PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rumours & News (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news-13/)
-   -   Ash clouds threaten air traffic (https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/412103-ash-clouds-threaten-air-traffic.html)

spamcanppl 19th April 2010 12:22

If the RAF do the test in what ever fast jet and it all goes pear shaped, at least they have the option to eject

silverstrata 19th April 2010 12:23


All the private pilots are still flying in PISTON engined aeroplanes, so come on Air Atlantique, get them out, let's get back to nostalgia and start operating all the old piston engined airliners

Oh - no, no, no, Sunny Jim. Cannot have that. I see some ash build-up on your spark plugs. :(

You're grounded, mate. :ok:

BOAC 19th April 2010 12:25

Has anyone seen a definitive report on the BA747 engines and airframe? Assuming that they really did fly into dust-contaminated air (the reports of a climb to 40k leave me unimpressed with the stuff all below 20k!!) and also assuming that the jet went in for heavy maintenance, there should be some engine inspection results available.

spamcanppl 19th April 2010 12:26

what we need is a fleet of GA a/c flying out of Lydd and/or Manston ferrying pax back over the channel. Might take a while, carrying only two or three per flight but.....................we'd log a lot of hours

:ok::):D

GoatMan205 19th April 2010 12:31

According to Willie Walsh, everything is 100% rosy, and presumably all flights should immediately be reinstated.

Let's just hope a flame out happens outside of London.

Rocket2 19th April 2010 12:34

Out of interest - since we've done the effect or no effect on the engines / airframe bit to death, what will the effects be on the SLF of flying for a few hours through the ash? Surely it'll make its way into the cabin via the CAU's & bleed air etc, not only being breathed in but also ingested in food & drinks.
R2

Cambrian man 19th April 2010 12:36

We're off
 
Manx2.com have two aircraft in the air flying from the Isle of Man to Belfast and Blackpool.

MPN11 19th April 2010 12:36

There's a risk of cabin contamination for sure. However, as I'm now up to smoking 30 a day through stress that will be the least of my worries. ;)

View From The Ground 19th April 2010 12:37

Open For Business
 
Just heard LHR likely to open at 1900 local on the 20th April with limited slots available and full resumption from 0530 on the 21st April.

PENKO 19th April 2010 12:37


Out of interest - since we've done the effect or no effect on the engines / airframe bit to death, what will the effects be on the SLF of flying for a few hours through the ash? Surely it'll make its way into the cabin via the CAU's & bleed air etc, not only being breathed in but also ingested in food & drink
That's a very valid question, I would suspect that once we start flying, the air quality will be monitored on a selection of aircraft. In the end a calculated risck will be taken, just as with the radiation you suffer once you reach cruising levels.

freddyfokker 19th April 2010 12:38

Unofficial but

FYI The Met Office has advised DfT that the eruption stopped last night.

UK airspace will be progressively reopened tomorrow.

Scottish airspace will open at 0600

Midlands at 1200

Southern UK at 1800

Northern France and German airspace are likely to remain closed tomorrow.

NATS and CAA are preparing initial operating principles for the start up period.

Whippersnapper 19th April 2010 12:39


Hi Whipper. Yeah fair comment, the RAF is under funded and stretched. But where does their funding come from. How many billions will be lost in tax collections over this period. I am sure they can risk a couple of Tornado engines. And its only that, a risk, its not certain that they would go up and wreck some engines. I have not caught up with other posts, but before someone has a go for risking a RAF pilots life......they are big boys and gals, when they signed on the knew they would be doing dangerous things. Trust me the nations finest take much bigger risks in Afganistan on a daily basis than what they would face on a jolly over Scotland.
I was briefly in the RAF, and that was not what I signed on to do. I signed on to fight for the nation's defence, but not to risk my life for the economic convenience of the airlines. Your "disposable" attitude to the armed forces is rather insulting, but sadly also common. However, if you had the slightest clue of the resources issues in the services, you would soon understand that the RAF cannot afford to risk the loss of a Tornado, or other aircraft, that would not be replaced because of budget cuts which are set to increase dramatically, and the crew should not be risked either. You may think that the aircraft may just suffer engine damage, but what if things go wrong on landing the crippled aircraft? The crew might be able to eject, but that's hardly low-risk.

More significantly, what do you propose they do with the Tornado? Just fly around aimlessly until things go wrong? There are no sensor pods or sample collectors that could be fitted, so nothing scientific would be gained from your disposal of critical military assets.

Chemin 19th April 2010 12:39

Beausoleil
 
What I should have said was "ash" of course. Silly me. I was going to mention, but didn't, soot from the Kuwait oilfields that were ignited during the gulf war, which along with blowing sand, caused huge amounts of "clag" in the area, but did not stop operations.
However, if you think we are not dealing with "grit" and "silicon" what do you suggest it is that has been deposited on my car this morning?

Jetex_Jim 19th April 2010 12:44


According to Willie Walsh, everything is 100% rosy, and presumably all flights should immediately be reinstated.
It's not so much that he's desperate to resume flying. He knows that to do so could bring down a 'cloud' of additional maintenance costs. What he is doing, assisted in part by his chums at IATA, is building the case for government overreaction.

When he's finished he'll be back looking for government handout.

It's really that simple.

Whippersnapper 19th April 2010 12:44

I don't understand the confusion over this and desert flying. Sand in the desert is made of large grains of silica. They are rounded from years of abrasion and they won't have the same melt characteristics of the finer, sharper mica in the ash cloud, which being fine will melt more readily, will be deflected less by airflow direction changes (coating more of the engine interior) and being more abrasive.

These comparisons with sand storms are pointless. The differences in effects between mica and silica have been posted previously, which is where I learnt about them yesterday. I think many would benefit from reading the thread properly and learning form the scientists and engineers who have contributed.

Mr A Tis 19th April 2010 12:59

As the situation is reviewed every six hours ( next at 1500), I dont see how they can give a prediction of 1900 tomorrow.
I'm not sure the SLF are in a hurry to travel unless they are stranded.

Denti 19th April 2010 13:01

German carriers are starting operation again using Y and Z flightplanes, effectively flying VFR in german airspace and then switching to IFR once they are clear of the affected area.

View From The Ground 19th April 2010 13:02

1900
 
Pretty confident my info of good quality let's wait and see, different people running the show now hence the different approach.

fruitbat 19th April 2010 13:05

BA has now cancelled all flights for Tues 20th.

znww5 19th April 2010 13:06

Jetex Jim - Good call! FYI WW has already played the handout card (according to this morning's BBC teletext), claiming the post 9/11 payouts as a legitimate precedent.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:37.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.