End of July I’ve got a six day block of days off before my wrap days and leave start at the beginning of August, again untouched by FA. So you can still have control it just depends where you want to take some time off, although I will freely concede that by its very nature means it’s reduced control. By the way anyone feeling fatigued on SH right now should bid for reserve. Done virtually nothing so far and I’m entering the final week! (Aware I’ve probably just blown my cover of anonymity for anyone taking a quick glance at iBid!) |
If it’s at the beginning of the month then, yes, you are right in line for an FA because that’s where the hotspots of uncovered work are. Leave the gap until later in the month and generally speaking you are safe. |
What about not bidding with JSS. It must then look at everyone else first and build their roster. It then gets to you and can not compute. You bid for nothing so you can have what I have left which is limited so have some Tass. That’s my hope anyway. Rex our cover was blown long ago. |
I did it, left a relatively senior FO position at BA to work for a low cost carrier in another part of the world. There is no easy answer to your question, I left for family reasons and have never regretted doing this to spend more time at home (less night stops) etc. I do however really miss BA, you are looked after very very well there, if I had been able to stay at BA whilst making the family situation work out I would have done that. I got a very rapid command in my new airline and now check and train as well, in my opinion I wouldn’t swap airlines if your only motivating factor is time to command, being in the Left hand seat is good but in no way outweighs what you would be giving up. BA training, bidding and contract are still of a very high standard and your months and years of seniority are hard earned and can never be gained back. Think of the overall picture as well, my mates at Easy find little things annoying like no staff travel outside of Easyjet, inability to experience Longhaul etc. |
Bex88 , sadly, I’m not sure JSS works like that. I think it will try to get you to your credit range...CAP+/- x, and so will take trips off people above you to drag up your credit and lower theirs slightly. I fear a homogenous mess, unless the rules are tweaked to allow more variations. All this talk of bidding restrictions makes me think it will end up being an autorostering system sold to us on the basis of “fairness”. |
Originally Posted by hunterboy
(Post 10182621)
Bex88 , sadly, I’m not sure JSS works like that. I think it will try to get you to your credit range...CAP+/- x, and so will take trips off people above you to drag up your credit and lower theirs slightly. Whatever happens, however it is done, I don’t think the most junior bod can hope to nil bid and then sit at home on TASS. |
Very interesting topic, thanks to those contributing.
Just wondering how long a new joining long haul DEP could reasonably expect to wait to achieve part time? |
It depends on what kind of part time you go for. There are a few options. "Right to request" and "Aspirational". And then there are different options within those. Standing by to be corrected, but: - Aspirational (I want it): You bid for this annually and you "might" get it. Not sure how long this takes - Right to request (I need it): Normally within 9 to 12 months (depending on which fleet you're on and if they have enough pilots to cover the work) I've requested the RTR version recently for childcare and have been told to expect a result next year. edit: “Just to clarify for people wondering after NLP’s comments, Right to Request can now be for any reason/person, it is not the sole preserve of parents.” (Thanks Rex) |
Forgive me if I repeat some things that I may have said elsewhere, but I will give you my input on the subject matter for those that are interested. I am a TRE at easyJet and have worked there for nearly 15 years. It is, overall, a great place to be. You can argue contracts, countries to live in, perks, management failings etc, etc. If you take it as read that both BA and easyJet are fundamentally safe airlines with healthy balance sheets, then we can move on to the key points that separate them.
