CRM Advice
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There is less likelyhood of a mistake being made in understanding a request for a selection of any switch, lever, or control movement if clear precise words are used. ie. "gear down" rather than "could you put the gear down honey"
Being polite is more a tone of voice and body langiuage than the use of flowery phrases.
CRM is all about safety and understandable commands for any needed action.
Trying to tie CRM with being politically or socially correct is counterproductive to good airmanship and crew co-ordination.
An a.. ho.. is still an a.. ho.. even when they are being polite.
Cat Driver:
Being polite is more a tone of voice and body langiuage than the use of flowery phrases.
CRM is all about safety and understandable commands for any needed action.
Trying to tie CRM with being politically or socially correct is counterproductive to good airmanship and crew co-ordination.
An a.. ho.. is still an a.. ho.. even when they are being polite.
Cat Driver:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes Rumbo I have, for many years, heard the oft repeated anecdote about "Cheer Up", but have never found anyone who could actually quote the incident!
I do not subscribe to saying something like, "Would you be so kind as to raise the gear?" I believe that saying something like that would be plain stupid, but, a simple 'Please' and ' Thank You' should not confuse the issue.
Can you honestly put your hand on your heart and say that you don't know of a single incident anywhere amongst the Ops Manuals you have had dealings with where an indivudual has not influenced the input? I have seen, in both very large and very small companies, items included under one reign only to be deleted under another, I am sure you have too.
I do not subscribe to saying something like, "Would you be so kind as to raise the gear?" I believe that saying something like that would be plain stupid, but, a simple 'Please' and ' Thank You' should not confuse the issue.
Can you honestly put your hand on your heart and say that you don't know of a single incident anywhere amongst the Ops Manuals you have had dealings with where an indivudual has not influenced the input? I have seen, in both very large and very small companies, items included under one reign only to be deleted under another, I am sure you have too.
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chaps,
Don't misunderstand me. If the kite's on fire after take off its GEAR UP. On a nice sunny day with no problems Gear Up please is what I say. You can argue till you are blue in the face about what that might cause. I would suggest the only thing it does is engender the right sort of atmosphere in the flight deck!
Don't misunderstand me. If the kite's on fire after take off its GEAR UP. On a nice sunny day with no problems Gear Up please is what I say. You can argue till you are blue in the face about what that might cause. I would suggest the only thing it does is engender the right sort of atmosphere in the flight deck!
Props are for boats!
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: An Asian Hub
Age: 56
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK guys have read the posts, I am in the belief of keeping to your sops even if it means Sterile Cockpit below FL100 ,which sounds a bit of an overkill unless its the Concorde.
I am Small Turbo Prop Captain in a type that is really a single pilot Airplane. I went from 3500HRS of singlepilot ops to 2 Crew Ops last year as a start off Captain. During my training I made all the mistakes including niceties, of which the Company Check Captain and Authority Testing Officer both said that nicities should remain outside. So I went to work with this in the back of my head. I did fell tense, the first couple of months, but have eased off now. I can asure that most of us, faced with an Emergency the nicities will definitely be naturaly left out of the procedure.
What erks me is the apparent 2 different theories expressed in this thread. Surley CRM in 2002 has eliminated any uncertainty in this area. I know Flight Safety believes in a sterile cockpit analogy, and all nonessential words minimized.
Just my 2 cents worth
I am Small Turbo Prop Captain in a type that is really a single pilot Airplane. I went from 3500HRS of singlepilot ops to 2 Crew Ops last year as a start off Captain. During my training I made all the mistakes including niceties, of which the Company Check Captain and Authority Testing Officer both said that nicities should remain outside. So I went to work with this in the back of my head. I did fell tense, the first couple of months, but have eased off now. I can asure that most of us, faced with an Emergency the nicities will definitely be naturaly left out of the procedure.
What erks me is the apparent 2 different theories expressed in this thread. Surley CRM in 2002 has eliminated any uncertainty in this area. I know Flight Safety believes in a sterile cockpit analogy, and all nonessential words minimized.
Just my 2 cents worth
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SV Marie Celeste
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are nice ways of saying 'GEAR UP' and very abrasive ways of saying 'GEAR UP PLEASE'. The problem is using the SOP's as an excuse to grumpy and offhand behaviuor.
The point must be that a good atmosphere in the cockpit contributes to the team effort and improves comunication and safety. The party really begins in the crewroom. Is this one of the points of CRM?. More experienced people can perhaps say.
The point must be that a good atmosphere in the cockpit contributes to the team effort and improves comunication and safety. The party really begins in the crewroom. Is this one of the points of CRM?. More experienced people can perhaps say.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Who can say?
