737NGs have cracked 'pickle forks' after finding several in the jets.
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: England
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Watch the winglets bounce around the next time you fly, then watch wings without them....cyclical loading with the extra mass at the end of the moment arm.
Source: leeham
https://leehamnews.com/2019/10/08/bo...pickle-part-2/
Source: leeham
https://leehamnews.com/2019/10/08/bo...pickle-part-2/
I can see that, right up to the point that surely the airframe is designed to cope with this? and adding mass to the wing will lower it's resonant frequency?
I don't subscribe to this, I would suggest it' way more likely that a change in manufacturing has caused this.
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: French Alps
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Hungary
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
https://investors.boeing.com/investo...s/default.aspx
Doesnt look good if the only horse they have is the 787
Doesnt look good if the only horse they have is the 787
I recall watching a documentary about Boeing whistleblowers who worked in QA reporting issues with sub-standard outsourced 737NG components a while back.
I wonder if those chickens have come home to roost....
Oh Boeing, how the mighty have fallen.
I wonder if those chickens have come home to roost....
Oh Boeing, how the mighty have fallen.
I believe that would be the Ducommun scandal I referred to earlier? One other thing. I read somewhere that pickle forks are made from AA7075-T3 - does anyone know this to be true? Most 7xxx alloys are not used in tension, which seems to be the role of a pickle fork, and certainly not in a naturally aged temper (i.e. age hardened at room temperature) as such tempers are unstable in 7xxx alloys. I would have thought a 2xxx damage tolerant alloy more appropriate for pickle forks.
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: leftcoast
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe that would be the Ducommun scandal I referred to earlier? One other thing. I read somewhere that pickle forks are made from AA7075-T3 - does anyone know this to be true? Most 7xxx alloys are not used in tension, which seems to be the role of a pickle fork, and certainly not in a naturally aged temper (i.e. age hardened at room temperature) as such tempers are unstable in 7xxx alloys. I would have thought a 2xxx damage tolerant alloy more appropriate for pickle forks.
But the above being said- This SLF non structural engineer suggests that the landing loads and skipped production techniques re hole prep ( drill, coldwork, ream, interference fit being the baseline ) when skipped ( saves time ) and/or improperly checked tooling size ( coldwork mandrel ) is the most likely issue. ( see Fatigue technology ) disclaimer I have NO ties to Fatigue technology- almost opposite for ancient reasons not pertinent here
Add the file to fit- pound to suit- and here we are.
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Grebe : and/or improperly checked tooling size ( coldwork mandrel ) is the most likely issue. ( see Fatigue technology )
If the cracks are originating at the fastener holes I do agree with your statement.
Cold Working of holes is very important to relieve stresses as well as proper fastener hole size and proper installation of Hi-Loks.
Hi-Loks are usually installed interference or close tolerance fit.
https://www.aerofastener.com/products/hi-lok-pins
Shot Peening and Flap Peening are also important post assembly maintenance processes on various structural members and parts that also relieves stresses.
Note: I posted this info for folks who have never cold worked holes or installed Hi-Loks.
If the cracks are originating at the fastener holes I do agree with your statement.
Cold Working of holes is very important to relieve stresses as well as proper fastener hole size and proper installation of Hi-Loks.
Hi-Loks are usually installed interference or close tolerance fit.
https://www.aerofastener.com/products/hi-lok-pins
Shot Peening and Flap Peening are also important post assembly maintenance processes on various structural members and parts that also relieves stresses.
Note: I posted this info for folks who have never cold worked holes or installed Hi-Loks.
Last edited by B727223Fan; 12th Oct 2019 at 15:32. Reason: more info.
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: leftcoast
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Grebe : and/or improperly checked tooling size ( coldwork mandrel ) is the most likely issue. ( see Fatigue technology )
If the cracks are originating at the fastener holes I do agree with your statement.
Cold Working of holes is very important to relieve stresses as well as proper fastener hole size and proper installation of Hi-Loks.
Hi-Loks are usually installed interference or close tolerance fit.
https://www.aerofastener.com/products/hi-lok-pins
Shot Peening and Flap Peening are also important post assembly maintenance processes on various structural members and parts that also relieves stresses.
Note: I posted this info for folks who have never cold worked holes or installed Hi-Loks.
If the cracks are originating at the fastener holes I do agree with your statement.
Cold Working of holes is very important to relieve stresses as well as proper fastener hole size and proper installation of Hi-Loks.
Hi-Loks are usually installed interference or close tolerance fit.
https://www.aerofastener.com/products/hi-lok-pins
Shot Peening and Flap Peening are also important post assembly maintenance processes on various structural members and parts that also relieves stresses.
Note: I posted this info for folks who have never cold worked holes or installed Hi-Loks.
As to cracks and holes - somewhere in this thread are some photos which show exactly that- and early on I had postulated just that kind of problem.
