Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Emirates emergency landing in JNB

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Emirates emergency landing in JNB

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th May 2004, 14:12
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Far East
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Good grief CAP 56 - you sure you are refferring to the correct airline -sounds very much like you are talking about SQ!!!
CDRW is offline  
Old 5th May 2004, 14:48
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: here and there but mostly lgw
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cap 56.

Nice one , bang on , just wait for the slagging as many the dubai self apprecciation society chip in.

And before i'm attacked no i havent failed ek, passed, chose not to go for the same reasons.

cheers
Farty Flaps is offline  
Old 5th May 2004, 15:49
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai - sand land.
Age: 55
Posts: 2,832
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Awful lot of editing going on here folks
White Knight is offline  
Old 6th May 2004, 06:30
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The frequency jungle
Posts: 975
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since page 2 nothing has been edited??? Or are you expecting some editing to happen in the near future ?
126,7 is offline  
Old 6th May 2004, 07:07
  #125 (permalink)  
7x7
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
‘126,7,’, what ‘White Knight’ was referring to was that the Moderators have seen fit to remove three(?) posts on this page, two of which were from a contributor who made the suggestion that ‘Cap 56’ and ‘Streamline’ might be one in the same person. He also suggested that this person might be a disaffected ex-EK employee, (a First Officer), who was sacked by EK with the full agreement of UAE DCAA (and, I hasten to add, the vast majority of EK pilots).
7x7 is offline  
Old 6th May 2004, 13:13
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fantasy Island
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely it's JNB?

Or have EK had another incident, this time in Jairobi?
BahrainLad is offline  
Old 7th May 2004, 12:37
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Africa
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fact #1
Nothing unusual on the load sheet. (cannot comment on actual loading)
Fact #2
For TOW 23280kg, TODV1min 14543ft if eng failed at V1 of 132 kts and assumed 30° flex on full runway length.
TOD for JNB21R is 14823ft.
Fact #3
Takeoff limited by brakes and not 2nd segment climb nor obstacle limited at 30°C
Fact #4
Takeoff obstacle limited at 32°C
Fact #5
Takeoff VMU limited at 28°C
Backroom is offline  
Old 8th May 2004, 14:05
  #128 (permalink)  
jtr
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: .
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FROM MEMORY (Not current)

All Eng 12.5 deg
E-inop 11.0 deg
jtr is offline  
Old 8th May 2004, 16:33
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Mahlangeni
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't have the wisdom, the facts, nor the knowledge to make any judgement. I also wasn't there to observe what happened.

Maybe this has been mentioned before, I don't know, BUT I hear (this being ppRune) that the engines were derated more than reflected by the books. That A/C was an ex-Boeing A/C sold to Emirates (not that that should make a difference), having come from Singapore or some other outfit that changed to Boeing.

But the moral of the story is that any of us could have experienced the same as the (un)fortunate crew on that day, had we been using official data that was incorrect.

So , I take my hat of to the crew, irrespective of who is to blame. Let us rather look forward and learn from what happened (when the info is available) and correct the mistakes and forget about it.

Again, this is tsjust anuthzur rumour

Safe flying
square leg is offline  
Old 9th May 2004, 04:34
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: England
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Feeling a Little Dumpy? Think You Might be Putting on a Little Weight?

http://nation.ittefaq.com/artman/pub...cle_8773.shtml

It can lead to ground-stick - even though the paperwork is great.

It's not the lighter side of weight theft - pilferage

but 25% can affect your profit margins in the long run... particularly in that long run off the end......

how gross!
TheShadow is offline  
Old 9th May 2004, 17:39
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Mahlangeni
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Should my previous post have incorrectly led anybody to believe that I implied that Boeing made a mistake, then I would like to apologise. This was not the intention whatsoever.

I don't see a connection with the two bits of info anyhow.

The company that operates the A/C would theoretically be in charge of making sure that the IRT data is correct.
square leg is offline  
Old 9th May 2004, 18:29
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Front Left, Right and Center.
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
..........................yawn!
El Peligroso is offline  
Old 9th May 2004, 22:56
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems that EK needs DECaptains rather urgently...not only at the pointy end but in the head shed as well.

We wait with baited breath for the investigation...ah, outcome....presuming of course that the outcome will be 'OK' with the UAE DGCA.
411A is offline  
Old 10th May 2004, 04:22
  #134 (permalink)  
7x7
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The anonymous Cap 56 has made some rather serious and wide-ranging allegations on this thread. Readers of his (and Streamline's) posts might be forgiven for thinking that he is employed by EK. (Note that I said 'he', not 'they').

It needs to be said that First Officer Cap 56 ceased his employment with EK in 1999 or thereabouts in circumstances that could only be termed 'highly unusual'.

Rightly or wrongly. five or so years later, he quite obviously still feels very aggrieved.
7x7 is offline  
Old 10th May 2004, 08:20
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester.UK
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

CAP 56

'A...technically speaking perfectly... A340'.

Did you have many conversations? What were they about? Good depth of knowledge of all things technical?No grammatical errors,eh?

Do Airbus and the Press know about this phenomenon???????????????

Pontious is offline  
Old 11th May 2004, 10:06
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PPRuNers please note, CAP 56 is not the source of anything that appears in Flight International this week (or at any time in history), but you might find what we have reported useful to test his theories against.

DL
David Learmount is offline  
Old 11th May 2004, 20:11
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Classified
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello David. Well we are in good company aren't we.

Good to see you on the forum!!
Formally Known As is offline  
Old 12th May 2004, 06:06
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Planet Earth, mostly
Posts: 467
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
7x7, re "The anonymous Cap 56 "

Aren't we all anonymous here? (almost all anyway)
etrang is offline  
Old 16th May 2004, 16:43
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Croydon
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAP 56
I do not care to get into a debate about why you left Emirates,
but the GF air incident and this particular one have nothing in common other than both aircraft being Airbus. The GF incident has been studied and been beaten to death in the western world in all universities and I can assure you that Emirates in JNB is completely different. For one there were no fatalities. The crew never lost situational awareness. The whole issue you are trying to raise is losing credibility when you attack fellow colleagues in such a way. When you retire and are no longer flying you can look back and say " I have been fortunate enough to have had no inidents or accidents, thank god"

Skyslave
skyslave is offline  
Old 16th May 2004, 22:38
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: SW PORTUGAL
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The field wasn't that high last weekend.......
blaireau is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.