Arguments for BA - 1. Opportunities to fly different aircraft types. 2. Mix of long haul/short haul as you wish. 3. Seniority bringing great advantages as the years go by - once lost those advantages can never be recovered. 4. Pay increments every year. 5. Stable rostering, if you want it - easyJet has more roster instability, particularly at the big bases like Gatwick. 6. Great staff travel. 7. Generally well treated by management (although some BA pilots may argue differently!). Arguments for easyJet. 1. Preferential bidding - ie you ask for earlies/lates and generally speaking get what you ask for (unless you are a training captain!). 2. Fixed-pattern rostering - 5/3/5/4 so you know your off days years in advance. 3. Quick time to command. 4. Good starting salary for captains (£104750 plus allowances, 7% pension contribution, performance bonuses, sector pay, loyalty bonus (incremental pay in all but name). 5. Very few night stops. 6. Opportunity to live and work in numerous bases across Europe. Of all of these, there is really one stand-out difference that anyone comparing easyJet and BA should consider - night stops. At easyJet you get home most nights and at BA you do not. Arguably that is the biggest single factor in any decision to be in easyJet against BA. I personally love coming home every night to my family and therefore BA has always been a complete non-starter for me. I fully appreciate that is not everyone's position, but it is most definitely mine. If you join BA at, say, 25 years old, you will be there for 40 years. You could conceivably spend 20 of those years not sleeping in your own bed - that simply is not what I want. In the final analysis, I would say that is the key distinctive about whether or not to make the leap. It is a one-way move from BA to easyJet and only a handful of pilots have done it, which tells its own story. BA has so much to offer, but if you want to be home a lot then easyJet has got it. If that is not your main issue, my advice would be to sit back at BA and enjoy the numerous other great advantages of flying for one of the world's top airlines. |
Thats a great summary Count. Thanks for the input.
And thanks everyone else for the great debate. Nice to see that the thread didn't turn into the usual pprune arguments, insults and all over doom and gloom. Nice to see that there are still a lot of adults on the site. |
You know if you were telling me you want to go fly in South east asia/south america (just for example) for a new experience, then I would understand where you're coming from. But to leave one of the best airline in the world and your flag carrier and as a Brithish (I am guessing), to go fly the same short haul in the same part of the world with the same long days for an lcc...then I really can't understand. I would think veeery hard before jumping. |
Just to clarify for people wondering after NLP’s comments, Right to Request can now be for any reason/person, it is not the sole preserve of parents. |
For those of us clueless about life at BA, why is long haul so unbearable? What you are suggesting is tantamount to somebody leaving Delta Airlines for Spirit Airlines here in the states. Does not happen regardless of time to command. This being the case when most, if not all legacy carriers, are operating under essentially bankruptcy contracts. Pay is reasonable, work rules are non existent. It's hard to imagine that LH life at BA could be that bad...
|
Originally Posted by Reluctant Bus Driver
(Post 10183761)
For those of us clueless about life at BA, why is long haul so unbearable? What you are suggesting is tantamount to somebody leaving Delta Airlines for Spirit Airlines here in the states. Does not happen regardless of time to command. This being the case when most, if not all legacy carriers, are operating under essentially bankruptcy contracts. Pay is reasonable, work rules are non existent. It's hard to imagine that LH life at BA could be that bad...
|
So out of curiosity what does Easy pay vs. BA short haul? Don't the Easy guys work a hell of a lot more than BA? I good friend of mine from university is a captain for Swiss ( formerly SR ) and when he was on the 320 he said he worked his but off. Right to the limits of the regs. Now on the 340 and is pretty happy. Interesting how much all this varies depending on region and airline.
In the states the seniority list is somewhat upside down. At my airline guys are upgrading to captain in 3-4 years but need 5-6 years to get in the right seat of a 777. They look at short haul rosters and want no part of it. Personally I think its better to rule in hell than to serve in heaven, but to each his own! |
Originally Posted by recall_checked
(Post 10183768)
I don’t think it’s the case that BA is bad at all, but easyJet is a very well paid job as a captain, good and relatively quick career progression. The idea of “majors or bust” doesnt exist in the U.K., some people are desperate to fly the flag but others are very happy not doing so. In the US, my impression is that unless you fly for the majors you haven’t “made it” and won’t get the best pay/benefits, but that’s not true in the U.K. so other factors come into play like bases, rosters, career progression and part time. |
Interesting thread. But it's surprising to me that nobody has mentioned the difference in the day to day job when comparing RHS 747 with LHS on a medium LOCO jet. I mean, what is it about being an airline pilot that floats your boat, as it were? In my humble opinion, there is a fundamental difference between longhaul and shorthaul jobs.
