Lo Co? will it fail?
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: varies..a lot
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lo Co? will it fail?
Hi all
I'll try and keep this short as there are so many contibuting factors to the mess that this industry is in, but here is one aspect I would like to discuss.
Of course the world economies and the current worlwide depression has ment that fewer people are travelling and these events have ultimately cost me and so many others their jobs in the industry. HOWEVER, let's set that aside for a minute.
The seemingly Low Cost model is in my opinion not sustainable! Yes for a time we all benefitted from cheap fares and trainees like me found work due to ever expanding airlines and routes! But at what cost? Crews pay for their own training ( in some cases cabin crew), salaries are in decline, T&C's are continuously being eroded and now pilots pay to fly in a desparate bid to get started! Of the average 28 or so different service personel involved in an aircraft turnaround, ALL have seen their working conditions fall apart in order for airlines to say they sell cheap seats. But do they?????
Yes there are still some great deals available, but as we can see, airlines have to claw back money everywhere in order to advertise a €4.99 return fare! But you may add at least €80 to that before you can print out your own boarding pass and I believe now our favourite airline is charging a fee for online bookings!! So what is to be done, as clearly this business model is failing. Am I missing something? This industry is a complete disaster and it has become a race to the bottom for ALL involved including passengers.
Enough is enough! I as a passenger, no longer want to see my flight advertised free one way, 99cent return and then be charged for a meriad of expenses attached to my ticket! I would be happy to pay a fair price for my journey, so that the industry can find SOME level ground again!
So the question is this, is it time for air fares to rise again and would the public accept it?? Would pax be relieved to finally see only ONE bottom line price to pay when booking a ticket, not outrageous but FAIR?? I think so!
Low Cost airlines need to become Sustainable Cost airlines.
I'll try and keep this short as there are so many contibuting factors to the mess that this industry is in, but here is one aspect I would like to discuss.
Of course the world economies and the current worlwide depression has ment that fewer people are travelling and these events have ultimately cost me and so many others their jobs in the industry. HOWEVER, let's set that aside for a minute.
The seemingly Low Cost model is in my opinion not sustainable! Yes for a time we all benefitted from cheap fares and trainees like me found work due to ever expanding airlines and routes! But at what cost? Crews pay for their own training ( in some cases cabin crew), salaries are in decline, T&C's are continuously being eroded and now pilots pay to fly in a desparate bid to get started! Of the average 28 or so different service personel involved in an aircraft turnaround, ALL have seen their working conditions fall apart in order for airlines to say they sell cheap seats. But do they?????
Yes there are still some great deals available, but as we can see, airlines have to claw back money everywhere in order to advertise a €4.99 return fare! But you may add at least €80 to that before you can print out your own boarding pass and I believe now our favourite airline is charging a fee for online bookings!! So what is to be done, as clearly this business model is failing. Am I missing something? This industry is a complete disaster and it has become a race to the bottom for ALL involved including passengers.
Enough is enough! I as a passenger, no longer want to see my flight advertised free one way, 99cent return and then be charged for a meriad of expenses attached to my ticket! I would be happy to pay a fair price for my journey, so that the industry can find SOME level ground again!
So the question is this, is it time for air fares to rise again and would the public accept it?? Would pax be relieved to finally see only ONE bottom line price to pay when booking a ticket, not outrageous but FAIR?? I think so!
Low Cost airlines need to become Sustainable Cost airlines.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: italy
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you'll find that Lo-Co is the only show in town. In recession consumers become price sensitive, airlines with the lowest costs will be able to offer fares from A to B and still make a margin.
There will be a contraction in overall traffic, but people will still fly. Airlines with high costs will not be able to compete.
There will be a contraction in overall traffic, but people will still fly. Airlines with high costs will not be able to compete.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Playing Golf!
Age: 46
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I still think low cost are doing far better than their full service counterparts.. are they not?
I do think that low cost is still the way forward.. like it or not - and the credit crunch is just meaning that only the fittest survive in these times of an overall traffic reduction.
I do think that low cost is still the way forward.. like it or not - and the credit crunch is just meaning that only the fittest survive in these times of an overall traffic reduction.
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: varies..a lot
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes.....but is there a happy medium?? Low cost is costing more and more...so are we starting to see a trend towards a Medium cost? Why else are all these extras being charged?
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Formerly resident of Knoteatingham
Posts: 957
Received 121 Likes
on
61 Posts
I flew with Air Asia SIN/KUL/SIN last week and it was interesting to note the number of business travellers on board. I think that a lot of business travellers are now shunning the legacy carriers and taking the cheapest option - certainly on short haul. That has to be good news for the lo co's.
