BA056 JNB-LHR Incident.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Herts, UK
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, slats do appear (visibly) to increase wing camber as flaps do.
However, their predominant effect is (and always has been) to re-energise top-surface flow at high incidences due to the slot effect (when otherwise it would be breaking down)
However, their predominant effect is (and always has been) to re-energise top-surface flow at high incidences due to the slot effect (when otherwise it would be breaking down)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It goes back to basics in the heat of the moment, ie.
Stick Shaker = Stall recovery = full power, lower attitude
Its not a scenario that I have ever had thrown at me in a sim at that phase of flight ....
I would imagine initial reaction of crew is that they have used the wrong figures as a mass of red appears on the speed strip.
Stick Shaker = Stall recovery = full power, lower attitude
Its not a scenario that I have ever had thrown at me in a sim at that phase of flight ....
I would imagine initial reaction of crew is that they have used the wrong figures as a mass of red appears on the speed strip.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Petaluma
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Out on a limb, no problem. The LE slats accomplish an extension and droop of the leading edge of the a/c wing. The extension widens the chord, the droop increases the camber. This is obvious, what seems to be at issue is the function of the "holes in the area left open by the slats". Wiki tells us the holes are the critical gain of the mechanism. I disagree. An aside: Wiki is bollocks in many ways, sit on it with caution.
Further, I'll introduce the concept of the "Blown" wing, to illustrate why the holes are not the deal, this time it is the cheese. See NASA's QRSA, an interesting experiment in short field performance. After reading up on the QRSA, think of the slats leaking underside airflow upward and see if you think the concept is what applies to slats. As air flows into the leading edge of the slatted wing, more will flow over the top than the unslatted config. this is a way of holding back the Stall, surely, but Stall isn't the consideration, foremost, lift is. A wider chord and increased camber airfoil produces more lift at any speed than the standard wing. Once slow speed lift augmentation is accomplished, they are retracted. The ribs that extend the device do just that, they are not there to allow airflow to change its mind and swap sides after passing the leading edge. At 100 knots, how much airflow will change direction by nearly 90 degrees to passively "Blow" (supercharge) the top surface?
Wiki indeed.
Will
Further, I'll introduce the concept of the "Blown" wing, to illustrate why the holes are not the deal, this time it is the cheese. See NASA's QRSA, an interesting experiment in short field performance. After reading up on the QRSA, think of the slats leaking underside airflow upward and see if you think the concept is what applies to slats. As air flows into the leading edge of the slatted wing, more will flow over the top than the unslatted config. this is a way of holding back the Stall, surely, but Stall isn't the consideration, foremost, lift is. A wider chord and increased camber airfoil produces more lift at any speed than the standard wing. Once slow speed lift augmentation is accomplished, they are retracted. The ribs that extend the device do just that, they are not there to allow airflow to change its mind and swap sides after passing the leading edge. At 100 knots, how much airflow will change direction by nearly 90 degrees to passively "Blow" (supercharge) the top surface?
Wiki indeed.
Will
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All very hard to understand.
I guess Boeing will review the DFDR and various reports they have, may be they will remove the L/E/H/L/D from the 747/44 to save weight, but a I have feeling may be they won't.
To knock the same old nail, well done to all involved, lets hope we don't have a repete act with the 747/44 L/E.
I guess Boeing will review the DFDR and various reports they have, may be they will remove the L/E/H/L/D from the 747/44 to save weight, but a I have feeling may be they won't.
To knock the same old nail, well done to all involved, lets hope we don't have a repete act with the 747/44 L/E.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Age: 70
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Still baffled
I've read this thread again from start to finish and I still don't understand exactly what the crew did and why. Given that the amber rev unlocked lights were on for 2 & 3, and given that that the stick shaker deployed before they realized that the L/E devices were retracting, did the crew advance thrust on all 4 engines (the right course of action in this case) or just 1 & 4 (which you might say was a more intuitive action if the inboard reversers were in fact starting to unlock).
Or did they just say "well, if both inboard reversers are unlocking, the aircraft isnt going anywhere anyway so we've nothing to lose by assuming it's two false indications and taking it to the max on all four".
In fact it's more than that, because without knowledge of the L/E slat retraction surely the intuitive assumption would be that the activation of the stick shaker was due to a degradation of performance caused by the inboard reversers starting to unlock?
The thing that I cant understand is that they appear, on the basis of the admittedly shaky info on this thread, to have done the right thing based on illogic...
Much respect, whatever the reason.
Pinkman
Or did they just say "well, if both inboard reversers are unlocking, the aircraft isnt going anywhere anyway so we've nothing to lose by assuming it's two false indications and taking it to the max on all four".
In fact it's more than that, because without knowledge of the L/E slat retraction surely the intuitive assumption would be that the activation of the stick shaker was due to a degradation of performance caused by the inboard reversers starting to unlock?
The thing that I cant understand is that they appear, on the basis of the admittedly shaky info on this thread, to have done the right thing based on illogic...
