Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

BA 747 divert to Irkutsk after nav system fails

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

BA 747 divert to Irkutsk after nav system fails

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Aug 2013, 13:32
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If this was a multi system failure than it rates interest.

If not surely it can compete with other minor flight interruptions without photos
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 14:55
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A reminder of why BA crews love pprune.
FANS is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 15:07
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Canadian Shield
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmmm.... quick refresher required on use of compass, maps and ded reckoning.
er340790 is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 15:19
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sussex and Asia
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An unusual task for systems managers.

This event will have been a nice change from a routine flight.

A bit of genuine hand flying.

I love the cracked paving and weeds in the pictures.

Last edited by Ye Olde Pilot; 28th Aug 2013 at 15:21.
Ye Olde Pilot is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 15:26
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 349
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Despite being without NAV they managed to avoid the schoolyard AND the hospital, so no probs.
fleigle is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 15:47
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Atlanta, GA USA
Age: 60
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They probably could have found their way, without the NAV, but the argument could be made nowadays, that losing the NAV could be a symptom of problems yet to be noticed or to come, in other important electronic equipment on the aircraft, so I give them them a pass. I'm sure they are relieved to hear that!!!
Coagie is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 15:59
  #27 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, they will have been sweating on a from PPRune.....................
BOAC is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 16:36
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sussex and Asia
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those pictures of a 17 year old BA 747 stuck on a weed infested cracked runway in Siberia are a PR man's nightmare.

If we spool back to the days of Lord King v Branson he tried to sell the idea that Virgin would operate old unreliable aircraft.

Eddie Stobart does not operate 17 year old trucks and I guess most people on here don't drive 17 year old cars. There is only so much you can do to a 1970's design before things start to go wrong.

If the age of ever commercial aircraft was emblazoned on the side how many passengers would board an elderly airframe
Ye Olde Pilot is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 16:55
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Jersey
Age: 43
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"If the age of ever commercial aircraft was emblazoned on the side how many passengers would board an elderly airframe"


Oh yeah, I do feel much safer in a 3 month old Lionair 737-900 than I do on a 17 year old BA 744
GGFFB is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 17:44
  #30 (permalink)  

Usual disclaimers apply!
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: EGGW
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EE cooling failure!!
gas path is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 18:06
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,399
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Despite being without NAV they managed to avoid the schoolyard AND the hospital, so no probs.
But what happened to the orphanage!




EE cooling failure!!
Just to help the understanding of our layman readers, I believe that means Electrical & Electronic equipment compartment, which is usually somewhere under the floor of a Boeing aircraft. Without proper cooling down there, things can go a bit awry!
MrBernoulli is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 18:31
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
MrB

Indeed, and as far as I recall it for very good reasons (you may end up with equipment overheating) if the QRH actions don't immediately resolve the issue then it becomes a "land at nearest suitable", regardless of the crew's navigational skills.

Last edited by wiggy; 28th Aug 2013 at 18:38.
wiggy is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 18:42
  #33 (permalink)  
Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: On the western edge of The Moor
Age: 67
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Initial information incorrect see here: -

Incident: British Airways B744 near Irkutsk on Aug 28th 2013, avionics overtemperature

A British Airways Boeing 747-400, registration G-CIVI performing flight BA-39 from London Heathrow,EN (UK) to Beijing (China) with 289 people on board, was enroute at FL390 about 300nm eastsoutheast of Irkutsk (Russia) in Mongolian Airspace when the crew reported an overtemperature indication for the avionics and decided to divert to Irkutsk. The aircraft landed safely on Irkutsk's runway 30 about 50 minutes later.

Russia's Emergency ministry initially said the commander reported the avionics had failed but later corrected to say the avionics had overheated.
west lakes is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 18:59
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sussex and Asia
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well given where they landed the avionics will have cooled own quickly.

