Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Misc. Forums > Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner)
Reload this Page >

Routes That Dont Exist But Could Be Proiftable To An Airline

Wikiposts
Search
Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) If you're not a professional pilot but want to discuss issues about the job, this is the best place to loiter. You won't be moved on by 'security' and there'll be plenty of experts to answer any questions.

Routes That Dont Exist But Could Be Proiftable To An Airline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jun 2008, 11:52
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manchester
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
why have it at LBA when an hour down the road their are 2 daily services?

- surely you could say that about all routes served from both LBA and MAN?
DispExt is offline  
Old 18th Jun 2008, 18:45
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Stockport
Age: 84
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Multi-source routes

From post #32:
"Another idea though would be to maybe divert one of the SFO flights or LAX into MAN to carry onto SFO or LAX. Or is that just a plain stupid idea. I think it is"

Thirty years or so ago BA used to do something similar at the other end. The LHR-LAX flight (747-100) continued on to SFO, so the idea isn't completely crazy.

Other multi-stop flights could also make sense. For example late evening LHR-MAN-GLA or LHR-NCL-EDI by BA could be make it possible to do a full afternoon's work on the continent and still get to the outer reaches of the kingdom the same day with full service, while allowing BA to carry a fairly full load out of LHR.

Other routes where a UK carrier should be able to make a profit include Osaka (or possibly even better Kobe) in Japan and Korea. And how about potential growth tourist destinations such as urumqi and Xian in China. An entry point in Western China could give much shorter travel times than going through Beijing or Shanghai.
Dairyground is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 20:14
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i agree,

i dont know why manchester doesnt push for more 'through' routes, ie like saudia already operates RYD-GVA-MAN-GVA-RYD, ok its only getting on average 100px per flight, but you know what i mean.

Looks at Qantas for instance, im sure they could come up from LHR and operate a LHR-MAN-SYD service, same as Virgin, they could do a LHR-MAN-SFO routing......

i think it could work.....

G-STAW
G-STAW is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2008, 21:14
  #84 (permalink)  
Scourge of Bad Airline Management!
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Global Nomad
Age: 55
Posts: 1,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i dont know why manchester doesnt push for more 'through' routes..... ok its only getting on average 100px per flight
Well that's a great example of someone answering their own question!

im sure they could come up from LHR and operate a LHR-MAN-SYD service, same as Virgin, they could do a LHR-MAN-SFO routing......
I'm sure they could, but why would they? Landings cost money, and it seems that their passengers are happy to travel to them....

TA
TwinAisle is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2008, 20:10
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Manchester
Age: 41
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what about blk-lon, was some talk of blk-lcy or has that died a death?!
david.g is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 10:49
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London (Babylon-on-Thames)
Age: 42
Posts: 6,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It amazes me the limited memory span of punters on here. For example why don't QANTAS serve Manchester with a B744 onwards from Heathrow. They used to but found a more profitable way of doing it. They code share on the BA shuttle so they still get the same passengers but don't have to fly a Jumbo on a short haul route to get them !

It's the same reason BA serve so few routes in Asia, they are served onwards from the hubs of their Oneworld partner airlines like JAL and QANTAS.

For the multi landing questions of London flights routing via MAN, that would be commercial suicide as the London market is highly competitive and you want to run a flight that isn't NON STOP and takes over an hour more????? Really?

As for BLK-LCY, that would stand less chance than the recently axed NCL and BHD let's be honest.
Skipness One Echo is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2008, 12:04
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Valencia
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A flight from Okinawa that's early enough to make a connection with a Europe bound flight in Tokyo or Osaka would make me happy. I always seem to end up losing a day of my trip with an overnight stay in a Japanese airport hotel.
joniveson is offline  
Old 1st Jul 2008, 22:34
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 723
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Daza

BHX-TXL
BHX-ARN

Both 2 x daily week days with VB

BHX-ATH 1 x daily week days with VB

Alas, I believe we (VB) operated more profitable routes, both as BA and duo

Bored
boredcounter is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2008, 18:40
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QF at MAN

Are we forgetting that when QF withdrew, BA in their infinite wisdom decided to operate 737s with flight numbers QF10A/QF9A, overnighting at LHR. BA withdrew those services after a year (or less) as it was "competing with it's own shuttle service"?

I would forget about operating LHR-MAN-anywhere: if there's to be Australia to be featured on the departure board for MAN, a routing along the lines of MAN-BOM-SYD giving an opportunity to market 3 sectors should become profitable I've seen some comments on other forums suggesting that SQ operating MAN-BOM was profitable when they routed some of their services through there)
Ringwayman is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.