AH-64 Apache
Now all they need is a mission.....any of them being painted in pink?
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BMW M6 versus S76b
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, the heli don't need a racetrack...
If i had the money to buy a silly sportscar, i'd be asking "which heli" advice on this forum and giving my Polo Diesel a carwash.
Mart
If i had the money to buy a silly sportscar, i'd be asking "which heli" advice on this forum and giving my Polo Diesel a carwash.
Mart
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: ?
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some questions about the AH-64 Apache
Some questions about the AH-64 Apache
AH-64 A
AH-64 D Longbow (with MMW)
AH-64 D (without MMW)
AH-64 D (without anything)
I wonder what the difference is, between the two AH-64 D Models without the MMW?
I also wonder what these balls are, on the wingtips of the Israeli AH-64 D?
Maybe someone can help me.
Thanks in advance,
Hotzenplotz
AH-64 A
AH-64 D Longbow (with MMW)
AH-64 D (without MMW)
AH-64 D (without anything)
I wonder what the difference is, between the two AH-64 D Models without the MMW?
I also wonder what these balls are, on the wingtips of the Israeli AH-64 D?
Maybe someone can help me.
Thanks in advance,
Hotzenplotz
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Buckinghamshire, UK
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have no idea, and unfortunately can't help. What I can say, is if you think thats odd, you try sitting in one. The only things you can recognise are the 3 basic controls - everything else is like nothing else I have flown.
We were lucky enough to visit them at Shawbury a year ago, and even sit in the cockpit - amazing bit of kit
Jon P
We were lucky enough to visit them at Shawbury a year ago, and even sit in the cockpit - amazing bit of kit
Jon P
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The difference between the two pictures is simply that the third picture shows a DWI (D model with Longbow) aircraft with the Longbow de-rotation collar installed, whereas the fourth shows a DWO (D model wthout Longbow), which lacks both the collar (since it is never fitted with the fire control radar) and the antenna from the AH-64A.
As you probably know, only 45% of the D fleet was installed with the Longbow FCR.
I suspect the wart on the Israeli bird is part of the Elisra Passive Airborne Warning System fitted to the Saraf.
I/C
As you probably know, only 45% of the D fleet was installed with the Longbow FCR.
I suspect the wart on the Israeli bird is part of the Elisra Passive Airborne Warning System fitted to the Saraf.
I/C
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: ?
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Does this mean that the DWO's with the Longbow de-rotation collar get the MMW-Radar later?
Or are they "full" Longbow machines with demontaged Radar, because the Radar is not needed for the actual mission?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here stands that the Elisra Passive Airborne Warning System is for the F-16:
http://www.aviationnow.com/media/pdf/spec05_ew.pdf
Do you have a source for the "warts" ?
Or are they "full" Longbow machines with demontaged Radar, because the Radar is not needed for the actual mission?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here stands that the Elisra Passive Airborne Warning System is for the F-16:
http://www.aviationnow.com/media/pdf/spec05_ew.pdf
Do you have a source for the "warts" ?
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
hotzenplotz:
All upgraded Ds with the glass cockpit are supposed to be wired for the Longbow FCR, and capable of being retrofitted with the system in 4-8 hours (a task which is obviously simplified when the de-rotation collar is installed). Even without the FCR, Ds are capable of launching the MMW AGM-114L Hellfire, handing-off to FCR-equipped aircraft for targeting.
However, since the buy of AN/APG-78 FCRs has not increased, even under the Block III upgrade program, less than half the fleet remains equipped with the radar (hence the lack of collars on all the fleet). While driven primarily by cost considerations, this is also a reflection of the fact that FCR-equipped aircraft are not needed for all missions, and that a DWO D model Apache equipped with laser-guided Hellfires is still capable enough for most missions, esp. in non-obscured environments.
The Block III upgrade, which adds a range of improvements to the overall D model fleet including a extended-range FCR and AGM-114Ls, also includes uprated 701D engines, which help offset the weight penalty associated with the radar and accompanying boxes (e.g in mid-East opps).
Re: the IAF aircraft, I have no proof that the warts are associated with the PAWS (for some reason the IDF is strangely protective of its mission fit ! ), but the program has been under consideration for several years and there was additional blurb on it at Paris this year.
