This strike is not going well for the Pilots. They are barely making an impact. Occassional 10% cancelled flights with most passengers being accommodated is not enough to crush the will of the opponent.
The opponent is making it appear that they are the good guy who is prioritising families ahead of business travellers to the UK as a result of the pilot strike. Pilots here might not see it like that but that is how it looks to the passengers. |
Originally Posted by diple
(Post 10201600)
This strike is not going well for the Pilots. They are barely making an impact. Occassional 10% cancelled flights with most passengers being accommodated is not enough to crush the will of the opponent.
The opponent is making it appear that they are the good guy who is prioritising families ahead of business travellers to the UK as a result of the pilot strike. Pilots here might not see it like that but that is how it looks to the passengers. |
Originally Posted by ExDubai
(Post 10201772)
Not enough impact if the do this only in 1 country. Do it in 3-4 countries and you‘ll see much more cancellations. 600 flights cancelled because CC know how to do it. I do think Ryanair paid less respect to Cabin Crew's ability to organise than Pilots or maybe Ryanair are just so cheap that they wouldn't invest in avoiding cabin crew strikes until the strikes actually hit. |
Ryanair seem to be heading for a showdown with the CAA due to a clash over compensation payments caused by the strikes.
https://www.moneysavingexpert.com/ne...868.1520447614 |
“UK law far behind...”. Definitely! Proved by the outrageous decision to allow British Airways to use Qatar Airways (whose crews would have faced deportation or imprisonment if they’d refused!) to break their cabin crew strike. Even that didn’t work. Full credit to B A cabin crew who stuck it out! |
Would I be a bit of a cynic if I see these strikes as 'useful' for saving up pilots' flying hours to avoid the problems of last September? In other words, a few bits of disjointed disruption now is better than that big disruption in September.
|
A bit of disjointed disruption at the busiest time of year? Doesn't really sound plausible.
What I suggest is happening, is Ryanair having failed to grasp the seriousness of the situation, and the resolve of their cabin- and cockpit crews. They've publicly said they'll acknowledge unions, but not any union. Particularly, Ryanair doesn't seem to recognise any existing unions. Since then all they've done is give staff a song and a dance, trying to stall for as long as possible hoping it'll all go away. |
Originally Posted by SMT Member
(Post 10202991)
A bit of disjointed disruption at the busiest time of year? Doesn't really sound plausible.
What I suggest is happening, is Ryanair having failed to grasp the seriousness of the situation, and the resolve of their cabin- and cockpit crews. They've publicly said they'll acknowledge unions, but not any union. Particularly, Ryanair doesn't seem to recognise any existing unions. Since then all they've done is give staff a song and a dance, trying to stall for as long as possible hoping it'll all go away. They will turn themselves inside out doing everything, then finally having exhausted all other options, do the right thing... |
Originally Posted by Rated De
(Post 10203021)
Mr O'Leary like all bullies will extend and pretend.
They will turn themselves inside out doing everything, then finally having exhausted all other options, do the right thing... If Ryanair Management sees forward bookings begin to struggle then they might change strategy but that hasn't happened so far. I'm not seeing the motivator in either financial or legal terms which compels Ryanair Management to genuinely embrace the Unions if at all. |
I'm not seeing the motivator in either financial or legal terms which compels Ryanair Management to genuinely embrace the Unions if at all. as for......... Chief Executive Michael O’Leary said he expected more strikes during the summer “as we are not prepared to concede to unreasonable demands that will compromise either our low fares or our highly efficient model. He also warned staff of possible job losses if strikes went on. |
Ryanair warns Dutch passengers to claim compensation directl Ryanair is now threatening a claim-buro in the Netherlands with legal action. It will ‘take all necessary measures’ to protect the contractual relationship with its passengers. |
Originally Posted by golfyankeesierra
(Post 10204973)
Ryanair is now threatening a claim-buro in the Netherlands with legal action. It will ‘take all necessary measures’ to protect the contractual relationship with its passengers. |
https://www.rte.ie/news/business/201...r-dublin-cuts/ O Leary and his bullyboys showing their true colours. It would be great if the Board decided that the Job cuts began at the very top. Time for all Ryanair staff to stand up to these bully’s . |
Sky Reporting the following:
Ryanair has taken the unusual step of publishing staff pay and benefit details online as workers for the airline stage strikes. The budget airline hit back at Irish pilots staging a third 24-hour strike over working conditions. Ryanair posted details on its website of pilots' monthly and annual salaries, which included captains from Ireland, the UK, Belgium, Germany and Portugal. The airline claimed the pilots earned between €190,000 and €220,000 (£169,000 and £195,000) year. Not about money then I'd guess?;) |
Given Ryanair have posted the wage slips details of the earnings that various captains earn at various different bases in different countries, would it not also be a good idea to reveal (other than the Basic) the Social and PAYE headings also, just to clarify?. I am interested to know what the other (second) largest amount is on each payslip. If you look purely at the Basic salary, then it's less than other operator's Command salaries for equivalent fleet position and size in the main. The bulk of salary is made up of something else (pre-tax?), and also - what position in Ryanair do these individuals hold? Base Captains? Directors of some sort? or just ordinary line pilots?.
|
Dublin reduction!
