PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) (https://www.pprune.org/spectators-balcony-spotters-corner-52/)
-   -   BA 747 divert to Irkutsk after nav system fails (https://www.pprune.org/spectators-balcony-spotters-corner/522391-ba-747-divert-irkutsk-after-nav-system-fails.html)

Ye Olde Pilot 28th Aug 2013 10:55

BA 747 divert to Irkutsk after nav system fails
 
The London-Beijing flight with 270 passengers and 16 crew landed in Irkutsk, Eastern Siberia, at 10.41 local time on Wednesday.
Siberia Times report

Passengers were told there was a malfunction of the flight software on board flight BA 039. The plane landed 40 minutes after the initial request from the pilot to bring the plane down in Irkutsk.
British Airways Boeing 747 makes safe emergency landing after failure of navigation equipment

http://siberiantimes.com/PICTURES/OT...e%20boeing.jpg
http://siberiantimes.com/PICTURES/OT...wards%20it.jpg

D'pirate 28th Aug 2013 10:58

Interesting with 2 GPS, 3 IRS, VOR, DME, ADF and FMC? More to this than is immediately obvious!

Ye Olde Pilot 28th Aug 2013 11:02

Airport spokesperson;


'The plane made an emergency landing in Irkutsk because of the failure of navigation equipment', said Yelena Stavitskaya, the Siberian airport's spokeswoman.

'Its passengers will be accommodated in hotels Angara and Irkutsk.'

BA technical experts are expected to fly to Irkutsk to assess the damage to the jumbo aircraft. It is expected many passengers will be offered onward travel by S7 - a Siberian airline that is also part of the OneWorld alliance.

The BA website indicated that an onward flight would be available at 21.00 (9pm) local time

CaptainProp 28th Aug 2013 11:12

For landing fuel, it was 40 min after the request to land, not after T/O.

Bearcat 28th Aug 2013 11:20

Those old 74's have seen better days. They are jaded and odd ball failures are bound to occur.

GalleyTeapot 28th Aug 2013 11:34

BA 747's are dropping to bits, the 767's are even worse!

Lord Spandex Masher 28th Aug 2013 11:35

Bearcat, I was about to say speak for yourself...but then you edited. ;)

GobonaStick 28th Aug 2013 11:35

Whatever happened seems to have happened over the northern Mongolian border.

Ye Olde Pilot 28th Aug 2013 11:49

It appears to be an oldie G-CIVI..reg in May 1996.
They certainly get their moneys worth out of airframes at BA.

Heathrow Harry 28th Aug 2013 11:50

Could have flown by Bradshaw - follow the Trans-Siberian................

Contacttower 28th Aug 2013 11:54

1996 is young compared to some 747s in the BA fleet...

Skipness One Echo 28th Aug 2013 11:56

Seventeen years is not old for a long haul airliner. Even Emirates have seventeen year old B777s, G-CIVI is from the second tranche of BA B744s.

Capetonian 28th Aug 2013 11:57


It appears to be an oldie G-CIVI..reg in May 1996.
17 years ..... middle aged perhaps, but it's more about cycles than actual age and it will have done far less cycles than an aircraft of similar age used on short haul routes, and there are plenty of 20 year old+ shorthaul aircraft flying safely.

I have noticed though that some of BA's 747s are tatty inside and that doesn't give a good impression of the overall maintenance standards although I am confident they are safer than some other carriers with newer aircraft.

Ye Olde Pilot 28th Aug 2013 12:01

Whatever the age of the aircraft this appears to be a software problem.

HEATHROW DIRECTOR 28th Aug 2013 12:02

Emergency landing? Just a tech diversion surely?

eckhard 28th Aug 2013 12:09

There are around 15 QRH drills that may require landing at the 'nearest suitable airport', inc:

Fire
Smoke
Fuel filter
Equipment cooling
Hydraulics
Fuel leak
Engine fail/damage

Not sure that 'navigation' per se was the problem. Maybe Equip Cooling affecting the nav displays?

Anyway, well done to the crew!

GobonaStick 28th Aug 2013 12:24

If the nav system's conked, how do they know it's Irkutsk? :E

Capn Bloggs 28th Aug 2013 12:26

Bluetooth GPS...ON
Tablet...ON
Memory Map...Start
Now Capn, where was it you wanted to go again?

Ex Cargo Clown 28th Aug 2013 12:30

Are the BNL lot still knocking about?

buggaluggs 28th Aug 2013 13:00

I would hazard a guess that if they did have a dual FMC issue, and were no longer able RNP, the Chinese may well refuse them entry into their airspace, especially Beijing. In which case Irkutsk has got to be a better option then Ulaanbaatar :ooh:


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:59.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.