PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Bristow S92 down west of Bergen Norway (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/657874-bristow-s92-down-west-bergen-norway.html)

maxwelg2 2nd Mar 2024 12:40

Why was the EGPWS/FLIR blurred out in the photos, were they possibly testing a new variant?

albatross 2nd Mar 2024 13:00


Originally Posted by rrekn (Post 11607485)
Also interesting that the floats didn't deploy...

Gear down, Sliding door closed, no float deployment, pilots window and 2 emergency exits jettisoned on the port side, only the aft emerg. exit jettisoned on the starboard. Interesting indeed.

Sad that there was a tragic loss of life. RIP

212man 2nd Mar 2024 13:31


Originally Posted by maxwelg2 (Post 11607567)
Why was the EGPWS/FLIR blurred out in the photos, were they possibly testing a new variant?

Nothing to do with EGPWS (that’s GPS and radar-altimeter based) but an interesting observation about the FLIR!

212man 2nd Mar 2024 13:32


Originally Posted by albatross (Post 11607585)
Gear down, Sliding door closed, no float deployment, pilots window and 2 emergency exits jettisoned on the port side, only the aft emerg. exit jettisoned on the starboard. Interesting indeed.

Sad that there was a tragic loss of life. RIP

Starboard door exit also jettisoned I think.

Blackhawk9 2nd Mar 2024 13:38


Originally Posted by maxwelg2 (Post 11607567)
Why was the EGPWS/FLIR blurred out in the photos, were they possibly testing a new variant?

FLIR is ITAR, blocking it out just keeps various organisation in the US happy .

212man 2nd Mar 2024 14:36


Originally Posted by Blackhawk9 (Post 11607604)
FLIR is ITAR, blocking it out just keeps various organisation in the US happy .

I was going to suggest that might be a reason, but there are so many photos in the public domain (including the LM website) that I discounted it!

212man 2nd Mar 2024 14:39

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....355daf25a.jpeg
It looks to me like the silhouette of the landing gear is visible, top left, so maybe it came off in recovery?

helicrazi 2nd Mar 2024 15:50


Originally Posted by 212man (Post 11607626)
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....355daf25a.jpeg
It looks to me like the silhouette of the landing gear is visible, top left, so maybe it came off in recovery?

Good obs!

OnePerRev 2nd Mar 2024 15:55

Zoom in and see those tail blades have some big lengthwise cracks in them. They were probably spinning hard to do that damage.

212man 2nd Mar 2024 16:35


Originally Posted by helicrazi (Post 11607638)
Good obs!

I could not equate/reconcile the lack of damage to the airframe, with anything that would rip the gear off on impact, plus I could not see how the nose gear could be extended in isolation. Seems more plausible it was recovery damage - but pure speculation on my part.

albatross 2nd Mar 2024 17:04


Originally Posted by 212man (Post 11607601)
Starboard door exit also jettisoned I think.

It appears so.
In any case … No matter the cause.. I think. a big …”Thank. Gawd for Dunker training” is probably in order.

albatross 2nd Mar 2024 17:19


Originally Posted by 212man (Post 11607662)
I could not equate/reconcile the lack of damage to the airframe, with anything that would rip the gear off on impact, plus I could not see how the nose gear could be extended in isolation. Seems more plausible it was recovery damage - but pure speculation on my part.

Good catch …I didn’t notice that the aft gear is not down.


NOQ 2nd Mar 2024 17:29

What caused the damage in the tail area? And what could be the reason the floaters did not activate?

albatross 2nd Mar 2024 17:32


Originally Posted by jazzypjs (Post 11607263)
No direct link to the incident but an emergency AD has been issued by the FAA outlining immediate inspection requirements for certain GE engines, including CT7-8"s
FAA AD 2014-05-51

2014? Isn’t that the year of issue?
There is an AD 2024-05-51 issued Feb 16 2024 that concerns P+W PT6 engines.
I can not find an EAD 2014-05-51
Do you have a link?

jazzypjs 2nd Mar 2024 17:57


Originally Posted by albatross (Post 11607694)
2014? Isn’t that the year of issue?
There is an AD 2024-05-51 issued Feb 16 2024 that concerns P+W PT6 engines.
I can not find an EAD 2014-05-51
Do you have a link?

Sorry, typo. It is US-2024-05-51 though. Won't let me post a link as I'm a new account holder, if you go to the Easa AD tool, it's the newest published AD.

RVDT 2nd Mar 2024 18:11


Originally Posted by albatross (Post 11607694)
2014? Isn’t that the year of issue?
There is an AD 2024-05-51 issued Feb 16 2024 that concerns P+W PT6 engines.
I can not find an EAD 2014-05-51
Do you have a link?

FAA EAD #: 2024-05-51 EASA EAD US 2024-05-51

60FltMech 2nd Mar 2024 18:30

Reading the AD makes me wonder if I’ll see a US Army ASAM of SOF for the same issue when I get back into work this week..

FltMech

ShyTorque 2nd Mar 2024 19:06

There’s a big contrast between the major damage to the main rotor blades and little or none to the tail rotor.

jimf671 2nd Mar 2024 19:33


Originally Posted by 212man (Post 11607626)
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....355daf25a.jpeg
It looks to me like the silhouette of the landing gear is visible, top left, so maybe it came off in recovery?

https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....93ee178c31.jpg

Starboard undercarriage leg visible in this lift from the water. The label on the front of the leg is a positive identifier as is the upper link.

albatross 2nd Mar 2024 20:15


Originally Posted by RVDT (Post 11607705)
FAA EAD #: 2024-05-51 EASA EAD US 2024-05-51

Got it now.Thank you very much.
My BAD ……the P+W PT6 AD is 2024-04-51 not 05-51
Note to self “Drink Morning Coffee and allow it to take desired effect upon brain function before posting!”


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:48.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.