AFA your not alone

BA looking for 744 type rated pilots. They are fast tracking anyone with a 744 rating, one guy went from application to job offer in a week.

Capt. Sullenberger said this "the single most important piece of safety equipment is an experienced well trained pilot." And that "Experience & Skills of pilots only comes from investing and if airlines do not change and start valuing the pilot profession, it will result in future pilots being less experienced and less skilled, it logically follows that we will see negative consequences to the flying public and to our country"

That said it all for me. Full support to our Guys and Girls up front.

Capt Sully talks a lot of sense
Mr Branson on the other hand said he would pay Sully twice as much as his pilots if he came to virgin.
How to p!££ a workforce off in easy lesson.

Trainee Virgin train drivers are paid a basic of £45K a year.

See:

Trainee Train Driver - Pay And Conditions For UK Train Drivers

Virgin First officers, who have had to achieve 2000 hours minimum flying a jet are paid £47K a year.

Absurd.

I hope there is a strike these companys have been taking the p*** for the last few years...they have sown the seed now they are about to reap the whirlwind! This is the first of many!

SKI,

Nah pilots are too self centred.

Won,t see many strikes if any.

''Well, as a free agent, take your excellent skills to another employer. I've done this twice since leaving the RAF & on each occasion have become considerably better off. ''

Done it only once myself - from VS!

The workforce at VS have decided to say ''enough is enough''. The rot started post 9/11 with the dreadful way the workforce were treated and got far worse in the GFC. From being the best airline to work for, it became one of the worst with a callous hire and fire employment philosophy.

Good luck boys and gals, but I suspect a strike won't happen. The Virgin brand's only strength is it's image. Richard can't afford the bad publicity and the company will cave before it happens.

peanuts and monkeys ?
 

If you pay peanuts you get monkeys!

A most convincing ballot result. Virgin pilots, hold out for what you are worth !

I don't know much about the VS situation but I would like to respond to the comment about "Lilly livered" TUI pilots. Here at Thomson Airways, we were offered a strings attached RPI rise. This went to ballot and was rejected 2:1. The union sat down and talked with the management and the pay offer was accepted, minus strings.

This is how union, employer relations should work. It doesn't have to be confrontational. VS obviously don't have this luxury.

So, Lilly livered or grown up, mature and professional? You decide.

Hope VS agree to everyones satisfaction asap.

As Mr Seagull states, robust response from TOM membership, CC response to Company leaving little room for doubt, sensible reaction from Company with glimmer of hope for a better relationship on the back of at least one problem at TOM sorted for the time being.

Ergo: Roy Hudd speaking out of his hoop at least as far as TOM is concerned. (Ops normal?, The requested facts are yet to be provided?)


VS have apparently been pushed beyond that point but no doubt all concerned will be looking for a similarly hopeful outcome. Good luck to you all.

Let's get one thing straight. Management will attempt to get away with paying the least they can get away with, and grab the largest bonus for themselves.

If we assume that a captain earns £100,000 a year and flies 500 hours it works out at £200 per flying hour. Assuming an average of 300 passengers on a wide body that works out to 67p per passenger per hour.

When you consider that Ryanair charge at least £4 per passenger for the privilege of using a debt card it puts it into perspective.

The reality is that FD costs are a marginal cost to airlines with modern aircraft and productivity. A decent pilot saves his company more time and fuel than his salary, it's just not recognised because we don't shout about it. Next time you fly look at the fuel and time used against planned and highlight the difference in your voyage report.

What are the Virgin Pilots asking for ?
 

I can't find anywhere what the pilots are asking for and how this compares with other airlines. Is it available on the web ? Are BALPA supporting this or are the pilots acting on their own initiative ? My experience of Unons is that they never win anything in the medium or long term.

This is the first time we have ever voted to strike.
With no pay increase since 2008, a below inflation offer for 2011 and proposals for 2012 and 2013 that will be sub-inflation this is now a six-year attack on living standards which has not happened in any other airline.
I say enough is enough.

>this is now a six-year attack on living standards which has not happened in any other airline.

yes it has......bmi

Yep, try Ryanair.

British airline then....national flag carrier even .....not German or Irish

Yes Virgin Atlantic First Officers should be paid alot more. Virgin Atlantic isn't exactly a lifestyle choice is it? So what does it have going for it?

Virgin share ownership 51/49. British but only just.