Cabin was clean and tidy, cabin/ground staff were polite and efficient, both flights ran to within 5 minutes of schedule and our bags were waiting for us as we arrived at each baggage carousel. As a business model, I would say it's working very nicely.
Cabin was clean and tidy, cabin/ground staff were polite and efficient, both flights ran to within 5 minutes of schedule and our bags were waiting for us as we arrived at each baggage carousel. As a business model, I would say it's working very nicely.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Playing Golf!
Age: 46
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very simple really because it works!
People are drawn in my the very low fare.... that can be advertised.
Very low fares are available if you are willing to have NO FRILLS and book in advance.
For those who want to add on to their basic ticket price for things like checked luggage, meals etc then they can.....
Or you have the alternative where all of these options are factored into every ticket even though they may not be used making the ticket price higher.
As for airlines having people paying for their own training.... If you ran an airline and had people throwing themselves at you to reduce what is a very expensive overhead.. would you not accept?
People are drawn in my the very low fare.... that can be advertised.
Very low fares are available if you are willing to have NO FRILLS and book in advance.
For those who want to add on to their basic ticket price for things like checked luggage, meals etc then they can.....
Or you have the alternative where all of these options are factored into every ticket even though they may not be used making the ticket price higher.
As for airlines having people paying for their own training.... If you ran an airline and had people throwing themselves at you to reduce what is a very expensive overhead.. would you not accept?
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iom
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My personal thoughts are that carriers offering a 'shopping basket' approach may be the way forward. Very similair to Lo Co but perhaps a headline fare of £x.xx which includes x KG of baggage. Then pax could be free to add and take off whatever they like, that way any lack of baggage and additional charges is purely through their own doing 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Balpamyass Palace
Age: 53
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I use low cost airlines when they are cheaper, but it's not always the case: sometimes it is much cheaper to take Iberia, Air France, KLM, British Airways, etc rather than Ryanair, easyjet, Vueling, etc... and of course the service is MUCH better outside lowcostland.
Low cost airlines are now charging for luggages
, for paying in VISA , etc, etc...
I think Low cost airline can survive IF and only IF they sell tickets at lower price, otherwise the will go to hell
Anyway all the low cost are struggling more and more at the moment, and it will be even worse as soon as winter comes...
Low cost airlines are now charging for luggages
, for paying in VISA , etc, etc...I think Low cost airline can survive IF and only IF they sell tickets at lower price, otherwise the will go to hell
Anyway all the low cost are struggling more and more at the moment, and it will be even worse as soon as winter comes...
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: varies..a lot
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree that the luxury all inclusive fares are in this economy an unatractive option and where people can they will save money and reduce the frills, but I have just booked a flight and although the basic seat was less than €20 return the final cost including 1 checked in bag was €100 more! And I did not choose to select my seat! So is this low fares?? There are no frills here, just me and a bag!!! My point is that these are not low fares, they are REASONABLE fares, the advertised price is utter garbage as we ALL know by now and ALL those extras being charged are purely a means to supplement the unworkable advertised cost of the seat. Me and a bag is NOT a frill. Those are the basic necessities of travel abroad!
AGAIN, bearing in mind that so far, this model has only been able to work by screwing over ALL the airline proffessions, not just flight deck, and I see that we are getting shafted more and more in order to try and sustain the low cost illusion! So can it continue?? Or will changes HAVE to be made before the whole sorry mess implodes?
AGAIN, bearing in mind that so far, this model has only been able to work by screwing over ALL the airline proffessions, not just flight deck, and I see that we are getting shafted more and more in order to try and sustain the low cost illusion! So can it continue?? Or will changes HAVE to be made before the whole sorry mess implodes?
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In many ways the question needs to be asked ... is it time to Re - Regulate the Airline Industry ? The bottom line price , tax included , obvious and apparent to all should be the one distributed online , in advertising , and the one that the passenger should pay and be aware that he / she is paying. Black and white , no manipulation of the " facts ". When just as much manipulation goes on in the fare structure as in the overall cost model , people become confused , aren`t sure what they are paying versus the competition to fly a similiar route on a similiar aircraft for a similiar airline.( Eventually prices will reflect more " real time "costs.. ) With added regulation we could get rid of all the crooks in airline management who don`t add value. Too many are there to decieve and fool the ticket buying public by blatantly decietful advertising. Imagine if EVERYTHING was priced the way airlines priced their tickets ?? There would be riots in the street. There would still be enough scope left for real entreprenuers and cost conscious airlines to compete , and compete fairly.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: FL450
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I see loco's as nothing more than good marketing. They simply are not cheap. Somehow the headline seat cost is enough to sucker pax into the con.
I simply don't use them as they are never cheap nor convenient.
