Weathercock effect in turns
I think the folks here can use a good dose of Triple H Jr's Aerodynamics for naval aviators...the relevant answer is in the 'stability and control section'
don't get fooled... Hugh Harrison Hurt Jr....Makes it hurt
don't get fooled... Hugh Harrison Hurt Jr....Makes it hurt
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If while in level flight, you banked an airplane to the left 30degrees and added no up or down elevator and didn't add any power, would the plane still turn? Yes.
RE: "push the tail around"... that's because it's in a slip and not in coordinated flight. In a coordinated turn I don't believe you're going to have weathercocking whatsoever as the relative airflow is parallel to the aircraft's longitudinal axis. Even in a 30kt wind, it's the same thing. It doesn't matter what the ground below you is doing, if that ball is centred, you're in coordinated flight. In a slip or skid you will get the weathercocking effect, which would return you to coordinated flight, but to stay in the slip or skid you're actually fighting the weathercocking tendency by using the rudder.
then changing the relative airflow on the wings would cause a slip to the left which would in turn change the relative airflow and would help "push the tail around"
Something provides the yawing moment that "pushes the tail around". That can be the response of the fuselage and fin to a slip angle -- which is your "so-called weathercocking effect", or it can be the rudder. Or it can be some of the other effects discussed above.
Those of us who have spent too long flying aircraft with short wings and more power than necessary to stay in the air tend to bank the aircraft and wait for the slip angle to do its job and yaw us around the turn -- hey, we're just mimicking the two-axis autopilot . Glider pilots, on the other hand, tend to finesse the slip angle to zero with their feet.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Dartmouth, Devon U.K.
Age: 91
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But it would also descend because the vertical component of lift would no longer equal the weight. Up elevator till the vertical component of lift again equals the weight will now prevent the descent. However, the now increased horizontal component of lift will increase the rate of turn and because the drag has been increased and the power not increased the aircraft will slow down till the drag again equals the thrust...
But it would also descend because the vertical component of lift would no longer equal the weight. Up elevator till the vertical component of lift again equals the weight will now prevent the descent. However, the now increased horizontal component of lift will increase the rate of turn and because the drag has been increased and the power not increased the aircraft will slow down till the drag again equals the thrust...
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It helps to distinguish turn (changing the direction of travel of the centre of gravity of the aircraft) from yaw (changing the heading of the aircraft, or as you put it, "pushing the tail around").
Yep yep yep. Yada yada. Agreed. My point is that a plane will turn (albeit a descending turn) without any increased effort from the elevator.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bielefeld, Germany
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is going on and on. Time to get more or less definitive about the original question.
italia458 asked a question. ImbracableCrunk answered it with the usual answer, found in most aerodynamics texts. italia458 wants to doubt it, in favor of some effect due to the elevator, he suggests.
Since no one seems to have taken up PA's suggestion to look at Hurt, here is an on-line aero reference for people taking up flying in T-34C's: https://www.netc.navy.mil/nascweb/ap...COM-SG-111.pdf
Let me quote from the section on "Stability". On p7 of this section one will find statements concerning the effect of the vertical stabiliser during a roll.
I don't have Hurt to hand, but I do have Shevell (more "middlebrow" to Hurt's "lowbrow" take):
To complete the thought, consider: what influence does a vertical fin have vis-a-vis yaw? What influence does the elevator have? To those who may find it difficult to answer these questions, let me again quote Shevell:
That should settle the original question. Please.
It doesn't settle the question, which I raised, of what happens with tailless airplanes such as flexwing microlights.
PBL
italia458 asked a question. ImbracableCrunk answered it with the usual answer, found in most aerodynamics texts. italia458 wants to doubt it, in favor of some effect due to the elevator, he suggests.
Since no one seems to have taken up PA's suggestion to look at Hurt, here is an on-line aero reference for people taking up flying in T-34C's: https://www.netc.navy.mil/nascweb/ap...COM-SG-111.pdf
Let me quote from the section on "Stability". On p7 of this section one will find statements concerning the effect of the vertical stabiliser during a roll.
A sideslip causes the vertical stabilizer to experience an increased angle of attack. This creates a horizontal lifting force on the stabilizer
that is multiplied by the moment arm distance to the airplane’s CG (Figure 1-9-18). The moment created will swing the nose of the airplane back into the relative wind. This is identical to the way a weather-vane stays oriented into the wind.
that is multiplied by the moment arm distance to the airplane’s CG (Figure 1-9-18). The moment created will swing the nose of the airplane back into the relative wind. This is identical to the way a weather-vane stays oriented into the wind.