MY guess then and now - is probalby a production change tg ensure coldworking of that area, and a repair of non cracked holes via coldwork and first oversize- awkward to be sure- but cheaper in long run
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=B727223Fan;
Note: I posted this info for folks who have never cold worked holes or installed Hi-Loks.[/QUOTE]
That would be me then - which prompted a google and found a good explanation at ENG-TIPS
Thanks for the lead
DaveD
Note: I posted this info for folks who have never cold worked holes or installed Hi-Loks.[/QUOTE]
That would be me then - which prompted a google and found a good explanation at ENG-TIPS
Thanks for the lead
DaveD
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: leftcoast
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PICS OF ACTUAL CRACKS
The Boeing MOM referenced in the AD is available to the public in the public rule making docket, which can be viewed at:
https://www.regulations.gov/document...2019-0711-0002
https://www.regulations.gov/document...2019-0711-0002
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: leftcoast
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Psychophysiological entity
Mention on PPRuNe about them being milled from the solid. They talked of waste but I assume the dross was collected. Whether it can be recast or used for something else I don't know.
A mill can make short work of a lot of metal, but it's possible that high speed milling might not be normalizable - or whatever has to happen to it.
A mill can make short work of a lot of metal, but it's possible that high speed milling might not be normalizable - or whatever has to happen to it.
OK, as an engineer, I am struggling to understand how winglets would make any difference to the loading on this fork?
My thinking is this, the plane's body mass has to be supported by the wings, makes no odds if the wings are bigger/smaller or more/less efficient, they still have to hold up the same mass.
My thinking is this, the plane's body mass has to be supported by the wings, makes no odds if the wings are bigger/smaller or more/less efficient, they still have to hold up the same mass.
Bending moment is the product of force by distance.
An aircraft supported at the wingtips would exert a much higher bending moment at the wing roots than one supported beneath the engines, close to the fuselage.
The winglets alter the distribution of the wing outwards by making the wing tips more efficient, thus increasing the bending moment at the fuselage.
Regardless of the stiffness of the structure, increasing the lift at the wingtips moves the effective location of the total lift in the wing outwards, increasing the bending moment at the fuselage.
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: shiny side up
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can see that, right up to the point that surely the airframe is designed to cope with this? and adding mass to the wing will lower it's resonant frequency?
I find it interesting that only pax ac have found cracks so far...
The issue was found by Boeing Shanghai on the new C2F line July 2019).....What about all of the previous C2F conversions done by others..., why was nothing found there?
Are freighters (and C2F) not included in the group the FAA wants tested?
Moderator
I'm thinking about it differently, and, purely speculating, as 737's are outside the scope of my work. As the cracks appear at the last aft fastener holes of a four fastener cluster, I'm not thinking that there is a lot of motion or load between those four fasteners, they're going to act as a unit, even if the spar is bending a little in that area. The presence of a crack indicates a load exceeding the local capacity right there, it's not the whole cluster, just that one last line of two fasteners. So what load separates the area of structure of that cluster of four fasteners (and those above) from those below? Not so much wing bending, but yaw torsion between the wing and the fuselage. The force which would have to be resisted if lots of rudder were being applied. I've always wondered about the applicability of Va in the yaw axis, and this defect continues my wonder about that. As those pickle fork fittings would appear to be the sole structure which resist a wing to fuselage yaw load transfer, perhaps they're just not quite up to it. The presence of winglets could aggravate a yaw reaction a little (winglets would not reduce yaw reaction anyway!).
But, of course, that's all speculation on my part. I'm just thinking about aging aircraft and primary structure cracks, as I'm dealing with them on other aircraft these days. Obviously a load in direction or magnitude, or both, is exceeding what the engineers accounted for, and as we consider repairs, we must consider what load is being carried, which was originally inadequately considered.
But, of course, that's all speculation on my part. I'm just thinking about aging aircraft and primary structure cracks, as I'm dealing with them on other aircraft these days. Obviously a load in direction or magnitude, or both, is exceeding what the engineers accounted for, and as we consider repairs, we must consider what load is being carried, which was originally inadequately considered.
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: leftcoast
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm thinking about it differently, and, purely speculating, as 737's are outside the scope of my work. As the cracks appear at the last aft fastener holes of a four fastener cluster, I'm not thinking that there is a lot of motion or load between those four fasteners, they're going to act as a unit, even if the spar is bending a little in that area. The presence of a crack indicates a load exceeding the local capacity right there, it's not the whole cluster, just that one last line of two fasteners. So what load separates the area of structure of that cluster of four fasteners (and those above) from those below? Not so much wing bending, but yaw torsion between the wing and the fuselage. The force which would have to be resisted if lots of rudder were being applied. I've always wondered about the applicability of Va in the yaw axis, and this defect continues my wonder about that. As those pickle fork fittings would appear to be the sole structure which resist a wing to fuselage yaw load transfer, perhaps they're just not quite up to it. The presence of winglets could aggravate a yaw reaction a little (winglets would not reduce yaw reaction anyway!).
But, of course, that's all speculation on my part. I'm just thinking about aging aircraft and primary structure cracks, as I'm dealing with them on other aircraft these days. Obviously a load in direction or magnitude, or both, is exceeding what the engineers accounted for, and as we consider repairs, we must consider what load is being carried, which was originally inadequately considered.
But, of course, that's all speculation on my part. I'm just thinking about aging aircraft and primary structure cracks, as I'm dealing with them on other aircraft these days. Obviously a load in direction or magnitude, or both, is exceeding what the engineers accounted for, and as we consider repairs, we must consider what load is being carried, which was originally inadequately considered.
BE interesting to find the flight time vs cycles for the carriers that have found the highest incidence of cracks or other high-over stressed indications.