Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Air Canada towing incident

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Air Canada towing incident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Dec 2019, 21:59
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: halifax
Age: 58
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Air Canada towing incident

https://toronto.ctvnews.ca/video-cap...rmac-1.4748791

Thats gonna be an expensive tow job
Back door is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2019, 23:36
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That A321 got swapped around like a ragged doll.
Jet Jockey A4 is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2019, 23:47
  #3 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 76
Posts: 2,484
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"...like a ragged doll.",
Yeah, that's not just a brush of the rudder with the triple's wing-tip - looks like it hit the 321's vertical stabilizer. It shouldn't occur if both a/c are within their parking zones so it will be interesting to learn where the A321 was parked, (assuming the tow was on the centerline).
PJ2 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 00:22
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Macau
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is there wing creep on the triple when it in the turn?
On another swept wing aircraft I am familiar with, the sweep of the wing results in the wing tip extending beyond the documented wingspan.
Taxdodge2015 is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 03:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Used to be the Beer Store, now the dépanneur
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 777 will take any opportunity to prove that it's a tank.
Glad no one was hurt.
Smurfjet is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 09:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Taxdodge2015
Is there wing creep on the triple when it in the turn?
On another swept wing aircraft I am familiar with, the sweep of the wing results in the wing tip extending beyond the documented wingspan.
It's a swept wing..so yes, you get "swept wing growth"
wiggy is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 15:30
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The Boeing has since returned to service but the Airbus is still being repaired." Well we've finally put that debate to bed after 40 years.... ;-)
misd-agin is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 19:13
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Up
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Updates for those who may be interested


















Seat4A is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 22:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: on the road less travelled
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Wide body tows should be on lane 13E but driver took 13 instead. Experienced crews off for Xmas holidays. Tough way to end a brief ground crew career. Expensive lesson for AC.

Last edited by HighSpeedAluminum; 1st Jan 2020 at 22:08. Reason: More informative
HighSpeedAluminum is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2020, 23:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1998
Location: between 20 & 30 000'
Posts: 80
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HighSpeedAluminum

Wide body tows should be on lane 13E but driver took 13 instead. Experienced crews off for Xmas holidays. Tough way to end a brief ground crew career. Expensive lesson for AC.
This should also be a lesson for the authorities, in Canada AND worldwide. STOP this very ambiguous marking/naming of taxiways. Would it not have been simpler to rename 13e something else. There are way too many confusing taxiways, airways and rules around the world. People are being set up to make mistakes. The authorities should take some of the blame here.
gtseraf is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2020, 00:35
  #11 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 76
Posts: 2,484
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are way too many confusing taxiways, airways and rules around the world. People are being set up to make mistakes. The authorities should take some of the blame here.
Yep. The Singapore 006 B744 takeoff accident at Taipei comes to mind.
PJ2 is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2020, 06:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,847
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
This should also be a lesson for the authorities, in Canada AND worldwide. STOP this very ambiguous marking/naming of taxiways. Would it not have been simpler to rename 13e something else. There are way too many confusing taxiways, airways and rules around the world. People are being set up to make mistakes. The authorities should take some of the blame here.
Agreed. Some time ago I was turning on to stand in a 777 and it didn’t look quite right to either of us so I stopped. It was dark, wet and I’d followed the only line I could see at the time, which happened to be the wrong one for the type even though it had the right number on it. Was able to be marshalled onto the correct line, so not irretrievable but I think I would have got *very* close to the aircraft in the next bay if I’d carried on...

I’ve been flying out of LHR for >20 years and I still feel the need to double check at this end:


LHR 27L...
FullWings is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.