.......mate......
......."my opinion" or/& "rumour" very clearly i stated those words in that post
the one really clueless or wondering around what i am or not
if i'm in training or not is U
& if you really think that in order to have an opinion "here":ugh:....hello!!!! "romour network" :}
one must be TRE or TRI
well............mate..........that's your business
anyway i think and believe (as well as many other TRE's & TRI's say both local & foreign) that they failed due lack of;
assertiveness + attitude + knowledge + skill's
keep it up................mate

Jump drive. Your post quite clearly suggests many things, most of them untrue. The guys failed for reasons way above your pay scale. So in fact the whole post is irrelevant drivel.

and your last post is quite frankly more of the same.

and in any event there are only 5 ex pat tres here including myself. I know what they all think so please do not try to educate me on the internal workings of the training department. stick to what you know.

which isn't much by what i read.

Well ia1166

Any department is only as good as the people they have in it. Don't pretend it's all roses there.

Some of the local TRE are quite lacking in technical knowledge and CRM. They do not posess the background or skills to be TRE's and would no be anywhere else. And that is a fact.

Also that portuguese TRE is a nasty piece of work. Neither liked nor respected by his peers and should be weeded out.

That being sayed there are also a lot of good people there, including most probably yourself.

But don't vouch for some of the other specimens there. They are not worth it. :=

Quote:

---

...Also that portuguese TRE is a nasty piece of work. Neither liked nor respected by his peers and should be weeded out...

---

him, and that pommy piece of work...the aussie what-to-be...bloody Galah that one is!

What do you think this is, bush week?

bloody arrogant...typical pom!

...ah, a pissing contest. Been a while so I guess it's time for one now.
:-D
Gentlemen: on your marks!

Five months in Vietnam, and I'm in a piss'in contest with a TRE. THIS WILL NOT LOOK GOOD ON A RESUMÈ!!!

Direct Personnel
 

Vietnam Airlines seem to have a lot on hold and don't seem to be having many screenings if any. Direct Personnel are brand spanking new to Vietnam Airlines and if you compare their contract terms to those of say Rishworth who have been recruiting for Vietnam Airlines forever, they are way below par. I'd stick to an agency that knows the airline and can provide better terms.

Rishworth vs Parc
 

Hi Jimmy Do Little, what you say about there being several cases of Rishworth pilots changing to Parc but not one instance of a Parc pilot changing to Rishworth is NOT true! I have mates who changed over from Parc to Rishworth and are very happy with Rishworth and are very happy with the move. Don't believe everything you hear!! :=

cods wallop! jimmy was spot on. youse be liz, david or gretchen?

Adrian you don't know what you're talking about. Think whatever you like but i know for a fact that people have made the move to rishworth. Like i said, these are people i know! don't know who those names are you mentioned but they aint me

and tellin us all that you know this or that about RAL. You don't know christmas from Bourke street mate.

Rishworht vs Parc
 

Adrian,

You seem to be very aware of both care to elaborate further?
If Parc is better than Rishworth why?

Cheers:ok:

No real urgency to compare Rishworth with Parc, they both pay the same and offer similar insurance schemes, what we do need to pay attention to is a third contractor coming into the picture paying much less along with less benefits. People considering Vietnam Airlines need to do their homework.

Cheers, D.L.

u'r rite

EuroPacific

:yuk:

Eshana
 

I don't want to bring up the word "Poser", but I am very suspicious of your posts, Jimmy Do Little speaks the truth.

1. You have no posts on any other thread.
2. You only have 3 posts.
3. If you were from the states, you wouldn't indicate America.

People from the agencies should steer clear of trying to post in a "pilot" forum.

Cheers, D.L. :=

well @ least 1 things correct
his name
do little.................very little indeed:}

Hey Jumpstart. At 85 hours each month and four sectors daily - consistantly - I take some offense to that!

just an fyi ... (the guilty know who they are)

ICAO Annex 2 Rules of the Air: 3.2.2.7.3
An aircraft taxiing on the manoeuvring area shall stop and hold at all lighted stop bars and may proceed further when the lights are switched off.

ICAO Annex 14 Aerodromes: 5.3.19.13
A stop bar is switched on to indicate that traffic stop and switched off to indicate that traffic proceed

ICAO Doc 9870 Manual on the Prevention of Runway Incursions:

4.4.1 Pilots should never cross illuminated red stop bars when lining up on, or crossing, a runway.

4.5.5 Aircraft or vehicles should never be instructed to cross illuminated red stop bars when entering or crossing a runway. In the event of unserviceable stop bars that cannot be deselected, contingency measures, such as follow‐me vehicles, should be used..

So what's the point ????
i thought it was a trhead about vietnam airlines INFOS not a shooting range
cheers!!!!!