Ash clouds threaten air traffic
Let me put it this way - this summer you have an IFSD during ETOPS. How comfortable will you be with the fact that your one remaining engine spent a week or two operating in an ash environment?
I am staring at a GE First stage turbine blade as I write this. It has dozens of holes in it that channel cooling air through it. The holes are about .25 mm or less in diameter. They are also angled and profiled.
This blade operates in a gas stream that is around 300C hotter than its melting point.
If the cooling system fails due to clogging with molten ash, damage will be immediate, severe and very very expensive.
Please understand that the airlines are currently between a rock and a hard place until they can satisfy themselves that they can fly without wrecking their very expensive equipment.
They can fly, earn revenue, then bust the equipment and lose revenue as well as suffer repair expense, or they can lose revenue until it is determined that there is no hazard, or that the risk is manageable.
At present no one to my knowledge knows enough to satisfy themselves that the risk is manageable. Failure to manage that risk could involve loss of life or grounding a large chunk of the fleet in the coming weeks/months due to lack of engines.
This blade operates in a gas stream that is around 300C hotter than its melting point.
If the cooling system fails due to clogging with molten ash, damage will be immediate, severe and very very expensive.
Please understand that the airlines are currently between a rock and a hard place until they can satisfy themselves that they can fly without wrecking their very expensive equipment.
They can fly, earn revenue, then bust the equipment and lose revenue as well as suffer repair expense, or they can lose revenue until it is determined that there is no hazard, or that the risk is manageable.
At present no one to my knowledge knows enough to satisfy themselves that the risk is manageable. Failure to manage that risk could involve loss of life or grounding a large chunk of the fleet in the coming weeks/months due to lack of engines.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: US
Age: 50
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New map up
http://
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/aviation...1271634757.png
Looks like all new cloud caps out at FL200....?
Definitely looks "friendlier" than previous forecasts..
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/aviation...1271634757.png
Looks like all new cloud caps out at FL200....?
Definitely looks "friendlier" than previous forecasts..
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Samsonite
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am staring at a GE First stage turbine blade as I write this.
My only point so far is that the decision should be left to those best able to make them:
1. Airlines
2. Insurance firms
3. Pilots (w butt at risk)
4. PAX (idem)
Having zee Govt making the calls means vanilla for all, wether you like it or not.
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North West, UK
Age: 56
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Watch Air Traffic - LIVE! - We said cash, not ash!
Aeroflot AFL315 is flying from Moscow to JFK via PORTO Portugal right now
Hows that for a re route
Aeroflot AFL315 is flying from Moscow to JFK via PORTO Portugal right now
Hows that for a re route
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jungles of SW London
Age: 77
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a very small example of the thought process that is probably now evident in the minds of 'the authorities', the Blackwall Tunnel (A102M) in East London is, I think, instructive.
At one time, a couple of years ago, the two Lanes of traffic through the northbound 'old bore' were supplemented during the morning rush hours by one lane of the southbound 'new bore'. Diverting gates and lane closure lights emphasised local custom and it was a system that worked pretty well, allowing almost half as much traffic again, to flow through the tunnel. Once the peak morning period was over, the lights changed and the southbound bore reverted to two lane for the rest of the day.
For a reason best known to himself, but most Londoners suspect it was part of his agenda to shutdown private traffic in London entirely, Ken Livingstone - the Mayor - suddenly stopped the morning contraflow scheme. It was said that this was 'for safety reasons'. Now most Londoners had been completely unaware of frequent - or indeed any contraflow related accidents. This added 40 minutes to the average transit through the tunnel, making it about an hour and a quarter or more, to travel a couple of miles and cross the river Thames.
When Boris Johnson was elected mayor, he commissioned a review of the Blackwall tunnel situation and found, to no-ones great surprise, that the effects on accidents was negligable, but the effect on congestion was unacceptable. So he ordered that the contraflow scheme be reinstated.
However ........... the HSE said, 'oh wait, if we start the contraflow and there is an accident after all this time not doing it, then it will be our fault. So we cannot agree to opening it.' And there it rests, a perfectly good system for reducing congestion cannot be used because, basically, nobody wants to take the responsibility for saying it can.
As I said, a bit off thread, but you can probably see where I was going with it.
Roger.
At one time, a couple of years ago, the two Lanes of traffic through the northbound 'old bore' were supplemented during the morning rush hours by one lane of the southbound 'new bore'. Diverting gates and lane closure lights emphasised local custom and it was a system that worked pretty well, allowing almost half as much traffic again, to flow through the tunnel. Once the peak morning period was over, the lights changed and the southbound bore reverted to two lane for the rest of the day.
