Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Southwest KLGA gear collapse.

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Southwest KLGA gear collapse.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Oct 2013, 15:28
  #481 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"@Airbubba - I'm sure Auburn Calloway was a "he", no?"

He was.
Desert185 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2013, 15:45
  #482 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Boston
Age: 73
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What I don't understand here - even someone whose only experience is in a Cessna 152 will understand enough about flight dynamics to not spike the nose gear. How is conceivably possible that the captain preferred spiking the nose to going around?
Agreed, what still puzzles me is why if the situation looks bad enough at 400 feet to take control that that by itself does not qualify as an unstabilized approach that would require a go around?
MurphyWasRight is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2013, 15:46
  #483 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DozyWannabe
@Airbubba - I'm sure Auburn Calloway was a "he", no?
Women aren't the only group who get diversity points in the hiring process.

Last edited by A Squared; 7th Oct 2013 at 15:49.
A Squared is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2013, 15:50
  #484 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yancey Slide:

"Tell me, any CA here during their initial command training or subsequent upgrades receive ANY training/discussion in the sim on taking over from an FO, anyone here have any guide on this in their manuals? From my experience NO, yet some here expect a picture perfect result from it."

Haven't most CA's by the time they get to those levels have some instructing background? One would think that the knowledge of knowing just how long a rope you can safely leave someone before jumping in would have been developed there, especially initial student pilot instructing.
Taking over from a student's botched approach/landing attempt was something I learned early on as a GA CFI (with course training and later experience). The airlines never taught that, even when becoming a check airman. Knowing how much rope to dole out, along with knowing your personal ability to recover said rope is part of the game. Like Harry Callahan said, "A man's got to know his limitations".

Sometimes doling out the rope can be an instructional learning situation for some pilots in order to fully realize the error of their ways, but then safety and structural integrity must always be measured in the equation. That balancing act should always be extremely conservative when herding a load of pax, and the industry default go-around was certainly a step in the right direction.
Desert185 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2013, 15:57
  #485 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MurphyWasRight
Agreed, what still puzzles me is why if the situation looks bad enough at 400 feet to take control that that by itself does not qualify as an unstabilized approach that would require a go around?
Well, if the Captain takes over at 400 feet, there certainly does seem to be an implication that the approach was unstable or otherwise outside of parameters. But the Crew reported that the approach was stable, on speed, on track and on glide. Not sure what the missing bit of information is that makes those two facts fit together.
A Squared is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2013, 16:01
  #486 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
@Airbubba - I'm sure Auburn Calloway was a "he", no?
Yes, and he was 'diverse' which presumably mitigated the many negative issues in his employment history prior to FedEx offering him a job.

As I asserted in the opening sentence of the paragraph:
When diversity is considered, a checkered employment history has not prevented some folks from finding a job in night freight.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2013, 18:08
  #487 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought Calloway came to Fedex via the Flying Tigers buyout. Was he not already flying for Tigers?
viking767 is offline  
Old 7th Oct 2013, 22:47
  #488 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I thought Calloway came to Fedex via the Flying Tigers buyout. Was he not already flying for Tigers?
Auburn Calloway was at Gulf Air out of Biloxi, Mississippi (not the one out of BAH) flying L-188's in 1987 when he was hired by Tigers. He tried the trick of calling in sick and claiming jury duty to keep both jobs. This stunt seems incredible but I personally knew of another guy who tried it in the late '80's. RP was at PSA and got hired by United, kept both jobs, caught, fired both places and hired by a third airline and fired again. He somehow claimed he was on the strike bus in '85 or something and recently retired at UAL after successfully wrapping himself in the ALPA mantle.