I always try to see what the deal is and they always fail. Besides I would much sooner pay more and not have to be treated like sh1t!
The sooner the industry returns to something sustainable for all the better.
This whole loco model has destroyed every aspect in this now. The likes of ryanair and easy can rot for all I care!
I simply don't use them as they are never cheap nor convenient.
I always try to see what the deal is and they always fail. Besides I would much sooner pay more and not have to be treated like sh1t!
The sooner the industry returns to something sustainable for all the better.
This whole loco model has destroyed every aspect in this now. The likes of ryanair and easy can rot for all I care!
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Paying your bills...
Be it low-cost carrier, high-cost carrier, legacy carrier or regional carrier, all of us have to pay the bills at the end of month. We basically operate similar equipment on competitive routes, try to optimize crew utility- and aircraft utility-rate, gamble on fuel hedging, "optimize" company overhead structures, have a pool of external consultants from the same institutions to tell us how to run the show, market our brands to the best extent possible in order to bring our customers on board of our aircraft and then safe, efficient and on time from A to B and hopefully from B to A later on.
All this has a price tag, and our customers finally have to pay it.
Our passengers will decide how much of low-cost, high-cost, legacy or you name it will continue to exist in the future. While the "low-costers" will add a little more "gadets" to attract former legacy or "high-coster" business, former will try to add some "no-frills" to their product to get those "low-costers" on board. Finally, we'll probably see just ONE ultimate, very best and universally survivable world carrier offering all kinds of standardized air travel...with higher ticket cost due lack of competition...brave new world this will be !
All this has a price tag, and our customers finally have to pay it.
Our passengers will decide how much of low-cost, high-cost, legacy or you name it will continue to exist in the future. While the "low-costers" will add a little more "gadets" to attract former legacy or "high-coster" business, former will try to add some "no-frills" to their product to get those "low-costers" on board. Finally, we'll probably see just ONE ultimate, very best and universally survivable world carrier offering all kinds of standardized air travel...with higher ticket cost due lack of competition...brave new world this will be !
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: varies..a lot
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh DEAR GOD Flare-Idle will it be Blue, White and Yellow, or have a large amount of Orange on it??? That's a scary thought.....however...I do think you are correct to some extent, low cost fares will have to rise and high priced tickets may well have to drop....and somewhere in the middle some happy middle ground will be had...with a few variables to draw passengers....here's a novel idea....wait for it.....like GOOD SERVICE AND HAPPY CREWS?? I do love the idea that you can still pay silly money on premium class if you still chose to do so and we need that variable.....but all I want is the low cost pretention to fade away to a mirky past!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: another place
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The legacy carriers could really put the squeeze on the low costers if they wanted to. By reducing the ticket price to nearer the low co's not so low current price they, could really put the likes of Ryan and Easy into financial meltdown. No one would travel "low cost" carriers if the price was right on BA etc.
Just a thought D and F
Just a thought D and F
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Summary Table of Results (IFRS) - in Euro
Half Year Results
Sept 30, 2007 Sept 30, 2008
Passengers 26.6m 31.6m
Revenue €1,554m E1,811m
The above Ryanairfigures tell you many things, including the fact that the passengers increased by 18% in 2008, and that average gross yield per passenger was 58.42 Euros in the year to 30 Sep 07, going down to 57.31 in the last year.
That would be all the revenue from all charges made by Ryanair, of which only one is the "fare". It follows that the average yield from each return flight is 116 Euros or so, or a little more than £100 at todays xrates.
I only mention it to illustrate the point that neither Ryanair nor any other budget airline is particuarly "low-cost", and that revenues were holding up quite nicely until last autumn at least. So I wouldn't panic too much, apart from realising that the increase in costs needs to be stopped or even reversed to preserve the airline's long-term health. Much of that might have been fuel, of course, I haven't looked.
Half Year Results
Sept 30, 2007 Sept 30, 2008
Passengers 26.6m 31.6m
Revenue €1,554m E1,811m
The above Ryanairfigures tell you many things, including the fact that the passengers increased by 18% in 2008, and that average gross yield per passenger was 58.42 Euros in the year to 30 Sep 07, going down to 57.31 in the last year.
That would be all the revenue from all charges made by Ryanair, of which only one is the "fare". It follows that the average yield from each return flight is 116 Euros or so, or a little more than £100 at todays xrates.
I only mention it to illustrate the point that neither Ryanair nor any other budget airline is particuarly "low-cost", and that revenues were holding up quite nicely until last autumn at least. So I wouldn't panic too much, apart from realising that the increase in costs needs to be stopped or even reversed to preserve the airline's long-term health. Much of that might have been fuel, of course, I haven't looked.