For a reason best known to himself, but most Londoners suspect it was part of his agenda to shutdown private traffic in London entirely, Ken Livingstone - the Mayor - suddenly stopped the morning contraflow scheme. It was said that this was 'for safety reasons'. Now most Londoners had been completely unaware of frequent - or indeed any contraflow related accidents. This added 40 minutes to the average transit through the tunnel, making it about an hour and a quarter or more, to travel a couple of miles and cross the river Thames.
When Boris Johnson was elected mayor, he commissioned a review of the Blackwall tunnel situation and found, to no-ones great surprise, that the effects on accidents was negligable, but the effect on congestion was unacceptable. So he ordered that the contraflow scheme be reinstated.
However ........... the HSE said, 'oh wait, if we start the contraflow and there is an accident after all this time not doing it, then it will be our fault. So we cannot agree to opening it.' And there it rests, a perfectly good system for reducing congestion cannot be used because, basically, nobody wants to take the responsibility for saying it can.
As I said, a bit off thread, but you can probably see where I was going with it.
Roger.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: In some Marriott
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jetstream forecast
Here's a forecast summary for the week coming up. Interestingly, this article states most of the ash is 10000 feet and below. Maybe more ash over UK/Germany midweek but in a narrower band. Southwesterly to kick in late week and take the ash away from Europe.
A respite until the next northwesterly flow sets in?
AccuWeather.com - Weather News | Ash Plume to Shift Farther South through Europe
Best,
Jim
A respite until the next northwesterly flow sets in?
AccuWeather.com - Weather News | Ash Plume to Shift Farther South through Europe
Best,
Jim
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: God's Country
Age: 73
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Strange
"Over in the US, Continental have announced today that they don't expect to resume flights to Europe this month!"
I heard that this afternoon on FoxNews, found it rather odd. What do they think they know that we don't - hiring psychics now ?
"It must be getting serious, the yanks are even covering it on the TV now."
Believe it or not, some of us here in the colonieshave been following it from the get-go, but more as a curiousity of nature.
I heard that this afternoon on FoxNews, found it rather odd. What do they think they know that we don't - hiring psychics now ?
"It must be getting serious, the yanks are even covering it on the TV now."
Believe it or not, some of us here in the colonieshave been following it from the get-go, but more as a curiousity of nature.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: US
Age: 50
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
new NATS release
NO change on restrictions - still 7pm. First time they hadn't extended it....
Conditions around the movement of the layers of the volcanic ash cloud over the UK remain dynamic. NATS is maintaining close dialogue with the Met Office and with the UK's safety regulator, the CAA, in respect of the international civil aviation policy we follow in applying restrictions to use of airspace. We are currently awaiting CAA guidance
Conditions around the movement of the layers of the volcanic ash cloud over the UK remain dynamic. NATS is maintaining close dialogue with the Met Office and with the UK's safety regulator, the CAA, in respect of the international civil aviation policy we follow in applying restrictions to use of airspace. We are currently awaiting CAA guidance
At present no one to my knowledge knows enough to satisfy themselves that the risk is manageable. Failure to manage that risk could involve loss of life or grounding a large chunk of the fleet in the coming weeks/months due to lack of engines.
The risk managers define the data necessary and the authorities examine the numbers to ensure that they do not appreciably increase risk compared to the normal base risk that is carried in day to day operations. No doubt it may take some extra precautions for the time period that the risk of encounter is raised (operation downstream of an eruption) as well as increased maintainence actions between flights.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Queensland, Australia
Age: 71
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let me start by saying that I'm SLF, not a pilot and I'm also not a geologist. However, I have a friend who IS a geologist and one that specialises in volcanoes. A couple of us asked her about why THIS eruption is causing such a problem and also about the prospects for the future. Her reply might be of interest here:
I haven't bothered recreating the links she posted, mainly because they're ones I've already seen in PPRuNe.
However, what seems to come out of this is that the particular combination of Magma erupting under a glacier is why this is creating "the wrong type of ash" and causing the problems we are seeing. My friend's post also explains why it it misleading to assume that, because a previous volcano did or didn't cause problems, there is a precedent in this case. This eruption is a particular combination of circumstances--I quite like the analogy to pouring water on a chip pan fire--and I, for one, am happy to leave the decision about when it is safe to fly to the experts.
Hope this is of use.
Bob
To answer your question, It ALL depends on the type of magma that is erupting - how viscous it is and how much there is going to be erupted. The volcano /could/ - it has before - erupt for up to two years or more. If the magma is basaltic then yes, pretty much as soon as it runs out of water it will go from phreatoplinian style (phreato indicating the presence of water, plinian being the eruption type - see pic below - it's v. recent) back to the effusive Hawaiian lava fountain type that was happening last month - it's a bit like pouring water on a chip pan fire (which I can tell you from seeing this done in controlled conditions is a /most/ impressive fireball). Samples collected last month and analysed suggested that the lava being erupted was a alkali-olivine basalt, with a silica content
of about 47% (silica being the thing that makes a lava all sticky and gooey and therefore more difficult for gas to escape). So it was all fairly fluid and gas trapped in the lava could easily escape. So far as that goes it would cause relatively few problems once the glacier had melted (10-15% of this has already gone according to my sources.)
