Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Ryanair Captain dismissed for promoting unions

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Ryanair Captain dismissed for promoting unions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jun 2009, 09:47
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 1,608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DFC

Doing work for BALPA (or any other organisation) in work time where such activities were not agreed with the employer would be a breach of contract.
Google the following:

Hansard employment law

Read the UK Employment Acts 1996 & 2002, and try to understand the permissible nature of undertaking union activities, organising the workforce etc.

I assume by your tone, you have never picked up a newspaper, discussed your forthcoming holiday or even asked your colleagues how their day is going.

What a boring fellow.
Re-Heat is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 10:10
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Dre's mum's house
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This would appear to be the opportunity for BALPA to step up to the plate: let's see how they respond and take that as an indication of their effectiveness.
The Real Slim Shady is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 10:20
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: land
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Real Slim Shady

Totally agreed.

If this Captain was a paid up member of BALPA, they should stand up to to these bullies. I will watch the actions of BALPA with great interest. If they cave in over this I for one will cancel my BALPA membership. ID cards, well will they have the balls to make a stand?

If the guy in question was a BA line pilot, BA crews would most probably been out on strike by now, if he was not reinstated.
joehunt is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 10:26
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DFC, you are still missing the point !

How were his actions deemed to be A FLIGHT SAFETY ISSUE ?!

(for which he was dismissed on the spot - the union leaflets would have been a disciplinary hearing, the flight safety issues were thrown in to try and justify the company's actions at the industrial tribunal that will almost certainly follow )

PS
Wonder who shopped him ? Not much "unity" there .....
Aldente is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 10:47
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'Pour encourager les autres'

The following phrase sprang to mind :-

'Pour encourager les autres' is a quote from Voltaire's 'Candide', often used in the context of political punishment and persecution.

The phrase 'pour encourager les autres' has subsequently entered the language, and is frequently used in the media whenever the official punishment for an act has seemed to be out of proportion to the act itself, or where the punishment has an element of political bias to it (in order to encourager les autres to shut up and keep their heads down). In these gentler times the term is often applied to sackings, or footballers who have been given a red card.


So there you have it........
Aldente is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 10:58
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: ...............
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The cause of union recognition in Ryanair was a fight that took place and was lost many years ago. BALPA came, played by the rules and took a beating that from those of us in Ryanair was embarrassing. They were outclassed outplayed and ran with their tail between there legs. Now Ryanair pilots themselves are responsible for this not BALPA being naive. What I find amusing is the same management now perceive a threat that I personally think is non existent. The paranoia is simply astounding. What threat ? what union ? . Are the trying to distract us from the fact that we took a shafting in April. Gave up productivity for free (A/L, LTC, No pay rise). All UK bases were frozen last week no transfers, no upgrades, was there a whimper was there . O'Lolly loses close to a billion in cocked up hedging and aer lingus shares.....is it mentioned No. We will be doing CDA approachs for a long time to make that kind of dough back. Anyway bottom line we are all sheep, admit it know it now get back into the flock with me like good boys...Baaaaa
doniedarko is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 11:28
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edinburgh and 3C
Age: 71
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unless you are part of a recognised Union, then it is not legal to strike.
Not strictly true. If you are not a member of the union which balloted on the action, then you have no legal protection against disciplinary action by your employer should you strike. That's not quite the same as illegal.
MagnusP is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 11:33
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FOR GOD's SAKE! STRIKE!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why on Earth do ANY of you put op with this 19th century slavery?! Don't you FR guys have any self-respect?!
One of the most important things in being a professional and safe flight-crew member is having a backbone, it seems that FR pilots are just jellyfish...
The quite typical reply I would expect from a pilot not employed by the airline under discussion, and therefore unaffected by any sort of industrial action there...legal or not.
I would then wonder...would the poster with the above listed quote care to put his job on the line to enable 'better' employee relations at FR?

No?
Thought not.
411A is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 11:40
  #29 (permalink)  
DFC
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How were his actions deemed to be A FLIGHT SAFETY ISSUE ?!
I never said that there was a flight safety issue.

The same thing applies if you are working in an office or working on a farm. When employed by an employer the employer has the right to expect that during your working hours while being paid you are working exclusively for them unless they agree otherwise. Handing out leaflets for an organisation is doing work for that organisation.

The fact that BALPA was not paying this person to hand out the leaflets does not detract from the fact that they were working for BALPA.

Had the pilot spoken with people and said "see me after work and I will give you a leaflet" then there can not be a problem since people have the right to talk about anything they like and it would be alsmost impossible to prove that such "talk" affected the work being done.

Finally I expect that UK employment law will have no effect on this matter if the pilot was employed in Ireland or was "self employed".

