Wikiposts
Search
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

AIB NEO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Nov 2022, 20:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AIB NEO

I’m quite new on this variant.
do you have better explanation than fcom/fctm about rotation and flare mode?

and some good hints how Eng cooling is calculated?

thanks
michelda is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2022, 05:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Holding at DESDI
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What would you like to know? Tech background? Handling and feel? Failures or abnormal ops?

My experience is A320ceo vs A321neo, so quite a few variables here. Different FAC and FMGS standard. Different engines and obviously, different body angles.
J.L.Seagull is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2022, 04:48
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: italy
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for your reply,

technical back ground, abnormal procedures and information not available in aib manuals

thanks
michelda is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2022, 21:45
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 3,103
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Do you have the Worldwide Instructors Network (WIN) app? It has articles and videos on various topics. They aren’t just for the 320 so possibly not as specific as you’re looking for, but good information nevertheless. The Safety First articles are good as well, but with a different focus from the WIN articles.
AerocatS2A is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2022, 03:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by michelda
I’m quite new on this variant.
do you have better explanation than fcom/fctm about rotation and flare mode?

and some good hints how Eng cooling is calculated?

thanks
There's no aerodynamic feel in Airbus.There are now many varients of 320 & 321. So during rotation and flare they will respond to stick inputs a little differently. Through a software Airbus has tried to keep their responses same to stick inputs.
vilas is online now  
Old 4th Nov 2022, 08:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vilas
There's no aerodynamic feel in Airbus.There are now many varients of 320 & 321. So during rotation and flare they will respond to stick inputs a little differently. Through a software Airbus has tried to keep their responses same to stick inputs.
I'm not really a fan of the changes airbus made to the air/ground transition in normal law when they introduced the NEO. If my understanding is right, they modelled it after the widebodies. The problem is that after flying the NEO for a week, going back to the CEO, I make NEO control inputs. It wasn't broken, so I'm not sure why they "fixed" it.
Check Airman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.