A330 RA1+2
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A330 RA1+2
Hello boys and girls,
Apologies if this has already been discussed before but I couldn't find some definitive answers. Being (much) more used to the A320 for the above mentioned failure, I am a bit confused if the landing distance procedure of direct law is applicable or not on the A330. As far as I understand it is not, as the airplane goes to Flare law, and not direct law. If someone can shed some light that's appreciated.
Cheers and thanks.
Apologies if this has already been discussed before but I couldn't find some definitive answers. Being (much) more used to the A320 for the above mentioned failure, I am a bit confused if the landing distance procedure of direct law is applicable or not on the A330. As far as I understand it is not, as the airplane goes to Flare law, and not direct law. If someone can shed some light that's appreciated.
Cheers and thanks.
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dzherzhinsky Square
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello,
This is taken directly from the FCTM for our A319/20 aircraft for dual RAD ALT failure so as you see it actually goes to flare law for the A320 also. Hope tnat helps.
"On approach, flare law becomes active when the L/G is selected down and provided AP is disconnected. At this point, "USE MAN PITCH TRIM" is displayed on the PFD."
This is taken directly from the FCTM for our A319/20 aircraft for dual RAD ALT failure so as you see it actually goes to flare law for the A320 also. Hope tnat helps.
"On approach, flare law becomes active when the L/G is selected down and provided AP is disconnected. At this point, "USE MAN PITCH TRIM" is displayed on the PFD."
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sonicbum
You are correct, Flare Mode is the usual law for landing so no CONF 3 restriction, no increase in LDR.
flying headbutt ... A320 goes to Direct Law not Flare Law with this failure, so CONF 3 and L DIST PROC required.
You are correct, Flare Mode is the usual law for landing so no CONF 3 restriction, no increase in LDR.
flying headbutt ... A320 goes to Direct Law not Flare Law with this failure, so CONF 3 and L DIST PROC required.
Last edited by TyroPicard; 29th Aug 2014 at 10:32.
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dzherzhinsky Square
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.....well I thought the A320 went to direct law too but what I posted was a cut and paste from an Airbus A320 Flight Crew Training Manual - Abnormal Operations/Navigation/Dual Radio Altimeter Failure.
For info, the A330/340 FCTM that I just referenced defines flare law as follows. FLARE LAW: The control law is a smoother direct law. (FCTM Operational philosophy, Flight Controls)
The A319/320 FCTM in the same section reads - FLARE LAW: The control law is a pitch demand law.
For info, the A330/340 FCTM that I just referenced defines flare law as follows. FLARE LAW: The control law is a smoother direct law. (FCTM Operational philosophy, Flight Controls)
The A319/320 FCTM in the same section reads - FLARE LAW: The control law is a pitch demand law.
Last edited by flying headbutt; 28th Aug 2014 at 00:47.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Tyro and flying headbutt. What makes me wonder is that on the A330 you still get the "USE MAN PITCH TRIM" on PFD as you do on the A320 for the same scenario. In the normal flare mode with no failures on the A330 you obviously don't get it as you don't get it on the A320. The subtile difference here as far as I can interpret it is that the A320 FCOM says when LG down -> direct law and the A330 talks about Flare mode only. Handling wise where is the difference ? Looking it this ways it seems that the final stages of the approach (ie AP OFF LG DOWN) will be flown in the same way in both airplanes.
Cheers.
Cheers.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Having a margarita on the beach
Posts: 2,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.....well I thought the A320 went to direct law too but what I posted was a cut and paste from an Airbus A320 Flight Crew Training Manual - Abnormal Operations/Navigation/Dual Radio Altimeter Failure.
For info, the A330/340 FCTM that I just referenced defines flare law as follows. FLARE LAW: The control law is a smoother direct law. (FCTM Operational philosophy, Flight Controls)
The A319/320 FCTM in the same section reads - FLARE LAW: The control law is a pitch demand law.