I gave up a previous career because I didn't want to sit at a paperwork-strewn desk surrounded by grey filing cabinets, looking out a window at a view of brick walls and concrete. For me, being an airline pilot is about the Vr and Vref, the hand-flying, selecting of AP modes, judging descents, and beautiful (and ugly) views into 150+ sometimes challenging airports, over a variety of routes and with a multicultural mix of interesting personnel. Those being the parts of the actual day to day job I most enjoy, longhaul flying and even the boring two-sector days, with 4-5 hour legs that the likes of Thomson fly on the 737, simply does not hold much attraction. I have been with the same LOCO for the best part of 9 years, have lived at the base closest to my family for 7 years, fly a stable roster which allows me to plan childcare months in advance, and I'm in my own bed almost every night. The occasional out of base trip becomes a pleasure. I'm also training and checking, which brings an added dimension to my career. I'm happy with my remuneration, though benefits are non-existent and this is a company with a high turnover of staff for a reason. Interestingly, the leavers are split pretty evenly between short and longhaul airlines. Overall, however, it's clear in my mind that being RHS 747 with BA would not give me what I want from my flying career. Much as I would love to spend a day on a 747 flightdeck, I wouldn't trade jobs. Horses for courses. For some pilots, flying longhaul or joining a legacy carrier is the Holy Grail. ;) |
easyJet work harder than BA short haul? Don’t think so. I didn’t do over 30 hours a month during the winter. For July all 2 sector days totalling 65 hours for the month and I don’t have leave until August. Some nice short days just going to AMS and back, not all horrendous, yes we can have long days but so do pretty much everyone else. Spoke to a friend of mine who got his command 2 years ago based at LGW on the 320 with BA. He’s working a damn side harder than I am and on less. easyJet LGW is a different company to easyJet regional base. LGW is international rescue and the work and stresses will be greater but no more than anyone else. I do around 700-760 hours a year. Only twice in my 15 years at EZY have I gone over 800. Depends what you want, some say why would you want to leave BA, I’ve never had any interest in joining, I don’t live anywhere near to London, all my family and friends are where I’m based now and I don’t want to commute and live out of a suitcase, done that before. Its what you want out of life that more important, I don’t feel the need to go part time yet, I will once the mortgage is paid off in a few years and I don’t need the money as much. There is no flying utopia anymore, there is little difference between most of the big airlines, whether it’s easyJet or BA in the grand scheme of things. They exist to make money, they want to work you all as hard as possible and pay as little as they can get away with. |
Couldn't agree more.
I am not based in the UK, but in southern Europe, 15 mins away from where I was born and grew up and at the moment there is not a company that could offer me a better lifestyle than easyJet. In the last rolling 6 months I have flown exactly 268 hours, 616 in my last 12 months. I am at home every night, and have my days off set in stone for the next years (5 on 4 off). I get paid reasonably well, amazing part time options available, good benefits and get to fly with with great colleagues. We have long days, yes, and fatigue is an issue sometimes, but never was I called in the office or questioned when I have reported unfit or fatigued for a duty. There is no perfect job, but this one does it for me, right now. |
Originally Posted by Boeing 7E7
(Post 10183835)
That’s because the British flag carrier doesn’t pay nearly as well as the American legacy carriers. And so the difference between BA and low cost/ charter airlines is less significant. |
They exist to make money, they want to work you all as hard as possible and pay as little as they can get away with |
I believe you will not have to serve the full 5 year engagement freeze if you bid for LGW P1. They are desperate. If you have the hours, put it in your PRIAM bid!! |
BA will always ignore freezes of any sort (initial, type changes etc) if they are strapped for person power in certain seats..that’s why “Bid for what you want, don”t just bid for what you think you might get” has always been good advice,...coupled with “ never bid for something you really don’t want “ |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 13:13. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.