Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Tiger Australia grounded by CASA

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Tiger Australia grounded by CASA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jul 2011, 21:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: London
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tiger Australia grounded by CASA

Statement from Tiger Airways Australia

As of 11:00 pm on Friday, 1 July 2011, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority of Australia (CASA) has instructed Tiger Airways Australia to suspend domestic services until Saturday, 9 July 2011, whilst they conduct further investigations into two recent operational incidents.

Tiger Airways' services to and from Singapore are not affected and continue to operate normally.

Tiger Airways continues to cooperate fully with the industry regulator and safety underpins our operations at all times.

The airline is currently working with the safety regulator to achieve a satisfactory outcome to its investigation at the earliest opportunity, as was achieved with the recent Show Cause Notice. Tiger Airways has fully complied with the conditions required by CASA as a result of this process.

In the meantime the airline is doing all it can to minimise passenger disruption, especially for passengers who are travelling this weekend and over the next week.

Customers with bookings within Australia between now and 6:00 am on Saturday, 9 July should not travel to the airport. They will be offered a full refund or credit for deferred travel.

Tiger Airways will be providing regular updates via its website (Welcome To Tiger Airways) as well as through the media. The next update will be at 3:00 pm AEST Saturday, 2 July 2011.

The airline apologises for any inconvenience to its passengers. Tiger Airways is committed to resolving the issue, assisting CASA and to resuming services as soon as possible.

Please note: Tiger Airways' call centre is experiencing a high volume of calls at this time but the airline has added extra agents to help field the volume of calls.

Passengers are advised to monitor the website as it will be updated regularly throughout the week with further updates.
running on the D & G forum but probarbly deserves a wider forum
STN Ramp Rat is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2011, 02:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at the over all picture I think CASA probably had to act, based on what has been reported (so far not disputed by Tiger) CASA had been investigating concerns since March, have issued a show cause notice. Then the ATSB starts an investigation of a Tiger flight busting Lowest Safe Altitude on 7 June, and another flight descends below LSALT on 30 June (another ATSB investigation), this was probably a last straw event.

There is clearly cause for concern, as this looks like more than a run of bad luck.
RobShan is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2011, 08:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two altitude busts in one month, (not) bad.....
hetfield is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2011, 11:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the news tonight, a flight engineer stated that he would not have flown with Tiger Airways anyway, due to the knowledge he had about their operation (from what I can gather giving viewers the indication that the issue was an engineering safety issue).

Now coming here, I see reports that are based on flight operations (LSA's) being the issue, not engineering. (I think I'll trust PPRuNe before the 6'oclock news personally), but I would be interested to know if there have been any official release as to what CASA's concerns are that have closed down an entire airline during the start of the school holidays for at least the first week.
adzA is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2011, 11:55
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tiger Airways Australia suspended

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority has suspended the operations of Tiger Airways Australia Pty Ltd with immediate effect from Saturday 2 July 2011.
This action has been taken because CASA believes permitting the airline to continue to fly poses a serious and imminent risk to air safety.
The suspension of Tiger Airways Australia follows the issue of a show cause notice to the airline in March 2011.
Taking Tiger Airways Australia’s response to this show cause notice into account, CASA subsequently imposed a number of conditions on the airline’s air operator’s certificate.
These conditions required actions to improve the proficiency of Tiger Airways Australia’s pilots, improvements to pilot training and checking processes, changes to fatigue management, improvements to maintenance control and ongoing airworthiness systems and ensuring appropriately qualified people fill management and operational positions.
CASA has been closely monitoring the operations of Tiger Airways Australia throughout 2011, with surveillance undertaken at a range of locations.
Since Tiger Airways Australia was served the show cause notice there have been further events raising concerns about the airline’s ability to continue to conduct operations safely.
In the circumstances, CASA no longer has confidence in the ability of Tiger Airways Australia to satisfactorily address the safety issues that have been identified.
The suspension is in force immediately for an initial five working days, during which time CASA must apply to the Federal Court for an extension of the grounding.
If the Federal Court supports CASA’s application the court can continue the suspension for a period of time which will allow CASA to finalise investigations into the safety matters.
CASA will provide additional information on Saturday 2 July 2011.
Media contact:
Peter Gibson
Mobile: 0419 296 446
Ref: MR4511
Civil Aviation Safety Authority - Tiger Airways Australia suspended
hetfield is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2011, 12:17
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Perth - Western Australia
Age: 75
Posts: 1,805
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From Tiger's CEO, Davis -
"We've worked very hard with CASA to make sure we address any issues that they identify, and we're committed to doing that going forward"...
The minute I hear that cute middle management BS phrase inserted into a statement, I know full well that the speaker has got to his position by substantial applications of BS... rather than any capable management ability, or leadership skills...

