Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

BA 747 divert to Irkutsk after nav system fails

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

BA 747 divert to Irkutsk after nav system fails

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Aug 2013, 15:35
  #61 (permalink)  
maf
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ganddal, Norway
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cant help myself.. But when someone calls out the 744 in BAs fleet as old (refering that to the Irkutsk diversion) is just being blatantly ignorant. And then to compare that with Ryanairs fleet? Come on!

If some of you had the slightest clue to how much wear and tear those 738s have to tackle compared to BAs 744, you'd be thinking twice before boarding a Ryanair machine again...
maf is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2013, 15:46
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Hotels
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I attended Antwerp maritime academy, we still had to know 60 stars by sight, perform astro nav. ( bloody difficult I tell you) and use and maintain the sextant. One time, during a apprenticeship exercise on a Belgian Navy ship, we had an English Navigational officer onboard via NATO cooperation ...she wasn't taught the use of sextant, never heard of astro nav... So even in shipping, things are quickly changing and the whole art of Navigation is quickly disappearing.

At least we must know in the Northern Hemisphere to identify Polaris, Ursa Major, the Orion belt, Rigel, Betelgeuze and Sirius. Most FO's do not have a clue, I try to enlighten them
We owe it to our profession to keep at least some traditions intact.
Captaintcas is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2013, 16:42
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
jimjim1,
Re: ded. or dead.
Much indebted for another viewpoint.
Basil is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2013, 17:57
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Banbury
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you'd be thinking twice before boarding a Ryanair machine again...
I wouldnt "think" at all. I'd rather walk . . .
Leftofcentre2009 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2013, 20:31
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the ones who think age is all would have any notion of the differences between handling characteristics of the supercritical wings of the A330, B777 et al, compared to the "heavy metal" of the 25 year old B747, they would think twice.
On the B747 you seldomly use the "fasten belts" switch. Says it all....
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 13:27
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fatigue and wear
is not relevant with long haul aircraft.
The issue was reliability and not fatigue bytheway...
And I was pointing out that the older aircraft, with their disadvantages of perhaps lower reliability dispatch rates, still have some huge advantages.
For instance a stable and smooth ride...
When I hear others complaining about the ride I hardly see a ripple in my coffee on my "unreliable" dinosaur.
And while landing in a storm in a B777 or A330 can be a challenge, in the B747 the only challenge is if the windspeed is over the door-limit....
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 13:54
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Age: 53
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Travel time, the same

Must have something to do with the speed of sound...
douglasheld is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 14:33
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It did, but then Concorde was retired
TopBunk is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 15:27
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Astro was much easier with HO249 or ANT pre-computed tables. I never tried spheroidal trigonometry in flight.
Mr WHBM Senior (WW2 nav, Halifax and later DC3) once told me he took along a few times his log tables and 12" slide rules from school days and on the sector home did the calcs from first principles.

It would be interesting to know if the Equipment Cooling fan was a 'lifed' item and if so when it was last changed, possibly nothing at all to do with the age of the airframe.
I recall being on a BA One-Eleven service out of Birmingham in the 1990s, in the last couple of months of service. The interior was immaculate, totally clean, nothing broken, nothing even discoloured. This after 25 years of service.

In contrast the BA European 767s, even a few years ago, had been allowed to get into a dreadful state internally, and regulars on the Moscow flight on Flyertalk started a list, by aircraft registration, of all the unresolved cabin issues which plagued those flights, including broken, missing or filthy cabin fittings, many of which should have been standard stores items. The worst was G-BZHC, whose cabin lighting had some longstanding intermittent issue that caused all the lights to flash on and off at random - this aircraft gained the long-running soubriquet of "The Disco", and regulars said their hearts would sink when they saw it on the gate. Now at the time ZC was the newest 767 in the fleet, less than 10 years old. There really is no excuse for such maintenance budget cheeseparing, and to be frank, saying that it's only non-vital components that this is done with, having two completely different maintenance regimes for different components, strains credulity.

http://www.pprune.org/passengers-slf...ml#post5777138
WHBM is online now  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 17:35
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ded Reckoning

Ded -for Deduced Reckoning. -And to be nit pickitty; looking out of the window with a map is called 'Pilotage'. Ded Reckoning calls for a chart & a stopwatch, and works in IMC (in principal)..
neilki is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 18:27
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On the flightpath
Age: 61
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Irkutsk is quite nice. I can think of plenty of places I'd like a lot less to be stuck for 10 hours - Heathrow, for example.
ConstantFlyer is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2013, 21:57
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Slough, UK
Age: 35
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In contrast the BA European 767s, even a few years ago, had been allowed to get into a dreadful state internally, and regulars on the Moscow flight on Flyertalk started a list, by aircraft registration, of all the unresolved cabin issues which plagued those flights, including broken, missing or filthy cabin fittings, many of which should have been standard stores items. The worst was G-BZHC, whose cabin lighting had some longstanding intermittent issue that caused all the lights to flash on and off at random - this aircraft gained the long-running soubriquet of "The Disco", and regulars said their hearts would sink when they saw it on the gate. Now at the time ZC was the newest 767 in the fleet, less than 10 years old. There really is no excuse for such maintenance budget cheeseparing, and to be frank, saying that it's only non-vital components that this is done with, having two completely different maintenance regimes for different components, strains credulity.
You'll be pleased to know WHBM that all of the short haul 767s had an interior upgrade last year and are now actually quite nice. They even have flat screens hanging from the ceiling rather than those flickery old monitors that never used to work!

As for the 747s, some of them are falling to pieces and others are still quite nice. I flew on G-BNLR last week from BKK. Dreadful thing. Hopefully the most dilapidated ones will get the boot soon. Some of the older 747s with New First (Prime) are being retired over the next few months. The new-ish cabins from these aircraft will be used to replace some of the middle-aged 747s that still have old First fitted.

Despite moaning about the interiors, I still love the Queen of the Skies!

Champ

Last edited by champair79; 2nd Sep 2013 at 21:58.
champair79 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.