Regards,

DFC
DFC is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 11:57
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: london
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Handing out leaflets.......??

What about 'recognition roulette' that was posted on the internal web system as a 'must read' document along with real safety related issues/documents?? i assume 99% of pilots read this 'safety' related pile of horse s**t when they reported for work........and im sure they read it there and then,certainly eating into the 45min report time,when flight plans,weather briefing and other 'safety' related tasks should be completed.....

As i have said on my (1) previous post,im still unsure about BALPA,but something like this,where one of the 'good' guys gets targeted,well,it makes you think,it cant get much worse.......

My thoughts go out to the captain,ive flown with him many a time,hes a good operator,a safe operator and a really nice chap also.a real loss.

good luck buddy.
backwardsman is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 12:06
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: It wasn't me, I wasn't there, wrong country ;-)
Age: 79
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's abou ttime...

That you soft lot on 'mol's' bouncy castle don't stand the heck up, and be counted Do you realise what damage you are letting this bunch of
shag awful 'itinerants' (to use the legal Irish term) are doing to the good name of Tony Ryan RIP. And to yourselves, and others, if you can work for a third world employer in a so called first world country, then you are a sad bunch

I'll never get anywhere near one of yr acft, go to SNN allot, fly & hire or get the ferry. Even the folks in SNN hate MOL
merlinxx is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 12:21
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From DFC

I never said that there was a flight safety issue.
No, but the company did, and that's why they sacked him on the spot.

This is what angers me so much. They are saying that talking to cabin crew during the flight amounts to a distraction that is a flight safety issue !!!
Aldente is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 12:53
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Fragrant Harbour
Posts: 4,787
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Quote: "Could someone explain why FR can get away with this?".

Because they know they can, because their workforce have no representation.





At the moment!
Dan Winterland is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 13:40
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: MAN UK
Age: 48
Posts: 47
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The bully-boy tactics step up a gear...

Aldente, think you may have hit the nail on the head on this one - this probably will not stand up in court but RYR were waiting to make 'a point'
and show their workforce whos 'boss' esp. during this time. Would make me laugh if it wasn't so pathetic, and someone has lost their job.
Personally I think MOL should off to North Korea, think his 'management' skills would be put to good use there.

Things have got to come to a head in favour of the people who fly and work on MOL's multi million £ machines.

Unbelievable.
Rob1975 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 14:45
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What very sad news this is, and sadder still that the likes of DFC get to spout their totally corrupted version of Employment Law on PPRuNe like Islamists spout bits of their holy book to suit their rogue agendas.

This captain should now proceed to take Ryanair for a few hundred thousand (he won't need a union lawyer for something this blatant) and those of you that counted said captain as a colleague should get your sorry a$$es into gear right now and start bringing your rogue employer to heel in oh so many ways.
altogethernow is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 15:44
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Aberfreeze or the Sandpit
Age: 58
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unionised work environments fail.

supply and demand rules.

you are kidding yourselves if you believe otherwise.
Strike all you like, you'll kill the company you work for.
airwave45 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 16:04
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1997
Location: 5530N
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
was it micheal or peter bellew that fired him?
Bearcat is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 19:19
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: manchester
Age: 70
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
airwave45

unionised work environments fail.
Please substantiate this statement.
al446 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 19:33
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please substantiate this statement.
Depends on the specific country and the regulatory environment, however...just ask the folks at CX...the 49ers+ chose to try during hard times in the airline profits downturn...all were terminated without cause.

Similar at the original National Airlines, in Miami.
Bud Maytag (similar in the thought process with MOL), played the FD guys like a Stradivarius violin...and beat 'em every time.

Read up on history...good examples are available.

However, it can be said with a good deal of accuracy...pilots are many times their own worst enemy.
Silly fools.
411A is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 19:59
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
pilots are many times their own worst enemy
Exactly because of people like this :-

And if I'd spent 70k-100k on training and was offered a job, I hate to admit it, but yeah, I'd have to take the job I'd have no choice
People who are so desperate to get a flying job that they will gladly shaft others and accept ever decreasing terms and conditions in order to achieve it without realising (or probably caring) about how it is making it worse for everyone in the long term.

Due to these sort of people we now have airlines like FR where YOU have to PAY to apply for the job, PAY for the interview, PAY for the t/r, PAY for the uniform etc etc....whilst NOT being paid to train and it is slowly spreading to other airlines too.

I have recently qualified and like most other low houred f/atpl's, I'm struggling to find a job, but I'll be voting with my feet as I DO have a choice - I will not apply for a job with that awful company.

Good luck with your vote to get union recognition.

Leezyjet is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.