Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

AS332L2 Ditching off Shetland: 23rd August 2013

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

AS332L2 Ditching off Shetland: 23rd August 2013

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Sep 2013, 23:42
  #1121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Arlington, Tx. US
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Max

Passenger deaths are minimized if the pilots only wear t-shirts and shorts. That way they will be less prone to fly the aircraft into the drink.

The Sultan
The Sultan is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 07:05
  #1122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Fareastdriver, the remote cabin door jettisons are fitted to all our AS332Ls. As far as I know it was standard. However, in the L2 and 225 the same handles remotely deploy the life rafts instead. This is because (amongst other things) remotely deployable life rafts are a JAR-OPS 3 requirement, remotely jettisonable doors are not.
Seems rather a retrograde step. We now have three methods of deploying the liferafts, yet only one for jettisoning the doors, which isn't even within easy reach of pax in the doorway.
diginagain is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 07:09
  #1123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: North
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Passenger deaths are minimized if the pilots only wear t-shirts and shorts. That way they will be less prone to fly the aircraft into the drink.
Or - less likely to want to put it in the drink - even if that is the best course of action, as they aint gonna survive very long in shorts and t-shirt. This might bias the decision to ditch and cause them to try to push on to land, when in reality it may be the best option to put it in the drink.
26500lbs is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 07:19
  #1124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Aer
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sultan, that was a puerile comment.

Max, there would certainly be no obstacle in my company to providing the best suit available for our passengers.
terminus mos is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 08:05
  #1125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Passenger deaths are minimized if the pilots only wear t-shirts and shorts. That way they will be less prone to fly the aircraft into the drink.
If we're in the market for radical ideas, by all means give the pilots survival equipment that matches or exceeds the capabilities of that given to the pax.

Then fit a 'weight-on-wheels' microswitch to the pilot's door locking mechanism and increase the gauge of the locking wire on the jettison handles. One of you is nominated Captain, and you have the ability (and are encouraged) to sweep the cabin for reluctant evacuees before joining us in the raft.

Last edited by diginagain; 3rd Sep 2013 at 08:06.
diginagain is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 08:14
  #1126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 1,546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
While we are all waiting for words of wisdom from the AAIB, I recall a scene from a James Bond film that involved deployment of a rigid inflatable from either an airship, or heli.....perhaps someone remembers more accurately?

Friend of mine, training captain now for a nameless airline, was a young boffin at the time, and actually took part in that interesting ditching, riding the RIB down to the water.... if you buy him a beer he will go into detail...
mary meagher is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 08:37
  #1127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of you is nominated Captain, and you have the ability (and are encouraged) to sweep the cabin for reluctant evacuees before joining us in the raft.
and if I pass you on the way out, please assume the rank of Captain..
obnoxio f*ckwit is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 08:50
  #1128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: At home
Posts: 1,232
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Mary, QinetiQ did some trials with the Royal Marines, to retrieve an inflatable by driving it into the back of a Chinook.



Deployment presumably, as Haynes car repair manuals famously quote, 'is the reverse of the above procedure...'
Mechta is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 09:07
  #1129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: North
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now that would be seriously interesting if it were 20ft+ sea
26500lbs is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 09:11
  #1130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,459
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
Re Post 1134.

Reminds me of the theory that the best way to reduce car accidents is to remove the air bags and install a large spike on the steering wheel.

Last edited by ericferret; 3rd Sep 2013 at 09:13.
ericferret is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 09:58
  #1131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Posts: 1,460
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
Chinook Water Pickup

Taking the concept of self loading freight to extremes.
jimf671 is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 10:48
  #1132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
and if I pass you on the way out, please assume the rank of Captain..
Someone should.
diginagain is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 12:40
  #1133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Age: 54
Posts: 178
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Max, there would certainly be no obstacle in my company to providing the best suit available for our passengers.
Thanks Terminus, I'm all for everybody having the same chance of survival in a helo accident/crash/ditch.

Sultan, I'm assuming that your comment was meant to be tongue in cheek, not quite the response I was expecting from a professional in our industry, and in light of the original thread topic not very appropriate.
maxwelg2 is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 12:50
  #1134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
Look back and see how many of us have objected to the tone and measure of his posts in just the past few weeks.

I save myself from his charming wit by appointing him to the back row of the Peanut Gallery.
SASless is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 13:47
  #1135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Age: 67
Posts: 2,090
Received 39 Likes on 21 Posts
Come on guys, I know people died in this accident, but people die all the time. Typically, we don't care because they are brown, live a long way away and talk funny. Even when we do care, I think that to try to ban humour is a big mistake because its a great healer and stress reliever. In my case, the jokes definitely get better the more critical the situation is. I can't be doing with mawkishness.

Last edited by HeliComparator; 3rd Sep 2013 at 13:51.
HeliComparator is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 14:20
  #1136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
HC

I agree with your sentiments on humour. The jokes and comments made by crews when on SAR were certainly very close to the bone and helped to relieve the stress of dealing with some very tragic accidents - an example was a young lad who had his hat blown off on a cliff edge - it landed on some gorse so he reached over to get it unfortunately the gorse overhung the edge so he lost his balance and fell about 80ft but was just alive when we reached him - the winchman managed to keep him alive until we reached the hospital - it affected him greatly but with humour we helped him through his emotional trauma. The difference was they were made in private and we wouldn't have dreamed of saying such things in public.

This is a public forum and we don't know if any of the families have been directed to look at it!

This thread started out as a technical examination as to what has happened. If humour is required then I suggest another thread which clearly says it is humourous therefore warning any families.

HF
Hummingfrog is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 15:11
  #1137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sussex and Asia
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Super Puma offshore passenger flights resume after tragedy


Bristow said it resumed operations using the Super Puma AS332 L on Monday after an earlier suspension was lifted.

The aircraft is a different model to the Super Puma that crashed off Shetland last month, leaving four people dead.
BBC News - Super Puma offshore passenger flights resume after tragedy
Ye Olde Pilot is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 15:50
  #1138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: A very long way North
Posts: 469
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Or maybe rename this one:

"Caution. After 50 or so pages this thread degenerates, with occasional comments containing some mild pilot-type humour."
PlasticCabDriver is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 16:07
  #1139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Inverness-shire, Ross-shire
Posts: 1,460
Received 23 Likes on 17 Posts
The photo in the BBC piece shows George Osborne in a Super Puma. The caption says 'George Osborne flew offshore ... .' Did he? So did he do a dunker?
jimf671 is offline  
Old 3rd Sep 2013, 17:09
  #1140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
I notice a blurb in the Civvie Tiltrotor thread that it has a "Heads Up Display".....which leads me to ask why no Helicopters have them?

They also have synthetic vision systems on it too.....would that not be nice to have as well on an offshore helicopter?

Are we really just Bus Drivers who wear Poopy Suits to work?
SASless is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.