The man must be in training to be a politician...
onetrack is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2011, 12:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sydney
Age: 49
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"CASA says the action has been taken because it believes permitting the airline to continue to fly poses a serious and imminent risk to air safety.

CASA spokesman Peter Gibson said the action was not taken lightly and was the culmination of a number of events this year."

Tiger domestic flights suspended: CASA | News | Business Spectator

Does not sound like a happy ending....
estuardo is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2011, 12:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: melbourne
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats just brilliant for me... i was supposed to start ground school...and iv been on hold, . im totally disappointed at tiger and the way they operate, seriously forget being a customer, tigers ruined my career and others who are in the same position as me...tiger needs to be more ethical and responsible.
elrehab is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2011, 13:23
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 661
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given the 2 reported "minimum safe altitude" violations in June, the latter of which seems to have precipitated this grounding - is the issue here mainly pilot training? Why would there be systematic problems in this area - short cuts, pilot inexperience/unqualified or even incompetance?
JFZ90 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2011, 13:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TGW/TT show cause notice and now AOC suspension?

Can anyone shed light on the original CASA “show cause” in March 2011? How did TGW/TT respond? Why has that response and their subsequent operations not satisfied CASA? Did CASA during this period change the goal posts? Have there been any recent changes in personnel or the head count in TGW/TT CEO, Flight Ops, Maintenance, Training, Safety Management, Quality Assurance, and Compliance Depts. etc.?

How can TGW senior management have allowed the situation to deteriorate to such a level as an AOC suspension? One would have thought that a “show cause” would have been more than a sufficient warning, rap on the knuckles, an alarm bell, a necessary wake up call, gentle coercion or arm twisting for TGW management indeed to respond in an appropriate and timely manner? The suspension last night could hardly be seen by accountable and responsible TGW managers as “out of the blue”, an ambush, or a surprise? Given CASA’s close oversight, inspection and regulation, why could they not convince TGW to behave earlier? Can someone please give some insight into the real safety and compliance culture at TGW and TT in particuliar?

Were TGW managers asleep on the job, complacent, blasé, incompetent, dysfunctional, not fit for purpose, negligent, inexperienced, arrogant, or distracted? How did TGW’s financial situation / loss making play out? Was TGW/TT sufficiently resourced? How could the Tiger Board supposedly exercising due diligence and corporate governance allow a not insignificant Australian airline’s ( 10 + A320s ) brand, reliability and safety reputation ( and maybe that of the Singapore TR as well ) to be diminished or even destroyed by an AOC suspension? Given the strong links and association with TR in Singapore who continue to fly into Australia for the time being begs the question, are they any better? With a different AOC and regulator, just how do TR in Singapore do things differently to TT in Australia? Why would SIA/SQ as 30 odd per cent shareholders want or need to be associated with this lot?

Looks like the TGW/TT (and maybe including TR) LCC business model needs major surgery as opposed to some cosmetic changes and minor tweaking around the edges.

Safety is no accident, and if you can’t be safe, then be bloody careful!
vianostra is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2011, 22:55
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Enzed
Posts: 2,289
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if CASA will take similar action with another Australian LCC that had an incident a Melbourne a while back, or are they just being selective?
27/09 is offline  
Old 2nd Jul 2011, 23:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have there been any recent changes in personnel
New Chief Pilot took the job in April, I understand. If half the stories I've heard are true, he took on a poison chalice, to put it mildly.
MTOW is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2011, 00:09
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Denmark
Age: 64
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow!

All we know is that on two occasions Tiger Airways crews descended below MSA on approach.

We do not know what led to that. We do not know if it was two unrelated incidents of crew error or if it is a systemic flaw in training, operation or maintenaince at Tiger Airways.

