Jet2 evacuation at Blackpool
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: NEWCASTLE, UK
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED
The aircraft braked in a normal manner, well as normal as it ever is at BLK, (autobrake 3) Tower advised the crew that lots of white smoke was coming from the area of the undercarriage, they crashed the Fire Crew, FIRE CHIEF ADVISED THAT THE CAPTAIN EVACUATE THE AIRCRAFT. It's a brave Captain that goes against the advice of the Fire Chief, ( At the subsequent board of enquiry, blah blah blah ) The smoke was caused by a loose union in a hydraulic pipe, non- flammable fluid dripped onto the hot brakes following the landing run those are the facts so can we please stop all this rubbish speculation. The Crew and especially the Captain acted in a thoroughly professional manner, and .....NOONE WAS HURT !!!!
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dogsbreath
Thank you for the concise description of the events, posts #18, 21 & 33 had already raised this as being the most likely chain of events but it is always helpfull to get the precise detail.
However the posts from some above seem to prove that some are incapable of reading and understanding a safety card, let alone the technical issues described by the wiser contributors to this thread.
A job well done by the flight crew, cabin crew and fire service in my opinion.
However the posts from some above seem to prove that some are incapable of reading and understanding a safety card, let alone the technical issues described by the wiser contributors to this thread.
A job well done by the flight crew, cabin crew and fire service in my opinion.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Going back to my post #21, I do not see any response from our resident skygods as to how they would have handled the situation as described by 'dogsbreath'. We understand from the brethren that the method of evacuation chosen was 'wrong' or 'inappropriate', so it would be useful for all of us to know the way you SGs would have handled it so we can offer our learned opinions and possibly learn a better way.
Listening.................?
Listening.................?
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Captplaystation
Skydrol will burn if in contact with a flame or heat but won't it's Self support combustion, hence in this case a vapour that appeared to the observers to be smoke but no fire.
Last edited by A and C; 2nd Jul 2014 at 08:01.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Near sheep!
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The fire crew apparently deemed an evacuation a suitable action.
There was an aircraft many years ago (cant recall the detail, but featured in Naked Pilot HF book) where an in flight fire was followed by a safe emergency landing. The captain decided not to evacuate and sadly, everyone perished on board due to sudden smoke inhalation.
It is so easy to judge based on hindsight, but at the end of the day....no one was majorly hurt in this incident, and the aircraft is still intact.
Lessons can be learned. UK aviation should be proud of its just culture. Some of you speculators that are apportioning blame......that blame culture is an unwelcome thing of the past!
There was an aircraft many years ago (cant recall the detail, but featured in Naked Pilot HF book) where an in flight fire was followed by a safe emergency landing. The captain decided not to evacuate and sadly, everyone perished on board due to sudden smoke inhalation.
It is so easy to judge based on hindsight, but at the end of the day....no one was majorly hurt in this incident, and the aircraft is still intact.
Lessons can be learned. UK aviation should be proud of its just culture. Some of you speculators that are apportioning blame......that blame culture is an unwelcome thing of the past!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hadlow
Age: 60
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Newcastle NI
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An evacuation is a serious incident that nearly always results in injury, i Would go with Fire 1 recommendation every time. It will be interesting to see what the problem was with the R1 door slide, the picture seems to show the door only partially open I assume a door handling problem rather than a defect, but a useful reminder that things don't always work as described in the cabin simulator, a lose hydraulic union is just one of those things.
All well handled by the crew and Blackpool fire service.
All well handled by the crew and Blackpool fire service.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Behind you all the way!
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fire Chief on scene recommended evacuation, Capt. elected to evacuate the cabin using the main doors only. Good call in my opinion. To any detractors or the habitual Jet2.com 'Knockers', I'll say it was the safest decision, professionally executed with excellent support from the Airport Services.
Well done to all.
Well done to all.
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: usa
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That the smoke was later found to have been caused by a loose union in a hydraulic pipe, non-flammable fluid dripping on hot brakes etc. is immaterial to the decision made on the spot. The decision re evacuation had to take place quickly, well before those facts were known to either the PIC or the Fire Chief. They could not wait for a lab analysis of the fluids involved.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: A little south of the "Black Sheep" brewery
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Smoke from fluid dropping on hot brakes can turn nasty very quickly:
I agree with rmiller774:
I agree with rmiller774:
[Do] not wait for a lab analysis of the fluids involved.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A & C - trust me. Skydrol WILL burn. I've seen first hand the resultant fire caused by hydraulic fluid leaking onto hot brakes. I should know I attended the award presentation today to the colleague of mine who spotted the smoke on CCTV and crashed the Fire Crews.