Good Morning
And the plot thickens! According newspaper Rte.ie Ryanair has told them that this winter it reduces the Dublin based aircraft from 30 to 25. 100 pilots and 200 cabin crew has been given notice of temporary redundancy and an offer to transfer to Poland this winter. Union busting on a high level! Not sure the timing is right. Correction , : I am sure the timing is NOT right. Time to dust off that old CV, me thinks. Regards Cpt B |
Originally Posted by OutsideCAS
(Post 10203845)
That would be sensible. Sacking staff when you don’t have enough as it is?. Model is not broken perhaps but it’s definitely needing some adhesive to stop the wheels falling off. And they are falling off if the reports are accurate.
Low-cost end of the market in any industry is notoriously sensitive, pax don't fly ryanair because they like them, they put up with ryanair because it does the job at a low price, the minute it stops doing the job or having lowest price, the pax will be gone. Ryanair doesn't do frequent-flyer-miles or airport-lounges, if you have a bad flight there isn't anywhere to upgrade you to on the next one, and MOL will happily leave pax stranded without assistance or EU261 compensation. Every time that happens it's at least one pax lost, for a long time. MOL doesn't care of course, plenty of work for his planes elsewhere in the EU, apparently, and the crew of course provided they want to transfer to another EU country with the same standards of EU law and judicial independence (*cough*)... |
The Irish Independent has more details of Ryanair's latest moves, here:
Ryanair has today written to over 300 employees warning them that their services may not be required from October 28. The protective notice to staff has been issued after the board took the decision to cut its Dublin-based fleet by 20pc for the winter. Over 100 pilots and 200 cabin crew employees will be affected by Ryanair’s decision to cut its Dublin fleet to 24 from 30 for the winter period. The low-fares airline said that the decision had been driven by the rapid growth of its Polish charter airline, allied to a down turn in forward bookings and airfares in Ireland, which it said was "partly as a result of recent rolling strikes by Irish pilots." The airline said that the strikes had resulted in consumer confidence in the reliability of its Irish flight schedules being disturbed. |
"Temporary redundancy" in other words unpaid leave over the winter reserving the right to call you back when we need you --on our terms. They know winter is the soft season for recruitment and most guys would need 3 months to get a job and would probably choose to stay but loose the pay.. Let me guess.. if you've been on strike you run the risk of being a target! Perhaps the crews can shaft them by offering a "job share" spread the pain amongst the brethren and avoid the need for "reductions"
|
Are the 100 Pilots the one's on strike or....Union needs to stand firm
|
Oh my Lord. Staff will be transferred ''based on performance and attendance''. No safety issues there! Move along now! Nothing to be seen here
|
I haven't seen this elsewhere: Ryanair cabin crew on strike today and tomorrow in Spain, Portugal, Italy, and Belgium.
|
Originally Posted by SliabhLuachra
(Post 10205980)
Oh my Lord. Staff will be transferred ''based on performance and attendance''. No safety issues there! Move along now! Nothing to be seen here
Ryanair strike has been all over the media in the U.S. - https://www.usatoday.com/story/trave...ers/832069002/ |
I think the list of 13 bullet points in the El Pais article above sums it up. No social insurance,no company sick pay, not able to get mortgage. This is monumental and I am hoping there's a lot of head baging in Swords right now. |
Originally Posted by 172_driver
(Post 10206135)
I think the list of 13 bullet points in the El Pais article above sums it up. No social insurance,no company sick pay, not able to get mortgage. This is monumental and I am hoping there's a lot of head baging in Swords right now. |
Without wishing to defend RYR, the general issue that you can be employed in one country and as a result can't get a mortgage in another is something the EU probably ought to have a look at Negan, when the Ryanair delegation make a 180 in the doorway and leave as they don't approve of the Union selected negotiators we're pretty far off negotiating "in good faith". |
Originally Posted by Negan
(Post 10206232)
The pilots should call an end to the strikes and Ryanair should offer to negotiate in good faith over the coming months to seek a solution as I don't think anyone wins with the current strike situation
|
Originally Posted by Negan
(Post 10206232)
The pilots should call an end to the strikes and Ryanair should offer to negotiate in good faith over the coming months to seek a solution as I don't think anyone wins with the current strike situation
Customers and crew all stand behind this strike Ryanair! |
Is it time to help?!
Guys, Just one question; why do pilots offer themselves to be trainers when they are getting slapped in the face by management?!!?? Is it not time to give up training and let them deal with it? |
Originally Posted by 172_driver
(Post 10206244)
Negan, when the Ryanair delegation make a 180 in the doorway and leave as they don't approve of the Union selected negotiators we're pretty far off negotiating "in good faith".
1. Was the current IALPA President Mr. Cullen of Aer Lingus one of the negotiators selected by the union? 2. Were any other Aer Lingus people included among the negotiators selected by the union? 3. If not, what other airlines had negotiators selected by the union? 4. What reason did Ryanair give for doing a 180. Who (no names) did they object to? If you are unwilling to provide answers to these questions then your statement quoted above remains unsubstantiated and mere hearsay. |
Ryanair should offer to negotiate in good faith |
Negan
There is a few words for people like You!
