PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Terms and Endearment (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment-38/)
-   -   BA pilots vote to strike (https://www.pprune.org/terms-endearment/623798-ba-pilots-vote-strike.html)

Ollie Onion 29th Jul 2019 01:45

Whenever I have been involved in industrial action normally one of the first things the company has done it get the staff to notify if they are taking part in the said action. They do/did it under the guise of forward schedule planning and pay calculations etc but could certainly be used to withdraw perks like staff travel etc, don't expect them to play nice.

The Mixmaster 31st Jul 2019 11:13

https://www.balpa.org/Media-Centre/P...egal-challenge


BA have had their appeal dismissed. Kudos to BALPA for having their ducks in a row on this. Keep up the good fight!

Starbear 31st Jul 2019 12:24


Originally Posted by The Mixmaster (Post 10532911)
https://www.balpa.org/Media-Centre/P...egal-challenge


BA have had their appeal dismissed. Kudos to BALPA for having their ducks in a row on this. Keep up the good fight!

absolutely! It’s good to see that unions have finally cottoned onto using management style tools against them. I have been relentlessly frustrated watching management of many airlines using the legal system to thwart workers plans. I could never figure out why the unions weren’t alert to this in a similar fashion.

And they should engage decent PR people to get their message across. eg immediate rebuttal of management’s disappointment at pilots threatening passenger travel plans, stating we are disappointed at management’s position forcing the pilots to feel it necessary to consider such drastic action.

In fact getting that out ahead of corporate spin is the way to go.

Officer Kite 1st Aug 2019 13:57

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art....html#comments


This article is a nasty piece of work

fivecandles 1st Aug 2019 15:15

The Daily Mail is a nasty piece of work

Tay Cough 1st Aug 2019 16:44

The Daily Mail exists to sell the Daily Mail. Accurate reporting is a secondary consideration.

bex88 1st Aug 2019 17:14

I was told by a neighbour on our street that I should be ashamed of myself. He said it’s disgusting that I am earning 200k whilst others struggle........FFS........I don’t earn half that and thus far I have not done anything. I certainly don’t feel “safe and secure” when the company allows these articles to go unchallenged

Ranmore 1st Aug 2019 17:48


Originally Posted by bex88 (Post 10534186)
I was told by a neighbour on our street that I should be ashamed of myself. He said it’s disgusting that I am earning 200k whilst others struggle........FFS........I don’t earn half that and thus far I have not done anything. I certainly don’t feel “safe and secure” when the company allows these articles to go unchallenged

As one wise sage commented - “If only I worked as little as my neighbour does and also earned as much as my neighbour thinks I do”

To a large degree most people have a choice in life regarding their career path. I’m guessing your neighbour had that choice also.
I’m a commercial pilot for a well known UK airline - and I’ve been shocked quite frankly at BA management’s industrial behaviour.
In a word - amateur

May I suggest that those critics amongst you take time to consider the facts before commenting so ignorantly.
Had the Daily Angry and the like actually done so then what they would have reported would have been fact.

But hey - never ever let the truth get in the way of a “good” story. !

The very best of luck to our fellow UK pilots in BA

Enough is enough quite frankly



Trossie 1st Aug 2019 18:51


Originally Posted by UAV689 (Post 10526247)
i dont give 2 hoots what the public or press say.



-- then --


Originally Posted by Officer Kite (Post 10534023)
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art....html#comments


This article is a nasty piece of work

Not the time to get thin-skinned now!

Paul Lupp 1st Aug 2019 20:30

Would the pilots dare disrupt the nominal 100 year anniversary on August Bank Holiday weekend (England and Wales)?

wiggy 2nd Aug 2019 05:54

TBH Paul in the current climate I'm not sure many pilots hold the anniversary date dear to their hearts, and anyway some of the special company events, such as HM the Queens visit to company HQ, have already happened.

If the date of the (alleged ;) ) 100th anniversary falls within the nominated dates for Industrial Action (IA) and that IA takes place then personally I can't see it escaping the disruption.

beamer 2nd Aug 2019 07:57

Morning all

I have just been walking my dog with a neighbour who has return flights to Denver booked with BA in September. He has no connection with aviation whatsoever and is thoroughly bemused as to why BA pilots are not content with the three year deal that is on offer from their employers. As I have been out of the industry since retirement three years ago ( not BA ), could someone give me a simple one paragraph reason as to why this deal is unacceptable - I can then pass it on to my chum.

Thanks in anticipation - I take no sides in the issue whatsoever !

wiggy 2nd Aug 2019 08:42

beamer..

First question would be what does your friend think the three year deal is?

The sensible will recognise a need to take care in 100% candidly and honestly answering your quite reasonable follow up question..I have been looking around for a suitable BALPA sanctioned public statement/press release but so far have failed to find one.

Tight Accountant 2nd Aug 2019 09:50


Originally Posted by Maxfli (Post 10529166)
2018 £1,952m +10.3%
2017 £1,769m +20%
2016 £1,473m +16.5%

£5.19b in 3 years.
What % did SNR Cruz share with the Nigels?

