Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Bad RWY at JFK again

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Bad RWY at JFK again

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jul 2010, 08:07
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wiley, I am a 'kick it straight' cross wind pilot. I have never had a problem right up to max crosswinds. Although I tried it your way after being shown it in the sim. OMG! I thought we'd crashed! It was the most scary, stupid and un controlled crosswind landing technique I have ever had the stupidity to try out. That was on a 757. I'm sticking to the old way thanks. Its not ace of the base its called being a pilot!
Airprox is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2010, 12:17
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was the most scary, stupid and un controlled crosswind landing technique I have ever had the stupidity to try out.
Strange then that it's the way the Boeing autopilot does it (on the 777 at least) in an autoland.
MTOW is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2010, 20:10
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Strange then that it's the way the Boeing autopilot does it (on the 777 at least) in an autoland.
Not strange at all... Xwind limitations for a (777-) autoland are far less than the max. demonstrated xwind. I wonder why that is? Having said that; I'm okay with "George" using its technique... upto 25kts across. I'm going to stick with my preferred and approved by mr. Boeing -method...

I guess that puts me in the "ego-trippin' heroes-" camp...
fireloop is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2010, 20:38
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,410
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing recommends "kick off drift" for the B747-800 due limited engine clearance wing down.
BusyB is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2010, 02:41
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wiley's technique or Boeing's procedure?

Wiley's technique or Boeing's procedure?

If you're wondering about the answer to the question...
misd-agin is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2010, 05:29
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: a shack on a hill
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On Airbuses, LLZ signal is processed so the deviation displayed on PFDs is that between the LLZ beam and the aircraft yaw axis...
The fitted Multi-Mode Receivers take care of that.


This is not correct. Having landed in x-winds on A330, A343 and 346, if this feature has really been implemented, it does not work. The landings are not scary, but they need proficiency.
heavy.airbourne is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 13:47
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Storms at JFK 19/7/10

Would love to hear from any jockeys caught up in the storm action at JFK on 19/7/10 at around 1700z. Sounded like things were getting hectic, with quite a few inbounds on min fuel after multiple go-arounds. Quick runway changes were required, and a Lufthansa just made it in after switching from 22L to 04R having asked for clearance to another field if the 3rd attempt didn't come off. Would be interested to hear what people thought of the ATC in the situation. Sounded pretty impressive to me.
cheeseman is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2010, 18:24
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: 5530N
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it was certainly sporty with the wind all over the place as the TZ's went through. Final approach controller for 4R did a mega job. thanks
Bearcat is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2010, 01:41
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austria
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 777 autoland x-wind limit is 25kt, demonstrated autoland x-wind is 39kts
Servus ! is offline  
Old 5th Aug 2010, 08:12
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,410
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Servus, ours is 40kts
BusyB is offline  
Old 6th Aug 2010, 16:25
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Pacific
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing to do with JFK, but some time past I was doing a line check on a pilot whose first language was not english and in a company that would translate all documents for the pilots into their own language. I was in the jump seat and he did a superb job in a 30 knot direct crosswind, manually flying the ILS onto a shortish runway. Superb job.
But at the last minute he failed to kick straight, held wings level and landed with all the drift. I truly thought all the main wheel tires would have been rolled off the rims, and the impact was dreadful, made the worse because it was so totally unexpected. Yet he was smiling as if he had done a great job.
In the crew bus I debriefed him and asked him what had gone wrong, but he professed no knowledge of what, or why, I was complaining about. He claimed he had followed all procedures correctly.
I asked him to explain the procedure, and he was correct except for the need to straighten the airplane. He said that in the B744 it was normal to hold the airplane in the crab until after touchdown.
I suspected the translation and showed him the english version. he was surprised to read that the technique he was using was only applicable to a WET runway.
boofhead is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.