The question remains why the overheat?
Ye Olde Pilot is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 19:01
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Weather's nice there just now. Don't know about the midges though.
Basil is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 19:56
  #36 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sussex and Asia
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We'll have to see what the outcome is but the bottom line is BA are out to milk the last drops out of their aircraft.

Compared to Ryanair.
As of July 2013, the average age of the Ryanair fleet is 4.9 years.
The cabins in the BA 747 fleet are tired as are the airframes.

Hire cars are restricted to 15000 miles.

BA are running an old fleet like a lot of the flag carriers.
Ye Olde Pilot is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 23:02
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Perhaps the crew were thinking about the Swiss Air MD 11, flight 111 which ended up in the Atlantic ?
Metro man is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 23:11
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The cabins in the BA 747 fleet are tired as are the airframes.

Hire cars are restricted to 15000 miles.
Some are some aren't. Most of the B744s have been through a New First product refresh, the ones that didn't get it are retiring. I think a B744 needs to work a little harder to pay for itself than a hire car.
BA are running an old fleet like a lot of the flag carriers.
Airbus A318 2 3.8 years On 19 airlines operating this type of aircraft British Airways ranks 5
Airbus A319 44 11.4 years On 129 airlines operating this type of aircraft British Airways ranks 109
Airbus A320 47 7.7 years On 229 airlines operating this type of aircraft British Airways ranks 110
Airbus A321 18 7.6 years On 65 airlines operating this type of aircraft British Airways ranks 25
Boeing 737 19 20.7 years On 272 airlines operating this type of aircraft British Airways ranks 93
Boeing 747 52 18.4 years On 92 airlines operating this type of aircraft British Airways ranks 39
Boeing 767 21 20.2 years On 97 airlines operating this type of aircraft British Airways ranks 61
Boeing 777 52 12.2 years On 64 airlines operating this type of aircraft British Airways ranks 53
TOTAL 255 13.4 years The calculation of the fleet age can be approximated because it is only based on the supported aircraft
Fleet age British Airways | Airfleets aviation

It's only old compared to exceptional cases like Singapore and QATAR. Even Cathay fly some pretty legacy wide bodies having the first build B777s and A330s. The B767s are an issue as they're supposed to be well on their way out as the B787s are late.

Last edited by Skipness One Echo; 28th Aug 2013 at 23:12.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2013, 23:55
  #39 (permalink)  
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,095
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those old 74's have seen better days. They are jaded and odd ball failures are bound to occur.
Ye Olde Pilot - you must have had a pretty charmed aviation life then? There are many, many B737 around that are thirty years old in regular scheduled work, just imagine the cycles on those compared to the BA 747-400! It would be interesting to know if the Equipment Cooling fan was a 'lifed' item and if so when it was last changed, possibly nothing at all to do with the age of the airframe.
parabellum is offline  
Old 29th Aug 2013, 04:30
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Smaller Antipode
Age: 89
Posts: 31
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
Continue flying across potentially unknown territory in a 747 using a map and a Boy Scout compass ? I don't think so - unless absolutely no option.

I know insufficient about the -400, ( even less about the cause of this one - thinks.... does anyone else ! ) but ....en route London/ Bahrain I had 2 INS units fail on a 747 Classic within the space of 5 minutes, and had dumped fuel and was on the ground in Frankfurt very soon afterwards.

The LH mechanic assigned to look after us was very miffed, it being Saturday night and he was now going to be late for his party, "Why didn't you go back to London? " was his complaint. Because the INS units drive my flight instruments, I replied, it's snowing in London and I don't fancy trying to fly an ILS approach to minima on standby instruments. 2 Units have failed in quick succession, how long before the third (and last) unit goes tits up too ? I'm down here wishing I was up there, instead of being up there wishing I was down here - fix the problem.

He did, and we were airborne again not long afterwards.

If correspondents think they can outguess the operating crew - - - no, I'll go back to my cave.

I'm sure you'll all sort it out.
ExSp33db1rd is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.