I will have to look at the IAG Annual Report to see which numbers you are picking up. I don't know the history between BA and the pilots; apparently they took a salary cut or changed T&C's when things were lean? However, one thing I do find strange about BA employees' perception on how BA as a firm should behave it is the idea that it is workers cooperative, where the fruits of the labour and rewards are equally shared. I get the impression that this is a legacy from being a State owned airline which hasn't quite diminished.

Chris the Robot 2nd Aug 2019 10:44

From what I can see as an outsider the main problems with the deal are as follows:

(i) The pilots took a pay cut when BA was struggling but now that the airline is performing well financially the pay cut hasn't been repaid after being adjusted for inflation.
(ii) The proposed deal is supposedly in-line with inflation, however unspecified productivity demands labelled as "management changes" are being made of pilots which could affect the pilots' quality of life/fatigue. Productivity related pay increases should be discussed over and above the inflation part of a pay deal when things are going well and it should be specified exactly what these productivity changes are.
(iii) There doesn't seem to be any inflation lock on the proposed deal, at least where I work pay deals take the form of "RPI +x%" or "£x or RPI whichever is greater", so if inflation rose, pilots would still be out of pocket.
(iv) General dissatisfaction at large with the way the airline is being run, especially regarding rostering and accomodation.

It may be true that BA isn't a workers co-operative, however that's one of the main reasons why trade unions were formed, to strengthen the workers' position in negotiations with the forces of capital. The capital/labour relationship is a two-way one, without labour capital doesn't develop and without capital, there is no-one to employ the labour force.

MD80rookie 2nd Aug 2019 10:58

Fellow pilots with BA and elsewhere!

Avoid discussions in media. Avoid discussions with dog walking neighbors. I'm with SAS and we recently survived a wee long strike where representatives of the airline industry in Scandinavia desperately tried to hang us out in media with salaries etc.

Trust your union, your colleagues and yourself. Best of luck!

RetiredBA/BY 2nd Aug 2019 11:24


Originally Posted by Tight Accountant (Post 10534750)
I will have to look at the IAG Annual Report to see which numbers you are picking up. I don't know the history between BA and the pilots; apparently they took a salary cut or changed T&C's when things were lean? However, one thing I do find strange about BA employees' perception on how BA as a firm should behave it is the idea that it is workers cooperative, where the fruits of the labour and rewards are equally shared. I get the impression that this is a legacy from being a State owned airline which hasn't quite diminished.

I do not believe for one moment that BA staff consider the company as a worker’s co-operative but there is nothing wrong with wanting to share on the companies success when it is making seriously good profits, and especially after the management said it could not have been achieved without their efforts.

Quite some years ago I owned and ran a small aviation related company. My small team were paid for the work they did, regardless. However when we made good profits, we usually did, I shared that success with them in the form of a Christmas bonus. It worked, they had something tangible to show for their loyalty and good work, not just fine words.

Now, I wonder, just what the Directors in BA receive as THEIR profit related bonus ( directors ’bonuses are very tax efficient) and how that is related to company profits and why key staff should not, similarly, share in success.

Paul Lupp 2nd Aug 2019 12:42


Originally Posted by RetiredBA/BY (Post 10534824)

Now, I wonder, just what the Directors in BA receive as THEIR profit related bonus ( directors ’bonuses are very tax efficient) and how that is related to company profits and why key staff should not, similarly, share in success.

As I said previously, the rich are getting richer and the poor, poorer. Executive pay is out of control with wholly unjustifiable levels of pay rises for people who are simply doing their job well.
In the case of BA and no doubt, many other firms, the fact that they are run by people who are, to put it kindly, complete a**holes, doesn't help matters.....

The Mixmaster 2nd Aug 2019 13:25


Originally Posted by Tight Accountant (Post 10534750)
I will have to look at the IAG Annual Report to see which numbers you are picking up. I don't know the history between BA and the pilots; apparently they took a salary cut or changed T&C's when things were lean? However, one thing I do find strange about BA employees' perception on how BA as a firm should behave it is the idea that it is workers cooperative, where the fruits of the labour and rewards are equally shared. I get the impression that this is a legacy from being a State owned airline which hasn't quite diminished.


Perhaps you can explain why Jet2 offer their pilots a profit share or EasyJet offer theirs a share save scheme?

IAG Executive management were asked by analyst investors today who will win as the match between BALPA & BA management goes into a penalty shoot out. Alex Cruz didn’t have much to say. Keep up the good work BALPA. Your colleagues in other airlines and associations Europe wide are right behind you:ok:

beamer 2nd Aug 2019 15:49

Wiggy - my pal is under the impression that the deal on offer is 11.5% over three years. Whether there are conditions attached such as increased productivity or reduced 'benefits' in lieu, I have no idea as I have not been following the issue that closely. The BA pilots I know tell me that they want an increased share of BA profits to retain their position relative to other 'major' carriers.

As I said earlier, I have absolutely no axe to grind on this one but there must surely come a point when public perception about potential strike action becomes a very pertinent factor. Would I normally consider BA to travel - yes, would I think about booking with them until this issue is settled - no.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:21.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.