So why does the boss sit here?
I've always assumed it's because most western fixed wing aircraft are based in some way on American design - in the US the driver of a car sits on the left, while in Russia until WWI they sat on the right (This was around Igor Sikorskys time, and he was from Russia)
No proof, that's just my theory
No proof, that's just my theory
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,096
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This subject well overdone on other forum. Mixed opinion re rotary but on fixed wing it was a convention that, if following a line feature like a road, railway, river, canal etc. etc. then one kept it on ones left thereby opposite direction traffic doing the same would not be head on but off set on the other side of the feature, so the pilot sat on the left.
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 71
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From the early days of flying (fixed wing of course), left hand circuits were the convention, so the captain sat on the left so that he could see the signals square... and the runway when it came into view under the left wing during the final turn.
Helicopters... can't remember why; someone did tell me but... age isn't on my side!
TCF
Helicopters... can't remember why; someone did tell me but... age isn't on my side!
TCF
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With helicopters it's certainly not due to the direction of rotation of the rotor blades. After all a Puma's blades rotate the opposite way to a Sikorsky's, or other American machine.
Most pilots would be right handed and therefore would hold the cyclic in their right hand and the collective in their left hand. Having the collective in the centre of the aircraft is better. Of course the other pilot has their own collective as well, but that is ownly in machines with two pilots / dual controls.
Most pilots would be right handed and therefore would hold the cyclic in their right hand and the collective in their left hand. Having the collective in the centre of the aircraft is better. Of course the other pilot has their own collective as well, but that is ownly in machines with two pilots / dual controls.
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Done to death here http://www.pprune.org/forums/tech-log/327959-side.html
Just don't take any notice of anything written by Angels 60 and you'll be OK.
Just don't take any notice of anything written by Angels 60 and you'll be OK.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: B.F.E.
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Always thought it was based on maritime law, where ships pass port-to-port, the captain sitting on the port side to maintain visual contact with the other ship when passing. Which doesn't explain why so many pleasure craft are built these days with the pilothouse to starboard, even though maritime law still mandates ships pass "to each other's right", just as aeronautical law says.
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,096
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Always thought it was based on maritime law, where ships pass port-to-port, the captain sitting on the port side to maintain visual contact with the other ship when passing. Which doesn't explain why so many pleasure craft are built these days with the pilothouse to starboard, even though maritime law still mandates ships pass "to each other's right", just as aeronautical law says.
Probably me that has missed something but if ships pass 'port to port' then are they not keeping each other on their left?
Probably me that has missed something but if ships pass 'port to port' then are they not keeping each other on their left?
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
parabellum - You are correct, port to port, left to left.
International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (1948)
Rule 18 (a) When two power vessels are meeting end on, or nearly end on, so as to involve risk of collision, each shall alter her course to starboard, so that each may pass on the port side of each other.
International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (1948)
Rule 18 (a) When two power vessels are meeting end on, or nearly end on, so as to involve risk of collision, each shall alter her course to starboard, so that each may pass on the port side of each other.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian Abraham
Rule 18 (a) When two power vessels are meeting end on, or nearly end on, so as to involve risk of collision, each shall alter her course to starboard, so that each may pass on the port side of each other.
Originally Posted by airsupport
Yes, and it has only taken her a little over 39 years.
Plus I know she will never read this.
Plus I know she will never read this.
Originally Posted by airsupport_wifey
That's where you are wrong.
See you Monday at ten o'clock sharp at our lawyer. And bring the keys to the Porsche. It's still in my name.
See you Monday at ten o'clock sharp at our lawyer. And bring the keys to the Porsche. It's still in my name.
CJ
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: cornwall UK
Age: 80
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boss's seat
I don't know about fixed-wing but I always understood with helicopters that it was because, when helicopters really came of age, flying off carriers in the Korean War, with the island on a carrier to starboard, approaches from port and plane guard to port, it made sense for the pilot, often on his own, to sit on the right. S55 (Whirlwind), S58 (Wessex), S61.
Since then, CH53, Chinook, Puma, Lynx and so on.
Since then, CH53, Chinook, Puma, Lynx and so on.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boslandew,
Your answer sounds plausible.
The 'tradition' is older than the Korean war, but it may well be one of the reasons it persisted!
The subject has already been done to death elsewhere.
But in very brief... in the very early and small helicopters, with only one central collective, it makes more sense for the average right-handed person to fly right hand on cyclic and left hand on collective, hence from the right-hand seat. The 'tradition' has persisted, even when dual collectives became the norm.
For fixed-wing, I've never been sure what was the chicken and what was the egg.... pilot/driver on the left because that was already the habit in cars, hence left-hand circuits and flying to the right of the railway line... or the other way around.
Your answer sounds plausible.
The 'tradition' is older than the Korean war, but it may well be one of the reasons it persisted!
The subject has already been done to death elsewhere.
But in very brief... in the very early and small helicopters, with only one central collective, it makes more sense for the average right-handed person to fly right hand on cyclic and left hand on collective, hence from the right-hand seat. The 'tradition' has persisted, even when dual collectives became the norm.
For fixed-wing, I've never been sure what was the chicken and what was the egg.... pilot/driver on the left because that was already the habit in cars, hence left-hand circuits and flying to the right of the railway line... or the other way around.