All of them will get this post deleted. So lets just say You are WRONG ! |
Hi ayroplain, I am not talking about Dublin but another country where the union is seeking collective bargaining agreement with Ryanair. They objected to the chairman of the union being present as he was not employed by Ryanair. |
Originally Posted by ayroplain
(Post 10206833)
Hi 172_driver. As you appear to have information that the rest of us do not have could you answer the following questions please:
1. Was the current IALPA President Mr. Cullen of Aer Lingus one of the negotiators selected by the union? 2. Were any other Aer Lingus people included among the negotiators selected by the union? 3. If not, what other airlines had negotiators selected by the union? 4. What reason did Ryanair give for doing a 180. Who (no names) did they object to? If you are unwilling to provide answers to these questions then your statement quoted above remains unsubstantiated and mere hearsay. 1. None of Ryanairs business, 2. Irrelevant, 3. Who they choose to negotiate is up to them, and 4. All of the above Ryanair doesn’t get a say in who they negotiate with. If Ryanair pilots showed up with the tooth fairy, and the SWAPA negotiating committee, it’s still none of their business. Your list of questions, is really a list of excuses and fears. Niether of which bode well for the Ryanair ‘negotiators’. |
Originally Posted by JPJP
(Post 10207026)
Ryanair doesn’t get a say in who they negotiate with.
In the light of the claim that Ryanair didn't act "in good faith" by walking out of an intended meeting with the union I thought it was important to find out if they actually DID walk out and why before trying to reach any conclusions. Let us assume for the moment that they did do a 180. If, and I say IF they saw any Aer Lingus reps on the union's team when they arrived they would have every right to walk away given the long history between the two airlines and, in particular, with the IALPA President. It doesn't matter which side of the discussion you are on, it happened. If you don't know what that history is then you need to look it up. In this (Dublin) dispute it is a very relevant factor whether you agree or not. Any Aer Lingus presence on the team would have to be considered a provocative (bad faith) move by the union. On the other hand, if there was nobody on the team from Aer Lingus then that's a different ballgame altogether. However, following 172_driver's reply it is now clear that the 180 he referred to didn't happen at Dublin. 172_driver, thanks for your reply. Apologies, I thought you were referring to the high profile dispute with pilots at the Dublin base. |
Originally Posted by ayroplain
(Post 10207088)
Let us assume for the moment that they did do a 180.
If, and I say IF they saw any Aer Lingus reps on the union's team when they arrived they would have every right to walk away given the long history between the two airlines and, in particular, with the IALPA President. It doesn't matter which side of the discussion you are on, it happened. If you don't know what that history is then you need to look it up. In this (Dublin) dispute it is a very relevant factor whether you agree or not. Any Aer Lingus presence on the team would have to be considered a provocative (bad faith) move by the union. On the other hand, if there was nobody on the team from Aer Lingus then that's a different ballgame altogether. . You don’t seem to have any grasp of how negotiations for a EBA/CBA are carried out. There are established guidelines that define “bad faith”. Whom one chooses to negotiate, isn’t one of them. Your points above are irrelevant. They’re a transparent attempt to muddy the waters, delay, distract and reframe the discussion. Ryanair have no ability to dictate who the pilots choose as negotiators. Are you implying that the Ryanair team would be so upset by the choice of negotiators that they would be unable to continue ? Overwhelmed and distracted, angered and unable to concentrate ? Spluttering spittle over their tight polyester and spandex suits, at the hint of facing a negotiating team that doesn’t please them. Interesting. |
Originally Posted by JPJP
(Post 10207138)
Your points above are irrelevant.
|
Firing 200 pilots as cabin crew an advantage to their competitors.
Ryanair's Rivals Want to Hire Its Disgruntled Pilots | Fortune |
Originally Posted by ayroplain
(Post 10207156)
It is perfectly obvious that you have no clear understanding of the difficulties that beset this particular (Dublin) dispute, are incapable of carrying on a reasoned discussion and are just intent on ranting on with your obvious hatred of the airline blinding your mind. It's there for all to see.
Fail. Again. There’s an old aviation adage - Airlines get the Union that they deserve. Good luck. |
Talking of “obvious hatred” the Ryanair management have an entirely irrational hatred of Aer Lingus. I recall a winter storm a few years back where the weather around the British Isles was appalling, and the Chief pilot issued an internal memo congratulating pilots for managing to get in and out of Dublin safely and noting “a small Dublin based Airbus operator” were unable to do likewise. Given the only audience for communications like that was Ryanair pilots, most of whom don’t give a monkeys about some golf club pissing contest, it displays the madness that comes over FR management whenever EI are involved. Anyone who has followed the history of Ryanair management over the years will be unsurprised by their efforts to prevent any kind of meaningful negotiations with the unions. If you have had any personal interactions with Eddie Wilson (the man who flew all the way to Copenhagen solely to tell the Danish Unions to **** off then fly home) will know that Ryanair have no intention of building any form of honest relationship with their employees. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:58. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.