Nose light switch on Landing: Take off position?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Dubai
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nose light switch on Landing: Take off position?
Does anyone please know of any restriction imposed by Airbus on putting the taxi light to Landing on the approach (a330 / a340)? We've been told that it is is against 'manufacturer guidance', but I can't find it anywhere.
Also, is there a reference from the FAA or JAA on the recommended position of aircraft lights?
Thanks again
Also, is there a reference from the FAA or JAA on the recommended position of aircraft lights?
Thanks again
Not wishing to hijack your thread, but in an allied vein I still cannot understand the captains who won't turn on the nosewheel landing light for takeoff or landing but are happy to have the wing-mounted landing lights on. When asked why, they can provide no reason or, for landing, resort to the fatuous "Well, the landing gear is still up so the light won't come on". Yes, I know, Mr Boeing designed it to come on when the gear is extended but it won't if the switch is off. Pathetic.
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: us
Age: 44
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hi,
i havent heard of any restriction on the taxi light. we still put it on. maybe your company is trying to save on some bulbs.
as for the wing light the explanation i got was it makes the plane look nice.
cheers.
i havent heard of any restriction on the taxi light. we still put it on. maybe your company is trying to save on some bulbs.
as for the wing light the explanation i got was it makes the plane look nice.
cheers.
Not all Boeing aeroplanes switch the nose gear light/s off when the gear is retracted - on the 737 anyway it is a customer option.
The nose gear is also subject to greater levels of vibration which decreases filament life as compared to the wing root mounted bulbs.
Wing mounted lights are used more to make the aeroplane more visible to others than for illumination - hence the requirement in most companies for the landing lights to be on below 10000 ft and when in holding patterns.
The nose gear is also subject to greater levels of vibration which decreases filament life as compared to the wing root mounted bulbs.
Wing mounted lights are used more to make the aeroplane more visible to others than for illumination - hence the requirement in most companies for the landing lights to be on below 10000 ft and when in holding patterns.
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: AUS
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FCOM 3.03.18
SOP - ILS Approach
........
........
Exterior Lights............AS RQRD
Set: NOSE switch to TAXI
RWY TURN OFF switch to ON and
LAND switch to ON
Don't know the reason why just TAXI, but it is not my train set and I'm not a 'Test Pilot'
SOP - ILS Approach
........
........
Exterior Lights............AS RQRD
Set: NOSE switch to TAXI
RWY TURN OFF switch to ON and
LAND switch to ON
Don't know the reason why just TAXI, but it is not my train set and I'm not a 'Test Pilot'
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: land of the long BLUE cloud
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understood the reason for the restriction, is that the takeoff light is aimed higher for takeoff, and therefore illuminates an incorrect aiming point when used for landing.
The takeoff light is also quite a large (expensive) filament, and therefore why give it the landing shock, vibration etc when the LANDING lights should give you all the illumiation you need.
(I am assuming the big buses have the same independent lights like my mini-bus)
The takeoff light is also quite a large (expensive) filament, and therefore why give it the landing shock, vibration etc when the LANDING lights should give you all the illumiation you need.
(I am assuming the big buses have the same independent lights like my mini-bus)
Only half a speed-brake
My minibus instructor pointed out that for 550 m RVR you could easily lose ground contact as you pitch up in the flare due to light scatter from the NW take-off light. So what was the question again, why to use take-off light for landing?
FD.
FD.
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Switzerland, Singapore
Posts: 1,309
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You must have an expanded checklist in your company, do you? There it should also state how and when to put on and off your lights.
What does it say?
When you go to Toulouse and learn the "original" Airbus procedures, you put (FCOM 3.03.18)
Exterior Lights ............ set
set NOSE switch to TAXI
RWY TURN OFF switch to ON, and
LAND switch to ON
Since Airbus emphazises the common cockpit philosophy, it wants it to have it on all fleets the same, so A318 to A380 all the same.
Then there are reasons that you want to spare the bulbs and then there are policies in certain companies that lights belong to the CMD. So depending on your company, do what your policy say and try to live with it. There are always strange captains that want strange things. It's not the purpose of the FO to adapt to the Captain but to the correct company procedures. If your CMD wants something else, he must tell it to you.
Dani
What does it say?
When you go to Toulouse and learn the "original" Airbus procedures, you put (FCOM 3.03.18)
Exterior Lights ............ set
set NOSE switch to TAXI
RWY TURN OFF switch to ON, and
LAND switch to ON
Since Airbus emphazises the common cockpit philosophy, it wants it to have it on all fleets the same, so A318 to A380 all the same.
Then there are reasons that you want to spare the bulbs and then there are policies in certain companies that lights belong to the CMD. So depending on your company, do what your policy say and try to live with it. There are always strange captains that want strange things. It's not the purpose of the FO to adapt to the Captain but to the correct company procedures. If your CMD wants something else, he must tell it to you.
Dani
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Airplane
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FlightDetent
At first sight you appear to have something there. Perhaps you could explain why we switch the "landing lights" on for takeoff.
Personally I like to have all the forward illuminating lights on unless I see a reason not to... low vis ops for example.
7
So what was the question again, why to use take-off light for landing?
Personally I like to have all the forward illuminating lights on unless I see a reason not to... low vis ops for example.
7
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stockholm Sweden
Age: 74
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And please remember that the wing mounted landing lights are designed to illuminate the runway for landing, i.e. they point down.
Last winter I had an A319 Captain snag the landing lights because they were shining on the ground just in front of the aircraft when parked. When I looked at another A319, and it was the same, I twigged that this is how they are designed.
Last winter I had an A319 Captain snag the landing lights because they were shining on the ground just in front of the aircraft when parked. When I looked at another A319, and it was the same, I twigged that this is how they are designed.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Sunrise Senior Living
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Fcom used to say that the reason for only putting the taxi light to 'Taxi' for landing was .....'to avoid unwanted reflections.' I'm not sure if it still says that.
Cheers,
mcdhu
Cheers,
mcdhu
Only half a speed-brake
FD.