Sorry for splitting hairs. I truely hope Virgin pilots take this all the way. A line needs to be drawn in the sand. bmi pilots, pre LH, had a similar mandate and squandered it.

Good luck.

There are hundreds of pilots out there who will do the VS pilots jobs for a lot less money. It is called supply and demand.

Beardy should hold firm and cancel his striking pilots staff travel for life. Branson should then follow BA's example of sacking union reps and suspending any VS pilots who send inflamatory texts or Faceb**k messages about non strikers. Any intimidation of pilots who disagree with the strike should be dealt with by the full force of the companies disciplinary procedures.

I am confident that VIRGIN's team of lawyers will find a way to injunct this strike and declare the ballot void.

It is about time that BALPA was busted. The union caused trouble at BA turning a blind eye to its members flying as cabin crew, and now wants to call a strike.

Hypocrisy, utter hypocrisy.

Flatfour suggests unions don't work in the short or long term. The Thomson CC have over many decades kept us at the forefront regarding terms and conditions. As a 25 year pilot who works 680 hrs per year my remuneration compares whith almost any pilot worldwide and I don't live in the tropics, sandpit or do longhaul.

Thomson success is down to the calibre of guys who serve on the CC and a staunch core of supporters. Bob Crowe achieves similar for RMT members through hard nose tactics.

Pilots can apear a strange bunch, isolated or ego driven. Simple really, we are articulate and motivated employees with huge leverage who occasionally need to grow dangly bits as the VS guys have done. The middle class squadron mentality can hold us back as can the diverse ethnicicity that now pervades airlines such as Ryanair. These can be overcome with communication and a realisation that the vaseline treatment doesn't have to be accepted as the norm.

Good luck guys.

In the history of uk industrial relations, strike action does not benefit the workers taking the action and certainly not the organisation suffering the strike action, whatever union or left wing activist may declare. What does influence the direction of the settlement is the threat of downing tools. Virgin Pilots, use this threat wisely, if you strike, then thousands of families will not fly with you again, ever. Your airline will shrink and possibly be taken over with your influence decimated. The recent BA action cost the airline a huge amount of financial penalties, and the staff were split. The passengers booked elsewhere. They still will. Virgin is a minow in world avaition.... be careful out there.

LNAV, you are correct that strike action adversely affects companies,
that is the reason companies needs to NEGOTIATE reasonably with pilots.:ugh:

Disappointing
 

How disappointing that high paid workers who have a fantastic career have lost sight of where they are heading and just obsessed by money. How disappointing that holiday makers will see their travel plans go up in smoke.

RN98, are you talking about the management or the pilots?

disappointing
 

I am talking about the pilots BigGeordie. Very disappointing :(

RN98
 

RN98, a simple question for you.

If your employer is doing well, turning a decent profit , awarding its directors large pay increases etc, is it reasonable for Joe employee to expect his salary to stay constant in real terms? If so, would you describe Joe (with the usual family, car, mortgage etc) as 'obsessed by money', as you just have VS's pilots?

Thanks in advance for your reply.

Mods, could I trouble you to consider whether Count N's posts are relevant to the title of this generally worthwhile thread, and if not remove them as a time-wasting distraction? He's free to start a new thread with his views.

Disappointing
 

Normal Joe employee does not already earn in excess of 65k a year though.

So anyone earning over 65k should never complain and should accept whatever their management decide. Just compliantly watch their lifestyle gradually eroded?

Are you a secret admirer of the Bolshevik party? It didn't get them far did it?:ugh:

Now,nurses try to tell us how much we may earn and when we might strike. That is one inflated mind, I reckon?!

RN98 - I am a pilot and my wife is a nurse, in the last ten years

• she has not been made redundant, TWICE, I have
• she has not worried about redundancy in every job she has, I have
• she has not stuggled to find a job and been forced to work in the middle east, I have
• She has a guaranteed pension, I will be lucky to have a fraction of her pension

you cannot compare oranges to apples nor nursing to piloting

One question Beardie might like to answer is why can he pay his train drivers an industry leading salary (currently £52500 for a 4 day 35hr week and no Sunday working if you elect not to work them) but not do the same for his flight and cabin crew?

I suggest that strong trade unionism on the railway may be part of the answer.

There are always a few idiots.
I was paid £25K a year to fly the rich and famous around Europe. Should we start complaining about how they made their money? Or should we stick to the disgusting state huge parts of the NHS is?

