PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Cumbria - Dauphin in the fog... (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/611774-cumbria-dauphin-fog.html)

Nige321 2nd Aug 2018 18:40

Cumbria - Dauphin in the fog...
 
There's a video doing the rounds on Facebook.

https://www.facebook-DOT-com/brian.weatherall.7/videos/10156472130493490/UzpfSTYzNTg2ODQ4OToyMTcxMzc3MjAzMTg1NDU4/

Chap driving round a corner to be met by a Dauphin looming out the fog at the end of his bonnet...
I can only find it on Facebook, others might have more luck finding it elsewhere...


https://cimg9.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.gmf...befac304cf.jpg

SASless 2nd Aug 2018 20:36

Honest Guv.....I retired in '06 and I ain't never flown a Dauphin!

Been there and done that back when I was a dedicated Rudscunner!:uhoh:

ShyTorque 2nd Aug 2018 20:47

Yes, those who need to know already know who it was.

As someone once said to me after arriving at our refuel airfield during a mission: "What was the vis like when you broke cloud at MDH?"

I answered truthfully: "We didn't fly an instrument approach, The vis here was too poor to fly IFR, so we had to maintain VMC".
I did have top cover...

But these days the (civvy) rules are different and I stick to them.

Flying Bull 2nd Aug 2018 20:49

IFR - I follow roads ;-)

ShyTorque 2nd Aug 2018 20:53


Originally Posted by Flying Bull (Post 10213087)
IFR - I follow roads ;-)

Railways and Rivers... ;)

sycamore 2nd Aug 2018 20:59

And no bl&&^y fog lights either...

paco 2nd Aug 2018 21:22

wow, been there, done that.....

misterbonkers 2nd Aug 2018 21:53

I was panicking for a minute there but then I realised there are no GNAAS stickers on it...!!!! Ha. Clearly that dauphin is not a dauphin, it doesn't exist, never has, must be a ghost or something.

DOUBLE BOGEY 3rd Aug 2018 07:55

Gents, the subtle glorification of a truly **** bit of airmanship is a risk to our brethren on ROTORHEAD with low skills a high egos. There are no circumstances acceptable EVER to fly in such a manner as to risk the safety of your aircraft or crew.


212man 3rd Aug 2018 08:39


Originally Posted by DOUBLE BOGEY (Post 10213357)
Gents, the subtle glorification of a truly **** bit of airmanship is a risk to our brethren on ROTORHEAD with low skills a high egos. There are no circumstances acceptable EVER to fly in such a manner as to risk the safety of your aircraft or crew.


I understand your point but if you actually look at the video you will see that the aircraft is basically hover taxying. Given the nature of the work the organisation this aircraft supports does, do you not think there may be circumstances where insertion or extraction in similar conditions might be necessary, and that the time to become skilled/proficient is probably not at the moment it's required? Not arguing, just discussing.

Flying Bull 3rd Aug 2018 08:48


Originally Posted by DOUBLE BOGEY (Post 10213357)
Gents, the subtle glorification of a truly **** bit of airmanship is a risk to our brethren on ROTORHEAD with low skills a high egos. There are no circumstances acceptable EVER to fly in such a manner as to risk the safety of your aircraft or

On the first glance, you‘re right.
But as always, only having little information, who knows?
May be the crew knows the routing, has been there before, is it a bad weather crossing opportunity?
May be it’s just the ridge, much better 500 meters before and behind?
May be they are on a live saving mission, where somebody will die for sure, if they don’t fly?
Seems, the crew is working together, with an open door for better vis.
They are going slowly at the side of the road to avoid trucktraffic, gear down.
They have a stone wall, which makes good visual reference.
I wouldnˋt throw the first stone, cause I have been in an similar situation, just worse.
Caught out in a heavy shower at night (NVG), radar telling me, either way around at least 15 miles of ****ty weather....
Hillside, with trees.
So I ended up, hovering along a powerline, which I illuminated with the landing light, cause I couldn’t see from mast to mast and would have certainly ended in it, if I had lost sight of it.
One eye on the fuel gauge, which seemed to empty far to fast, hoping for a clearing, where I could put the bird down - but didn’t find one.
Nowadays I for sure circumnavigate that area if the weather gets bad again - and or terminate the flight.
Still, last winter, have been searching for someone on another hillside, where the wind cumulated the clouds along the slope.
It was night again and we were around 100 feet ground in some places, but with an escaperoute visiable and a crew, who worked together. Would have been an interesting sight from the ground as well...