Much respect, whatever the reason.
Pinkman
Last edited by Pinkman; 26th May 2009 at 13:38.
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Glorious West Sussex
Age: 76
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The simplest technique is always to put all thrust levers to Full thrust - when things have calmed down you can decide where the problem lies. In the heat of the moment being selective may equal being wrong.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pinkman,
in summary:
the handling pilot flew the jet by feel into a dark hole at night with the jet at aroun 10'-20´ for what must have seemed like forever. 10deg pitch its hits the ground, 11.5deg it stalls. thank god he had the talent and experience to operate so far beyond the scope of our scenario driven training.
the skipper faced with no way of knowing what was happening on the wing made 2 decisions which it would appear, in tandem with the outstanding efforts of his co, got everything moving back into the right way.
Im not spock but I think it´s harsh to imply it was illogic thinking that saved the day here. what saved the day was a great deal of talent backed by an ability to make decisions under huge levels of stresss and uncertainty.
Im biased. I know both individuals and will consider it my privilage to buy them both a bottle of whatever they like when next in the bar. they saved a jet full of lives and possibly, but less importantly, my company and therfore my job.
Bravo gentleman.
in summary:
the handling pilot flew the jet by feel into a dark hole at night with the jet at aroun 10'-20´ for what must have seemed like forever. 10deg pitch its hits the ground, 11.5deg it stalls. thank god he had the talent and experience to operate so far beyond the scope of our scenario driven training.
the skipper faced with no way of knowing what was happening on the wing made 2 decisions which it would appear, in tandem with the outstanding efforts of his co, got everything moving back into the right way.
Im not spock but I think it´s harsh to imply it was illogic thinking that saved the day here. what saved the day was a great deal of talent backed by an ability to make decisions under huge levels of stresss and uncertainty.
Im biased. I know both individuals and will consider it my privilage to buy them both a bottle of whatever they like when next in the bar. they saved a jet full of lives and possibly, but less importantly, my company and therfore my job.
Bravo gentleman.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In answer to Dave's reply to reprogramming the FCUs to not have the autoflap function at flaps 25 and 30.
I would guess it would be possible to reprogram the FCUs so they could work in the sense you describe but without knowing the internal workings of the FCU I wouldn't like to speculate on what could be possible.
I have looked at the wiring diagrams for the T/R and Flap Systems and it is fairly simple in that when either T/R1+4 or 2+3 are detected unstowed(not deployed) and aircraft on the ground the Group A flaps retract. The input to the FCU from the T/R position system is a ground that is switched by a relay so I would imagine that Boeing would look at interlock circuit involving relays with some input from another source such as the throttle lever as previously suggested.
Hope this is of interest.
I would guess it would be possible to reprogram the FCUs so they could work in the sense you describe but without knowing the internal workings of the FCU I wouldn't like to speculate on what could be possible.
I have looked at the wiring diagrams for the T/R and Flap Systems and it is fairly simple in that when either T/R1+4 or 2+3 are detected unstowed(not deployed) and aircraft on the ground the Group A flaps retract. The input to the FCU from the T/R position system is a ground that is switched by a relay so I would imagine that Boeing would look at interlock circuit involving relays with some input from another source such as the throttle lever as previously suggested.
Hope this is of interest.
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Heathrow
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Slat function carried out on ground which involved T/R function not enough air because of sea level of jnb.T/r did not go back all the way but looked alright on ground.This did not show up until T/o roll.Expect to see changes to MM after Slat and T/R functions by Boeing.
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Age: 70
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Heavy Heavy
You're reading harshness where none was intended. What I was trying to understand is what led them to make the choices that they did when so many scenarios presented themselves in a few seconds. Thats all. If you PM me your address I will happily send you the cost of a second round in the pub for your colleagues. When I lived in RSA I flew that service often, either directly or via a Comair feeder when the CPT-LHR service was full. As I said in my post...much respect.
[Edit] Now we begin to get answers: SkyBoeingEngineer indicates that there was mtce carried out. I assume that would have been briefed in the handover. So that more or less answers my question about why they did what they did. The Rev Unlocked lights didn't 'just come on'. They came on during the t/o roll following prior operation of the T/R on the ground by mtce. The crew made the choices they did, not illogically, but with the knowledge that it was likely to be spurious and that it would have caused the inboard L/E devices to retract. Thats all I wanted to know.
[Edit] Now we begin to get answers: SkyBoeingEngineer indicates that there was mtce carried out. I assume that would have been briefed in the handover. So that more or less answers my question about why they did what they did. The Rev Unlocked lights didn't 'just come on'. They came on during the t/o roll following prior operation of the T/R on the ground by mtce. The crew made the choices they did, not illogically, but with the knowledge that it was likely to be spurious and that it would have caused the inboard L/E devices to retract. Thats all I wanted to know.
Last edited by Pinkman; 26th May 2009 at 20:58.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Germany
Age: 84
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Air Ground
I did not take the time to read trough the whole story.
