Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

British Airways Direct Entry Pilot

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

British Airways Direct Entry Pilot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th May 2023 | 12:49
  #201 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 90
Likes: 66
From: Looking north out to sea
Quite why this is being discussed here, I’m not sure.

Anyway, an interesting perspective from Plastic787. Because the operating captain can’t make a pragmatic decision (ie his is the wrong one) he is petty, unmalleable (meaning you want to mould him) and can’t be trusted. So, you would get off, of course cancelling the flight you were rostered to do. Hmmm… Best you swap seats then as you appear to think you are the captain! In addition, I’m sure ops would be overjoyed by your rational decision process.

There may be many reasons why he may exercise his right to refuse a request. For example, as a long time trainer, I never took anyone on the flight deck that had no role to play in the training. This was purely for the benefit of the trainee to avoid any pressure or should things not go quite as planned. Despite a couple of complaints to Flt Ops, the answer was always the same; it is for the captain to decide.

Me
ItsonlyMeagain is offline  
Reply
Old 7th May 2023 | 14:12
  #202 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 233
Likes: 13
From: Somewhere
Two replies above spoken like individuals who would happily shaft a colleague for no good reason (this was not a training flight) other than to make a point to somebody when the Ops manual clearly allows it.

So you’re basically saying you’d poison your relationship with a colleague and potential future flightdeck partner over a perceived point of principle so you can play the big I am “I’m the captain what I say goes”? Wow. Just wow. I hope to never have to share a flight deck with you.

anyway best take this argument elsewhere as I’m obviously the king (or queen) of thread drift. ATB.

Last edited by Plastic787; 7th May 2023 at 15:06.
Plastic787 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th May 2023 | 16:38
  #203 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 146
Likes: 4
From: UK
Sage parting advice on successful command checks ‘“not all ***** are in the lhs”.

seek first to understand, before being understood.
bylgw is offline  
Reply
Old 7th May 2023 | 17:13
  #204 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 911
Likes: 31
From: At altitude surviving on bleed air.
Originally Posted by Plastic787
Two replies above spoken like individuals who would happily shaft a colleague for no good reason (this was not a training flight) other than to make a point to somebody when the Ops manual clearly allows it.

So you’re basically saying you’d poison your relationship with a colleague and potential future flightdeck partner over a perceived point of principle so you can play the big I am “I’m the captain what I say goes”? Wow. Just wow. I hope to never have to share a flight deck with you.

anyway best take this argument elsewhere as I’m obviously the king (or queen) of thread drift. ATB.
Someone has been blessed with an enormous chip on their shoulder. Hopefully your comments are influenced by keyboard warrior syndrome. Firstly, I would suggest a reread of your initial comment which is somewhat contradictory; you referred to how poor it was of the Captain to POTENTIALLY disrupt the company operation, then you go on to say that you WOULD disrupt the situation to prove your point. I'm sure all here appreciate the importance of teamwork and CRM, but your knowledge appears to have one gigantic gap in it; the buck does stop at the Captain. Sorry to break that news to you but it's a vital piece on knowledge that should not escape any crew member's attention. Frankly you're either a troll or an individual bordering lunacy. Please answer this one question honestly, so that we can grasp some reality out of your outbursts; Would you send an email to management stating how you'd offload yourself from a flight down route in the event that you did not agree with a Captain's decision? And regarding the thread drift, yes this is well off piste but hopefully educational for any potential newbies to the company. They will no doubt draw their own conclusions based on their experiences, training and common sense.
Confusious is offline  
Reply
Old 7th May 2023 | 17:33
  #205 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 336
Likes: 3
From: somewhere in the middle
Originally Posted by Confusious
Please answer this one question honestly, so that we can grasp some reality out of your outbursts; Would you send an email to management stating how you'd offload yourself from a flight down route in the event that you did not agree with a Captain's decision?.
And just to add for clarity, the captains decision you would offload yourself for is s/he not allowing someone on a leisure ticket on the flight deck jumpseat? That's the hill you're prepared to die on?
thetimesreader84 is offline  
Reply
Old 7th May 2023 | 21:24
  #206 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 218
Likes: 3
From: Brexland
Any Captain in any airline who would refuse to board a company colleague of any rank, for any reason, is a top class knobhead who shouldn't be in charge of the crew bus let alone a jet. End of.
Whitemonk Returns is offline  
Reply
Old 7th May 2023 | 22:22
  #207 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 911
Likes: 31
From: At altitude surviving on bleed air.
Originally Posted by Whitemonk Returns
Any Captain in any airline who would refuse to board a company colleague of any rank, for any reason, is a top class knobhead who shouldn't be in charge of the crew bus let alone a jet. End of.
And that contribution is no more than an unnecessary inarticulate digression, further drifting away from the thread. The issue being discussed is the willingness of a First Officer to risk highly probable disciplinary implications purely to make a stand against a Captain's decision.

