What is the legal amount of fuel to takeoff?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Test
Age: 35
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is the legal amount of fuel to takeoff?
Hi,
Anyone can point me to the right place where I can find information on the legal amount of fuel to takeoff from the point of dispatch?
I'm thinking of a scenario where ground delay leading up to holding point caused my contingency fuel and taxi fuel to be wiped out. I'm left with Trip fuel, Alternate fuel and Final Reserve (30mins) fuel, is it still legal to takeoff?
Thanks!
Anyone can point me to the right place where I can find information on the legal amount of fuel to takeoff from the point of dispatch?
I'm thinking of a scenario where ground delay leading up to holding point caused my contingency fuel and taxi fuel to be wiped out. I'm left with Trip fuel, Alternate fuel and Final Reserve (30mins) fuel, is it still legal to takeoff?
Thanks!
Depends what you company allows but you can always plan a different destination with your planned destination as alternate and do a technical diversion in flight as long as you have the proscribed WX minimum. Was used a lot because of the limited range in the 80s.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: England
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi,
Anyone can point me to the right place where I can find information on the legal amount of fuel to takeoff from the point of dispatch?
I'm thinking of a scenario where ground delay leading up to holding point caused my contingency fuel and taxi fuel to be wiped out. I'm left with Trip fuel, Alternate fuel and Final Reserve (30mins) fuel, is it still legal to takeoff?
Thanks!
Anyone can point me to the right place where I can find information on the legal amount of fuel to takeoff from the point of dispatch?
I'm thinking of a scenario where ground delay leading up to holding point caused my contingency fuel and taxi fuel to be wiped out. I'm left with Trip fuel, Alternate fuel and Final Reserve (30mins) fuel, is it still legal to takeoff?
Thanks!
Are you really going to return to stand to ask for a top-up of about 1000 kg?
I agree that legally you can go, however I would also suggest that it is sometimes prudent to go back for a top up even if not legally required. Sometimes legal minimum is not much fuel, particularly if you were not required to carry alternate fuel. I was in a situation a while back where the airport became unexpectedly fogged in and they weren’t issuing take-off clearances until some work vehicles had been removed so that LVOs could be put in place. Capt and I agreed on a minimum fuel we were happy with which happened to be more than min required due to short sector length and no alternate requirement. 20 minutes later we told ATC we were going back for a top up.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Test
Age: 35
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I searched and found this in ICAO Annex 6
"4.3.6.5 A flight shall not commence unless the usable fuel on board meets the requirements in 4.3.6.3 a), b), c), d), e) and f) if required and shall not continue from the point of in-flight re-planning unless the usable fuel on board meets the requirements in 4.3.6.3 b), c), d), e) and f) if required."
where a: Taxi Fuel, b: Trip Fuel, c: Contingency Fuel, d: Destination Alt Fuel, e: Final Reserve Fuel
"4.3.6.5 A flight shall not commence unless the usable fuel on board meets the requirements in 4.3.6.3 a), b), c), d), e) and f) if required and shall not continue from the point of in-flight re-planning unless the usable fuel on board meets the requirements in 4.3.6.3 b), c), d), e) and f) if required."
where a: Taxi Fuel, b: Trip Fuel, c: Contingency Fuel, d: Destination Alt Fuel, e: Final Reserve Fuel
I searched and found this in ICAO Annex 6
"4.3.6.5 A flight shall not commence unless the usable fuel on board meets the requirements in 4.3.6.3 a), b), c), d), e) and f) if required and shall not continue from the point of in-flight re-planning unless the usable fuel on board meets the requirements in 4.3.6.3 b), c), d), e) and f) if required."
where a: Taxi Fuel, b: Trip Fuel, c: Contingency Fuel, d: Destination Alt Fuel, e: Final Reserve Fuel
"4.3.6.5 A flight shall not commence unless the usable fuel on board meets the requirements in 4.3.6.3 a), b), c), d), e) and f) if required and shall not continue from the point of in-flight re-planning unless the usable fuel on board meets the requirements in 4.3.6.3 b), c), d), e) and f) if required."
where a: Taxi Fuel, b: Trip Fuel, c: Contingency Fuel, d: Destination Alt Fuel, e: Final Reserve Fuel
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Now define the commencement of flight for file planning purposes. Any such definition had been removed from our manuals. Therefore in my case I believe for fuel planning purposes flight starts the moment the first drop of fuel is consumed. So is it legal to take off? I think it is. The important question though is it sensible to do so? Given the right circumstances I might, but that is not the question the OP asked.
PM
PM
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi,
Anyone can point me to the right place where I can find information on the legal amount of fuel to takeoff from the point of dispatch?