Originally Posted by Shevell, p306
A roll to the right.... inclines the lift vector to the right.... The lateral component of the lift vector accelerates the airplane toward the right. The sideways velocity adds to the forward velocity to produce an angle of yaw between the airplane centerline and the effective oncoming velocity.
Originally Posted by Shevell, p299
Longitudinal motions occur in the plane of symmetry, which remains in its original position. Lateral motions, such as rolling, yawing, and sideslipping, displace the plane of symmetry. The technical significance of this distinction is that for normal symmetrical aircraft with small displacements these two types of motion are independent of each other.
It doesn't settle the question, which I raised, of what happens with tailless airplanes such as flexwing microlights.
PBL
Last edited by PBL; 5th Jul 2010 at 09:24. Reason: formatting and typos
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PBL... doesn't this quote you use prove exactly what I was saying?!
I completely agree with this!! I have acknowledged that in a sideslip, the airplane would weathercock if no control inputs were applied to either keep it in the sideslip or to recover from the sideslip. It seems from all the discussion and quotes used that the aircraft has to be in a sideslip before this "weathercock effect" will happen. I have not seen anything published that says that "weathercock effect" happens while in a "coordinated turn". I should also point out that the quote is, like you said, from the Stability section and is dealing with "Directional Static Stability".
Again, this quote mentions a roll and then discusses how it will progress into a sideslip and how the nose will yaw. I completely agree with this!!
A sideslip causes the vertical stabilizer to experience an increased angle of attack. This creates a horizontal lifting force on the stabilizer
that is multiplied by the moment arm distance to the airplane’s CG (Figure 1-9-18). The moment created will swing the nose of the airplane back into the relative wind. This is identical to the way a weather-vane stays oriented into the wind.
that is multiplied by the moment arm distance to the airplane’s CG (Figure 1-9-18). The moment created will swing the nose of the airplane back into the relative wind. This is identical to the way a weather-vane stays oriented into the wind.
A roll to the right.... inclines the lift vector to the right.... The lateral component of the lift vector accelerates the airplane toward the right. The sideways velocity adds to the forward velocity to produce an angle of yaw between the airplane centerline and the effective oncoming velocity.
I like re-examining these topics. Keeps my head in the game.
Italia, I was thinking and I'm just wondering about straight and level. The tail is back there doing it's thing, we're coordinated. But you're coordinated because it's back there maybe doing micro slips and micro skids and corrections, if you like.
As to a descending turn with no elevator:
You're banked in a turn, the plane is constantly in a "new" slip because it's always under acceleration if it's in a turn. Weathercocking effect is always in present and that's why you are coordinated and turning. The forces that caused the initial slip didn't go away, they just have a new vector.
Italia, I was thinking and I'm just wondering about straight and level. The tail is back there doing it's thing, we're coordinated. But you're coordinated because it's back there maybe doing micro slips and micro skids and corrections, if you like.
As to a descending turn with no elevator:
I totally agree, that's weathercocking effect. But "while established in a coordinated turn", weathercock effect is not present.
You're banked in a turn, the plane is constantly in a "new" slip because it's always under acceleration if it's in a turn. Weathercocking effect is always in present and that's why you are coordinated and turning. The forces that caused the initial slip didn't go away, they just have a new vector.
In a coordinated level turn the aircraft is yawing, under the influence of the rudder, and pitching, under the influence of the elevator.
In a climbing or descending turn the aircraft is also rolling (in a climbing turn, opposite the turn direction, in a descending turn, with the turn direction), under the influence of the ailerons and the different angle of the attack on the wings.
"Weathercocking" is an undefined, colloquial term which only really applies to questions of stability. In any case, it doesn't apply in coordinated turning.
In a climbing or descending turn the aircraft is also rolling (in a climbing turn, opposite the turn direction, in a descending turn, with the turn direction), under the influence of the ailerons and the different angle of the attack on the wings.
"Weathercocking" is an undefined, colloquial term which only really applies to questions of stability. In any case, it doesn't apply in coordinated turning.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi,
I thought "weather cocking" was the term used to explain why the aircraft wants to turn into wind whilst on the runway when it experiences a cross wind.