But then again the NHS stands for waste, political correctness and be un-touchable - unlike those of us who work in the private sector, you have it easy as far as pay and conditions goes.

This is however wildly off topic. Being no fan of the unions, I would hope that the V boys and girls stick to their guns.

RN98 is a troll. In fact she sounds the same as Flying Nurse who was on the cabincrew.com forum during the BA CC dispute. She funnily enough supported their cause, but showed a deep contempt of pilots.

At least it's good to know it's not just BA pilots you hate, but ALL pilots.

Ignore, ignore, ignore

There are many who talk on from ignorance rather than from knowledge,
and who find the former an inexhaustible fund of conversation.

In all the stuff on this thread, I have not heard from either the pilot supporters or the management supporters, a cogent argument about what is going on. If it is simply "they didn't increase our salaries for a couple of years, and now the increases are too small", then what is the management's response to this?
Clearly it can't be "we can't afford to pay you any more". With such a solid vote in favour of IA, I would hope the managers have something better to say than that.

Could we have a little more info and a little less slagging each other off?

AO,

I don't really wish to fully answer your question because I don't have the time right now.Maybe someone else here will.

Suffice to say that a union may ballot for Industrial Action for one issue only.In this case they made it pay because in 8 months the negotiations have gone nowhere.

Believe me, if all was sweetness and light at VS the turnout /votes for,would not have been nearly so great.

It is this level of discontent which has been brewing for some years which has finally spilled out.

The company carried out a staff survey last autumn and the flight ops management are reported to have achieved a 6% approval rating.

6%

I do not work for VS but have considerable sympathy for the pilots there. Count Niemantznarr - it is difficult to know where to begin to correct your numerous misunderstandings. Perhaps the first place to start is your concept of there being non-strikers to protect. Given the scale of BALPA membership and the almost 100% support given for strike action, I think you will find there will not be too many non-strikers to abuse. Secondly, your idea that BALPA needs brought down reveals a crazy attitude to employee rights - they have exhausted all avenues and are left with nowhere else to go. BALPA are the elected representatives of the pilots and have gone to great lengths to ensure the strike vote was carried out legally - sooner or later the pilots will go for it unless something comes in to change the situation. Finally, whatever credibility the company may have had over pay freezes was lost some time back before the last round of redundancies at VS when at the same time the CEO received a rise in basic salary from £500,000 to £700,000 and a gaggle of senior managers did similarly well.

Despite my support for the pilots' case, I also have a word of caution. It seems to me that few of the pilots realise just how precarious the financial position of Branson and VS is. You just need to go on the very old and tatty aircraft they have to see that there is little money around for refurbishment. They are now a very small player in a big market where BA/AA are starting to eat them alive. Their Upper Class is a long way short of BA's First Class and the once-innovative service they provided now looks all a little tired. It is abundantly clear that Singapore Airlines wants shot of them and no obvious buyer is in the wings. Despite the unspeakable folly of paying big managers big money while telling everyone else the cupboard is bare, I am not sure the money-in-must-exceed-money-out equation is in Virgin's favour at the moment. I really do wish the VS well, but twhe cupboard may indeed be more bare than the pilots think or believe.

NSF,

Just a couple of things.

Virgins financial position is and always has been a case of smoke and mirrors. SRBs attitude has always been to show how poor the company is whilst siphoning money out. It has always been in his interest to keep the company private. I am sure the pilots at VS have a good idea what they are dealing with.

With regard to Upper Class vs BA First Class. Upper Class was never meant to be the equivalent of First Class. It is basically business class with some nice seats/sleeper beds. If you want direct comparisons try premium economy where VS win hands down!

Rather than pushing for a pay rise that might precipitate the demise of VS, the airlines pilots should sit tight and survey the scene around them. Are they earning more than pilots in the lo-co's?

I agree with NSF, Virgin is in coffin corner financially. It is a point to point operator and increasingly isolated in a world of huge alliances. For instance, BA's "success" in the future will be to trap passengers into having to fly the OneWorld network, rather than service or price being a factor. There isn't going to be any "white knight" to save VS. SIA want to offload their share and Lufthansa the only other possible suitor, is trying to cut costs and is already lumbered with BMI. There isn't much value in the VS fleet either - all four engined planes. Ha ha Beardy - "Four engines for longhaul". Remember that?

So be prepared for another round of 'Glory Day' advertising, with busty blondes strutting through terminals on the arms of suave pilots, just before the plug is pulled.