Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Terms and Endearment
Reload this Page >

Revised Pay Offer to easyJet Pilots - April 2006

Wikiposts
Search
Terms and Endearment The forum the bean counters hoped would never happen. Your news on pay, rostering, allowances, extras and negotiations where you work - scheduled, charter or contract.

Revised Pay Offer to easyJet Pilots - April 2006

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Apr 2006, 23:33
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A25R
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have 18 yrs to retirement on peanuts as things stand. It ain't good enough. I'm tired of being patronised by management euphenisms about how this company is a career airline. Until they show serious intentions my vote is no.
autobrake3 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2006, 11:01
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct me if I am wrong, but in this new pay deal the loyalty bonus is combined with an escape route ?

Quote: "All captains will be paid a lump sum loyalty bonus on the second and subsequent anniversaries of joining the company in accordance with the table below, provided the company was in profit on the previous 30th september "

I don't like the last part, do you ?
So this has to be adressed.

For the F/O's loyalty bonus, it's the same !!
marshall737 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2006, 11:05
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

I quite agree. The idea was to set out to make easy a career airline in both terms of pay and lifestyle.

The pay side of things was generally thought by everyone ( including myself ) to mean a decent pension and an incremental pay scale.

Why are so many people seemingly giving up when neither of these two have been achieved??
All they have given back are things they took away from us a year or so ago...So back to stage one. No great achievement in my book.

The negotiations over roster etc are forthcoming but don't give up on this yet.
Vote NO!

Last edited by quattro1; 23rd Apr 2006 at 11:16.
quattro1 is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2006, 14:04
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: peoples republic of EU
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
although this deal represents an improvement on previous, i don't think the pension element is anywhere close to what should secure a yes vote. But unfortunately apathy seems to be setting in. Standing by to repent at leisure (as usual).
orangetree is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2006, 15:17
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The caveat on loyalty bonus is the same as currently exists and, I'm pretty sure, always has done.

The company had to be £1 in profit to pay out the whole bonus.

Can't remember when it wasn't paid!!
FlapsOne is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2006, 16:52
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has the BALPA CC formally recommended the deal to us? I don't see where they have.
easyprison is offline  
Old 23rd Apr 2006, 19:52
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a free vote with no recommendations.

Good idea I think considering that whatever any CC does there is always someone loading a gun in the background!
FlapsOne is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2006, 00:30
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 'An Airfield Somewhere in England'
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regarding the pay offer, it has indeed been officially recommended by BALPA. In the statement of 20th April called 'October 2005 Pay and Benefits Review Bulletin no. 15', there is a covering letter from the CC Chairman. In it he states, 'As, in terms of pay, the new offer is a good one we recommend its acceptance. Also we believe the time has now come to concentrate of the scheduling/lifestyle issues.'

It is apparent that the vote will be closer than I first thought - although I still think there will be a comfortable 'YES' vote. Quite a lot of people have come out on the BALPA website against it and among those contributing it is running about 50/50. Can I recommend to all BALPA members that they participate in the online poll that is being provided there. It is not the 'official' ballot but proved remarkably accurate as a predictor for the last vote. At the moment it is indicating 66% in favour but with only a few votes cast.
Norman Stanley Fletcher is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2006, 06:48
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by marshall737
Correct me if I am wrong, but in this new pay deal the loyalty bonus is combined with an escape route ?

Quote: "All captains will be paid a lump sum loyalty bonus on the second and subsequent anniversaries of joining the company in accordance with the table below, provided the company was in profit on the previous 30th september "

I don't like the last part, do you ?
So this has to be adressed.

For the F/O's loyalty bonus, it's the same !!
Don't worry too much about this, no company will pay bonuses to the masses if it isn't in profit. Besides, as Flapsone said, when hasn't easyJet been in profit by September of each year? - in profit comfortable, too.

If the company isn't in profit by year's end, be worried about more than just your bonus!

JB
Just Browsing is offline  
Old 24th Apr 2006, 17:23
  #30 (permalink)  
WTB
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rostering's PC
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oleo,

Plenty of guys have had to relocate to get their commands. I did it myself at a time when my youngest child was 12 months old entailing a 220 mile commute with really only one useful day off at home - but guess what, you could always turn down the course and stay in the rhs! Payrise with some pain or easier life with less money - your choice. The company will offer commands where they are required, they won't invent a vacancy just to suit you. I take your point about DECs though. I eventually returned to my base to find DECs there who 'couldn't accept any other base for personal reasons'. That's just the way it is at Easyjet. I've since left by the way - not particularly unhappy with Easyjet, just wanted to try something different.