I'm thinking of a scenario where ground delay leading up to holding point caused my contingency fuel and taxi fuel to be wiped out. I'm left with Trip fuel, Alternate fuel and Final Reserve (30mins) fuel, is it still legal to takeoff?
Thanks!
Anyone can point me to the right place where I can find information on the legal amount of fuel to takeoff from the point of dispatch?
I'm thinking of a scenario where ground delay leading up to holding point caused my contingency fuel and taxi fuel to be wiped out. I'm left with Trip fuel, Alternate fuel and Final Reserve (30mins) fuel, is it still legal to takeoff?
Thanks!
*I was recently planned with 1st alternate being the closest one and a NOTAM stating that due to limiting parking space available the diversion could not be assured, on top of that NPA only... destination single runway with NPA only, weather ok but gambling in aviation is generally not working well, so I took fuel for the next alternate, nice big airport with an ILS and plenty of parking (uh uh !).
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Therefore in my case I believe for fuel planning purposes flight starts the moment the first drop of fuel is consumed.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Test
Age: 35
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Extricate
you are right. According to ICAO Flight Planning document:
you are right. According to ICAO Flight Planning document:
Fundamentally, contingency fuel is the fuel required to compensate for factors that could not be foreseen during flight planning. Such factors include, but are not necessarily limited to deviations from flight plan that could influence the total fuel consumed en-route to the destination such as:
deviations of an individual aeroplane from the expected fuel consumption data;
unforeseen meteorological conditions;
unexpected taxi times before take-off;
unplanned or unanticipated routings and/or cruising levels.
deviations of an individual aeroplane from the expected fuel consumption data;
unforeseen meteorological conditions;
unexpected taxi times before take-off;
unplanned or unanticipated routings and/or cruising levels.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If that is so then why is taxi fuel separately calculated and provided for
Soon we will learn exactly when a flight commences for fuel planning. Will it be APU start, push, first engine start, taxi start, taxi end, take-off power set, start of take off roll, wheels up... Will Paddy Power be running a book on this one?
PM
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From ICAO Doc 9976
Occasionally, unpredicted prolonged taxi times may consume the planned taxi fuel and burn into the contingency fuel leaving the flight crew with fewer options, once airborne, to compensate for any other unforeseen factor(s). The PIC, in making the decision to continue a flight, must consider this
and all other operational factors that may affect his or her ability to safely complete the planned operation and protect final reserve fuel.
In the case of unforeseen taxi delays, for example, it may be possible to take-off having burned into the contingency fuel in order to avoid a very long delay. Conversely, a return to the gate for more fuel may be prudent if continuing the flight means having to make a fuel stop prior to reaching the intended commercial destination.
and all other operational factors that may affect his or her ability to safely complete the planned operation and protect final reserve fuel.
In the case of unforeseen taxi delays, for example, it may be possible to take-off having burned into the contingency fuel in order to avoid a very long delay. Conversely, a return to the gate for more fuel may be prudent if continuing the flight means having to make a fuel stop prior to reaching the intended commercial destination.
Exactly - an unexpectedly long taxi time (or any other unexpected delay between engine start and reaching the runway hold line) is a contingency, for which the contingency fuel is available and intended.
It does mean that if there are additional contingencies once on the air (everything goes fruit-shaped: unforecast headwinds, 100nm diversions around weather buildups), that the contingency margin will be less, so keep it in mind as the flight progresses.
It does mean that if there are additional contingencies once on the air (everything goes fruit-shaped: unforecast headwinds, 100nm diversions around weather buildups), that the contingency margin will be less, so keep it in mind as the flight progresses.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Test
Age: 35
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks all for the replies. Looks like there's only regulation governing fuel requirements for a flight and NOT fuel requirements before takeoff. Essentially, you could run down taxi and contingency fuel or even dip into alternate fuel (worst case but unwise) prior to takeoff.
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Age: 48
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's the same thing as out there in the club: if you have to ask yourself if she's legal, you better not take her to your room
Your fuel build up is based on your CFP and company policy. Your route knowledge and awareness of any differences between what is on the CFP and what you are likely to actually fly all add into the mix as to whether you would get airborne after a lengthy taxi delay. As would the length of flight.... A 16hr flight provides both the opportunity for fuel gains above CFP figures due airborne efficiency opportunities as well as a tech stop to top up the gas should you not gain any fuel along the way. A 1hr flight with potential destination ATC delays and/or potential weather related delays would potentially drive a decision to return to bay for more fuel.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Test
Age: 35
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks all for the replies. Looks like there's only regulation governing fuel requirements for a flight and NOT fuel requirements before takeoff. Essentially, you could run down taxi and contingency fuel or even dip into alternate fuel (worst case but unwise) prior to takeoff.