Anyway, Auburn got fired at Gulf Air and Tigers and was hired by FedEx in 1988 shortly before FedEx bought Tigers late in the year. Auburn was less than candid about his employment history and greatly pencil whipped his Navy pilot in command time on his FedEx application.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2013, 05:21
  #489 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not many more than him who deserved a fire axe implant for what he did.
Desert185 is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2013, 15:45
  #490 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed that the guy was unstable and an undoubted hole to boot - but there's no evidence that he was a "diversity hire" to my knowledge. In my experience a wrong'un is a wrong'un irrespective of race or gender.
DozyWannabe is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2013, 14:24
  #491 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: nowhere
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A2

Quote:Post 410
Well, actually, given that her job is, in part, to keep the airplane from crashing, it's pretty much indisputable that she *wasn't* doing her job. She was the handling pilot from 400 ft AGL to the impact crater. Doesn't matter how badly the FO may screwed up prior to her taking over, driving the nose strut into the avionics bay is all on her.
Quote:Post 466
Just to be clear, I've never claimed that all pilots who wreck airplanes are, or should be, fired. I just said that it's not an unexpected outcome and not unreasonable. Just as an example closer to the incident at hand, the Midway pilots were not fired, by Southwest, but the Burbank pilots were.

A2,

Make up your mind, before you were adamant that yes deserved to lose her job, she bent her a/c and had no excuse. Why wouldn't the Midway CA deserve to lose his job, landed d/w on contaminated rwy, landed long, went off the rwy and killed someone. In Jamaica, they landed d/w, landed long and went off the rwy. Yet you display a different attitude towards her, what's you reasoning? Yes, they faced demanding situations, but did they face having to land immediately when maybe going around would have seen a better outcome?

Anyone getting uppity about what I've said pls don't get excited, I'm not criticising them.

Last edited by ANCPER; 11th Oct 2013 at 06:46.
ANCPER is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 01:51
  #492 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: New York City
Age: 63
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A key bit of info that only recently came to my attention was that the FO called for a go-around whereupon the CA took the controls and "landed". Under CRM rules, this would seem to explain her termination.
wjcandee is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 07:18
  #493 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wjcandee
A key bit of info that only recently came to my attention was that the FO called for a go-around whereupon the CA took the controls and "landed". Under CRM rules, this would seem to explain her termination.
Do you have a source for that? That's has been mentioned previously at least once in this thread, but so far I haven't seen anything to back it up. Not saying it's wrong, just that there's been a lot of things posted here, many of which have been shown to be incorrect. That's an interesting piece of information and would go a long way in making the other pieces fit together, but it would be nice to know where it's coming from.
A Squared is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 14:17
  #494 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,556
Received 75 Likes on 43 Posts
How can the PF "call for a G/A"? Why didn't he just do it? Perhaps he said "I think we should go around".
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 13th Oct 2013, 14:22
  #495 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
callout by PF "go around" while simultaneously advancing the thrust levers
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 14th Oct 2013, 10:05
  #496 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That's right, you go around now and talk about it later.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 00:13
  #497 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: South Alabama
Age: 74
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A rumor

Since this is a rumor network......

A friend of mine, retired from America West told me a story today.

He said that there was a female pilot at AW who was very good on academics, procedures, and systems knowledge, but had a lot of trouble with flying the plane and making decisions. She failed 2 upgrade attempts.

He further stated that she took a leave, and had a ground school and sim work with AA, but did not make it there, either.

She returned to AW, and eventually left to go to Morris Air......and he was told that the KLGA captain is the same person.
Old Boeing Driver is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 21:32
  #498 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Rocky Mts High
Age: 61
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
She can always sneak easily into Korean Air!
Samba Anaconda is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 22:48
  #499 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Western USA
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old Boeing Driver

...pilot at AW who was very good on academics, procedures, and systems knowledge, but...
Wait a minute! Isn't education and academic capability the reason for lowering the experience levels for an ATP and airline employment?

Last edited by Desert185; 17th Oct 2013 at 22:50.
Desert185 is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2013, 22:51
  #500 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sometimes it doesn't work though.
bubbers44 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.