Why was the EGPWS/FLIR blurred out in the photos, were they possibly testing a new variant?
|
Originally Posted by rrekn
(Post 11607485)
Also interesting that the floats didn't deploy...
Sad that there was a tragic loss of life. RIP |
Originally Posted by maxwelg2
(Post 11607567)
Why was the EGPWS/FLIR blurred out in the photos, were they possibly testing a new variant?
|
Originally Posted by albatross
(Post 11607585)
Gear down, Sliding door closed, no float deployment, pilots window and 2 emergency exits jettisoned on the port side, only the aft emerg. exit jettisoned on the starboard. Interesting indeed.
Sad that there was a tragic loss of life. RIP |
Originally Posted by maxwelg2
(Post 11607567)
Why was the EGPWS/FLIR blurred out in the photos, were they possibly testing a new variant?
|
Originally Posted by Blackhawk9
(Post 11607604)
FLIR is ITAR, blocking it out just keeps various organisation in the US happy .
|
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....355daf25a.jpeg
It looks to me like the silhouette of the landing gear is visible, top left, so maybe it came off in recovery? |
Originally Posted by 212man
(Post 11607626)
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....355daf25a.jpeg
It looks to me like the silhouette of the landing gear is visible, top left, so maybe it came off in recovery? |
Zoom in and see those tail blades have some big lengthwise cracks in them. They were probably spinning hard to do that damage.
|
Originally Posted by helicrazi
(Post 11607638)
Good obs!
|
Originally Posted by 212man
(Post 11607601)
Starboard door exit also jettisoned I think.
In any case … No matter the cause.. I think. a big …”Thank. Gawd for Dunker training” is probably in order. |
Originally Posted by 212man
(Post 11607662)
I could not equate/reconcile the lack of damage to the airframe, with anything that would rip the gear off on impact, plus I could not see how the nose gear could be extended in isolation. Seems more plausible it was recovery damage - but pure speculation on my part.
|
What caused the damage in the tail area? And what could be the reason the floaters did not activate?
|
Originally Posted by jazzypjs
(Post 11607263)
No direct link to the incident but an emergency AD has been issued by the FAA outlining immediate inspection requirements for certain GE engines, including CT7-8"s
FAA AD 2014-05-51 There is an AD 2024-05-51 issued Feb 16 2024 that concerns P+W PT6 engines. I can not find an EAD 2014-05-51 Do you have a link? |
Originally Posted by albatross
(Post 11607694)
2014? Isn’t that the year of issue?
There is an AD 2024-05-51 issued Feb 16 2024 that concerns P+W PT6 engines. I can not find an EAD 2014-05-51 Do you have a link? |
Originally Posted by albatross
(Post 11607694)
2014? Isn’t that the year of issue?
There is an AD 2024-05-51 issued Feb 16 2024 that concerns P+W PT6 engines. I can not find an EAD 2014-05-51 Do you have a link? |
Reading the AD makes me wonder if I’ll see a US Army ASAM of SOF for the same issue when I get back into work this week..
FltMech |
There’s a big contrast between the major damage to the main rotor blades and little or none to the tail rotor.
|
Originally Posted by 212man
(Post 11607626)
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....355daf25a.jpeg
It looks to me like the silhouette of the landing gear is visible, top left, so maybe it came off in recovery? Starboard undercarriage leg visible in this lift from the water. The label on the front of the leg is a positive identifier as is the upper link. |
My BAD ……the P+W PT6 AD is 2024-04-51 not 05-51 Note to self “Drink Morning Coffee and allow it to take desired effect upon brain function before posting!” |
All times are GMT. The time now is 22:48. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.