"Weathercocking" is an undefined, colloquial term
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Age: 37
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're banked in a turn, the plane is constantly in a "new" slip because it's always under acceleration if it's in a turn. Weathercocking effect is always in present and that's why you are coordinated and turning. The forces that caused the initial slip didn't go away, they just have a new vector.
The rudder is the force that is making the tail "come around" and point the nose in the turn. it's creating a cambered surface and is essentially a wing standing on end. So as the rudder deflects left, it creates camber and lift which acts 90 degrees perpendicular to the surface, ie: to the right! This then rotates the airplane around the CofG to point the nose into the turn. It's exactly the same as applying elevator to adjust the pitch of the aircraft!! This isn't weathercocking! If it was, then the wing would fly because it's "weathercocking" which isn't true.
"Weathercocking" is an undefined, colloquial term which only really applies to questions of stability. In any case, it doesn't apply in coordinated turning.
I thought "weather cocking" was the term used to explain why the aircraft wants to turn into wind whilst on the runway when it experiences a cross wind.
"Weathercocking" is stability. I'm simply using the OP's term. Newtonian, Bernoullian, Brobdingnagian, it doesn't matter. You've got a symmetrical airfoil at the back of the plane. Don't get caught up in semantics.
I thought Italia's original point was that it was the elevator that makes the plane turn.
I thought Italia's original point was that it was the elevator that makes the plane turn.
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Future
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Edit: Having brushed the dust off my PoF notes, a yawing moment is referred to with regards to the affect of the tail fin during a turn. Nothing more is said about it except that it exists.
Adverse yaw is mentioned during a turn, due to the difference in lift coefficient and hence induced drag between the outer and inner wing.
I guess the adverse yaw is greater than the yaw due to the tail fin hence the need to balance a turn.
Adverse yaw is mentioned during a turn, due to the difference in lift coefficient and hence induced drag between the outer and inner wing.
I guess the adverse yaw is greater than the yaw due to the tail fin hence the need to balance a turn.
Last edited by Gutter Airways; 9th Jul 2010 at 16:18.
Flexwings in turns
With a flexwing, be it a microlight or a hang glider, the pilot shifts his weight. If he shifts it to the left, he loads up the left wing, this increases the camber and drag on that wing relative to the right wing, and the aircraft turns left. High performance hang gliders are stiff and hard to turn, and this is usually addressed by a variable tension device (piece of cord on a pulley). Slack it off for take off, landing, and slow flight. Tighten it up for reduced drag at high speed, and accept the reduced controllability. In this condition, a weight shift will cause little effect, possibly even adverse yaw. Some foot-launched rigid microlights use differential spoilers for roll control. I seem to remember reading, probably in Flight Magazine, that the B2 is steered in the same way.
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bielefeld, Germany
Posts: 955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for addressing my question, 911slf. I am not sure you have answered it in aerodynamic terms.
I understand what it may mean for a dancer, say, to "shift his weight". He's got one foot on the floor; he takes it up and puts the other one down (or vice versa). However, without a floor, it is not clear to me what "shifting his weight" can mean dynamically, even though it seems to be colloquial usage amongst flexwing pilots.
I am aware that moving the control bar relative to the trike alters the roll attitude of the wing relative to the trike. That is simple geometry. What is not so clear to me is how the various force vectors change and why. Those must explain why the aircraft yaws (earth-axes), and continues to yaw into a turn.
You are suggesting that the down wing has increased drag. Yes, that is another way of saying that there is a moment created about the earth-z-axis. That must indeed happen if the aircraft is to yaw. But why that increased drag? The wing is going slower and has less lift; why should the drag have increased?
PBL
Originally Posted by 911slf
With a flexwing, be it a microlight or a hang glider, the pilot shifts his weight. If he shifts it to the left, he loads up the left wing, this increases the camber and drag on that wing relative to the right wing, and the aircraft turns left
I am aware that moving the control bar relative to the trike alters the roll attitude of the wing relative to the trike. That is simple geometry. What is not so clear to me is how the various force vectors change and why. Those must explain why the aircraft yaws (earth-axes), and continues to yaw into a turn.
You are suggesting that the down wing has increased drag. Yes, that is another way of saying that there is a moment created about the earth-z-axis. That must indeed happen if the aircraft is to yaw. But why that increased drag? The wing is going slower and has less lift; why should the drag have increased?
PBL