Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

2022-03-05: Derriford Hospital: Woman dies in helicopter landing incident

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

2022-03-05: Derriford Hospital: Woman dies in helicopter landing incident

Old 11th Mar 2022, 12:09
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Falkland Islands
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected] View Post

Having an HLS in the middle of a car park is sadly too common as the income from the car parks is so important to the hospitals.
I had to attend Southampton Hospital recently for treatment, and the HLS there is right in the middle of one of the car parks - the pad is marked 14,6t, and cars are parked right under the perimeter net !
Ant T is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2022, 13:13
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 9,662
Received 108 Likes on 51 Posts
The Southampton one was not well thought out - one way in and the same way out (over the cemetery) giving a very poor go around option on arrival and usually a downwind component on departure.

Ironically I see that Benny Hill is buried in the cemetery, perhaps he was part of the design team.......
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 12th Mar 2022, 13:55
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: South West
Posts: 238
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected] View Post
The Southampton one was not well thought out - one way in and the same way out (over the cemetery) giving a very poor go around option on arrival and usually a downwind component on departure.

Ironically I see that Benny Hill is buried in the cemetery, perhaps he was part of the design team.......
That very depends on whose landing site directory you use. Each company has its own which could have entirely different approach criteria. I feel this should be part of AAIBs investigation - were there risks identified in one version and not another?
gipsymagpie is online now  
Old 13th Mar 2022, 13:01
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 9,662
Received 108 Likes on 51 Posts
Helipad approaches don't seem to vary much from type to type for PC1, especially in the last 100' or so, so why would different companies have different criteria?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2022, 15:14
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: South West
Posts: 238
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected] View Post
Helipad approaches don't seem to vary much from type to type for PC1, especially in the last 100' or so, so why would different companies have different criteria?
A Bell 429 goes diagonally for PC1 for a start, an H145 (with the right kit) can do vertical from LDP and an MD902 is far shallower than an EC135. So plenty of variation. And the military don't do PC1 at all. Above 200' there are indeed pretty identical. Below that, not so much.
gipsymagpie is online now  
Old 13th Mar 2022, 16:23
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: london
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had to attend Southampton Hospital recently for treatment, and the HLS there is right in the middle of one of the car parks - the pad is marked 14,6t, and cars are parked right under the perimeter net !
Before that it was actually the consultants' car park. I landed there and a colleague gave me a consultant parking permit to put in the cab!

The NHS has historically had little interest in and even less knowledge about landing pads. In the past the issues have been location and difficulties with patient transfer - distance, slopes etc etc. As larger aircraft become more common on HEMS this incident may be a wake up call to also review safety
homonculus is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2022, 18:15
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 9,662
Received 108 Likes on 51 Posts
And the military don't do PC1 at all.
I must have been dreaming when I was teaching it on AS365 then.............

My point is that whatever profile you fly, I've done 365 and 139, the obstacles at Southampton mean you are going to the pad whether you want to or not.

139 had diagonal or straight in helipad profiles but with buildings in front of you your LDP would have to be very high.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 13th Mar 2022, 22:19
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: South West
Posts: 238
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected] View Post
I must have been dreaming when I was teaching it on AS365 then.............

My point is that whatever profile you fly, I've done 365 and 139, the obstacles at Southampton mean you are going to the pad whether you want to or not.

139 had diagonal or straight in helipad profiles but with buildings in front of you your LDP would have to be very high.
Fair point, I forgot the Dauphin/A109 - most mil guys using the RAF HLS wouldn't have the first clue about PC1 though.

But on your specific earlier point about Southampton, I know at least one version of that HLS description that has 3 ways in and out which are possible due to the types used. But it wouldn't be suitable for a big Heli, hence different versions for different companies / types.
gipsymagpie is online now  
Old 14th Mar 2022, 03:27
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Posts: 1,398
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by homonculus View Post
... ...
The NHS has historically had little interest in and even less knowledge about landing pads. ... ...
Even in a territory where the NHS runs the air ambulance fleet there are persisting problems with HLS for HEMS and SAR at some key locations.
jimf671 is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2022, 08:14
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Somerset
Posts: 166
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer View Post
It doesn’t take much for an elderly person in their 80’s to fall over. There are many fall related fatalities or serious injuries that occur at home, before you even consider the contribution downwash can make.
Before leaping to conclusions, this may have been avoidable or it may just be very bad luck.
How many people pay attention to level crossings? I doubt a helipad would be treated with much more attention.
You can’t protect everyone, all the time. Some times people have to take responsibility for themselves.
Nice bit of victim blaming. You expect elderly people, worried about their health, treatment, “where do I park, where do I go, am I late” to take responsibility for their safety around aircraft when they have no experience of them at all and then say “may be just very bad luck”. No. This was an avoidable accident. Heads should roll.
Blackfriar is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2022, 10:39
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 752
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackfriar View Post
Nice bit of victim blaming. You expect elderly people, worried about their health, treatment, “where do I park, where do I go, am I late” to take responsibility for their safety around aircraft when they have no experience of them at all and then say “may be just very bad luck”. No. This was an avoidable accident. Heads should roll.
I am generally someone who takes the view that individual responsibility should be at the fore and that common sense should be applied. I particularly don't like the way that the phrase "victim blaming" gets wheeled out on every possible occasion