For info, the A330/340 FCTM that I just referenced defines flare law as follows. FLARE LAW: The control law is a smoother direct law. (FCTM Operational philosophy, Flight Controls)
The A319/320 FCTM in the same section reads - FLARE LAW: The control law is a pitch demand law.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sonicbum
in normal ops the A330 goes into Flare Mode at 100'RA... no autotrim but you don't need to trim at that point, just flare and land.
With RA1+2 FAULT you fly in Flare Mode from L/G down and AP OFF, so you need to trim manually during the approach - hence the caption.
flying headbutt
I have just found your FCTM reference and amazingly that is what it says .. but it's wrong!
Here is the bit from FCOM Abnormal Procedures...
WHEN L/G DN: DIRECT LAW
At landing gear extension, flight controls revert to direct law in pitch, as well as in roll (Refer to PRO-ABN-27 F/CTL DIRECT LAW). ILS APPR mode cannot be engaged, LOC mode is available via the FCU LOC pb.
Handling wise, the major difference between the two is A330 remains in Normal Law in roll, A320 goes fully direct.
in normal ops the A330 goes into Flare Mode at 100'RA... no autotrim but you don't need to trim at that point, just flare and land.
With RA1+2 FAULT you fly in Flare Mode from L/G down and AP OFF, so you need to trim manually during the approach - hence the caption.
flying headbutt
I have just found your FCTM reference and amazingly that is what it says .. but it's wrong!
Here is the bit from FCOM Abnormal Procedures...
WHEN L/G DN: DIRECT LAW
At landing gear extension, flight controls revert to direct law in pitch, as well as in roll (Refer to PRO-ABN-27 F/CTL DIRECT LAW). ILS APPR mode cannot be engaged, LOC mode is available via the FCU LOC pb.
Handling wise, the major difference between the two is A330 remains in Normal Law in roll, A320 goes fully direct.
Last edited by TyroPicard; 29th Aug 2014 at 10:33. Reason: Getting my Laws and Modes sorted...
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tyro,flying headbut
It is not wrong. In A320 direct law is the only other flare mode. That is why in alternate law with gear down it is put in direct law to give you flare mode.
It is not wrong. In A320 direct law is the only other flare mode. That is why in alternate law with gear down it is put in direct law to give you flare mode.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have read FCOM again...
A320 in ALTN law, pitch goes into Flare Mode with gear down; this Flare Mode is different to Normal Law Flare Mode, being a direct sidestick to elevator relationship... so what I think of as a Direct law landing is actually an ALTN Law landing because the Yaw remains Alternate ... not Mechanical. True or False?
But with RA1+2 Fault the A320 is NOT in ALTN Law..... FCOM says it goes straight to Direct Law with gear down, which does not have a "Flare Mode" in FCOM DSC, it is just Direct Law. Or does it really go to ALTN Law with Flare Mode enabled but we call it Direct Law for simplicity?
And I thought I understood it...
A320 in ALTN law, pitch goes into Flare Mode with gear down; this Flare Mode is different to Normal Law Flare Mode, being a direct sidestick to elevator relationship... so what I think of as a Direct law landing is actually an ALTN Law landing because the Yaw remains Alternate ... not Mechanical. True or False?
But with RA1+2 Fault the A320 is NOT in ALTN Law..... FCOM says it goes straight to Direct Law with gear down, which does not have a "Flare Mode" in FCOM DSC, it is just Direct Law. Or does it really go to ALTN Law with Flare Mode enabled but we call it Direct Law for simplicity?
And I thought I understood it...
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wanderlust
Posts: 3,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tyro
In A320 with RA1+2 it is not in alternate law. Then why direct law with gear down? Only to give you the conventional behaviour during flare and landing. That is, in no auto trim during flare and when you close thrust nose drops requiring steady backward pressure.
In A320 with RA1+2 it is not in alternate law. Then why direct law with gear down? Only to give you the conventional behaviour during flare and landing. That is, in no auto trim during flare and when you close thrust nose drops requiring steady backward pressure.