Hughes500 3rd Aug 2018 08:49

212

But why would you want to hover taxi in that ? Difficult to see wire lines as it is, bearing in mind most follow roads and low level ones arent on a chart ! Not a very good advert for junior pilots, doesnt matter if it is a HEMS heli or not

PlasticCabDriver 3rd Aug 2018 09:15


Originally Posted by ShyTorque (Post 10213085)
Yes, those who need to know already know who it was.

As someone once said to me after arriving at our refuel airfield during a mission: "What was the vis like when you broke cloud at MDH?"

I answered truthfully: "We didn't fly an instrument approach, The vis here was too poor to fly IFR, so we had to maintain VMC".
I did have top cover...

But these days the (civvy) rules are different and I stick to them.

That was one thing that struck me when going through Shawbury. On BFTS when the weather was too bad for GH we did IF, on helicopters when the weather was too bad for IF, we did GH!

Hawkeye0001 3rd Aug 2018 09:19


Originally Posted by Flying Bull (Post 10213394)
May be the crew knows the routing, has been there before, is it a bad weather crossing opportunity?
May be it’s just the ridge, much better 500 meters before and behind?
May be they are on a live saving mission, where somebody will die for sure, if they don’t fly?

None of these points make a particularly good excuse to pull this stunt on purpose. I'm sure we've all got ourselves in a crappy situation like this, but as you said the lesson you should take home (if you get home in one piece) is to either go around ****ty weather next time or land). And: no patient's life is ever important enough to knowingly risk and endanger the lifes of your two or three crew members and innocent bystanders on the ground.

Nige321 3rd Aug 2018 09:22


Originally Posted by Hawkeye0001 (Post 10213422)
None of these points make a particularly good excuse to pull this stunt on purpose. I'm sure we've all got ourselves in a crappy situation like this, but as you said the lesson you should take home (if you get home in one piece) is to either go around ****ty weather next time or land). And: no patient's life is ever important enough to knowingly risk and endanger the lifes of your two or three crew members and innocent bystanders on the ground.

It's not a HEMS flight, it's a bunch of miltary types you wouldn't want to meet on a dark night...

Flying Bull 3rd Aug 2018 09:24


Originally Posted by Hughes500 (Post 10213395)
212

But why would you want to hover taxi in that ? Difficult to see wire lines as it is, bearing in mind most follow roads and low level ones arent on a chart ! Not a very good advert for junior pilots, doesnt matter if it is a HEMS heli or not

May be there are no powerlines along this road?
If you fly an assigned area, you normally have some bad weather routes, which you know throughout, especially where the wires are and where not.
“My area“ is also divided by a long ridgeline, where clouds like to accumulate.
Every 20 miles or so I know a gap, where I could try, if need be, without risking to encounter unknown powerlines.
Its always a juggle between the mission, the experience of the crew and what you can do without risking too much....


diginagain 3rd Aug 2018 09:29


Originally Posted by Nige321 (Post 10213426)
It's not a HEMS flight, it's a bunch of miltary types you wouldn't want to meet on a dark night...

Or on a dirty hillside for that matter....

212man 3rd Aug 2018 09:55

Not sure where the chat about HEMS comes from after I used the terms 'insertion/extraction'? For those that still haven't got it: 658 Squadron Army Air Corps

Flying Bull 3rd Aug 2018 10:13

@212man
so it’s military flying, not civil
and risking their lives to protect and serve is part of their job.
Sure they won‘t tell us why they were there 😏

Nige321 3rd Aug 2018 10:23

It's the Kirkstone Pass a couple of miles from Ullswater.

https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.gmf...b44af28524.jpg
The view from the car in better visibility


https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.gmf...41e53e130c.jpg

Looking the other way, where the Dauphin was heading...

Fortyodd2 3rd Aug 2018 10:26

All I see is a “weather balloon”................


[email protected] 3rd Aug 2018 10:28


Gents, the subtle glorification of a truly **** bit of airmanship is a risk to our brethren on ROTORHEAD with low skills a high egos. There are no circumstances acceptable EVER to fly in such a manner as to risk the safety of your aircraft or crew
Uninformed cobblers DB, you have no idea of their crew composition, skill level, experience or task yet you choose to jump on the outrage bus...........

SASless 3rd Aug 2018 14:13

There is a time and place for everything.....and without knowing the full circumtances....how does one properly judge?

If the route was known to be free of obstructions and it was the Pass that was fogged in and better conditions were at each end...the controlling rules afforded dispensation for the flight in such conditions....then what is the problem?

If it was a "special" flight....then don't we want the crew to have the expertise, experience, and proficiency to carry out their Tasking?

As we do not know....and are not going to know....then there should not be a very crowded "Outrage" Bus.



it's a bunch of miltary types you wouldn't want to meet on a dark night...
No problem meeting them anywhere and anytime....so long as they remember I am on their side of things!