In this case however I am inclined to agree strongly with Blackfriar here.

This is a hospital car park which by definition is a place where elderly frail and infirm people will routinely be found. It is simply not reasonable to expect them to be aware of this risk - or even if they are aware of it to respond to it effectively when a helicopter appears on short finals.

If an old lady falls over in her house and bangs her head - then that can be put down as "one of those things"

When she gets knocked off her feet by a helicopter whilst crossing a hospital car park then as Blackfriar says this was an avoidable accident and someone should at least be made to account for it (not the Helicopter crew, but rather whoever within the organisation signed off on the Risk Assessment).

I imagine that this is now an AAIB investigation so that should go a fair way towards opening up the can of worms (unless they limit themselves to the direct aviation aspects and refer the organisational / planning matters to someone else).

Very sad for everyone - Very tough for this crew.

OH
OvertHawk is offline  
Old 14th Mar 2022, 16:11
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Brantisvogan
Posts: 935
Received 13 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackfriar View Post
Nice bit of victim blaming
Nice bit of internet outrage. Now sit down, and take a deep breath before you fall over.

The point I was making is that context is important, as are details, and many, myself included, have no clue what risk mitigations have been taken here.
Obviously life shouldn't be lost in a hospital carpark, that's what hospital beds are for.
It is easy to jump on the "burn them at the stake bandwagon", but you should also consider if the individuals contributed to the outcome.

We regularly see people having to be rescued despite them being told that what they are doing is dangerous, people, especially older ones, can be stubborn. Not saying that is the case here, just an observation of human behaviour.
Many variables must intersect for a fatal accident, it is rare for all of them to belong to one party.
We live in a society that is plastered with warnings and health and safety notices, to such an extent they become background noise.

It is sad and unfortunate what happened, and hopefully they can de-risk the environment with greater success to prevent it happening again, preferably without costing more lives by inhibiting a critical service.
Bell_ringer is offline  
Old 16th Mar 2022, 23:25
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Midlands
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bell_ringer View Post

....We regularly see people having to be rescued despite them being told that what they are doing is dangerous, people, especially older ones, can be stubborn. Not saying that is the case here, just an observation of human behaviour.....
You're not getting this, are you. This was a member of the public, in a public place, doing nothing dangerous.
Pozidrive is offline  
Old 19th Apr 2022, 05:51
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Age: 74
Posts: 4,363
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by John Eacott View Post
Melbourne's The Alfred helipad had three pedestrian incidents, and following this one a further two were identified at other sites. All 3 at The Alfred involved an AW139.

ATSB Report AB-2021-028
A bit more on the issue here. Apparently they currently have a pedestrian controller on the pavement when helicopter movements are occuring, out on Commercial Road.
John Eacott is offline  
Old 20th Apr 2022, 05:57
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Underground
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got to feel for the crew on this one, they must be mortified.

That being said the state of hospital landing sites up and down the country is appalling. Even modern, purpose built sites aren’t always up to task.

Some of the older sites about are desperately in need of repair or replacement, there’s no BO105s landing on them anymore.

For those pads that have been built in car parks or near hospital entrances, pad security needs taking more seriously. Maybe a 4-5t 145 going in isn’t too bad but slap a 13t S92 and you have all sorts of problems.

Pad security awareness and training may stop this in future but sadly so few have a grasp on the destructive effects a helicopter can have.

I’ve even been told of a pad with a brittle bone clinic next to it that had a picnic bench added outside so the patients could watch the aircraft, all about 20ft from the pad and under the flight path, no the pad isn’t elevated…..

For HEMS what is supposed to be the safest part of the flight with guaranteed PC1, it’s not always as safe as it could be for Joe Public.
torqueshow is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.