10% is a minimum considering the cost of living in the UK - good luck to all.
WTB is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2006, 06:35
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: up up up
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How much per anum will an easyjet captain recieve when they retire?

Say 30 years in the company.
whatdoesthisbuttondo is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2006, 06:51
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Europe
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WTB, it's a shame you left, you could have had a great career in management.
Oleo is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2006, 09:44
  #33 (permalink)  
WTB
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rostering's PC
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oleo,

I wasn't trying to wind you up, just stating the facts as I saw them in easyjet. You can only work with what's on offer from the company and only the individual can decide if what's on offer suits them, that's all I was saying.
Good luck with the command, I hope it works out for you.
WTB is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2006, 12:18
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote WTB:

"You can only work with what's on offer from the company"

So lets change whats on offer!


By the way you would have no idee whats on offer now as management is diregarding all agreements and promises.
hotmail is offline  
Old 25th Apr 2006, 13:07
  #35 (permalink)  
WTB
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Rostering's PC
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hotmail,

My comments were only in relation to having to move base for a command.
WTB is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2006, 12:54
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so was my comment!

as long as the base transfer list is not transparant and being dog legged by management we have to try and change this system. By the way after just reading PT latest email regarding this issue I can from own experience confirm he's lying (again).

rgds
hotmail is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2006, 14:59
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North of London
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No easy jet Captain will last 30 years in the job. He will either be dead or working for another airline!!!
Colonel Klink is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2006, 23:03
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will vote yes! The offer is much better than any other in the industry. Never been a company man, but too much in life to be dismal about so tend to concentrate on the positives:

Quick time to command.
LHS, after 2 Years, package worth around £92,000 (500 sectors)
Million times more ethical management than FR!!!!!!!!

Reality Check; look at the other threads and see whats happening at other airlines. Personally I am glad to have a job, and with oil prices heading North feel BALPA have secured a great victory on our behalf. Move on and concentrate on improvements to Rostering; I for one would forego the payrise in exchange for 5454!
Capt Hook is offline  
Old 27th Apr 2006, 23:58
  #39 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 'An Airfield Somewhere in England'
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is apparent that the vote is very finely balanced at the moment. People who initially spoke of voting 'Yes' have now come out firmly against the deal. As you would imagine, there are strong feelings being expressed on all sides and I think a marginal No vote is now possible but unlikely. I received my ballot paper today and voted 'Yes' - albeit with some considerable reservations. My own view is that we are at the end of the road in terms of what can sensibly be achieved without a destructive strike that would ultimately be in nobody's interests. Were that to arise there would be a danger of losing our gains in order to fund the losses from the strike.

Many people are concerned about what could have been rather than what a significant victory BALPA have won. It is true that we really got nothing on the pension but we nonetheless gained 6% this year and 4% next year - a feat which I believe to be the best in the industry this year by some margin. Perhaps even more importantly, we have won this victory without having to disadvantage any other employee group to do so. In the past the FO's lost their loyalty bonus to pay for Captains' pay rises, but now they have won it back without having to give up anything in return. This may not be a perfect deal but right now it is still the best in town.
Norman Stanley Fletcher is offline  
Old 28th Apr 2006, 08:49
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North of London
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When you look at what has been achieved so far, then it really is better to vote "yes" but with obvious reservations. After 8 months of wrangling, it really is time to take the money and move on. While linking this deal to lifestyle issues would be sensible and appropriate, there can be no improvements in this area without more crew and this will take some time. Some feel,, myself included, that time is running out quickly for those in the Orange Empire as this lifestyle issue has been going on for 6 years and they are not going to get much more of a chance to fix it before it is too late. 350 pilots have left in less than 4 years: Get it sorted NOW!!!!!!
The deal is incredibly vanilla in terms of creating a career airline. The first deal, which was rejected due inconsistencies in the sector pay was actually better for us long term, providing the company had sorted out the massive anomilies in sector pay which could have been done easily and for comparitively little money. I was quite impressed and surprised with the structure of the last offer; it provided an excellent framework for the future and with minor tweaks could have been exceptional. I am a bit surprised they would stump up this rehash of the previous agreement without seriously trying to make the improved offer work. They just dont understand it though; this will cost them in the long term and they will end up paying more. But that has aways been the easyJet way: If they spent as much time trying to make money as they do trying to save money, they would actually make a lot more!!!!
Colonel Klink is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.