I seems to me that the air/ground logic must be in ground mode for the LE Flaps to retract.
How can this happen in the Air?
I seems to me that the air/ground logic must be in ground mode for the LE Flaps to retract.
How can this happen in the Air?
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: KwaZulu Natal
Age: 65
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The ribs that extend the device do just that, they are not there to allow airflow to change its mind and swap sides after passing the leading edge. At 100 knots, how much airflow will change direction by nearly 90 degrees to passively "Blow" (supercharge) the top surface?
Wiki indeed."
Will Fraser, surely that is exactly why it happens....the higher pressure underneath creates the lift and if there is a hole anywhere then the higher pressure will bleed to the lower, regardless of speed of Aircraft or airflow.
JSP
Wiki indeed."
Will Fraser, surely that is exactly why it happens....the higher pressure underneath creates the lift and if there is a hole anywhere then the higher pressure will bleed to the lower, regardless of speed of Aircraft or airflow.
JSP
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Herts, UK
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Will, I use Wiki a lot, but not for basic aerodynamics. 5 years studying for an Aero Eng Degree and practicing a wee bit afterwards means I don't need to...
The predominant effect of le devices is to extend the lift curve slope,
The predominant effect of flaps is to give a Delta Cl increment (with varying degrees of Delea Cd, becoming very significant at full flap positions)
I was indeed talking slotted le devices, but even if not slotted on the 747, the le camber has a similar effect, the predominant one (Wiki has it right) to extend lift curve slope (to higher alphas), since without the le camber, flow breakdown will occur earlier - but yes, an extension and camber will give a delta Cl increment as well.
So in actual fact for the 747 we're both right
As pointed out above, the pilot flying was doing a great job right on the edge of a cliff, between the devil and the dep blue sea, having a very narrow margin of operational alpha until he could dump some drag and pickup a few knots here and a few there...
Another Sully, making simple, basic, and most importantly quick decisions! He won't get to retire and write a book though...
The predominant effect of le devices is to extend the lift curve slope,
The predominant effect of flaps is to give a Delta Cl increment (with varying degrees of Delea Cd, becoming very significant at full flap positions)
I was indeed talking slotted le devices, but even if not slotted on the 747, the le camber has a similar effect, the predominant one (Wiki has it right) to extend lift curve slope (to higher alphas), since without the le camber, flow breakdown will occur earlier - but yes, an extension and camber will give a delta Cl increment as well.
So in actual fact for the 747 we're both right
As pointed out above, the pilot flying was doing a great job right on the edge of a cliff, between the devil and the dep blue sea, having a very narrow margin of operational alpha until he could dump some drag and pickup a few knots here and a few there...
Another Sully, making simple, basic, and most importantly quick decisions! He won't get to retire and write a book though...
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"he 747-400 does not have Slats (whatever Wiki says). It has a mixture of Kreugar Flaps (inboard) and Variable Camber Leading Edge Flaps."
The variable camber flaps on the 747-400 do have an air gap between the flap and the wing, so probably exhibit slat-like behaviour.
The variable camber flaps on the 747-400 do have an air gap between the flap and the wing, so probably exhibit slat-like behaviour.
Last edited by NSEU; 30th May 2009 at 09:29.
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Smogsville
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rollers on the 400 have a poorly designed proximity switch which has a long history, the fix by some airlines has been to check the rigging more frequently to prevent unwanted reverser messages, air load and/or thrust loads can cause a slight shift of the reverser as you could expect as components wear which sets off the proximity switch. Locking out the reverser doesn't fix the problem always either as the wear and or rigging won't be fixed by a locked out reverser, so you lock it because of the faulty message taxi out set thrust get the same message. Delay flight to re rig reverser? You can't change the reverser either as it requires the entire engine to be changed.
Experienced RR guys have probably seen all this before so know or try to do what they can to prevent unwanted reverser messages.
Was any work carried out on any of the reversers while in JNB?
The 'air gap' will also be a feature of the new 747-8 I/B Kreuger flap it's being redesigned for this purpose.
Experienced RR guys have probably seen all this before so know or try to do what they can to prevent unwanted reverser messages.
Was any work carried out on any of the reversers while in JNB?
The 'air gap' will also be a feature of the new 747-8 I/B Kreuger flap it's being redesigned for this purpose.
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A tribute to basic flying skills indeed and another weight to chuck into the on-going debate about the on-going erosion of those skills.
For my benefit (assuming I have this right), can anyone give me an idea of the time scale for all this? I. E. typical V1/Vr in Jo, how long retraction would take on the faulty signal and how long again to re-extend on the a/g switching? Do the L/Es have to complete retraction before they will re-extend or can they be instantly 'reversed'?
For my benefit (assuming I have this right), can anyone give me an idea of the time scale for all this? I. E. typical V1/Vr in Jo, how long retraction would take on the faulty signal and how long again to re-extend on the a/g switching? Do the L/Es have to complete retraction before they will re-extend or can they be instantly 'reversed'?