Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

United 967 diverted to DIA -- turbulence injuries

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

United 967 diverted to DIA -- turbulence injuries

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jul 2010, 02:05
  #1 (permalink)  
Everything is under control.
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
United 967 diverted to DIA -- turbulence injuries

About 30 people were injured this evening, one seriously, as a United Airlines passenger airplane experienced severe turbulence, authorities say.

The plane, Flight 967 enroute from Dulles International Airport in Washington D.C. to Los Angeles, landed at about 7:45 p.m.
30 injured on passenger plane diverted to DIA - The Denver Post
Eboy is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 08:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Try IAD. .........................
forget is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 08:26
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
No, the flight was from IAD to LAX and it diverted to DIA (Denver International Airport).

Engage brain before opening mouth.
JW411 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 08:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 62
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Independent had this to say...

Dozens injured as US flight hits turbulence - Europe, World - The Independent

The turbulence was "just a huge up and down", said passenger Kaoma Bechaz, a 19-year-old Australian in the US to visit her boyfriend.

She told the Denver Post that the head of the woman sitting next to her hit the side of the cabin, leaving a crack above the window, and a girl across the aisle flew into the air and hit the ceiling.

Ms Bechaz said she was not thrown around because her seat belt was tight
Go figure!
Cacophonix is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 08:31
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 58-33N. 00-18W. Peterborough UK
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Engage brain before opening mouth.
Sound advice. It's a little early.
forget is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 09:04
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: london,uk
Posts: 735
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Ms Bechaz said she was not thrown around because her seat belt was tight
I think airlines should emphasise a little stronger how important it is to keep buckled up.
peter we is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 11:12
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think airlines should emphasise a little stronger how important it is to keep buckled up.
If you don't know that, you probably shouldn't be flying. Besides, passengers ARE told to remain buckled up.
DC-ATE is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 12:18
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think airlines should emphasise a little stronger how important it is to keep buckled up.
People who feel that seat belts are important usually put them on without prompting. People who think seat belts are too uncool to wear usually aren't going to grasp their importance from seeing a safety demonstration, no matter how many times it's repeated.

It's true for airplanes, cars, roller-coasters, etc. Some people are safety-conscious and some aren't.

I haven't seen exact numbers, but my guess is that the difference in the number of people who belt up when given basic safety information and the number who do so when given an exhaustive, strong lecture on safety isn't that big. If they don't get it the first time, they never will.
AnthonyGA is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 12:43
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brussels
Age: 46
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wearing of seatbelts

Presumably this occurred while the seatbelt sign was turned off. I would assume therefore that many of the 20 pax injured were on way to/from or in toilets - as opposed to in seat with seatbelt off...
shogan1977 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 13:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas, like a whole other country
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
No, the flight was from IAD to LAX and it diverted to DIA (Denver International Airport).
And whilst the Denver Post and other locals commonly refer to it as DIA, officially it is known as DEN. (Or KDEN in ICAO-speak)
Carbon Bootprint is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 14:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: alameda
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wear seatbelts! it is even printed on the seatback in front of you.

pilots should be more alert for turbulence...many don't monitor the outside air temp (static air temp) for clues.

monitoring winds aloft constantly may help too. wonder what the forecasts/airmets/sigmets were for that day.

also...even though kansas is as flat as twiggy, mountain wave can be felt up to 700 miles downwind from the rockies.

just heard one passenger say that there were a few little bumps before the big one.
protectthehornet is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 14:24
  #12 (permalink)  
BRE
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are serving carts ever an issue during turbulence? Cannot remember reading about any instance where those caused injury.
BRE is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 17:16
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Slaving away in front of multiple LCDs, somewhere in the USA
Age: 69
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They do the same thing at Kansas City, where locals call it KCI (Kansas City International) instead of the correct MCI/KMCI (for the originally named Mid-Continent International).

You'd think that if the folks in Los Angeles can resist the temption to call LAX LIA (Los Angeles International Airport) then folks in both Denver and Kansas City could properly refer to their own airports, but I reckon not...
SeniorDispatcher is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 17:35
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: VA, USA
Age: 58
Posts: 578
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
People who think seat belts are too uncool to wear usually aren't going to grasp their importance from seeing a safety demonstration, no matter how many times it's repeated.
And probably deserve a bump on the head because of it! It might even do them some good...

- GY
GarageYears is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 18:17
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: us
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flight log here:
FlightAware > Track Log > UAL967 > 20-Jul-2010 > KIAD-KDEN
SaturnV is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 18:21
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,200
Received 395 Likes on 245 Posts
The article has all the data the Feds need on this case, yet I read on another online news outlet that the Feds are investigating.

The young lady clearly stated that she was in her seatbelt, and she had no problem.

Passengers are, on every flight I have been on for the last thirty years, cautioned more than once over the PA system to "wear you lap belts when in your seat" because all airlines know that you can hit clear air turbulence at the altitudes where airlines fly.

What needs investigating?

Anyone?
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 18:57
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It might be worthwhile to consider seatbelt policy as a cause of injuries in these instances. I'm just SLF, but I notice on domestic U.S. flights that carriers tend to leave the seatbelt sign on for most of the climb phase, during even light turbulence, and for the entire descent. The result? Lines of people at the bathroom when the seatbelt light goes off and therefore out of their seats in more vulnerable positions.

When I fly ANA to Japan, I notice they take the seatbelt sign off after takeoff and it generally stays off even when turbulence gets rather noticeable. So, lines rarely form at the toilets and more people are likely to be seated and at least have the chance to be buckled up should a sudden bad bump come along.

I realize long flight time permits toilet visits to be more spread out, but the more judicious use of the seatbelt sign is still a point to consider.
Momonishiki is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 19:29
  #18 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere between E17487 and F75775
Age: 80
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are serving carts ever an issue during turbulence? Cannot remember reading about any instance where those caused injury.

Yes. A colleague of mine was flying first on SABENA when they hit turbulance, a cart came flying down the aisle from the rear of the plane towards the open cockpit door (remember those happy pre-terrorist days), cabin staff getting out of the way, coffee and tea flying everywhere scalding passengers. My colleague tackled the cart and stopped it entering the cockpit and doing nasty things there.

SABENA - do we all remember for what the letters stood ?
OFSO is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 19:52
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lonewolf_50
<snip>
The young lady clearly stated that she was in her seatbelt, and she had no problem.
<snip>
I guess the natural conclusion to where you are going is every seat a pottie.
cats_five is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2010, 19:54
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Surrey
Age: 74
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Societe Anonyme Belgique Europe et Nord Afrique"
- or something similar, if my ageing brain recalls correctly ?

DL1812
dl1812 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.