Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Jet2 Hold Pool

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th October 2023 | 11:20
  #521 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 451
Likes: 6
From: the land of chocolate
Thanks for the info, much appreciated!
Oasis is offline  
Reply
Old 30th October 2023 | 21:06
  #522 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: London
It took a few weeks after the assessment day to get offered a course for my first choice of base. FYI non type rated FOs are being offered 75% contracts if they don’t have any previous Boeing or Airbus experience.
byrdstrike is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2023 | 20:11
  #523 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by go-around flap 15
My input - as someone that lives just on the border of the 1:30 commute time allowable by the company but chooses to rent a bolthole nearby for consecutive days of flying. Some crew commute 1:30 each way every day. I don't believe this is feasible long term as the fatigue effects on the body are unsustainable in peak summer roster periods (in my opinion having attempted it previously!)

Peak summer: (late June/July/August/early September) I generally manage 60% of the nights in a month in my own bed by driving up to start the run of duties day 1, and driving home after landing the final day. [~15 days a month of flying not incl. standbys]

Spring/Autumn: 80% of nights in my own bed a month. [~8 days of flying per month not incl. standbys]

Winter: 95% of nights per month in my own bed [~3-5 days of flying per month not incl. standbys]

Hope that helps. A word of advice though is that the company has been keen to make sure that those that live on the cusp of/outside the commutable distance as per the contract have made arrangements to stay closer to the airport before a flying/standby duty. There have been instances this year of delays due to crew pushing the limits on the 60 mile / 90 minute rule.
It is not legally enforceable for a company to determine where an employee resides. Even in if it’s in the contract.
flyboy146 is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2023 | 20:23
  #524 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 887
Likes: 131
From: Location, Location
Originally Posted by flyboy146
It is not legally enforceable for a company to determine where an employee resides. Even in if it’s in the contract.
Maybe not, but it is perfectly legal to require a crew member to be no more than 90 minutes travel time to the airport for rest reasons. Ask the CAA.

So you can choose to live as far away as you want but you’d better not have travelled more than 90 mins to work if something goes wrong that day. That’s why the rule is there.

Last edited by Mr Good Cat; 31st October 2023 at 20:38.
Mr Good Cat is offline  
Reply
Old 31st October 2023 | 20:41
  #525 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: London
Originally Posted by Mr Good Cat
Maybe not, but it is perfectly legal to require a crew member to be no more than 90 minutes travel time to the airport for rest reasons. Ask the CAA.

So you can choose to live as far away as you want but you’d better have not have travelled more than 90 mins to work if something goes wrong that day. That’s why the rule is there.
No doubt it is a legal requirement to be well rested for your duty. That judgement is on the crew member only. The 90 minutes is moot and not enforceable.What is the 90 mins based on? One could easily get stuck in traffic on a 60 minute journey which could then take 91 minutes - so what? You call fatigued because it’s “not legal”? Of course not. The CAA would say its based on the judgement of the crew member as it has always been and that’s why it is on the crew member to judge fatigue levels in a non punitive fashion.
flyboy146 is offline  
Reply
Old 1st November 2023 | 01:59
  #526 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 332
Likes: 75
From: Oxford
Originally Posted by flyboy146
No doubt it is a legal requirement to be well rested for your duty. That judgement is on the crew member only. The 90 minutes is moot and not enforceable.What is the 90 mins based on? One could easily get stuck in traffic on a 60 minute journey which could then take 91 minutes - so what? You call fatigued because it’s “not legal”? Of course not. The CAA would say its based on the judgement of the crew member as it has always been and that’s why it is on the crew member to judge fatigue levels in a non punitive fashion.
That's why the "90 minutes" is defined in the employment contract
SpamCanDriver is offline  
Reply
Old 1st November 2023 | 06:42
  #527 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 991
Likes: 128
From: big green wheely bin
What you’re both missing is where is “work”? For jet2 it’s the crew room. So if you’re Manchester based and in staff south you can actually only live about 45 mins from the airport for the 90 mins to work.
The whole thing isn’t legally enforceable, but that doesn’t really matter if you want a peaceful existence.
Jonty is offline  
Reply
Old 1st November 2023 | 21:56
  #528 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 332
Likes: 75
From: Oxford
Originally Posted by Jonty
What you’re both missing is where is “work”? For jet2 it’s the crew room. So if you’re Manchester based and in staff south you can actually only live about 45 mins from the airport for the 90 mins to work.
The whole thing isn’t legally enforceable, but that doesn’t really matter if you want a peaceful existence.
I dont know what your contract says, but that is not what it says in mine. The 90 mins is based on normal traffic conditions and a maximum distance from the airport.