However, the ice isn't really a massive problem in the long term especially if the lava IS still the same composition because once the ice has gone the eruption will settle down - locally however it could (and has) caused MASSIVE damage from jokulhlaup (meltwater floods). Roads, infrastructure, and farmlands have all been destroyed but so far there have been no fatalities as people had been evacuated from hazardous areas. Iceland being prepared for these eventualities.
It is currently erupting from a series of vents along a 2 km long north-south oriented fissure, with meltwater flowing down northern slopes of the volcano, but also to the south. The eruption has been fairly steady throughout this phase and will continue to be so for days at the least. Chemical analyses of the ash samples from this phase of the eruption however reveal fluorine rich intermediate eruptive products with silica contents of 58% (a more sticky magma than that erupting earlier) so it has evolved from the initial lava producing phase of the eruptive activity possibly by crystal fractionation in the magma chamber.
The eruption at Eyjafjallajokull is however still going strong with frequent regular cycles of steaming and phreatomagmatic explosions. The Icelandic Met Office is heading up to the volcano to conduct a survey of the crater area to find out (1) what it looks like and (2) how much new water (i.e., ice) is there available for the erupting magma. More water is likely to mean more explosive eruptions in this phreatoplinian style - however, like I mentioned earlier, the bulk andesitic composition of the ash implies it might have a decent ability to produce explosive eruptions without a lot of extra water (but it helps). You can see a great sequence of images from the eruption on this video (although the music might not be the most fitting). It shows the "puffing" nature of the eruption, which might imply periods of melt water getting into the conduit and flashing to steam (very loosely like a geyser behaves). The Icelandic Met Office has excellent information on the ash and the flooding, which has been somewhat forgotten in the news. There has been extensive flooding around the volcano due to the melting ice.
SO FAR there is little or no evidence that Eyjafjallajokull erupting is affecting her big sister Katla (who can cause far bigger eruptions) and is likewise sitting under an ice cap.
Eyjafjallajokull could keep erupting like this for months. It may not. It depends on many factors. We just have to wait and see (and pray Katla doesn't get set off - she is overdue for an eruption)
The weather patterns certainly aren't helping either so it really is a combination of things.
of about 47% (silica being the thing that makes a lava all sticky and gooey and therefore more difficult for gas to escape). So it was all fairly fluid and gas trapped in the lava could easily escape. So far as that goes it would cause relatively few problems once the glacier had melted (10-15% of this has already gone according to my sources.)
However, the ice isn't really a massive problem in the long term especially if the lava IS still the same composition because once the ice has gone the eruption will settle down - locally however it could (and has) caused MASSIVE damage from jokulhlaup (meltwater floods). Roads, infrastructure, and farmlands have all been destroyed but so far there have been no fatalities as people had been evacuated from hazardous areas. Iceland being prepared for these eventualities.
It is currently erupting from a series of vents along a 2 km long north-south oriented fissure, with meltwater flowing down northern slopes of the volcano, but also to the south. The eruption has been fairly steady throughout this phase and will continue to be so for days at the least. Chemical analyses of the ash samples from this phase of the eruption however reveal fluorine rich intermediate eruptive products with silica contents of 58% (a more sticky magma than that erupting earlier) so it has evolved from the initial lava producing phase of the eruptive activity possibly by crystal fractionation in the magma chamber.
The eruption at Eyjafjallajokull is however still going strong with frequent regular cycles of steaming and phreatomagmatic explosions. The Icelandic Met Office is heading up to the volcano to conduct a survey of the crater area to find out (1) what it looks like and (2) how much new water (i.e., ice) is there available for the erupting magma. More water is likely to mean more explosive eruptions in this phreatoplinian style - however, like I mentioned earlier, the bulk andesitic composition of the ash implies it might have a decent ability to produce explosive eruptions without a lot of extra water (but it helps). You can see a great sequence of images from the eruption on this video (although the music might not be the most fitting). It shows the "puffing" nature of the eruption, which might imply periods of melt water getting into the conduit and flashing to steam (very loosely like a geyser behaves). The Icelandic Met Office has excellent information on the ash and the flooding, which has been somewhat forgotten in the news. There has been extensive flooding around the volcano due to the melting ice.