Certainly not the kind of folk you wish to have any kind of feud with!

misterbonkers 3rd Aug 2018 14:25

Well said Crab! I want my special forces that protect me to be the best most experienced and capable in the world.

DOUBLE BOGEY 3rd Aug 2018 17:33

Crab.....I doubt very much that flying through Cumbria constitutes a viable military response. Even if it did.......never risk the cab and crew. I too have served my time, mil, HEMS ETC. There are rules....even in the military....that expressly prevent such activity and you know that Crab! But hey...let’s all wave our Willy’s about.

ShyTorque 3rd Aug 2018 17:35

Best to bear in mind that even if "our chaps" didn't train to fly in very poor visibility to get certain missions done, the other side will.

DOUBLE BOGEY 3rd Aug 2018 18:22

Shy....there are rules to prevent the young, dumb and full of c*m from self destructing. We are not at war!

they are flying in less than 50m vis. Suicide unless Lady Luck holds your hand.

SASless 3rd Aug 2018 18:26


We are not at war!
Fight like you Train.....Train like you Fight!

Some Folks are always prepared at very short notice to confront evil nose to nose!

DOUBLE BOGEY 3rd Aug 2018 18:30

SAS I prefer “Train Hard.....Fight Easy” However there has to be limits and common sense!

oldbeefer 3rd Aug 2018 19:25

Takes me back to Odius in the early eighties. Happy hour on Friday night, thick, thick fog then heard the sound of a Puma. All went quiet. 10 mins later, LB and crew hurtled through the bar window looking for a beer. No one was quite sure how they'd done it, and they didn't say.

MightyGem 3rd Aug 2018 19:53


But why would you want to hover taxi in that ?
Because before doing it for real, you want to practice first.

ShyTorque 3rd Aug 2018 22:02


We are not at war!
So why do we need our armed forces?
Tomorrow, maybe...

sycamore 3rd Aug 2018 22:10

If you want to practice it for real,then close the public roads and f*&k about to satisfy your ego..In this case if a family were driving along there,and had an accident due to the startle effect,lapse in concentration,whatever,then who would be to blame...?HO(OLI)GANS Heroes...?

Hedski 3rd Aug 2018 22:58

Train hard yes. However if this was training being so close to members of the public so as to put them at risk is not acceptable. Go do it in Otterburn. Any dash cam in general use contains a wide angle lens. This is clearly the case therefore the aircraft and rotor blades will be closer than they look.... and being able to hear it pass on the audio backs this up. I wonder how the cyclist who was overtaken at the start of the clip felt a few seconds later. Might downwash have blown him across a greasy wet road into the oncoming car.... just a bit of perspective. Of course if it was for tasking then fair enough. Can’t imagine it is though. Being a twin IFR cab though a high level transit of the lakes might be best. All just food for thought.

SASless 4th Aug 2018 00:12

No one hurt, no property damaged, so why all the hurry to get on the Outrage Bus....how were any of you harmed by any of this?

The aircraft was clear of the roadway.... no wires close by....after all it wasn’t a Purple Flight or a Charter.

DOUBLE BOGEY 4th Aug 2018 06:00

There are no excuses for flying like this along a public road. When you work in the Military, Police or HEMS you are supposed to add value. In my view this crew will be young and inexperienced. That’s proven by the **** decision they are making and the real hero’s, the boys in the back, are along for the ride whether they agree or otherwise.
I have made similar mistakes and also survived. However they are mistakes. My original post is aimed at recognising this incident for what it really is........a bad decision and poor airmanship. It’s a mistake to tar the SAS themselves with this as they are not at the controls.

[email protected] 4th Aug 2018 06:13


In my view this crew will be young and inexperienced.
And, again, that is where you are wrong.

paco 4th Aug 2018 06:46

So when I pulled an injured bike rider off a mountain in thick fog on the TT races and transported a dying soldier to hospital with my skids on the ground to get over hills, those were mistakes, were they? sometimes you just gotta have a go (within your capabilities).

DOUBLE BOGEY 4th Aug 2018 09:15

Paco you are describing HEMS. There are minimum vis and cloud base rules in the SPA and they do not allow flight in thick fog.....so not only mistakes but blatant disregard for the rules. The number 1 priority in any medical emergency is to not become a casualty yourself. The SPA contains limits to stop the gung-ho from killing themselves and any other poor sap they take with the. IOM TT HEMS.......subject to same EASA rules as everyone else.

in the case of IOM TT a road response is a few minutes away. The rider knows and has accepted the risks. Your crew deserve better. They deserve and should expect you to make an effort to follow the rules.

NEXT!

Cows getting bigger 4th Aug 2018 09:57

I see professionals going about their business. Legally.


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:22.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.