Last edited by Capot; 24th May 2009 at 16:04. Reason: Reformat!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: london
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Kelly Hopper ......so we can all rot for all you care
Glad you want us all out of a job and rotting...
Same to you where ever you are ... god help them..
Your a vile individual......
Glad you want us all out of a job and rotting...
Same to you where ever you are ... god help them..
Your a vile individual......
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The legacy carriers could really put the squeeze on the low costers if they wanted to.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i used to be an engineer and i don’t remember any of them saying others in different companies / race teams etc could 'rot', ever! what is it with pilots?? its not a religion to me. i just like flying and it pays the bills, i don’t care what other companies do or don’t do. good luck to them. get off your high horses and relax a bit.
Also - what is this rubbish ?!
if they wanted to????
ha! how would they do it? - by reducing the ticket cost, you say. and how would that be acheived, you utter genius?
later ladies..
Also - what is this rubbish ?!
The legacy carriers could really put the squeeze on the low costers if they wanted to. By reducing the ticket price to nearer the low co's not so low current price they, could really put the likes of Ryan and Easy into financial meltdown. No one would travel "low cost" carriers if the price was right on BA etc.
if they wanted to????
ha! how would they do it? - by reducing the ticket cost, you say. and how would that be acheived, you utter genius?later ladies..
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Qatar
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
don't check bag if you don't want pay.
the system "works", but there will be some "blood".
1-airline decreases their fees to kill other airlines, then when out of business, they increase their price back, until someone come and play the same system.
2-airlines become too big, and lose control of costs and his own structure collapses .(ex.:British Airways who will be soon dead, maybe?).
No airline will stay strong forever!an airline is just a ticking bomb!
tic tac tic tac....boum!!!
the system "works", but there will be some "blood".
1-airline decreases their fees to kill other airlines, then when out of business, they increase their price back, until someone come and play the same system.
2-airlines become too big, and lose control of costs and his own structure collapses .(ex.:British Airways who will be soon dead, maybe?).
No airline will stay strong forever!an airline is just a ticking bomb!
tic tac tic tac....boum!!!
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Scandiland
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The problem isn't the low cost carriers. It's the fact that they force other companies that don't have the same structure into doing things they can't afford.
The low cost carriers have basically very streamlined operations. As long as pilots stopped paying for their company training, I couldn't complain about it.
But as things are now, we are paying for jo-schmo's ticket. Ask a welder or a car mechanic how much it would cost him to get a job in the company next door. They'll probably look at you as if you were an idiot. But try getting a job with Ryan Air. It costs something like 200 euros just to send in the application. And then another xxxx euros to complete the training, pay for uniform etc.
I'm not going to start the usual rant. I paid for my TR so I've done wrong just like many others.
But the real problem is when high cost carriers try to emulate the low cost concept. Then it isn't just a nuicence to the employees, it becomes dangerous. Flight safety becomes the main area in which management who only sees costs and numbers, concentrate their efforts to save costs. At least it's like that in my company. We struggle to maintain a decent level of safety, but I'm affraid were loosing.
The only solution is that every pilot realises that this is only a job and not anything more. It's not a recreational interest or a hobby. It's something that pays bills. The companies know that we love to fly and that we would sell our parents to get the chance to handle a big jet. Don't let them have the satisfaction of offering a free ticket on your expense! My wish is for every pilot to know his/her value and not to sell out to a lower price. Many of our companies are a fundamental part of infrastructure and we are part of that infrastructure.
/LnS
The low cost carriers have basically very streamlined operations. As long as pilots stopped paying for their company training, I couldn't complain about it.
But as things are now, we are paying for jo-schmo's ticket. Ask a welder or a car mechanic how much it would cost him to get a job in the company next door. They'll probably look at you as if you were an idiot. But try getting a job with Ryan Air. It costs something like 200 euros just to send in the application. And then another xxxx euros to complete the training, pay for uniform etc.
I'm not going to start the usual rant. I paid for my TR so I've done wrong just like many others.
But the real problem is when high cost carriers try to emulate the low cost concept. Then it isn't just a nuicence to the employees, it becomes dangerous. Flight safety becomes the main area in which management who only sees costs and numbers, concentrate their efforts to save costs. At least it's like that in my company. We struggle to maintain a decent level of safety, but I'm affraid were loosing.
The only solution is that every pilot realises that this is only a job and not anything more. It's not a recreational interest or a hobby. It's something that pays bills. The companies know that we love to fly and that we would sell our parents to get the chance to handle a big jet. Don't let them have the satisfaction of offering a free ticket on your expense! My wish is for every pilot to know his/her value and not to sell out to a lower price. Many of our companies are a fundamental part of infrastructure and we are part of that infrastructure.
/LnS