Netralising Rudder Trim
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: PIT STOP
Netralising Rudder Trim
Hi
Can some one please explain the reason for putting the rudder trim to neutral short of landing during an engine out approach on A320.
In my understanding, it is to avoid directional control problems after landing. While the aircraft is decelerating rudder loses its effectiveness and directional control through the rudder pedals operating the nosewheel steering may not be sufficient to stay on the runway. Moreover using the nose wheel steering tiller is not recommended till the aircraft speed reduces to a decent fast taxi speed.
Thanks
Can some one please explain the reason for putting the rudder trim to neutral short of landing during an engine out approach on A320.
In my understanding, it is to avoid directional control problems after landing. While the aircraft is decelerating rudder loses its effectiveness and directional control through the rudder pedals operating the nosewheel steering may not be sufficient to stay on the runway. Moreover using the nose wheel steering tiller is not recommended till the aircraft speed reduces to a decent fast taxi speed.
Thanks
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: Wales
Rudder Trim
As the power on the live engine is reduced, the rudder will have be moved to compensate and keep the aircraft straight. I have tried both centring the trim at about 200 feet and leaving it alone, seems to not make much difference either way. I know some operators reccomend it and some dont. Best do as your company says and then you dont get in trouble !!
Waiting to be shot down
Waiting to be shot down
Guest
Posts: n/a
for 2 reasons:
1. you will have to reduce power to land, (so needing less rudder) you would have to use opposite one
2. after landing you would have to use more opposite rudder, and if you use reverse you might not even have enough rudder to push
1. you will have to reduce power to land, (so needing less rudder) you would have to use opposite one
2. after landing you would have to use more opposite rudder, and if you use reverse you might not even have enough rudder to push

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 211
Likes: 3
From: farmm intersection, our ranch
I would prefer to push in some opposite rudder in the flare vs being way out of trim for a go around.
You will not run out of rudder because of the trim setting. Every large twin I have been trained on has plenty of rudder authority in full reverse down to low speed.
Trim has no bearing on nose wheel position, rudder pedal position has bearing on nose wheel position. Most jets only have 6-7 degrees of nose wheel steering via the pedals anyway.
You will not run out of rudder because of the trim setting. Every large twin I have been trained on has plenty of rudder authority in full reverse down to low speed.
Trim has no bearing on nose wheel position, rudder pedal position has bearing on nose wheel position. Most jets only have 6-7 degrees of nose wheel steering via the pedals anyway.

Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
From: Tropics
Do I have the correct understanding then to say that the purpose for resetting the rudder trim to 0 during the after start flow is to ensure the neutral rudder position corresponds to zero rudder and centered nose wheel? Cheers.


Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 350
Likes: 147
From: FL390
Trim has no bearing on nose wheel position, rudder pedal position has bearing on nose wheel position. Most jets only have 6-7 degrees of nose wheel steering via the pedals anyway.
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: UK
Hi Fursty Ferret,
Never seen it and never done it on any previous aircraft type.
It's buried in the FCOM somewhere as an accepted technique.
Last edited by rudderrudderrat; 7th March 2012 at 12:57. Reason: Corrected by Meikleour

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 812
Likes: 19
From: uk
rudderrudderrat: Furst Ferret is correct! It was a procedure designed to help maintainence rig the nosewheel steering correctly. IIRC trim could be applied when taxying in a straight line, up to a maximum amount and this was noted for the engineers.
The procedure called for the trim to be zeroed prior to take-off. There were limits on how much left/right trim could be used and still considered normal.
The procedure called for the trim to be zeroed prior to take-off. There were limits on how much left/right trim could be used and still considered normal.

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 812
Likes: 19
From: uk
rudderrudderrat: A330 FCOM3.04.32p5/6 OPERATION WITH NOSEWHEEL STEERING OFFSET
The tolerance was +-0.5o NWS offset = 2.5o rudder trim to taxi straight.
Outside that range the limit was 4 - 10 degrees to use the procedure and the trim had to be reset to zero prior to take-off.
PS I have never seen this procedure on the A320
The tolerance was +-0.5o NWS offset = 2.5o rudder trim to taxi straight.
Outside that range the limit was 4 - 10 degrees to use the procedure and the trim had to be reset to zero prior to take-off.
PS I have never seen this procedure on the A320


Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 410
Likes: 87
From: EASA territory
Originally Posted by rudderrudderrat
But where have you found that procedure written for A320?
"The tolerance required by maintenance guidelines (± 0.5 ° NWS offset, corresponding to the ± 3 ° rudder trim necessary to taxi straight) remains valid.
Operating the aircraft outside the maintenance tolerance is possible by using the applicable procedure. However, in such cases, the flight crew must accurately and systematically make logbook entries (indicating the rudder trim input value to taxi straight) to ensure that maintenance can take corrective action within the applicable timeframe. When using rudder trim to taxi straight for NWS offset identification, takeoff must only be performed after a rudder trim reset."




