Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Tech Log
Reload this Page >

Log book question


Notices
Tech Log The very best in practical technical discussion on the web

Log book question

Old 10th October 2006 | 09:55
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: land of the long BLUE cloud
There is a huge difference here between Aviation Authorites and Airlines form a recruiting point of view.

My advice is... On your CV dont show PIC on any aircraft you havent sat in the left seat of. I have heard of several instances of pilots claiming X000 hours PIC on a type they have never qualified as commander! Some even use it as evidence for DEC applications. Why dont all logbooks have a 'Command Practice' column like some countries (NZ/AUS) so it clears all this confusion up. Perhaps the spare column should be used for this, but PICUS still going in the copilot totals.

It seems daft to me to log Command time on something you arent qualified as. Can all Boeing time be logged as B744?
outofsynch is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2006 | 10:12
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: London
According to our company OM part D (JAA but non-UK) one is allowed to log PICUS only when flying with a training captain after specific experience requirements are met
That's the thing with the UK though, if you didn't get PICUS time on the right seat with fATPL, you wouldn't have the hours to unfreeze your licence if you started your career with the minimum required 150 hours PIC (or whatever it is for Integrated guys).

P
Permafrost_ATPL is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2006 | 12:38
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
From: ex-DXB
My advice is... On your CV dont show PIC on any aircraft you havent sat in the left seat of.
Don't worry! Any UK airline will know what PICUS means.....
Craggenmore is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2006 | 13:32
  #24 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,697
Likes: 1,299
From: Australia
Friend of mine with a now defunct 737 operator had 6000 hours as first officer. Whenever it was "his leg" most times the check captain would swop seats and let him operate from the LH seat and fly ICUS. He placed that in the PIC column without any requirement to have the captain sign his log book entry. When the airline went tits up, he got a job in India as an direct entry command on the 737 and has never looked back. The Indian CAA apparently didn't look too closely at his log book as they assumed his ICUS time was real PIC - and who was he to contradict them?

The moral of the story is you should log as many hours ICUS as possible as it could one day get you a captain's job in a third world country.
Centaurus is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2006 | 13:40
  #25 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 3
From: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Originally Posted by Centaurus
Friend of mine with a now defunct 737 operator had 6000 hours as first officer. Whenever it was "his leg" most times the check captain would swop seats and let him operate from the LH seat and fly ICUS.
Sounds rather bizarre and illegal to me. Surely to operate in the 'other' seat (be it right or left), you have to have conducted EFATO drills from that seat in order to be sit there?
TopBunk is offline  
Reply
Old 10th October 2006 | 15:28
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
From: land of the long BLUE cloud
I agree topbunk. And I would suggest the individual concerned may be in deep **** when his logbook was analysed after a serious incident or accident. An insurance company could refuse paying on the strength of that alone IMHO.

Craggenmore I agree. But many individuals choose to add this figure into Command totals. And I know many non-UK airlines wont consider this as any more than FO time, because of the dubious rule interpretation by various airlines / authorities.

The ICUS label is daft anyway, because you are no more 'in command' than the pax in 26D, the way the law sees it.
outofsynch is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.