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I find myself in agreement with both sides here, but mostly with calypso.
Like many Brits, I find it very hard to leave out the "please". However, I work for a non-British carrier whose philosophy is very non-British (surprie, surprise!
) and who cannot understand why their British employees feel the need to include it.
The manner in which things are said can, as calypso points out, make a huge difference, and if the SOPs state that you leave it out then it is a little unprofessional not to make an effort to leave it out.
After all, saying word like "please" and "thank you" do not comprise the entirety of the atmosphere on the flight deck.
Like many Brits, I find it very hard to leave out the "please". However, I work for a non-British carrier whose philosophy is very non-British (surprie, surprise!
) and who cannot understand why their British employees feel the need to include it.The manner in which things are said can, as calypso points out, make a huge difference, and if the SOPs state that you leave it out then it is a little unprofessional not to make an effort to leave it out.
After all, saying word like "please" and "thank you" do not comprise the entirety of the atmosphere on the flight deck.
Join Date: Feb 1998
Location: Formerly of Nam
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive done quite a few CRM modules over the years and yeh I agree with the concept - when I was an F.O. years ago it was in the age of "F.O.s should be seen and not heard." It p!ssed me off a bit but I lived with it. Nowadays I think this new CRM stuff is a good thing.
What is very bloodey anoying is CRM is the catchcry of weak crew members - "Hes not using CRM!" and a 40yo captain with 20 years in the game is hauled in because of a complaining 21yo Quake generation wonder-boy. This complaining is esp so from those whos situational awareness is crap. There are SOME THINGS that can be done without having a discusion when its obvious even to a tree-stump that that particuler action must be done.
CRM comes naturaley to profesionals who know there stuff. The varius modules enhance and strengthen it which Im all for. But its also become a weapon used to prop up the importance of some egos.
What is very bloodey anoying is CRM is the catchcry of weak crew members - "Hes not using CRM!" and a 40yo captain with 20 years in the game is hauled in because of a complaining 21yo Quake generation wonder-boy. This complaining is esp so from those whos situational awareness is crap. There are SOME THINGS that can be done without having a discusion when its obvious even to a tree-stump that that particuler action must be done.
CRM comes naturaley to profesionals who know there stuff. The varius modules enhance and strengthen it which Im all for. But its also become a weapon used to prop up the importance of some egos.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dubai
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There have been many incidents and accidents were invetigations have revealed that the crew overlooked important information.
As a consequance CRM was develloped in order to cope with this problem.
Since it is the captains responsability to conduct a flight safely, it is also his responsability that an enviroment is created that allow everybody involved in the safe conduct of a flight to have an input.
We are all human beings and as such we make mistakes, realising this is opening the door to good CRM.
There are a lot of pitfalls in human communication realizing this will lead the way.
As a consequance CRM was develloped in order to cope with this problem.
Since it is the captains responsability to conduct a flight safely, it is also his responsability that an enviroment is created that allow everybody involved in the safe conduct of a flight to have an input.
We are all human beings and as such we make mistakes, realising this is opening the door to good CRM.
There are a lot of pitfalls in human communication realizing this will lead the way.
Last edited by Cap 56; 22nd May 2004 at 13:52.
Here is a link for the PACE reference – safetypee 23 Dec post. P.A.C.E. see PACE 1.
Although this paper was written with the co-pilot in mind, the principles apply to all crew, especially when in the primary monitoring role. Also, see PACE 2 at the bottom of the web page, this is a similar paper, but with examples.
A more recent view of CRM, being more focussed on threat and error management, in addition to using all available resources in order to enable safe and efficient flight operations, is here The Evolution of Crew Resource Management Training
--------------------
Unless specifically authorized everything else is forbidden.
Although this paper was written with the co-pilot in mind, the principles apply to all crew, especially when in the primary monitoring role. Also, see PACE 2 at the bottom of the web page, this is a similar paper, but with examples.
A more recent view of CRM, being more focussed on threat and error management, in addition to using all available resources in order to enable safe and efficient flight operations, is here The Evolution of Crew Resource Management Training
--------------------
Unless specifically authorized everything else is forbidden.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: london
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dynamite Dean
Be wary of 'Email advice' One of the worst examples of CRM I have ever come across and a view shared by many.
I have started a new post for you.
What does a Captain expect from a FO?
Be wary of 'Email advice' One of the worst examples of CRM I have ever come across and a view shared by many.
I have started a new post for you.
What does a Captain expect from a FO?
