Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Hill Helicopters HX50

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Hill Helicopters HX50

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th July 2023 | 13:29
  #901 (permalink)  
Guest
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 840
Likes: 236



Last edited by PPRuNeUser469990; 17th July 2023 at 20:12.
PPRuNeUser469990 is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2023 | 18:10
  #902 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 240
Likes: 50
From: San Diego, CA
10.4 is very good, exactly the sort of thing you'd want to see. Not sure what you're trying to point out by printing it here. Section 9 is also standard stuff, saying customers can't demand their money back due to delays. If they could then the company would go bankrupt because delays always happen in aircraft development. Even Boeing and Airbus take much longer than they anticipate. And regulatory approval can take forever. Luckily, in the US, no approval is needed for experimentals aside from one person looking it over to make sure it's not obviously unairworthy, like a contraption someone put together in their garage. Not sure about the UK or EU though.
CGameProgrammerr is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2023 | 20:07
  #903 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,373
Likes: 931
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by CGameProgrammerr
10.4 is very good, exactly the sort of thing you'd want to see. Not sure what you're trying to point out by printing it here. Section 9 is also standard stuff, saying customers can't demand their money back due to delays. If they could then the company would go bankrupt because delays always happen in aircraft development. Even Boeing and Airbus take much longer than they anticipate. And regulatory approval can take forever. Luckily, in the US, no approval is needed for experimentals aside from one person looking it over to make sure it's not obviously unairworthy, like a contraption someone put together in their garage. Not sure about the UK or EU though.
For delayed regulatory approval, just look at the H160 and the FAA. I’m sure there were some interesting conversations in the Shell and PHI leadership teams!
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2023 | 07:51
  #904 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 369
Likes: 77
From: SE of there
Question regarding 10.4: if deposits are used for R&D, how are they going to refund in worst case scenario?
admikar is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2023 | 13:40
  #905 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 603
Likes: 65
From: South of UK
Originally Posted by admikar
Question regarding 10.4: if deposits are used for R&D, how are they going to refund in worst case scenario?
​​​​
Good question, probably depends on what 10.3 says. But safe to say if the money has been spent, there's little chance that it will ever come back. Any depositor would come at the back of the queue of creditors. But really any depositor knows that. Better hope Dr Hill is wrapped in cotton wool until at least first flight.
206 jock is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2023 | 17:50
  #906 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 240
Likes: 50
From: San Diego, CA
There is no way he'd be in the helicopter for early test flights; neither was Frank Robinson. A lead engineer / CEO is not a test pilot. He'll use an actual experienced test pilot.
CGameProgrammerr is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2023 | 20:20
  #907 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 603
Likes: 65
From: South of UK
Originally Posted by CGameProgrammerr
There is no way he'd be in the helicopter for early test flights; neither was Frank Robinson. A lead engineer / CEO is not a test pilot. He'll use an actual experienced test pilot.
Err, not what I meant. He has nothing of value to a prospective buyer until his machine flies. Until then it's an ego trip and an engineer's dream.
206 jock is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2023 | 14:04
  #908 (permalink)  
Guest
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 840
Likes: 236
Jason Hill has posted an "Economic Benefits Summary" on the planning portal.

http://publicaccess.staffsmoorlands....ageName=333638

extracts:

- Hill’s turnover will rise from £250m to £1.5bn between 2025-2032 with 97% of all aircraft
being purchased by overseas customers

- Hill will bring 500 ultra-high net worth clients to our global headquarters every year and
will stay in the area along with their families for two-week periods, offering a significant
boost to the hospitality sector

- Our visiting ultra-high net worth customers will spend a further £1.5m in-area with the hospitality
sector while they stay for two-week periods with their families**.

- Hill has agreed to provide an operating base, free of charge for the Stoke Air Ambulance,
providing critical care and emergency responder cover to the Staffordshire Moorlands
area.


- Some trepidation by residents and members is understandable in the short term*,



* I think the people who currently face the prospect of living next to a busy heliport might disagree with that!
** Will all 500 people really bring their families?

Last edited by PPRuNeUser469990; 26th July 2023 at 14:17.
PPRuNeUser469990 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2023 | 16:13
  #909 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 10,577
Likes: 802
From: Northumberland
2 weeks near Stoke - everybodies dream, surely?
SWBKCB is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2023 | 16:17
  #910 (permalink)  
Guest
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 840
Likes: 236
"ultra-high net worth clients"

stop laughing at the back!
PPRuNeUser469990 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2023 | 17:36
  #911 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 603
Likes: 65
From: South of UK
Stoke Air Ambulance

Jeesh. Just what the sector needs. More snouts in the AA trough. Don't suppose DRLAA will be happy.

Mind you, the ego that led that outfit has now departed. about time too
206 jock is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2023 | 20:47
  #912 (permalink)  
Guest
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 840
Likes: 236
Does the new Stoke Air Ambulance helipad require separate planning permission?
PPRuNeUser469990 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th July 2023 | 20:53
  #913 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 187
Likes: 37
From: N/A
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
"ultra-high net worth clients"

stop laughing at the back!
And those people are going to buy a non proven, cheap, small, non-IFR certified, single engine helicopter??? 😂😂😂 I am pretty sure they will go for S-70, H160/175 or AW169/189… I think only the “wannabe” just made millionaire might go for a cheap, but good looking “show-off” vehicle..
casper64 is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2023 | 05:45
  #914 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 1,318
Likes: 387
From: Brantisvogan
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
"ultra-high net worth clients"

stop laughing at the back!
It's ultra-high net BS.
The one's I know on the list are tighter than the proverbial ducks arse.
That might actually align with his estimates as it only equates to 214 squid per day per family, accommodation, travel and so forth.
Bell_ringer is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2023 | 06:16
  #915 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
That humble pie is looking safer by the day.....
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2023 | 06:34
  #916 (permalink)  
Guest
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 840
Likes: 236
Why has this "Economic Benefits Summary" only just been submitted by Hill to the planning portal?
PPRuNeUser469990 is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2023 | 06:38
  #917 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 603
Likes: 65
From: South of UK
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
Why has this "Economic Benefits Summary" only just been submitted by Hill to the planning portal?
Be fair. Jason has been a bit busy designing the door handles, the combustion liner, the UX displays, the fenestron, doing the accounts if all 10 companies with up to three employees in each. Only so many hours in the day!
206 jock is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2023 | 07:51
  #918 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
Why has this "Economic Benefits Summary" only just been submitted by Hill to the planning portal?
Because he is trying to BS the planning committee who thus far haven't seen any merit in his plans
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2023 | 07:56
  #919 (permalink)  
Guest
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 840
Likes: 236
I don't understand how he can say he is giving the "stoke air ambulance" a free helipad, when a) they don't exist yet, and b) this has not been part of the Hill planning permission. Just seems like something Hill have suddenly said to sway the planning decision.

I bet the local residents are fuming.
PPRuNeUser469990 is offline  
Reply
Old 27th July 2023 | 09:10
  #920 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 57
From: UK
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
I don't understand how he can say he is giving the "stoke air ambulance" a free helipad, when a) they don't exist yet, and b) this has not been part of the Hill planning permission. Just seems like something Hill have suddenly said to sway the planning decision.

I bet the local residents are fuming.
FYI, (FWIW), the ‘Stoke Air Ambulance/helipad’ was mentioned in the original planning application.
Bravo73 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.