Plane Down in Hudson River - NYC
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Cote d'Azur
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: australia
Age: 66
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In an earlier post someone mentioned they landed with about a 10 knot tailwind. I would estimate the current from the video at about 2 knots.
Net result is an 8 knot downwind component on landing, so if you want to argue the irrelevant then going the other way would be better.
I would suggest that they turned left hoping that some power from at least one of the engines would give them a chance of a return to La Guardia. As it turned out that wasn't possible and they made the best of the situation. Full marks to all the crew, and particlarly the ferry crews who displayed exceptional seamanship to maintain station without steerage way in wind and current.
Net result is an 8 knot downwind component on landing, so if you want to argue the irrelevant then going the other way would be better.
I would suggest that they turned left hoping that some power from at least one of the engines would give them a chance of a return to La Guardia. As it turned out that wasn't possible and they made the best of the situation. Full marks to all the crew, and particlarly the ferry crews who displayed exceptional seamanship to maintain station without steerage way in wind and current.
In terms of the current, I believe the tide was going out at the time, so the downstream current would presumably be even faster (thus "better") for a low impact landing. Not that they planned it that way...
Tide Location Selection for New York
81% of the moon was visible (although everyone was off before dark.)
Tide Location Selection for New York
Tides for New York (The Battery) starting with January 15, 2009.
High Tide Height
/Low Time Feet
Low 5:14 AM -0.4
High 11:25 AM 4.8
Low 5:47 PM -0.6
Sunset 4:54 PM
Tides for Coney Island starting with January 15, 2009.
High Tide Height
/Low Time Feet
Low 4:27 AM -0.4
High 10:50 AM 5.0
Low 4:58 PM -0.6
High 11:30 PM 4.9
High Tide Height
/Low Time Feet
Low 5:14 AM -0.4
High 11:25 AM 4.8
Low 5:47 PM -0.6
Sunset 4:54 PM
Tides for Coney Island starting with January 15, 2009.
High Tide Height
/Low Time Feet
Low 4:27 AM -0.4
High 10:50 AM 5.0
Low 4:58 PM -0.6
High 11:30 PM 4.9
Last edited by visibility3miles; 18th Jan 2009 at 07:14.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Boring Point
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We actually agree, Wiley, altho you don't seem to realise that!
120 to 180 secs is the time they had available.
Which is no time at all! ( I did tell you I was slow on the typing! )
Hey, you're an ATPL from Oz, don't get sucked in with the PPL's on this thread!
120 to 180 secs is the time they had available.
Which is no time at all! ( I did tell you I was slow on the typing! )
Hey, you're an ATPL from Oz, don't get sucked in with the PPL's on this thread!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: back of the crew bus
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, so much for all the "experts" who said that the starboard engine couldn't possibly still be on the airframe... what with "vicious" swing to the left towards the end of the landing roll/plane... some of you just crack me up!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
According to the BBC this morning the port engine has been located by sonar, "30 feet down in the Hudson", but they have not said where (ie. how far from the impact position).
And as mentioned previously, FO was PF for the departure, pilots looked up and saw "windscreen full of large brown birds" (BBC) and Captain S. took control with the phrase "my aircraft".
And as mentioned previously, FO was PF for the departure, pilots looked up and saw "windscreen full of large brown birds" (BBC) and Captain S. took control with the phrase "my aircraft".
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Obie
Remoaks stupid comment has just brought this thread to an end, as far as I'm concerned. Unless the Mods get rid of it!!
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The CC role appears largely irrelevant thus far.
Whether the landing is as 'successful' as this one or not, there are still things that regular pax, no matter how frequently they fly, just do not know, or can do for themselves, without the crew.
For example, one of the articles linked to earlier quoted from one of the flight attendants saying that it was a pax who tried to open the rear doors, despite the FA being there. So yes, I would say at that point the cabin crew role became very relevant!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scandinavia
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...
Not saying conspiracy.....just wondering why something so pathetically simple to ascertain requires such a great amount of time to accomplish.
Not saying conspiracy.....just wondering why something so pathetically simple to ascertain requires such a great amount of time to accomplish.
Takes time, care, patience and planning ... 24hrs ... that's not bad!
fc101
E145 Driver
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Amazing New Engine Failure Drill!
The Sunday Telegraph reports that, as a part of the Emergency Drill, the Pilot
" Switched off everything except the emergency lighting to stop more fuel going into the engines". Where do the reporters get this drivel? If I wanted to stop fuel going to the engines I'd use the HP/LP cocks.