Some may hold a grouch against Tiger or against LCC airlines or management in general, but the information is not there yet to conclude anything.

CASA has to err on the safe side, and there may be a hint in the steps they have taken, but still nothing conclusive.
PA28Viking is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2011, 00:46
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 30
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The AVV incident can be viewed via Webtrak if you select 11pm on 30/06/2011 although part of the go-around is outside the system limits.
Skillsy is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2011, 01:20
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger

From what I have read, there were maintenance concerns, but the primary concern was Pilot proficiency. This Plane Talking blog by Ben Sandilands makes interesting reading.

If the sequence of events is confirmed, saving a few dollars with an attempted downwind landing, flying below LSALT and landing without a clearance is a scary occurrence.
RobShan is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2011, 02:37
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,955
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
------- landing without a clearance is a scary occurrence.
RobShan,
At the time, the Avalon aerodrome was uncontrolled, the tower had closed about an hour earlier.
The whole incident was tracked by Melbourne radar, so ATSB (and, presumably, CASA) have complete details of the track and heights of the aircraft.
There is significant terrain in the immediate vicinity of the airfield.
Tootle pip!!
LeadSled is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2011, 03:21
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Betwixt and between
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I have read, there were maintenance concerns, but the primary concern was Pilot proficiency. This Plane Talking blog by Ben Sandilands makes interesting reading
Hmmm, from Plane Talking:
Why the Tiger flight first attempted its landing with a tail wind component when for a few minutes additional time in the air it could have made a conventional landing into the wind will no doubt be explored by the ATSB.
The above quote is maybe an indicator of the level of ingnorance by some commentators. The wind on approach and the wind on the ground are not the same thing. It is quite normal in some places to experience 20-30 knots tailwind on approach and with the risk of getting high despite the wind on the ground being VRB/5!
Sciolistes is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2011, 11:35
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ryan Thai will be represented on the Thai Tiger board by Declan Ryan. Mr Ryan was one of the founding shareholders of both Tiger Airways and Ryanair.
TG and Tiger ready to joint venture : TTRweekly

March 2, 2011
hetfield is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2011, 11:52
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
Why the Tiger flight first attempted its landing with a tail wind component when for a few minutes additional time in the air it could have made a conventional landing into the wind will no doubt be explored by the ATSB.
The above quote is maybe an indicator of the level of ingnorance by some commentators. The wind on approach and the wind on the ground are not the same thing. It is quite normal in some places to experience 20-30 knots tailwind on approach and with the risk of getting high despite the wind on the ground being VRB/5!
Thank you for information, a check of the winds at Avalon at the time (see below) shows steady down wind for runway 18 on the ground and (I am not a pilot) I suspect well with limits for a landing with wind on the tail. At Melbourne 50km away where they were experiencing similar winds they were landing into the wind; it is probably worth asking the question.


Dir Spd Gust Spd Gust
km/h km/h kts kts
11:30pm NNE 9 13 5 7
11:00pm NNE 15 22 8 12
10:30pm NE 13 15 7 8
10:00pm ENE 11 13 6 7
09:30pm NE 13 17 7 9
09:00pm NNE 13 17 7 9
08:30pm NNE 15 19 8 10
08:00pm NNE 13 17 7 9
07:30pm N 11 17 6 9
07:00pm NNE 17 20 9 11
06:30pm NNE 22 28 12 15
06:00pm NNE 17 24 9 13
05:30pm NNE 19 24 10 13
RobShan is offline  
Old 3rd Jul 2011, 12:03
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:
------- landing without a clearance is a scary occurrence.
RobShan,
At the time, the Avalon aerodrome was uncontrolled, the tower had closed about an hour earlier.
The whole incident was tracked by Melbourne radar, so ATSB (and, presumably, CASA) have complete details of the track and heights of the aircraft.
There is significant terrain in the immediate vicinity of the airfield.
Tootle pip!!
Thank you for the reply, I have generally found Ben's blog a reliable source of information. The fact the tower closed three hours earlier, shows his information is not correct in this case. It may be it is totally wrong or it may be something like the flight left controlled airspace descending without proper clearance.

As a matter full disclosure, my sentence quoted above did start with "If the sequence of events is confirmed..." which did come from doubt because of the limited amount of confirmed information available.
RobShan is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.