When you actually have to leave home to get to the crew room in order not to be late for your report, is a separate matter. Which obviously varies on report time, day of the week, road works, security queues etc etc etc

Not sure what you mean by "legally enforceable" but if your place of rest doesn't meet the contractual requirements (which you signed). Then you would be in breach of contract, which could lead to disciplinary actions.
SpamCanDriver is offline  
Reply
Old 1st November 2023 | 22:10
  #529 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 400
Likes: 17
From: Utopia
Not sure what the 90 minutes is all about? My contract says, live within 60 miles or 75 mins of base. That’s a duty of care for fatigue purposes. Standby callout is 2 hours.
737 Jockey is offline  
Reply
Old 1st November 2023 | 23:14
  #530 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 332
Likes: 75
From: Oxford
Originally Posted by 737 Jockey
Not sure what the 90 minutes is all about? My contract says, live within 60 miles or 75 mins of base. That’s a duty of care for fatigue purposes. Standby callout is 2 hours.
There are obviously some different/newer? contracts out there.
SpamCanDriver is offline  
Reply
Old 1st November 2023 | 23:57
  #531 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: UK
It's nothing to do with contracts, it's to comply with this FTL guidance material:

GM1 CS FTL.1.200 Home base

TRAVELLING TIME

Crew members should consider making arrangements for temporary accommodation closer to their home base if the travelling time from their residence to their home base usually exceeds 90 minutes.

(My underlining)

Of course different contracts may have more restrictive rules and mine certainly did when I joined - whether those are enforceable is debatable.

To paraphrase Mr Good Cat, live wherever you want but if you have an incident then it would be wise to have proof that you didn't drive in that day from your house that's 2 hours away. I've had a letter from Jet2 asking me to consider my accommodation arrangements, as the permanent address they held for me was 5 hours travel time from my base, so they must audit it occasionally. As ever, it's unlikely to be a problem until other factors make it a problem.

I honestly don't know where it's defined, but I've always been under the impression that the staff car park is the place that matters, not the crew room (as it's so variable by airline and base). Hence why standby callout is 2 hours to the car park. i.e. 30 minutes to get out of the house and your 90 minutes travel time.

Last edited by k737; 2nd November 2023 at 00:04. Reason: Formatting
k737 is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd November 2023 | 01:41
  #532 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 332
Likes: 75
From: Oxford
Originally Posted by k737
It's nothing to do with contracts, it's to comply with this FTL guidance material:

GM1 CS FTL.1.200 Home base

TRAVELLING TIME

Crew members should consider making arrangements for temporary accommodation closer to their home base if the travelling time from their residence to their home base usually exceeds 90 minutes.

(My underlining)

Of course different contracts may have more restrictive rules and mine certainly did when I joined - whether those are enforceable is debatable.

To paraphrase Mr Good Cat, live wherever you want but if you have an incident then it would be wise to have proof that you didn't drive in that day from your house that's 2 hours away. I've had a letter from Jet2 asking me to consider my accommodation arrangements, as the permanent address they held for me was 5 hours travel time from my base, so they must audit it occasionally. As ever, it's unlikely to be a problem until other factors make it a problem.

I honestly don't know where it's defined, but I've always been under the impression that the staff car park is the place that matters, not the crew room (as it's so variable by airline and base). Hence why standby callout is 2 hours to the car park. i.e. 30 minutes to get out of the house and your 90 minutes travel time.
I'm sorry but it is to do with contracts, it's stipulated in mine.
The reason it's stipulated in the employment contracts, is because of the fatigue management scheme, which is based on the guidance issued from EASA you quoted.

Anyway that's enough thread drift from me
SpamCanDriver is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2023 | 00:00
  #533 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 159
Likes: 109
From: England
EZY to J2

Has anyone here gone from EZY to J2 who can share their opinions for fellow colleagues weighing up options and life considerations for potential ship jumping, before they give up all hope entirely and just take up pig farming or become a local dog walking alcoholic.
PPRuNe user 103842 is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2023 | 16:58
  #534 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 299
Likes: 183
From: newbury
Originally Posted by dhc1180
Has anyone here gone from EZY to J2 who can share their opinions for fellow colleagues weighing up options and life considerations for potential ship jumping, before they give up all hope entirely and just take up pig farming or become a local dog walking alcoholic.
Id say go with pig farming over dog walking alco
Prob30Tempo TSRA is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd November 2023 | 17:27
  #535 (permalink)  
Gender Faculty Specialist
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 2,325
Likes: 432
From: In your head.
Goof handful of exEzy at my base. All are happy and looking forward to the 'Bus.
Chesty Morgan is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2023 | 09:10
  #536 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 368
Likes: 88
From: Neither here or there
Sorry if it's been mentioned already. What chance for the Airbus at STN in the next year?
CW247 is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2023 | 09:18
  #537 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 400
Likes: 17
From: Utopia
Originally Posted by CW247
Sorry if it's been mentioned already. What chance for the Airbus at STN in the next year?

Think it has been mentioned above. 2026 is the earliest date for the bus at STN unfortunately. EDI is set to receive 3 next year I believe. With the 4/5 hour sectors of our bread & butter Canaries/Turkey/Greek routes, the 321 will be a very welcome work environment going forward.
737 Jockey is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2023 | 09:21
  #538 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 108
Likes: 15
From: Not in UK
GLA is next for the bus after EDI I believe.
santacruz is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2023 | 12:52
  #539 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 451
Likes: 6
From: the land of chocolate
I have an assessment coming up for DEC.

Where could I go to find out about the simulator profile?
Anything special for the interview day itself, group exercises or quizzes to be done?
What are the chances of a BRS basing?

Thanks in advance..
Oasis is offline  
Reply
Old 4th November 2023 | 13:31
  #540 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 22
Likes: 5
From: UK
Just trying to gauge how long NTR FO have been swimming recently following successful assessment? Thanks for any info.
DCT_ELSIR is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.