" Switched off everything except the emergency lighting to stop more fuel going into the engines". Where do the reporters get this drivel? If I wanted to stop fuel going to the engines I'd use the HP/LP cocks.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Age: 68
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OK, I ll put my hand up.
When i heard the right engine was the one still on the plane, i thought it was nonsense given that the plane veered to the left.
I ll eat humble pie and i stand corrected
I guess i do not yet qualify as an NTSB investigator
When i heard the right engine was the one still on the plane, i thought it was nonsense given that the plane veered to the left.
I ll eat humble pie and i stand corrected
I guess i do not yet qualify as an NTSB investigator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SW France
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could she ever fly again?
some input from any engineers out there?
or maybe she will be the prized relic in one of those aviation museums .. I bet there would be a few bids for it from around the country
some input from any engineers out there?
or maybe she will be the prized relic in one of those aviation museums .. I bet there would be a few bids for it from around the country
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Riga
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice to see the mods are hard at work removing posts that contain simple observations and correlations - namely mine. Maybe it is just nautical terms they don't like?
The pie chart omits those of us who have been professional pilots and are now gainfully employed as professionals in other aviation disciplines - God bless the Class 1
I will try again - early pictures show the aircraft on an even keel with a roughly even distributioin of SLF on the wings, the pictures of it being tugged show considerable listing to starboard.
I will refrain from imparting any conjecture on this seeing as the mods appear to be averse to it.
RIX
The pie chart omits those of us who have been professional pilots and are now gainfully employed as professionals in other aviation disciplines - God bless the Class 1
I will try again - early pictures show the aircraft on an even keel with a roughly even distributioin of SLF on the wings, the pictures of it being tugged show considerable listing to starboard.
I will refrain from imparting any conjecture on this seeing as the mods appear to be averse to it.
RIX
Last edited by Romeo India Xray; 18th Jan 2009 at 09:06. Reason: sp
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In a far better place
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could she ever fly again?
Destination for the jet after the investigation should be either Coors for beer cans or Gillette for razor blades… the aluminum parts of course.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: planet earth
Age: 72
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Glider pilots know why
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CC irrelevant or not?
For example, one of the articles linked to earlier quoted from one of the flight attendants saying that it was a pax who tried to open the rear doors, despite the FA being there. So yes, I would say at that point the cabin crew role became very relevant!
Replay the flight without any CC or incapacitated CC, and the outcome should be pretty much the same. That's the definition of irrelevance, isn't it? It's similar to if your house catches fire, and you manage to put it out yourself before the fire trucks arrive. The fire brigade would be completely irrelevant for this particular event, that doesn't change the fact that in other circumstances they can be the difference between life and death.
Of course, there were passengers floating around in rafts, which would have to be filled with the right amount of people and then detached. Perhaps without proper use of the rafts, people would have to swim, and there would probably be some fatalities. However, I would guess that the passengers would be able to organize this rather simple task on their own, especially with the flight crew available to give orders. So I'm stumped in trying to find areas where the CC would have made a difference this event, in different circumstances, sure, but this incident? Hence I claim they were irrelevant to the fortunate outcome. I would be happy to change my mind from new information.
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: MAN
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As a passenger, I'm a religious reader of safety booklets and listener to briefings, but the details don't stick beyond the end of the flight. Still, sittiing in the comfort of my living room, it seems to me that "water landing" instruction I remember most is not to use the overwing exits rather than not to use the rear exists.
Either my memory is faulty (could well be) or perhaps it is type dependent? Comments I've read about planes being designed to float nose up suggest the rear doors should never be used in a water landing.
Just curious - not fussed since I'll be reading the booklet again next time.
Wonderful work and a wonderful result in NY this week and by the engineers who designed the plane. Congrats to all involved.
Either my memory is faulty (could well be) or perhaps it is type dependent? Comments I've read about planes being designed to float nose up suggest the rear doors should never be used in a water landing.
Just curious - not fussed since I'll be reading the booklet again next time.
Wonderful work and a wonderful result in NY this week and by the engineers who designed the plane. Congrats to all involved.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yaw/Veering to left after touchdown
When I heard the right engine was the one still on the plane, i thought it was nonsense given that the plane veered to the left.
Anyone recall that wonderful clip of a bizjet over-run into a lake and the engines autostarting (after evacuation) and converting it into a motor launch?