Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

ASDA Margin with a Flex Temp Airbus

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

ASDA Margin with a Flex Temp Airbus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th January 2023 | 16:57
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
ASDA Margin with a Flex Temp Airbus

Hi all,

Where can I find decent Airbus/EASA documentation about the difference between assumed/Flex ASDA and the reality of ASDA?

There was a percentage reduction in ASDA that was calculable before but I can't find it anywhere and people keep thinking high Flex temps = low stop margins. But the fact is that those ASDAs are based on the high air temps (ie ISA + 30-65) and not representative of the real situation.

Thanks,

BD
Boeingdriver999 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2023 | 01:52
  #2 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 800
Likes: 279
From: East of Westralia
I assume the Airbus method would still be trying to balance the field length using reduced thrust. By it’s very nature the stop margin would be reduced - intentionally.
ScepticalOptomist is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2023 | 02:38
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 96
Likes: 9
From: SS Enterprise
Originally Posted by Boeingdriver999
Hi all,

Where can I find decent Airbus/EASA documentation about the difference between assumed/Flex ASDA and the reality of ASDA?

There was a percentage reduction in ASDA that was calculable before but I can't find it anywhere and people keep thinking high Flex temps = low stop margins. But the fact is that those ASDAs are based on the high air temps (ie ISA + 30-65) and not representative of the real situation.

Thanks,

BD
There is a document you can find online called “take off safety training aid” which comes from Airbus. It’s not policy just supporting material. It describes the additional margin over and above what is display in your Flysmart result.
Qwark is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2023 | 11:21
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 1,846
Likes: 4
From: Bristol, England
Thank you Quark , I have found an Airbus document from 2001 that will be very useful. Accepting that this is 20 years old, and that even then they could calculate the delta, does anyone know if the current Airbus EFB software takes account of the lower-than-anticipated TAS on a Flex take-off to optimise TOM? Same question for the current batch of RTOWs.
Alex Whittingham is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2023 | 12:14
  #5 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 154
From: Having a margarita on the beach
Originally Posted by Alex Whittingham
Thank you Quark , I have found an Airbus document from 2001 that will be very useful. Accepting that this is 20 years old, and that even then they could calculate the delta, does anyone know if the current Airbus EFB software takes account of the lower-than-anticipated TAS on a Flex take-off to optimise TOM? Same question for the current batch of RTOWs.
All You can Flex ;-)
sonicbum is offline  
Reply
Old 15th January 2023 | 12:41
  #6 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 402
Likes: 240
From: Seattle
Exxccceeelllleentt!!!
BoeingDriver99 is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.