Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Airline Employment

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Airline Employment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th Jan 2002, 23:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Tosh McCaber
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post Airline Employment

What’s your opinion on the seniority system within the airlines? In just about any other industry, a job will be advertised according to a person’s skills. People are thereafter let go, or kept with the firm, according to their value to the firm.

In the airline industry, it’s usually a case of last person in becomes junior to those with more service with the airline, no matter what the discrepancy may be in their individual skills. Is this system fair?
 
Old 25th Jan 2002, 23:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Central Europe
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Yes
christian_MD80 is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2002, 23:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Confederatio Helvetica
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

NO!. .It's union entrenched garbage that ensures snouts that would be unemployable elsewhere remain burried in their respective troughs.

I hold the view that its high time seniority was abolished completely from the airline industry. Whats wrong with using performance as the prerequisite for advancement?

[ 25 January 2002: Message edited by: Hold at Saffa ]</p>
Hold at Saffa is offline  
Old 25th Jan 2002, 23:54
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Unemployment line
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

How would propose to measure performance of airline pilot? The majority of pilots do their job and keep their noses clean. Most have never spoken to the Chief Pilot and are just "another number." Seniority is the only way to justify layoffs. What's next, would you base compensation on performance also?
hvassk is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2002, 00:20
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Confederatio Helvetica
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angel

The same way every other business on earth does it, by using things that are objectively measureable. Safety, economy, punctuality, appearance, bearing, demeanour, affability toward fellow employees, the list is long and dull, but equitable.. . [quote]What's next, would you base compensation on performance also? <hr></blockquote>. .Yes, I would!

[ 25 January 2002: Message edited by: Hold at Saffa ]</p>
Hold at Saffa is offline  
Old 26th Jan 2002, 00:47
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

[quote]appearance, bearing, demeanour<hr></blockquote>

Appearance...a nice white boy with clean shoes.

Bearing......Knows how to bend over, and does so without needing to be asked.

Demeanour....Suitably grovelling to me and the rest of management.

Yawwnnn...we've had this out already and it was binned as unworkable.

Next please.
maxalt is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.