Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

737 VAPP?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd April 2017 | 11:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: UK
737 VAPP?

Afternoon,

Have just seen THIS video of a 737 on final approach...

At 5:29 the speed briefly tops out at 183KIAS and the flap load relief activates. Are there any technical inspections required after such an event?
TotalBeginner is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd April 2017 | 13:10
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,698
Likes: 1,305
From: Australia
For all the frantic control wheel waggling by the pilot the artificial horizon didn't seem to move. Microsoft flight simulator view, maybe?
Centaurus is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd April 2017 | 15:36
  #3 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 265
Likes: 164
From: Sunnydale
Seems to be happening more and more on 737 drivers. And his/her thumb isn't on the trim switches. Just seems like radical over controlling to me.
back to Boeing is offline  
Reply
Old 2nd April 2017 | 18:16
  #4 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 164
Likes: 9
From: FL390
The flap limit is 175 for Flap 30, the kind of speed a lot of the approach seemed to be flown at, rather than a speed between Vref and the bugged Vfly, and yes tech log entry required for busting the flap limit speed.
737aviator is online now  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2017 | 01:33
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 658
Likes: 1
From: Ankh Morpork, DW
His power was parked at 68% during the overspeed. Seems self-induced.
ImbracableCrunk is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2017 | 02:31
  #6 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 922
Likes: 2
From: australia
Surprised no one's commented on the "50" call coming way before threshold crossing, seems low assuming a standard 3.0 degree path and 1000 ft aiming point were the references.
galdian is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2017 | 02:54
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 46
From: Between a rock and a hard place
Really odd.. hovering at the flap limit speed for much of the approach, with a couple of flap overspeed.
172_driver is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2017 | 03:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Someone else's acft
Not to mention moving the autobrake switch during the landing roll...

Need more braking? Take over and brake yourself.

Geeeez, that was weird.
B737SFP is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2017 | 07:28
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: UK
Looking at the airspeed bug on the PFD they already appear to have applied a wind additive (VREF 141, MCP SPD 155). Why would you add another 15 to that and fly the majority of the approach at 30, sometimes 40 KIAS above Vref?
TotalBeginner is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2017 | 10:39
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Boeing is pretty clear on this, at least in our manuals. Vapp should be set up to but not exceeding Vref+20, dependant on conditions. For a flap 30 approach this may well bring you within 10 knots of the flap limit speed during fluctuations, but you shouldn't be living there.
BleedingAir is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2017 | 15:31
  #11 (permalink)  
100 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 956
Likes: 68
From: away from home
And the wind all of 22 gusting 33 kts. What would this guy be doing in 50 kts?
Looks like frantic overcontolling.
oceancrosser is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2017 | 16:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: In Space
He busted the limit speed twice. Whats also interesting is that the Flap relief didn't work the second time? I bet the fleet manager is wondering whats going on there.
B737900er is offline  
Reply
Old 3rd April 2017 | 18:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Down the Taxiway...
In my company... A Flap Load Relief any where below 1000FT AGL Baro is an stabilized criterion "." I have had it and I have done a GA...
bucks_raj is offline  
Reply
Old 4th April 2017 | 18:19
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: FL410
Seeing this video frightens me to see what other airline operators can be like.

For one I do not think the approach should've been continued considering the guy is flying completely out of his comfort zone, flying WELL ABOVE Vref+20, the maximum stipulated by Boeing throughout the flight.
The high N1% certainly is partly to blame, let alone his yoke handling being way excessive...

Glad to see the aircraft is not a major low cost operator employing many (lower) experienced captains in the EU industry...
Skyjob is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2017 | 03:25
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 4
From: Hiding..... in one hemisphere or another
That was less than ordinary technique
Atlas Shrugged is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2017 | 11:07
  #16 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 3,435
Likes: 1,202
From: 41S174E
That video is nothing short of disturbing.
framer is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2017 | 11:38
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: EU
Completely insane to continue an approach like this..
Bobermo is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2017 | 11:46
  #18 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 4,578
Likes: 412
From: FNQ ... It's Permanent!
All I can suggest is stay out of other people's flightdecks. How would you like someone criticising your approach.
We don't have the full picture as to what is going on!
For example, the previous landing aircraft may have reported a large undershoot shear!
Who knows. I'm just uncomfortable with the finger pointing without knowing the facts and actually being there.
Capt Fathom is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2017 | 12:01
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: In Space
I agree Capt Fathom to a degree. Can you justify flying a non stable approach in an non emergency situation to a judge?

Last edited by B737900er; 8th April 2017 at 12:38.
B737900er is offline  
Reply
Old 5th April 2017 | 18:11
  #20 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 265
Likes: 164
From: Sunnydale
To be fair the person who's ego felt the need to make the video available online invited us in to the flight deck to be judged and or criticised. If he didn't want criticism of his flight he should have kept the video private.
back to Boeing is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.