Last edited by Confusious; 7th May 2023 at 23:22.
Confusious is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2023 | 00:41
  #208 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 218
Likes: 3
From: Brexland
Originally Posted by Confusious
And that contribution is no more than an unnecessary inarticulate digression, further drifting away from the thread. The issue being discussed is the willingness of a First Officer to risk highly probable disciplinary implications purely to make a stand against a Captain's decision.
But not incorrect.....
Whitemonk Returns is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2023 | 05:42
  #209 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 180
From: USA
Originally Posted by Confusious
And that contribution is no more than an unnecessary inarticulate digression, further drifting away from the thread. The issue being discussed is the willingness of a First Officer to risk highly probable disciplinary implications purely to make a stand against a Captain's decision.
The issue is a captain making a decision that is not supported by the company procedures, and the FO rightfully disagreeing. (was trying to find more articulate nonsense, but you would definitely beat me with the syllable count)
hans brinker is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2023 | 08:08
  #210 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 182
Likes: 29
From: where I lay my hat
As for the subject title; BA DEP, and prospective applicants looking in - these people are real, they do exist, in BA in numbers greater than any airlines I have encountered, (even round towards the Pacific). It's something to consider. I still shudder when I think back
midnight cruiser is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2023 | 08:56
  #211 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 70
Likes: 5
From: UK
Originally Posted by midnight cruiser
As for the subject title; BA DEP, and prospective applicants looking in - these people are real, they do exist, in BA in numbers greater than any airlines I have encountered, (even round towards the Pacific). It's something to consider. I still shudder when I think back
I have worked in the Pacific and at BA and that statement is utter rubbish the crews at BA are very relaxed and apart from a very very small minority would bend over backwards to help fellow crew (and other companies staff).
122.85 is offline  
Reply
Old 8th May 2023 | 09:10
  #212 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 182
Likes: 29
From: where I lay my hat
It's true to say they tend not to suffer fools out East, whereas at BA, they certainly exist!
midnight cruiser is offline  
Reply
Old 10th May 2023 | 12:25
  #213 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere
The last few posts on this thread are exactly why BA sounds like a terrible place to work. Superiority Complexes left, right and centre. Don't agree with the Captains decision = offloading yourself? Enjoy that meeting with the DFO.
marcus1290 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th May 2023 | 13:35
  #214 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 911
Likes: 31
From: At altitude surviving on bleed air.
Originally Posted by marcus1290
The last few posts on this thread are exactly why BA sounds like a terrible place to work. Superiority Complexes left, right and centre. Don't agree with the Captains decision = offloading yourself? Enjoy that meeting with the DFO.
Indeed, and who remembers when the pursers tried to argue the case that they should be second in charge and First Officers third?
Confusious is offline  
Reply
Old 10th May 2023 | 13:45
  #215 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2022
Posts: 49
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham
I’m glad to see it ! Makes me sleep easy at night after jumping from the sinking ship
RARA9 is offline  
Reply
Old 10th May 2023 | 21:49
  #216 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 353
Likes: 39
From: s england
Originally Posted by RARA9
I’m glad to see it ! Makes me sleep easy at night after jumping from the sinking ship
Thinking of green grass RARA9 how is Jet2 ?
sudden twang is offline  
Reply
Old 11th May 2023 | 04:29
  #217 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2022
Posts: 49
Likes: 1
From: Birmingham
Originally Posted by sudden twang
Thinking of green grass RARA9 how is Jet2 ?
I will speak honestly . It’s VERY well run , the pay is excellent, love being at a regional base and it’s so nice that most are so up beat about everything compared to constant moaning etc…

Bad things definitely a bit of an RAF old boy culture , but that apparently has got better for example the command process is more grown up .

If rumours are true about a few 330neos in the Airbus order, and if they bring in mixed fleet flying then I will be one happy bunny
RARA9 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th May 2023 | 06:14
  #218 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 20
Likes: 1
From: Cape Town
Hold Pool

Does anybody know the latest hold pool time after completing the sim check? I see 2 weeks in an earlier post, but is that still realistic considering the training backlog?
RPat01 is offline  
Reply
Old 11th May 2023 | 06:42
  #219 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2020
Posts: 140
Likes: 1
From: AUS
And here we go again…..soon to be another thread drift from J2 Pilots telling us how good it is Vs BA.

ToCatLady is offline  
Reply
Old 11th May 2023 | 08:54
  #220 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 171
Likes: 31
From: European riviera
Originally Posted by RPat01
Does anybody know the latest hold pool time after completing the sim check? I see 2 weeks in an earlier post, but is that still realistic considering the training backlog?
I was told about a training backlog and was in the pool for a couple of weeks at the most (earlier this year). I can’t really say anything beyond that.

Things can change very quickly at BA, so keep an open mind and don’t be surprised if they call you from a random mobile number.


Alrosa is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.