What followed the white smoke was an approximately 12 foot fireball when it ignited followed by a sustained fire until the fire crews could mobilise and knock down the fire.
And whilst, yes, the firemen do spend a lot of their time training they dont just go "Oooo flames. Must. Squirt. Water..." They train for a wide range of scenarios using real incidents and shared experience to inform their training. Many of those guys could tell you more about a fire spreads and the flammability of your aircraft than you. Bear in mind also that many of the airport firefighters were highly experienced local authority firefighters and have fought more real fires than you can imagine.
What followed the white smoke was an approximately 12 foot fireball when it ignited followed by a sustained fire until the fire crews could mobilise and knock down the fire.
And whilst, yes, the firemen do spend a lot of their time training they dont just go "Oooo flames. Must. Squirt. Water..." They train for a wide range of scenarios using real incidents and shared experience to inform their training. Many of those guys could tell you more about a fire spreads and the flammability of your aircraft than you. Bear in mind also that many of the airport firefighters were highly experienced local authority firefighters and have fought more real fires than you can imagine.
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: UK
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trossie, it's a good idea to make sure your example is relevant before you post it - the Okinawa fire was a massive fuel leak onto the engine, not a small hyd leak onto warm brakes, and resulted in an immediate large fire, not some smoke. Saying that fluid leaks lead to fireballs is ridiculous. Stretching the logic, are you going to evacuate because someone sees fluid dripping from the engine pylon during a turnaround? Chances are it's just condensation from cold soaking. Check first, then react accordingly...
I agree that that crew had no option but to evacuate after being so advised by the fire crew to do so - that recommendation put the aircrew in a very narrow and compromised situation, raking away their options. Frankly, I think the fire crew were overzealous and should have informed the captain that there was smoke but no fire and monitored the situation. With the appliances on site, they could have contained any fire that did erupt and then reported that for the captain to then order an evacuation. I think it's wrong that external agents make decisions for the pilots rather than just give them the information that is needed in what was an urgent, not emergency situation. Had this been a taller aircraft, more serious injuries would have occurred, all unnecessarily.
I agree that that crew had no option but to evacuate after being so advised by the fire crew to do so - that recommendation put the aircrew in a very narrow and compromised situation, raking away their options. Frankly, I think the fire crew were overzealous and should have informed the captain that there was smoke but no fire and monitored the situation. With the appliances on site, they could have contained any fire that did erupt and then reported that for the captain to then order an evacuation. I think it's wrong that external agents make decisions for the pilots rather than just give them the information that is needed in what was an urgent, not emergency situation. Had this been a taller aircraft, more serious injuries would have occurred, all unnecessarily.
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You mean a hot surface like a set of hot brakes just after landing...
Basically what I'm saying the Fire Crews were there, looking at the situation, knowing what the possible scenarios are (is this fluid oil, is it fuel) and have correctly assessed that the fluid dripping onto the hot brakes and vaporising represents a significant fire risk and have given their advice. They were there, they had all the facts and trying to armchair quarterback a decision made by someone who is an expert in their field (a field which, I would postulate, you know little [namely firefighting and fire development]) is not helpful when a decision was made in the interests of securing immediate safety for the passengers.
Basically what I'm saying the Fire Crews were there, looking at the situation, knowing what the possible scenarios are (is this fluid oil, is it fuel) and have correctly assessed that the fluid dripping onto the hot brakes and vaporising represents a significant fire risk and have given their advice. They were there, they had all the facts and trying to armchair quarterback a decision made by someone who is an expert in their field (a field which, I would postulate, you know little [namely firefighting and fire development]) is not helpful when a decision was made in the interests of securing immediate safety for the passengers.
So far, I have never needed the airport fire services chasing me down the runway, and hopefully never will.
But a relative of mine is a firefighter for one of our busy airports, and I'm really impressed with the way its all planned and trained for.
I have a lot of faith/respect in the guys and girls who are coming towards a potential inferno when we are doing our best to get away from it
But a relative of mine is a firefighter for one of our busy airports, and I'm really impressed with the way its all planned and trained for.
I have a lot of faith/respect in the guys and girls who are coming towards a potential inferno when we are doing our best to get away from it
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Denmark
Age: 56
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OWE instructions
As SLF I have a question, which was alluded to earlier on in this thread. In the past I have taken the seat next to the overwing exit. I' ve thoroughly read and inwardly digested the instructions for opening the door in an emergency, one flight attendant even commenting "i see you're training yourself". Now, in a catastrophic accident I would be quite keen and happy to get that door open. But no-one has ever told me what would happen if there was, say, a potential problem on my side of the a/c when things weren't quite so obviously 'get out or die'. Are further instructions given ? Logic suggests yes, but what form would they take?