I/C
All upgraded Ds with the glass cockpit are supposed to be wired for the Longbow FCR, and capable of being retrofitted with the system in 4-8 hours (a task which is obviously simplified when the de-rotation collar is installed). Even without the FCR, Ds are capable of launching the MMW AGM-114L Hellfire, handing-off to FCR-equipped aircraft for targeting.
However, since the buy of AN/APG-78 FCRs has not increased, even under the Block III upgrade program, less than half the fleet remains equipped with the radar (hence the lack of collars on all the fleet). While driven primarily by cost considerations, this is also a reflection of the fact that FCR-equipped aircraft are not needed for all missions, and that a DWO D model Apache equipped with laser-guided Hellfires is still capable enough for most missions, esp. in non-obscured environments.
The Block III upgrade, which adds a range of improvements to the overall D model fleet including a extended-range FCR and AGM-114Ls, also includes uprated 701D engines, which help offset the weight penalty associated with the radar and accompanying boxes (e.g in mid-East opps).
Re: the IAF aircraft, I have no proof that the warts are associated with the PAWS (for some reason the IDF is strangely protective of its mission fit ! ), but the program has been under consideration for several years and there was additional blurb on it at Paris this year.
I/C
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Age: 75
Posts: 3,012
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I wonder how the Longbow has proven itself in service. Those promises of swatting targets at 5 miles like video gamers do it always seemed excessive.
Some word I got from US Army pilots is that the MMW can't tell a school bus from a T-80, and that the eyeball and visual systems are what allow launch. Failure of the IAF to buy the whole lot would tell us they found it less capable than Boeing brochures would indicate.
Any of you Apache guys in Britain able to help out?
Some word I got from US Army pilots is that the MMW can't tell a school bus from a T-80, and that the eyeball and visual systems are what allow launch. Failure of the IAF to buy the whole lot would tell us they found it less capable than Boeing brochures would indicate.
Any of you Apache guys in Britain able to help out?
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: US
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MMW Radar for the Apache.
The capabilities of the MMW radar are pretty much governed by the tactical situation in which it is deployed. MMW in an urban environment is pretty much useless. MK I eyeball with the normal EO/FLIR and you have yourself a game of soldiers. On the other hand, stand off 6 or 8 clicks in the middle of a desert with a everything outside your cockpit deemed 'enemy' and you have yourself a barrel of fish. That would be 16 dead fish in under a minute.
As for T-80 versus Schoolbus. It can indeed tell the difference. The radar returns from both are quite different and extremely distinguishable.
There is plenty of room for improvement however.
The capabilities of the MMW radar are pretty much governed by the tactical situation in which it is deployed. MMW in an urban environment is pretty much useless. MK I eyeball with the normal EO/FLIR and you have yourself a game of soldiers. On the other hand, stand off 6 or 8 clicks in the middle of a desert with a everything outside your cockpit deemed 'enemy' and you have yourself a barrel of fish. That would be 16 dead fish in under a minute.
As for T-80 versus Schoolbus. It can indeed tell the difference. The radar returns from both are quite different and extremely distinguishable.
There is plenty of room for improvement however.
Apache night accident video link anyone?
Anyone have a link to the video of the Apache that struck trees with the MR blades, while NOE at night?
Thanks BM
Thanks BM
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: great britain
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BigMike
i've got exactly what you're looking for.
can't seem to figure out how to upload files on this site at the moment.
if you like, PM your personal e-mail address & i'll send it over pronto.
i've got exactly what you're looking for.
can't seem to figure out how to upload files on this site at the moment.
if you like, PM your personal e-mail address & i'll send it over pronto.
Guest
Posts: n/a
BM,
The video is on this website entitled "Will it fit through the gap":
http://www.griffin-helicopters.co.uk/videos/
ppf
The video is on this website entitled "Will it fit through the gap":
http://www.griffin-helicopters.co.uk/videos/
ppf
Thanks a lot ppf! and to SuperAviator as well.
Great site.
I am putting together a safety presentation and had been searching for this clip.
Any EMS related, or wire-strike clips, would be appreciated too.
Thanks BM
Great site.
I am putting together a safety presentation and had been searching for this clip.
Any EMS related, or wire-strike clips, would be appreciated too.
Thanks BM