SO FAR there is little or no evidence that Eyjafjallajokull erupting is affecting her big sister Katla (who can cause far bigger eruptions) and is likewise sitting under an ice cap.
Eyjafjallajokull could keep erupting like this for months. It may not. It depends on many factors. We just have to wait and see (and pray Katla doesn't get set off - she is overdue for an eruption)
The weather patterns certainly aren't helping either so it really is a combination of things.
However, what seems to come out of this is that the particular combination of Magma erupting under a glacier is why this is creating "the wrong type of ash" and causing the problems we are seeing. My friend's post also explains why it it misleading to assume that, because a previous volcano did or didn't cause problems, there is a precedent in this case. This eruption is a particular combination of circumstances--I quite like the analogy to pouring water on a chip pan fire--and I, for one, am happy to leave the decision about when it is safe to fly to the experts.
Hope this is of use.
Bob
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: EGCC
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Total lack of scientific approach
The closing down of European air space and airports is a dreadful knee-jerk reaction brought upon us all by politicians. There is no proper collection and processing of scientific data to support the measures.
Are air samples collected from the allegedly contaminated FLs at hourly (or, at least, regular) intervals? Obviously not, or we would have this data being released on an ongoing basis.
The people inflicting this chaos on us are, in fact, flying blind with all instruments turned off. Dreadful, absolutely dreadful.
Are air samples collected from the allegedly contaminated FLs at hourly (or, at least, regular) intervals? Obviously not, or we would have this data being released on an ongoing basis.
The people inflicting this chaos on us are, in fact, flying blind with all instruments turned off. Dreadful, absolutely dreadful.
Fakem:
1. The precautionary principle applies, especially to things that might involve life. The Volcanic Ash is regarded as dangerous to aircraft UNTIL it is proved scientifically that the risk is insignificant NOT the other way around as you suggest.
2. Politicians do not shoot from the hipthey make decisions on the basis of ADVICE they receive from public servants. I would imagine that public servants, mindful of the precautionary principle, asked for scientific advice on the level of risk, and failing receiving a ringing endorsement from the appropriate engineers and scientists for opening the skies, they applied the precautionary principle themselves.
To put it another way:
I know your holiday plans are in tatters. There is nothing anyone can do about it until the evidence is in that indicates it's safe to fly.
Total lack of scientific approach
The closing down of European air space and airports is a dreadful knee-jerk reaction brought upon us all by politicians. There is no proper collection and processing of scientific data to support the measures.
Are air samples collected from the allegedly contaminated FLs at hourly (or, at least, regular) intervals? Obviously not, or we would have this data being released on an ongoing basis.
The people inflicting this chaos on us are, in fact, flying blind with all instruments turned off. Dreadful, absolutely dreadful.
The closing down of European air space and airports is a dreadful knee-jerk reaction brought upon us all by politicians. There is no proper collection and processing of scientific data to support the measures.
Are air samples collected from the allegedly contaminated FLs at hourly (or, at least, regular) intervals? Obviously not, or we would have this data being released on an ongoing basis.
The people inflicting this chaos on us are, in fact, flying blind with all instruments turned off. Dreadful, absolutely dreadful.
2. Politicians do not shoot from the hipthey make decisions on the basis of ADVICE they receive from public servants. I would imagine that public servants, mindful of the precautionary principle, asked for scientific advice on the level of risk, and failing receiving a ringing endorsement from the appropriate engineers and scientists for opening the skies, they applied the precautionary principle themselves.
To put it another way:
I know your holiday plans are in tatters. There is nothing anyone can do about it until the evidence is in that indicates it's safe to fly.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Sydney
Age: 41
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Avoid the ash at different FLs?
Hi all,
Massively interesting reading your thoughts on all this. Quite a range of opinions, but all well-informed, which makes a nice change from the front pages of the tabloid at least!
My question that I haven't really heard is this: the ash is mostly at quite high altitude, right? Couldn't the airlines therefore simply fly beneath it? I do realise that because of the increased density at lower FLs this would require greater fuel to generate greater thrust to overcome resistance, and would therefore be more expensive... but would it be prohibitive? Would the ATCs be set up to deal with this?
Apologies if this is a stupid question, or well answered elsewhere.
Cheers all.
Massively interesting reading your thoughts on all this. Quite a range of opinions, but all well-informed, which makes a nice change from the front pages of the tabloid at least!
My question that I haven't really heard is this: the ash is mostly at quite high altitude, right? Couldn't the airlines therefore simply fly beneath it? I do realise that because of the increased density at lower FLs this would require greater fuel to generate greater thrust to overcome resistance, and would therefore be more expensive... but would it be prohibitive? Would the ATCs be set up to deal with this?
Apologies if this is a stupid question, or well answered elsewhere.
Cheers all.